
History: Recessions Trump Low Interest Rates For Car And Home Sales
Economists are worried about recession, with an average estimate of 45% probability that one will begin in the next 12 months, according to the Wall Street Journal's recent survey. The Federal Reserve would certainly cut interest rates if that happened, as emphasized by Chair Jerome Powell's recent comments that data will drive the Fed's upcoming decisions.
Interest-sensitive business might be wondering if a recession would actually help them by lowering interest rates. Stimulating spending in the interest-sensitive parts of the economy is a key element of monetary policy in a recession. The historical data are disappointing, though. Spending drops in recessions, even in interest-sensitive sectors. Looking at two key sectors in detail, it's clear that business contingency planning should focus on the downside risk of recession rather than the upside from falling interest rates.
This conclusion is driven by studying two sectors of the economy: car sales, new home sales and private non-residential construction.
Many of the country's recessions were triggered by rising interest rates as the Fed tried to fight inflation. Those downturns occurred in 1970, 1973-75, 1980 and 1981-82. In all of these cases, car sales and home sales had dropped well before the recessions. In fact, the interest-sensitive sectors pulled the economy down in these slumps. When the Fed cut interest rates to fight those recessions, sales in both sectors revived partially, but the recessions themselves hurt activity.
Two of the more recent recessions offer better lessons. Car sales began to fall in late 1989 just after interest rates hit their peak for that cycle. Sales slumped more even as interest rates fell, then slowly regained ground as the downturn fell farther into the past. The recession of 1990 played a larger role than interest rates movements.
The economy went into recession again in 2001, frequently attributed to the end of Y2K spending and the dot-com bust. Auto sales were roughly flat even though the Fed cut its benchmark interest rate from 6.5% to 1.75%. That enabled automakers to offer zero percent financing (making up the difference between market interest and zero). There was no real decline in sales in this recession, possibly because of that sharp interest rate cut. But certainly car dealers had no boost to sales from the lower interest rates.
New home sales in these two recessions did improve as interest rates fell, but the recession still had an impact. The data show that home sales would have been better if the recession had not occurred.
The 'Great Recession' of 2008-09 was very severe. Interest were cut to near zero percent (for short maturities). But new automobile sales took four years to regain their pre-recession level even with interest rates of approximately nil.
Home sales in this era do not tell a recession-and-interest rate story. Rather, the boom in new construction in the years preceding the recession swamped the market with excess housing. It took years before new home sales recovered. In fact, they have not yet regained the peak level of 2005 despite 20 years having elapsed.
The most recent recession occurred with the pandemic. The economy peaked in February 2020, then hit its trough just two months later. Auto sales dropped sharply in the lock-down days, then recovered with some make-up sales. The Fed cut interest rates sharply in the pandemic, but sales remained low for two years. Supply chain disruptions, including computer chip shortages, may explain some limitation of sales.
New home sales did surge with low interest rates, rising well above the pre-pandemic trend line. There's no doubt that low financing costs helped sales. Many apartment renters who had wanted to buy a house calculated their borrowing cost at the low interest rates and went shopping well before they otherwise would have been able to at the old interest rates.
The weight of evidence, despite the post-pandemic home sales rally, is that recessions trump low interest rates. Business plans should certainly take into account the mitigating effects of lower interest rates during recessions, but there's no justification for anticipating higher sales, not even in the most interest-sensitive parts of the economy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Nektar Therapeutics Stock Dived by 3% Today
The company announced it closed its latest capital-raising effort. This took the form of a nearly 5-million strong, secondary share issue. 10 stocks we like better than Nektar Therapeutics › Nektar Therapeutics (NASDAQ: NKTR) saw its stock price erode on Thursday, following the company's closing of a secondary stock issue. Investors gave the company a thumbs-down on the news by selling out of its shares, leaving it with a 3% loss at the close of trading. Meanwhile, the benchmark S&P 500 index ticked up on the day, rising by 0.8%. Just after market hours on Wednesday, Nektar announced that it completed that new share flotation. The clinical-stage biotech sold slightly more than 4.89 million shares of its common stock. Within that number were 638,298 that were sold to the underwriters of the issue. Collectively, those entities fully exercised their option to buy Nektar stock. The gross proceeds of the issue, which was priced at $23.50 per share, amounted to roughly $115 million. Nektar wrote that it aims to deploy the new funds for "general corporate purposes," which might include drug development and manufacturing, and research and development activities. As often happens with secondary share flotations, particularly in the frequently cash-hungry biotech space, this one is notably dilutive to existing shareholders. Prior to this issue, Nektar had slightly more than 12.4 million common shares outstanding. So that nearly 5 million share-count addition is going to make a difference -- and not in a positive way. At least the money is being raised by a business with potential. Relatively speaking, Nektar has quite a few pipeline projects in development. Its leading one, rezpegaldesleukin, recently tested quite well for treating moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, a skin disorder. That said, the new shares are weighing on the company, and investors are probably worried that more equity offerings are coming, hence more dilution. While a company's share count shouldn't be the only consideration when evaluating a stock, it does matter, and this latest one from Nektar has sparked concern. Before you buy stock in Nektar Therapeutics, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nektar Therapeutics wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $692,914!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $963,866!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,049% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 179% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 30, 2025 Eric Volkman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Nektar Therapeutics Stock Dived by 3% Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio


Time Magazine
36 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Trump's ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Cements GOP Dominance
The passage of the 'Big Beautiful Bill' on Thursday was a moment when President Donald Trump's hold on the Republican Party was tested — and he won. GOP holdouts objected to the trillions of dollars the bill is projected to add to the debt and the cuts to Medicaid and other safety net programs. But in the end, Trump was able to browbeat Republicans into supporting his costly plans to fund long-term tax cuts for the wealthy, more deportations of immigrants and boosting defense spending. Trump's victory further strengthens his power in Washington and clears the way for him to take even more aggressive actions on immigration, trade policy and depart from American tradition to hammer the chair of the Federal Reserve Jerome Powell into lowering interest rates, a move that could give the U.S. economy a sugar high of cheap cash. Trump's control over the GOP 'is as close to total as any President has ever had over his own political party,' says Whit Ayres, a long-time Republican pollster. 'It gives him the support of his own legislative caucus for almost anything he wants to do.' Trump plans to sign the bill into law on Friday at 5 p.m. as B-2 bombers jet over the White House during a Fourth of July celebration for military families. 'We'll be signing with those beautiful planes flying right over our heads,' Trump told reporters traveling with him on Air Force One on Thursday evening. In order to get the bill passed, some Republicans broke their promises not to cut Medicaid, other Republicans reneged on pledges to keep down the national debt. In the House, only two Republicans—Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick of Pennsylvania—ended up voting against Trump's bill. The bill narrowly passed the House 218-214 with all Democrats voting against it. Massie wrote on X that he voted 'no' because 'it will significantly increase U.S. budget deficits in the near term, negatively impacting all Americans through sustained inflation and high interest rates.' The bill barely made it out of the Senate earlier in the week. Republican Senators Susan Collins of Maine, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Thom Tillis of North Carolina voted against Trump's bill forcing Vice President J.D. Vance to cast a tie-breaking vote. Tillis said the Medicaid cuts would be devastating to his state, and, after bucking Trump, said he wouldn't run for reelection. Republican Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri had argued against the cuts to Medicaid but ended up voting 'yes,' and Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, a Republican, had criticized the bill for not cutting enough to offset adding trillions to the debt, but ended up voting for the bill. Now Trump is faced with the daunting task of selling the unpopular bill to the public. Only 29% of voters said they support the bill, according to a Quinnipiac University poll published on June 26, while 55% percent of voters said that they oppose the bill and 16% were unsure. The cuts to social safety net programs and the increase in the deficit could lead to political blowback that helps Democrats take back control of the House in the 2026 mid-term elections. The bill could be a political risk for Trump, says Ayres, if 'a whole lot of Trump supporters lose their health care and get angry about it.'
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Remote Pharmacy Releases 2025 Availability Update on GLP-1 Weight Loss Solutions and Consumer Interest in Semaglutide & Tirzepatide
In this 2025 availability update, Remote Pharmacy highlights the expanded access to non-branded GLP-1-based weight management options, including semaglutide and tirzepatide compounds. The release explores the evolving role of compounded therapeutics, shifts in consumer behavior toward remote prescribing, and how new formulations align with the growing interest in safe, physician-directed care for weight management. Bowling Green, July 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Section 1 – Introduction In 2025, the discourse surrounding prescription weight loss treatments is gaining momentum, fueled by increasing public awareness of GLP-1 receptor agonists, such as semaglutide and tirzepatide. Developed initially as antidiabetic agents, these medications are now at the forefront of interest in physician-monitored, non-surgical weight management protocols. The surge in online traffic related to terms like 'GLP-1 weight loss treatment,' 'semaglutide injections for weight loss,' and 'tirzepatide therapy' is a clear sign of a cultural shift towards science-based, regulated solutions over unverified or fad-driven alternatives. This evolution is taking place alongside a broader redefinition of healthcare delivery itself. As more consumers seek accessible, discreet, and flexible care models, telehealth platforms like Remote Pharmacy have become essential vehicles for accessing physician-guided prescription options from the comfort of their own homes, particularly in areas such as metabolic health, where continuity and personalization are crucial. Remote Pharmacy, as a telehealth platform, facilitates the connection between patients and U.S.-licensed physicians, ensuring safe and convenient access to prescription-based weight management options. Today's health-conscious consumer is no longer swayed solely by brand name recognition or conventional in-office protocols. Instead, there is a growing interest in non-branded GLP-1 compounds, compounded semaglutide with vitamin B12, and other clinically reviewed alternatives available through compliant pharmacy networks. This shift in consumer behavior reflects a broader desire for affordability, customization, and most importantly, licensed oversight, rather than just rapid results or commercial hype. As the weight management segment continues to evolve, individuals are increasingly seeking information-driven, regulated access to therapies that align with their long-term lifestyle goals. Remote Pharmacy's platform, which delivers professional review, pharmacist fulfillment, and secure, HIPAA-compliant infrastructure, is instrumental in shaping the future of prescription-based weight management. It meets modern expectations of care, offering a unique blend of convenience, safety, and personalization. Section 2 – Product/Company Update Remote Pharmacy announces continued nationwide availability of its compounded GLP-1 formulations, including semaglutide and tirzepatide-based treatments, for eligible adults pursuing physician-directed weight management. The platform provides 100% virtual consultations, with prescriptions evaluated and dispensed by U.S.-licensed healthcare professionals through independent third-party medical groups and pharmacies. For informational access to physician-reviewed compounded GLP-1 treatment pathways, visit Patients may begin the intake process through a secure digital health questionnaire, reviewed by an independent medical provider. Instead, it offers a digital platform that enables individuals to access healthcare consultations and prescription fulfillment via licensed providers. All medical decisions and prescriptions are managed exclusively by third-party providers. Treatments are tailored to individual medical history, intake forms, and professional review. Doses are determined case-by-case — without tiered pricing or promotional variance — and may include compounded semaglutide with vitamin B12. Solutions are sourced from 503A-certified U.S. pharmacies and shipped discreetly to approved patients within 3–5 business days. Remote Pharmacy's offerings include multiple GLP-1 options, such as: Compounded Semaglutide injections Tirzepatide in dissolvable or oral formats Non-branded GLP-1 alternatives Each option is reviewed through a secure medical intake form and physician consultation, with no video calls required. All services are conducted in compliance with HIPAA privacy protocols and applicable telehealth regulations. Section 3 – Consumer Trend Overview Increased search interest in 'prescription weight loss,' 'GLP-1 medication for weight loss,' and 'semaglutide vs tirzepatide' reflects a changing consumer mindset. Rather than pursuing rapid or unregulated solutions, more individuals are seeking medical oversight, scientific transparency, and safe pathways to long-term metabolic support. Recent data suggests that U.S. adults are becoming more familiar with terms like 'GLP-1 agonist,' 'non-branded weight loss medication,' and 'compounded semaglutide,' signaling both awareness and demand. Online conversations have also shifted in tone — away from one-size-fits-all products and toward medically supervised approaches that offer privacy, customization, and consistency. This growing awareness coincides with a broader preference for digital-first health models. Consumers increasingly value asynchronous consultations, flexible intake processes, and delivery options that do not require pharmacy pickups or clinic visits. As part of that evolution, patients are actively comparing GLP-1-based options based on ingredient profile, route of administration, and physician access — not brand loyalty or promotional claims. Platforms offering a range of prescription-based GLP-1 treatments, such as semaglutide injections or oral tirzepatide, are gaining visibility among adults seeking solutions that feel medically grounded yet logistically simple. Search behavior shows a rise in queries for 'telehealth weight loss prescriptions,' 'GLP-1 compounded injections,' and 'custom weight loss plan with doctor review,' indicating demand for precision over generalization. Remote Pharmacy's infrastructure — built to support U.S.-licensed prescribers, pharmacy fulfillment, and HIPAA-compliant access — reflects the priorities of this consumer base. For informational access to compounded GLP-1 treatment pathways, visit Learn more about how Remote Pharmacy facilitates HIPAA-compliant access to GLP-1 compounds prescribed by licensed providers. Individuals interested in physician-directed weight management options can review eligibility via the Remote Pharmacy patient portal. The platform offers informational access without marketing pressure and provides a structure that places clinical review at the center of the weight loss conversation. Section 4 – Ingredient/Technology Spotlight Semaglutide and tirzepatide remain the most searched GLP-1-related compounds in 2025, as both have gained prominence in the context of non-branded, physician-prescribed weight management protocols. Each compound offers a distinct pharmacological profile and delivery pathway, with compounded options tailored by licensed prescribers based on an individual's medical history and treatment eligibility. Semaglutide is frequently cited in clinical literature for its role in regulating blood glucose levels and modulating satiety signals. In a compounded format, it may be paired with vitamin B12 for supportive wellness alignment. Vitamin B12, while not a therapeutic agent for weight management, is often included in wellness-focused regimens due to its role in energy metabolism and its support for overall nutrient balance, which can be beneficial in a weight management program. Tirzepatide is a dual GLP-1 and GIP receptor agonist, discussed in recent studies for its role in regulating multiple metabolic pathways. Compounded tirzepatide is available in non-injection formats, such as oral drops and dissolvable tablets, broadening access for individuals seeking alternatives to injectable protocols. This non-branded availability is subject to regulatory compounding oversight and individual prescription review. Remote Pharmacy's affiliated providers may prescribe compounded versions of these agents after reviewing the patient's submitted intake and determining suitability. All ingredients are compounded in 503A-certified pharmacies and dispensed in accordance with U.S. pharmacy laws. No weight loss outcomes are implied or guaranteed. The use of semaglutide, tirzepatide, or B12 is guided solely by licensed medical discretion and the individual's clinical profile. These formulations are not substitutes for clinical treatment of obesity or metabolic disease and are intended for eligible adults within a physician-directed care model. Section 5 – User Journey and Market Tone Public discussions around GLP-1 weight management increasingly focus on the patient journey — from eligibility screening to virtual prescribing and pharmacy coordination. Consumers are gravitating toward models that offer simplicity, discretion, and clinical legitimacy, particularly when exploring treatments like compounded semaglutide or tirzepatide under the guidance of a medical professional. Across forums and healthcare threads, prospective patients frequently express interest in secure, asynchronous platforms that enable them to initiate care at their convenience. As video visits are not required, many find value in the ability to complete a private intake form and receive prescription approval after physician review, especially when compared to in-office consultations that may feel rushed or limited in scope. Remote Pharmacy's technology-enabled model reflects this evolving preference. Individuals who qualify are supported by licensed third-party providers who manage all medical determinations, including treatment selection and dosing. A secure patient portal offers real-time access to prescription updates, order history, and support options. This structure reinforces patient confidence without exerting promotional influence, thereby placing the decision-making authority in the hands of licensed professionals. Many adults exploring GLP-1 prescription options report prioritizing ease of access, pharmacy reliability, and compliance with U.S. telehealth regulations. There is growing rejection of platforms that rely on promotional tactics, and increased demand for those that deliver transparent terms, fixed pricing, and optionality in format, such as oral tirzepatide or weekly compounded semaglutide injections. Rather than framing the journey as product-first, patient narratives increasingly reflect a process-focused mindset: one that values accuracy, physician engagement, and the ability to control treatment pace without pressure. In this context, Remote Pharmacy's offering is experienced not as a sales mechanism, but as a compliant access point for individualized care through a licensed provider network. Section 6 – Availability and Transparency Remote Pharmacy's weight loss solutions are available to eligible adults located within states where prescribing services are legally offered through the platform's independent clinical partners. All prescriptions require prior approval from a licensed physician and are evaluated based on submitted medical intake data. Access to compounded GLP-1 treatments, including semaglutide and tirzepatide, is subject to individual suitability and the discretion of third-party providers. Remote Pharmacy does not offer medical advice or diagnostic services. Instead, it facilitates secure, HIPAA-compliant access to licensed prescribers and 503A-certified U.S. pharmacies that independently manage patient evaluations and prescription fulfillment. Remote Pharmacy does not make medical decisions and is not influenced by its administrative role on the platform. Product availability, including format (injectable, dissolvable, or oral), is determined solely by the prescribing provider and may vary by location, compound stability, or the compounding pharmacy's capacity. Delivery times are typically 3–5 business days after approval and fulfillment, but may vary depending on pharmacy operations and shipping logistics. The information provided on Remote Pharmacy's website and intake portals is intended for general awareness only. No therapeutic outcomes are implied or guaranteed. Individuals should consult a qualified healthcare professional to determine the appropriateness of any treatment. Prescription access through Remote Pharmacy aligns with current U.S. telehealth regulations and is designed to facilitate informational engagement with independently licensed providers. Section 7 – Industry Context and Final Observations The growth of digital healthcare models has transformed how consumers engage with prescription therapies, particularly in areas such as weight management and metabolic wellness. As interest in GLP-1 receptor agonists expands, patients are increasingly drawn to prescription platforms that prioritize accessibility, provider discretion, and compound integrity, rather than promotional campaigns or tiered pricing. The rise of compounded GLP-1 formulations, including semaglutide and tirzepatide, signals a notable shift in the healthcare landscape. Once limited to specialty settings, compounded medications are now entering mainstream demand as regulated, physician-directed alternatives. For many individuals, these formulations offer options that align with personal health goals and logistical needs, especially when dispensed through 503A-certified U.S. pharmacies with provider oversight. Telehealth is no longer viewed as a temporary solution, but rather as a standard pathway for clinical engagement. From asynchronous consultations to digital refill management, the patient experience has moved beyond location-bound models. Today's platforms must offer more than convenience — they must demonstrate compliance, transparency, and adaptability to individual needs. Remote Pharmacy's technology-enabled framework reflects these new expectations. By separating its administrative platform from the clinical and pharmaceutical responsibilities of third-party partners, it maintains a neutral stance while enabling lawful prescription access. This model fosters consumer trust while avoiding the common pitfalls of unregulated online marketplaces and exaggerated marketing claims. As the industry continues to evolve, regulated platforms offering secure access to licensed prescribers and independently dispensed, non-branded medications are likely to define the future of weight-related telehealth. For a closer look at how digital pharmacy infrastructure is evolving, visit Section 8 – Public Commentary Theme Summary Public discussions around GLP-1 medications and physician-directed weight loss care have grown more nuanced in 2025. A review of online discourse, forum threads, and social media commentary reveals consistent themes, with interest and caution often expressed in parallel. A recurring point of interest involves the distinction between branded medications and compounded alternatives. Some individuals have noted curiosity about whether non-branded formulations offer greater flexibility, mainly when prescribed by licensed providers and dispensed through accredited compounding pharmacies. Others have expressed appreciation for asynchronous intake methods that reduce the barriers to access, while still preserving professional oversight. Concerns about over-marketed platforms and variable pricing models are also frequently raised. Public commentary often reflects a desire for fixed-cost structures, transparent eligibility requirements, and clearer communication from providers. In this context, services that avoid tiered plans, aggressive promotions, or comparisons to brand-name drugs resonate with individuals seeking a clinical, unbiased experience. There is also growing interest in format diversity. Some consumers prefer injectables prescribed by a physician, while others opt for oral or dissolvable delivery forms, particularly for their potential alignment with daily routines. While discussions often cite motivation or lifestyle fit, users typically acknowledge that outcomes vary and that consistency, rather than speed, is the primary focus. Importantly, commentary acknowledges that access to compounded GLP-1 does not guarantee weight loss or clinical transformation. Individuals appear increasingly aware of the role physician discretion plays in determining suitability, and are open about the need for ongoing communication with providers. This public tone suggests that consumers are approaching compounded GLP-1 treatments not as quick solutions, but as part of an informed, regulated health decision that balances access with accountability. About Remote Pharmacy Remote Pharmacy is a U.S.-based technology platform that enables individuals to access physician-reviewed, pharmacy-dispensed treatments through affiliated third-party providers. The company does not practice medicine or dispense pharmaceuticals; instead, it facilitates access to virtual healthcare in compliance with applicable laws. Its platform prioritizes discretion, HIPAA compliance, and user privacy, with no marketing-driven pricing or usage claims. Remote Pharmacy does not provide diagnostic or disease-treatment services; its offerings are for informational use only, in the context of wellness and lifestyle support. Contact: Remote Pharmacy Email: support@ Website: CONTACT: Email: support@ Website: in to access your portfolio