logo
Trump's policy curbs: New innovation order and India's strategic rise

Trump's policy curbs: New innovation order and India's strategic rise

Hindustan Times4 hours ago

The flows of globalisation were once imagined catalysing a new world order based on leveraging trade, talents and innovation. However, what is now being witnessed under the second term of President Donald Trump in the US is a reversal of such flows. While the US seeks to Make America Great Again, a reduced role of the world's most powerful actor in pushing such flows not just create a vacuum for other actors in the international system, but also lead the system to suffer several strains. Policies under Trump 2.0, in the form of tariffs and visa restrictions, as well intended as they may be for America's safeguarding of its sovereignty and prowess, are disrupting traditional economic and talent flows. Iran Israel War Live Updates: President Donald Trump said Iran should have signed a deal with the United States. (AFP)
Extremely high tariffs, such as the proposed 100% duties on BRICS countries, aim to reshore manufacturing to the US, but they also risk increasing costs, while companies are pushed to seek alternatives outside China. How well this pans out for the US as well as other economies is something that is to be watched out for. Restrictions on H1-B visas and optional training programs, similarly, limit access to global talent, potentially creating skill gaps in US tech sectors. While it is the sovereign right for the US to decide what role it wants to play in the existing world order, other countries need to look out for themselves and turn adversities into opportunities. Disruptions to innovations in the US have been driving innovation to other hubs, as companies and talents seek environments with fewer restrictions and lower costs.
Countries like India, Germany and Canada have been emerging as alternative hubs. In fact, the US's tightened visa policies have already led to a 15% rise in Indian student applications to Canadian Universities and increased interest in Germany's no-tuition public universities. In June this year, speaking in New Delhi, German ambassador to India, Philipp Ackermann stated that there are already 50,000 Indian students in Germany and the country is keen to welcome more. Meanwhile, US tech giants, which have been reliant on foreign talent, could face labour shortages, prompting companies to expand research and development centres abroad, particularly in India, where local talent, owing to the positive demographic dividend that India has; is abundant and costs are competitive. What this sort of decentralisation of innovation could lead to is a reduction of the US's dominance in tech, and could create a more multipolar innovation landscape.
India, in fact is uniquely positioned to capitalise on these shifts owing to its robust IT sector, growing manufacturing capabilities and strategic alignment with US interests, particularly in countering China's influence. The push under Trump 2.0 to reduce reliance on Chinese tech firms, aligns with India's own efforts to limit Chinese influence in cybersecurity and telecommunications. As US forms diversify away from China, India is positioned as a prime destination for investment in semiconductors, 5G and AI. Indian tech giants such as Infosys, Wipro and TCS, could see increased demands as US companies expand operations in India. Additionally, restrictive H1-B policies may drive Indian tech professionals to build domestic startups, and help India in reducing brain drain, while further fostering India's own Silicon Valleys. In any case, US companies, seeking alternatives to Chinese manufacturing have been increasingly turning to India, particularly in auto components, pharmaceuticals and chemicals for example.
In the realm of education and talent development, India can capitalise on the opportunity created by visa restrictions in the US, by expanding its own higher education system. Joint degree programmes with US institutions, potentially ties to Fulbright-Nehru scholarships can go a long way in attracting talents and fostering innovative ecosystems. The process has already started, as foreign Universities, are increasingly establishing a presence in India, driven by the National Education Policy (NEP), and the University Grants Commission regulations of 2023. Top global Universities, that are ranked in the top 500 globally or in specific subjects are to set up branch campuses, and to collaborate with Indian institutions.
The path ahead for India however has challenges as well, and India has to navigate potential trade wars and further visa restrictions that can strain its $ 254 billion tech sector, which relies heavily on the US market. Diplomatic statecraft will be more crucial than ever to maintain strong bilateral ties, particularly given Trump's transactional approach. Preparing itself through further investments in education and tech is a necessity for India to navigate these challenges. Trump 2.0's restrictive policies, while immensely challenging should also be seen as a catalyst for global innovation, with India poised to emerge as a leading actor. Leveraging its tech prowess, manufacturing potential and through educational reforms, India can envisage turning these curbs into opportunities which will strengthen its economic and strategic standing.
This article is authored by Sriparna Pathak, professor, China Studies and International Relations, Jindal School of International Affairs, OP Jindal Global University, Sonipat.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Giving them two weeks': Donald Trump's timeless countdown returns; this time with Iran
'Giving them two weeks': Donald Trump's timeless countdown returns; this time with Iran

Time of India

time13 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'Giving them two weeks': Donald Trump's timeless countdown returns; this time with Iran

US President Donald Trump is expected to decide within the next two weeks whether to launch a military strike on Iran, according to the White House, a familiar timeline Trump has leaned on since his first term in office. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now 'Based on the fact that there's a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks,' she said in a statement issued through White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt on Thursday. Later on Saturday Trump again reiterated his 'two-week' timeline: "I'm giving them (Iran) a period of time- and I would say two weeks would be the maximum." Two-week a similar troupe Trump has pledged to make announcements or decisions 'in two weeks' more than a dozen times over the past two months, according to an NBC News analysis, a pattern that mirrors his tendency during his earlier presidency. Asked eight weeks ago if he could trust Russian President Vladimir Putin, Trump replied, 'I'll let you know in about two weeks.' During his first term, Trump frequently invoked the 'two weeks' timeline for a range of major promises, from tax reform and health care policy to infrastructure plans and the fight against ISIS. Many of these proposals, including claims related to conspiracy theories and coal mine reopenings, were repeatedly touted as imminent but ultimately failed to materialize. Trump's repeated use of the 'two weeks' promise has surged in recent weeks, applied to everything from trade negotiations and tariff decisions to the Russia-Ukraine war. Yet, many of these pronouncements have failed to materialize. The phrase 'two weeks' under Trump has become less a literal timeframe and more a rhetorical device, a vague, elastic placeholder that can mean anything or nothing at all, to signal action while delivering delay. In Trump's lexicon, 'two weeks' doesn't measure time; it simply means 'later'. Will the United States bomb Iran? It's unclear. Will we get a definitive answer in the next two weeks? That's just as uncertain.

Israel-Iran War: Big blow to Israel and US as these two countries suggest to form United Front, the countries are...
Israel-Iran War: Big blow to Israel and US as these two countries suggest to form United Front, the countries are...

India.com

time15 minutes ago

  • India.com

Israel-Iran War: Big blow to Israel and US as these two countries suggest to form United Front, the countries are...

New Delhi: Russia and China have announced to form a united front to protect Iran. CNN's report says that a strong message has been sent to Donald Trump. CNN has said in its report that Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin have appealed to the President to avoid the US's entry into the Israel-Iran war. Putin, Jinping call Trump During a telephonic conversation between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Russian President Vladimir Putin on Thursday, June 19, both leaders have called Israel's action a violation of international law and the United Nations Charter. Jinping and Putin spoke on the telephone at a time when Donald Trump threatened to kill Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei two days ago. CNN quoted the Kremlin as saying that the presidents of Russia and China strongly condemned the Israeli attack on Iran. The Chinese President has urged both parties involved in the war, especially Israel, not to escalate the war, so that the regional conflict does not spread and a ceasefire is reached soon. Chinese weapons for Iran? It has been reported that China has sent weapons to Iran via different flights which is yet to be confirmed. China has long held America responsible for instability in the Middle East while many Chinese political experts also blame America for the current war. As of now, any diplomatic breakthrough remains elusive as Israel-Iran war entered its second week on Friday, June 20. Many Chinese experts say that Donald Trump is pushing the Middle East into an alley of indefinite war and China does not want the end of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei's rule in Iran. Under the leadership of Supreme Leader Khamenei, Iran has emerged as a formidable power in the Middle East and a challenger to US dominance. This is exactly how China is now challenging the USA in West Asia. China Iran relations China has also arranged for reconciliation between Saudi Arabia and Iran in 2023, a move that shocked the United states. China has long supported Iran through oil imports amid an embargo and its seat on the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). In the last few years, China and Iran have deepened their strategic relationship along with conducting joint naval exercises. Beijing welcomed Tehran into the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) and BRICS. This group includes India, China and Russia, which is considered a counter to US-dominated G7. Iran is also an important member of China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Apart from this, China has set a target of investing $ 400 billion in Iran in the next few years. Russia Iran relations Iran is a very important ally for Russia and presented itself as a mediator to stop the Israel-Iran conflict. Iran had reportedly supplied many drones and missiles to Russia in its war with Ukraine. These drones and missiles are said to be proving advantageous to Russia.

66% Indian professionals trust degrees over short courses for career growth: Report
66% Indian professionals trust degrees over short courses for career growth: Report

Indian Express

time22 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

66% Indian professionals trust degrees over short courses for career growth: Report

Even in an era dominated by micro-courses, YouTube tutorials, and on-demand certifications, the traditional degree continues to hold strong ground among Indian professionals. According to TeamLease EdTech's latest report on the impact of upskilling on performance appraisals, nearly 66 per cent of respondents 'most definitely' believe that long-term upskilling via degrees and diplomas carries strong career signaling value. Only a small fraction, about 8 per cent, were unsure of its relevance. Are short courses falling short? Not necessarily. The report finds that professionals are still heavily engaging with short-term formats for real-time learning needs. In fact, over 50 per cent of respondents said they used online tutorials (like YouTube) or short online certifications lasting 1–3 months. This preference is especially visible in fields like Sales and Marketing, where over 80 per cent of respondents relied on such formats to build job-relevant skills. However, when it comes to career advancement, role shifts, and long-term growth, traditional programmes still dominate the perception of value. Are degrees the ultimate career currency? The survey indicates that formal education is seen not just as a knowledge acquisition tool, but also as a reliable currency in performance discussions and promotion cycles. This is particularly significant in a climate where professionals are increasingly taking charge of their growth journeys. The report highlights that over 84 per cent of respondents took up some form of upskilling in the past 12 months, with many aiming to future-proof their careers. Among them, those opting for formal, long-duration learning believe it positions them more strongly for advancement. What drives this trust in traditional degrees? A key insight lies in career planning behaviours. According to the report, about 61 per cent of professionals said their primary motivation for upskilling was future career planning. Interestingly, those with a long-term outlook were three times more likely to report clarity in their professional growth trajectory, even when promotions didn't follow immediately. This supports the idea that professionals view degrees not as quick wins, but as meaningful investments that enhance long-term career credibility. Who's paying for these degrees? Surprisingly, 46 per cent of professionals self-funded their most recent upskilling efforts, with only about 24 per cent receiving full employer sponsorship. This trend reflects not just initiative, but also a strong belief that investing in formal learning pays off, whether or not companies back it financially. The report also notes that tech and finance professionals were among the highest self-funders, with nearly 78 per cent in these sectors covering their costs. Short-term for survival, long-term for growth Given the data, this seems to be the emerging dual trend. While professionals turn to short, just-in-time content to solve immediate challenges, they still pursue long-form programs like diplomas and post-graduate degrees for role enhancements and career pivots. The TeamLease report notes that over 42 per cent of respondents reported a promotion, role enhancement, or salary hike within 18 months of upskilling, and a large share of them had invested in longer-term learning formats. The data is based on a nationwide survey conducted by TeamLease EdTech, which took insights from 14,316 professionals across diverse sectors, including Sales, Technology, HR, Finance, and Operations. The study aimed to understand how upskilling influences key career milestones—particularly performance appraisals, promotions, and role enhancements—while also examining the motivations behind learning and who funds it. ... Read More

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store