AI search pushing an already weakened media ecosystem to the brink
'The next three or four years will be incredibly challenging for publishers everywhere. No one is immune from the AI summaries storm gathering on the horizon,' warned Matt Karolian, vice-president of research and development at Boston Globe Media.
'Publishers need to build their own shelters or risk being swept away.'
While data remains limited, a recent Pew Research Centre study reveals that AI-generated summaries now appearing regularly in Google searches discourage users from clicking through to source articles.
When AI summaries are present, users click on suggested links half as often compared to traditional searches.
This represents a devastating loss of visitors for online media sites that depend on traffic for both advertising revenue and subscription conversions.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
According to Northeastern University professor John Wihbey, these trends 'will accelerate, and pretty soon we will have an entirely different web.'
The dominance of tech giants like Google and Meta had already slashed online media advertising revenue, forcing publishers to pivot toward paid subscriptions.
But Wihbey noted that subscriptions also depend on traffic, and paying subscribers alone aren't sufficient to support major media organisations.
Limited lifelines
The Boston Globe group has begun seeing subscribers sign up through ChatGPT, offering a new touchpoint with potential readers, Karolian said.
However, 'these remain incredibly modest compared to other platforms, including even smaller search engines.'
Other AI-powered tools like Perplexity are generating even fewer new subscriptions, he added.
To survive what many see as an inevitable shift, media companies are increasingly adopting GEO (Generative Engine Optimisation) -- a technique that replaces traditional SEO (Search Engine Optimisation).
This involves providing AI models with clearly labeled content, good structure, comprehensible text, and strong presence on social networks and forums like Reddit that get crawled by AI companies.
But a fundamental question remains: 'Should you allow OpenAI crawlers to basically crawl your website and your content?' asks Thomas Peham, CEO of optimisation startup OtterlyAI.
Burned by aggressive data collection from major AI companies, many news publishers have chosen to fight back by blocking AI crawlers from accessing their content.
'We just need to ensure that companies using our content are paying fair market value,' argued Danielle Coffey, who heads the News/Media Alliance trade organisation.
Some progress has been made on this front. Licensing agreements have emerged between major players, such as the New York Times and Amazon, Google and Associated Press, and Mistral and Agence France-Presse, among others.
But the issue is far from resolved, as several major legal battles are underway, most notably the New York Times' blockbuster lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft.
Let them crawl
Publishers face a dilemma: blocking AI crawlers protects their content but reduces exposure to potential new readers.
Faced with this challenge, 'media leaders are increasingly choosing to reopen access,' Peham observed.
Yet even with open access, success isn't guaranteed.
According to OtterlyAI data, media outlets represent just 29 per cent of citations offered by ChatGPT, trailing corporate websites at 36 per cent.
And while Google search has traditionally privileged sources recognised as reliable, 'we don't see this with ChatGPT,' Peham noted.
The stakes extend beyond business models.
According to the Reuters Institute's 2025 Digital News Report, about 15 per cent of people under 25 now use generative AI to get their news.
Given ongoing questions about AI sourcing and reliability, this trend risks confusing readers about information origins and credibility -- much like social media did before it.
'At some point, someone has to do the reporting,' Karolian said. 'Without original journalism, none of these AI platforms would have anything to summarise.'
Perhaps with this in mind, Google is already developing partnerships with news organisations to feed its generative AI features, suggesting potential paths forward.
'I think the platforms will realise how much they need the press,' predicted Wihbey - though whether that realisation comes soon enough to save struggling newsrooms remains an open question. AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Independent Singapore
3 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Stuck in reception but dreams of banking: 'Should I quit now or power through to land my real career?'
SINGAPORE: Starting a new job can be exciting. You have a fresh environment, new coworkers, and the rewarding feeling of earning your own money, but what if that job feels completely wrong from the very beginning? That's the situation for one recent graduate who sought advice, information, and a different viewpoint on Reddit. After just one month as a receptionist at a large consulting firm, she was already doubting her choice. With a degree in banking and dreams of a career in finance, this current job felt more like a distraction than a step forward, even though it was secure. The big question is whether she should stay, quit, or leave this short experience off her resume as if it never happened. Experience vs. direction The Reddit post sparked a lively discussion among users. Many recognised the poster's situation as a common early-career crossroads. One user asked a blunt question: 'Why did you take the job in the first place?' It's a fair challenge. Was it just to pay the bills? To gain some workplace experience? Or was it a temporary choice until a better opportunity came along? Whatever the reason, the reality is clear: The longer someone stays in an unrelated role, the more it risks pulling them off course. 'You need to move ASAP to avoid getting stuck in your current role,' one commenter urged. Staying too long in a non-finance position could make it harder to convince future employers of your commitment to the industry. See also Revenge quitting is the new rage—but here's why it could backfire However, others warned against quitting without a plan. 'If you need the money, keep working while you search for a job. If you don't need the income, think about quitting and concentrating fully on landing a finance role,' another person advised. In short, it's not just about appearance; it's also about your financial situation. The resume debate: To list or not to list? Some people had mixed feelings about the idea of simply leaving out a job that lasted only one or two months from a resume. While it's true that you don't have to mention every short-term job, some wondered if hiding it would really help your long-term goals. 'If it doesn't relate to your field and doesn't add value, you might leave it off,' one commenter said. 'But it's still a valid job at a respected company, and if you present it well, it can show that you are adaptable and hardworking.' Ultimately, the choice depends on how well the experience fits your story. If you're applying for finance roles, a customer-facing position might not seem directly relevant, but it can highlight communication skills, professionalism, and reliability—all important in any field. See also 8 proven tips for successfully scaling an e-commerce business What employers in finance actually want Several users brought the talk back to the basics: What do employers in banking and finance look for? 'Relevant internships, good grades from a respected university, and connections who can recommend you,' one experienced user summarised. 'The closer the role is to the front office, the tougher the competition.' This means that a receptionist role, while respectable, might not add much to your resume. Instead, users encouraged the original poster to take action: Enrol in relevant courses, get certifications like CFA Level 1 or in financial modelling, and apply for internships aggressively—even unpaid ones if possible. Internships in finance aren't just stepping stones; they often lead to full-time jobs. So, what must be done? If you find yourself in a similar situation—stuck in a job that doesn't match your degree or goals—here's a summary of your options based on the advice given: Quit immediately (if you can afford it): Focus entirely on applying for finance jobs, take courses to improve your skills, and network actively. You might leave the receptionist job off your resume entirely. Stay (if finances require it): Continue job hunting in your free time. Present the current role as a transitional one on your resume, emphasising transferable skills. Upskill and intern : Whether you quit or stay, find time for courses and certifications. Seek internships—some users stressed that they can be more valuable than entry-level jobs when moving into finance. Final thoughts Starting in the 'wrong' job doesn't mean your career is doomed. However, staying there without a plan might be. Whether you include that short-term role on your resume or not is less important than what you do next. Focus on improving your skills, building connections, and aiming for roles that match your degree. Your true career hasn't started yet; it's just waiting for you to show up.
Independent Singapore
3 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
'I'm still feeling pretty lost': Local in his 20s opens up about feeling directionless in life
SINGAPORE: A local man in his early 20s recently opened up online about feeling directionless, saying he is unsure what path to take next, even though he has already graduated with a degree in user experience and game design. Writing on Reddit's 'Ask Singapore' forum on Sunday (Aug 3), he shared that although he has some work experience, including a part-time job at a childcare centre and an internship that lasted about a year and a half, he has been unable to secure any interviews in the current job market. 'The job market is kind of bad, and I haven't been able to get any interviews, even for entry-level jobs,' he said. 'I'm still feeling pretty lost on what to do with my life. I guess what I want to ask is, is it normal for me to feel this way at my age? Especially in Singapore?' On the home front, he said things aren't any easier. While he's not the main breadwinner, he's hoping to move out, largely due to his parents' rigid views on success and lack of support for his chosen field. 'They aren't open-minded about what my degree is because it's just too new and foreign to them,' he wrote. 'I've had a few arguments with them in the past few months, the first ones I've ever had, because it's only this year that made me realise just how they ruined my mental health and self-image for all of my life. Case in point, I need to leave or I will never be able to grow and become stronger. I'm going for another part-time soon; will see how that goes.' 'I'm in my thirties and still feel this way sometimes.' Hoping to comfort the man, many Singaporean Redditors shared that they've also gone through this phase. One Redditor, reflecting on their own youth, wrote, 'I'm almost 50. Trust me, I felt the same way too when I was in my 20s. I guess some things never change. I graduated during the Asian economic crisis of 97. I had to make some pragmatic choices due to the soft job market. I wish you well.' Another Redditor encouraged the man to be kind to himself, saying, 'It's totally normal to feel lost in your early twenties. I'm sure everyone goes through that phase, and I did too. Hopefully, you'll be kinder to yourself and give meaning to the things you do.' A third added, 'It's perfectly normal, I think, for people in Singapore or anywhere else, especially in this day and age. Try to take your time to figure it out, I'm in my thirties and still feel this way sometimes.' 'What I've learnt is that you don't need to have it all figured out, don't give up applying for jobs, but use your part-time jobs to sustain yourself financially first till you can find a sustainable and stable income.' In other news, a domestic helper recently shared on social media that her employer 'becomes unhappy' whenever she eats their food. In a post shared on Friday (Aug 1) in the Direct Hire Transfer Singapore Maid / Domestic Helper Facebook group, the helper said that she never helps herself to their food unless she is explicitly told that she may do so. 'I never touch the food when they never say I can eat,' she wrote. 'If they say, 'can eat,' then I eat, but when I eat, they're not happy.' Read more: Maid says her employer becomes 'unhappy' whenever she eats their food
CNA
5 hours ago
- CNA
Google agrees to curb power use for AI data centers to ease strain on US grid when demand surges
NEW YORK, August 4 :Google has signed agreements with two U.S. electric utilities to reduce its AI data center power consumption during times of surging demand on the grid, the company said on Monday, as energy-intensive AI use outpaces power supplies. Utilities in the country have been inundated with requests for electricity for Big Tech's AI data centers, with demand eclipsing total available power supplies in some areas. That power crunch has led to concerns about spiking bills for everyday homes and business and blackouts. It has also complicated the technology industry's expansion of AI, which requires massive amounts of electricity - fast. Google's agreements with Indiana Michigan Power and Tennessee Power Authority would involve scaling back power use at the technology giant's data centers when called upon by the electric utilities to free up space on the grid. They are the first formal agreements by Google in demand-response programs with utilities to temporarily curtail its machine learning workloads, a subset of artificial intelligence. "It allows large electricity loads like data centers to be interconnected more quickly, helps reduce the need to build new transmission and power plants, and helps grid operators more effectively and efficiently manage power grids," Google said in a blog post. Demand-response programs have typically been used by other energy-intensive industries like heavy manufacturing or cryptocurrency mining. In exchange, the businesses generally receive payments or reduced power bills. The programs involving AI activity in data centers is generally new, and details of the commercial arrangements between Google and the utilities were not clear. While demand-response agreements apply only to a small portion of demand on the grid, the arrangements might become more common as U.S. electricity supply tightens.
