Eye Doctor Reveals 1 Major Thing You Should Never Do
It is considered the body's most complex organ after the brain and contains over 2 million working parts. About 80% of all learning happens through vision.
So how can we keep our eyes in tip-top condition? And what should we never do if we want them to stay as healthy as possible?
That's what we — Raj Punjabi and Noah Michelson, the hosts of HuffPost's 'Am I Doing It Wrong?' podcast — asked Dr. Amanda Redfern, an ophthalmologist and assistant professor at Oregon Health & Science University's Casey Eye Institute, when she recently dropped by our studio.
″[Sleeping with contact lenses in your eyes] is bad. It's real bad. Don't do it,' Redfern told us, adding that this even applies to naps. 'It's like a game of Russian roulette.'
That's because you can get a corneal ulcer, which is an infection on part of the eye that a contact covers.
'It's not going to happen every time, but when it happens, it's terrible,' Redfern said. 'It can be so bad you could, in really terrible cases, lose your eyeball.'
In less severe situations, Redfern said you could end up with a scar on your cornea.
'If that scar is in the center of your vision, that could affect your vision permanently, unless you get a corneal transplant,' she said.
Redfern also warned us not to engage in any activity that could cause lenses to become compromised or contaminated, including swimming in a pool or lake while wearing contacts or even showering with them.
'The problem with contact lenses is that it will sandwich bacteria between the lens and your cornea, and you can get infected and then have all the complications we talked about,' she said. 'In general, we frown upon anything where your eye is going to expose to something nonsterile.'
That includes using tap water to rinse or store lenses.
When asked what she would suggest if someone were on vacation and forgot to bring contact lens solution, pushing them to choose between sleeping while wearing contacts or using tap water to store them, Redfern refused to pick either choice.
'Both of those are awful options,' she said. 'I'd rather you [throw the contacts out] and just walk around a little bit blurry for the weekend.'
One thing Redfern does want us to do to keep our eyes healthy? Use eye protection more regularly.
'I always wear eye protection if I'm doing a house project where I'm hammering, sawing — anything where something can fly at my eye,' she said. 'Always wear eye protection, because I actually spend half my time seeing hospital consults and the trauma that you see is just crazy.'
If you end up getting something lodged in your eye, don't try to remove it yourself. Instead, tape a paper cup over your eye and immediately see a medical professional.
'Pulling it out in an uncontrolled fashion [could cause] the inner contents of the eye to come out with it,' Redfern said.
She also busted some myths about other activities that may be harmful or beneficial for the eyes (spoiler alert — reading in the dark isn't going to ruin your vision), why we get floaters (and when we should see a doctor about them), and lots more.
Listen to the full episode wherever you get your podcasts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
11 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Rebuilding faces, lives, and a sense of self in Ukraine
Patients depend on doctors to heal their physical wounds, and on the support of family to move forward. The face is the window to identity and emotion. To have it disfigured is not merely to be wounded, but to be unmoored from one's own sense of self. Since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, many Ukrainians have suffered grievous facial injuries, a brutal testament to the power of modern weaponry and the vulnerability of the flesh. 'A soldier loses a leg, and society calls him a hero,' said Dr. Andrii Kopchak, the head of the department of maxillofacial surgery at Bogomolets National Medical University in Kyiv, Ukraine. 'But lose your face? You become a ghost.' Surgeons have made significant strides in tending to Ukraine's wounded, particularly through the use of 3D printing. By creating patient-specific implants and surgical guides, the technology allows for more precise reconstruction of shattered jaws, cheekbones and eye sockets — restoring not just function, but the very contours of someone's identity. Advertisement These advances build on a century of innovation, from Harold Gillies' pioneering surgery to mend faces broken in the muddy trenches of the Somme in World War I to today's digital modeling to repair bodies mangled in the bloody battle for Bakhmut. The goal has long been to restore function, while also giving hope to the wounded. Advertisement For many of Ukraine's wounded, breakthrough surgical treatments followed earlier, botched operations that, in effect, had to be undone and redone. Like much of the Ukrainian war effort, the medical struggle has been marked by improvisation and experimentation. The New York Times spent two years visiting men and women whose lives have been shattered, and meeting the doctors and volunteers working to help them. 'It's the same fight, for yourself, for your life,' said Volodymyr Melnyk. 'Just like in the trenches, same goes for the hospital bed after the injury.' Throughout his recovery, Melnyk was driven by one burning desire: to rejoin the fight. Ukrainian and foreign surgeons have made significant strides in tending to the wounded. Doctors said the psychological scars can be even harder to heal. Melnyk, 32, was wounded in 2023, when his unit stormed a Russian hilltop position and, after intense combat, seized control of it. During the battle, shrapnel shredded his face. 'All the nerves on the right side of my face were severed,' he said. 'All the bones were shattered. I could not see out of my eye.' Melnyk underwent round after round of surgery. Plates were incorrectly placed, abscesses formed, and shrapnel was left inside. It was only after nearly two months that volunteers from the 'Doctors for Heroes' project intervened, helping transfer him to a new hospital and a new program to reconstruct his face. 'We scan the skull, create a digital model and print titanium plates layer by layer,' said Kopchak, pulling up a CT scan of a patient's smashed jaw. 'It's like rebuilding a shattered vase. Every fragment matters.' Advertisement Melnyk has endured more than 50 operations. Last fall, he was preparing for what he hoped would be the last. 'The main thing was to be able to chew and eat because that's energy for a person, especially a soldier,' he said. He has since returned to duty at the front. Artur Tkachenko returned from the front, hoping he had put the worst of the war behind him. It was just weeks later, when he, his wife, Julia, and their 20-month-old daughter were visiting his parents, that the missile struck. The explosion that killed his parents also injured his wife and daughter, hurling the little girl more than 20 yards. When he regained consciousness, Tkachenko, now 37, did not recognize the face in the mirror. 'It was very different,' he said from a hospital bed in Kyiv, still struggling to find words. 'I couldn't feel parts of it. I couldn't even talk.' He had suffered severe damage to his skull and facial bones. 'Shrapnel was embedded deep inside his head — one piece was even protruding when he arrived,' said Dr. Roman Kozak, the surgeon who performed the initial reconstructive surgery last year. It was an exceedingly complex case, the doctors said, that showed both the possibility and some limitations of technology. Kozak and his team collaborated with bioengineers to digitally reconstruct Tkachenko's shattered face. With 3D printing, they created implants tailored to his unique facial structure, to hold bone fragments in place. 'Now, we are preparing for a second surgery to reconstruct his lower eyelid and remove the metal plates, which pose a risk of infection due to their proximity to the nasal sinuses,' Kozak said. Advertisement Back From the dead Nelya Leonidova is determined to help others who have suffered wounds like hers. The first thing Leonidova, now 45, remembers after being injured was the feel of cold steel pressing against her cheek. She did not know where she was, only that it was dark and a stench hung thick in the air — a mix of antiseptic and death. She was returning from a chicken farm to distribute food to local residents when Russian warplanes bombed the road. 'My first thought, piercing like pain, was 'the children,'' she said. 'Dying isn't scary; I know that now,' she added. 'The fear is leaving your children alone in this world.' Her children later escaped Russian-occupied territory, joining her first in Kharkiv and now in western Ukraine. She has undergone countless surgeries, many to correct earlier operations. Doctors from the Canadian charity Face the Future used a titanium implant, tailor-made, to rebuild her shattered eye socket. Leonidova now wants to study psychology and open a center to help others wounded in war. Her darkest thoughts have faded. She and her boyfriend, Nazar Zhurba, got engaged. 'I'm a tough woman — titanium facade, steel bite, and the stare of a pit bull after a fight, creating miracles like Medusa Gorgon,' she said with dramatic flourish. 'My gaze turns people to stone.' Not wanting to be seen After an exploding mine tore apart his face, Bohdan Poplavskyi did not want his sons to see him. Advertisement It is common, doctors said, for patients with traumatic facial injuries to want to close themselves off. Patients who are unrecognizable to themselves can find it hard to reclaim their place in society. Poplavskyi's progress has been slow — he still cannot talk and has little sight. Poplavskyi struggles most with the loss of vision, his family said. He was eventually reunited with his sons, who often guide him through the world, and it pains him that he cannot see them or watch them grow up. For such patients, 'the psychological toll is relentless,' Kopchak said. 'Imagine looking in the mirror and not recognizing yourself. Now imagine your wife or child seeing you that way.'
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
"It's Basically Scientific Racism": Medical Experts Seriously Hate RFK Jr.'s Shocking Claim About Black People And Vaccines
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the Health and Human Services secretary, is making changes that threaten the public health system, from telling lies about the childhood vaccine schedule to replacing credible members of a vaccine advisory panel with people known to spread misinformation. Groups like the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics have spoken out against these changes, and some major medical associations are even suing Kennedy in response to his changes to the COVID-19 vaccine schedule. Kennedy's attack on vaccines isn't exactly a surprise — he has a history of anti-vaccine remarks, which was a major talking point throughout his Senate confirmation hearings earlier this year. Specifically, his beliefs were front and center during a heated exchange in which Sen. Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.) brought up a comment that Kennedy once made about vaccinations and the Black community. In 2021, Kennedy had said, 'We should not be giving Black people the same vaccine schedule that's given to whites, because their immune system is better than ours.' Related: Alsobrooks asked Kennedy to explain what he meant by that remark, and he went on to reference a 'series of studies' while saying research shows that 'Blacks need fewer antigens.' (For the record, experts say that this is not true.) 'Right now, how vaccine schedules are tailored is based on things like your age, your exposure risk, if you have other chronic underlying health conditions ― but race isn't one of them, and there isn't research that suggests that it should be,' Joel Bervell, a recent medical graduate and medical myth-buster on social media, told HuffPost. What especially bothered Bervell about Kennedy's exchange with Alsobrooks was the fact that he doubled down on his comment from 2021. Kennedy could have used this as an opportunity to admit that he needs to do more research and understand the vaccine schedule, 'but instead, he defended what he said, which I think, for me, that's where the problem lies in,' Bervell told HuffPost. 'Not necessarily the fact of the misinformation is out there, but the fact that he wasn't willing to at least confront it or admit that onstage.' Below, experts like Bervell share their concerns about Kennedy's statement and how it reflects a larger problematic picture: Kennedy's comment can be considered 'scientific racism,' experts say. Related: 'In medicine, in science, we know that race is a social construct, meaning that you can't look at someone's genes and identify what race they are,' Bervell said. That means differences in vaccine timelines just don't make scientific sense. 'The comment that [Kennedy] made about the vaccine schedule, it's basically scientific racism, which has been debunked,' Dr. Oni Blackstock, a primary care and HIV physician who is the founder and executive director of Health Justice, a racial and health equity consulting company, told HuffPost. 'He's really perpetuating this false belief that Black people are somehow biologically different from white people and, in that way, justifying differential and ultimately unequal treatment for Black people versus white people,' Blackstock added. 'By saying that, he was putting on one of the larger stages in health care this notion that race-based medicine should still exist, when that's actually what many scientists recently have been trying to root out,' Bervell said. Race-based medicine and scientific racism has led to undertreatment of Black patients, dismissal of pain and even death, Blackstock stressed. Both experts pointed to real-life examples of this, like the false belief that Black people have better-functioning kidneys than white people. This made it harder for Black people to get the treatment they needed, like kidney transplants, according to Bervell. And this thought pattern isn't from some faraway time ― a medical equation that reinforced this bias wasn't changed until 2021, Bervell said. What's more, during the 1793 yellow fever epidemic in Philadelphia, Black people were believed to be resistant to yellow fever, which was not true and led to high mortality rates among Black people, Blackstock explained. 'The importance of understanding the problem with the myths is that they can literally lead to regulations being written into medicine that treat populations differently just based on race,' Bervell said. 'It can actually change the care that people receive.' While it's easy to look at a particular viewpoint as a one-off, medical racism has real-world consequences that irresponsible comments can make worse. Promoting debunked beliefs 'distracts us from really doing the work that we need to do, which is dismantling systemic racism in health care and ensuring that everyone has equitable access to preventive care and treatments that they need,' Blackstock added. Related: Such stances may lead to more mistrust in the health care system. 'One thing that is also kind of strange about him [Kennedy] is he's someone who for a long time has said that he doesn't support vaccines,' Bervell said. 'Apparently, now he's changed his mind, but for a long time he said he hasn't supported vaccines, and then he's also saying that Black people should get a different vaccine schedule. So you have to wonder, what is your goal in saying that if you don't even believe in vaccines?' Bervell said comments like those from Kennedy can sow vaccine hesitancy in the Black population, which is dangerous and can erode trust in evidence-based medicine. It's not the first time that this has happened, either, Blackstock added. In 2021, Kennedy produced a documentary called 'Medical Racism: The New Apartheid,' which Blackstock said promoted misinformation about health and vaccines to the Black community, along with other marginalized groups. 'It's interesting how some of his efforts have been focused on taking advantage of [and] exploiting the mistrust that some in the Black community have around vaccines and the health care system because of structural racism and medical racism,' Blackstock said. With misinformation and scare tactics rampant on social media, misinformation from government leaders will only make it harder to tell what's real and what's fake in medicine. Trust needs to be paramount for health care as an institution, Bervell said. 'The trust is already eroded in health care,' Bervell explained. 'We need to have someone that is going to work with scientists, researchers, doctors that are on the ground seeing these problems every day, not someone that's in an ivory tower watching from above without understanding of what's actually happening on the ground.' Related: Experts say this rhetoric aligns with messaging from Donald Trump. Blackstock stressed that while such false beliefs are very problematic, they track with much of the messaging from Donald Trump and his presidential administration. 'It echoes some of the rhetoric that [Trump] has shared around eugenics and immigrants,' Blackstock said. 'He's talked about immigrants having 'bad genes' or 'poisoning the blood of our country.' It just speaks to this idea of racial purity or genetic purity, and this false idea that certain groups of people are inherently inferior or predisposed to certain behaviors because of their genetics.' And, again, race is a social construct and does not equal genetic differences. 'It's just really shocking that in the year 2025 we are still dealing with these beliefs being propagated that have been around for several centuries that have been used to justify slavery, used to justify inequitable treatment, used to justify forced sterilization,' Blackstock said. Blackstock added that she thinks individuals get away with this kind of rhetoric because people become accustomed to outlandish comments and bad behavior. 'But we need to really flag this and say this is really dangerous and really concerning rhetoric that can have real health implications,' Blackstock said. This article originally appeared on HuffPost. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
DNA Casts Doubt Over Theory on What Killed Napoleon's Forces
When Napoleon and his legion of multinational soldiers retreated from Russia in 1812 in the face of dwindling supplies and fierce Russian resistance, little did they know how much worse was yet to come. While withdrawing from Russia, at least half of the 600,000-strong force were ravaged by the extremes of winter, starvation, and disease. A new study that has yet to be peer reviewed has now identified which pathogens helped decimate the weakened forces. Physicians at the time documented typhus, with symptoms that include fevers, headaches, and rashes. But Paris Cité University microbiologist Rémi Barbieri and colleagues found no traces of the bacterium Rickettsia prowazekii, which would have been responsible for the disease. Related: After extracting and analyzing ancient DNA from the teeth of 13 soldiers they instead found evidence the men suffered from a combination of paratyphoid caused by a strain of Salmonella enterica, and a relapsing fever caused by a bacterium called Borrelia recurrentis, which is transmitted by body lice . "While not necessarily fatal, the louse-borne relapsing fever could significantly weaken an already exhausted individual," the researchers explain in their paper. Barbieri and team caution that just because their analysis did not detect typhus doesn't mean it didn't contribute to the infamous loss of soldiers, as they only took samples from 13 individuals. Over 3,000 bodies lie in the mass graves found in Vilnius, Lithuania, in 2001. Other researchers have pointed out several diseases match the historical accounting of symptoms, including typhus. Many of the men were buried in their uniforms and with horses, too. The lack of weapons suggests these people did not die in battle, Barbieri and his team explain. "The analysis of a larger number of samples will be necessary to fully understand the spectrum of epidemic diseases that impacted the Napoleonic army during the Russian retreat," they write. "In light of our results, a reasonable scenario for the deaths of these soldiers would be a combination of fatigue, cold, and several diseases, including paratyphoid fever and louse-borne relapsing fever." This paper has been uploaded to bioRxiv. Related News Study Reveals How Many IVF Babies Have Been Born Worldwide Image on The Shroud of Turin May Not Belong to a Real Human Venting Doesn't Reduce Anger, But Something Else Does, Says Study Solve the daily Crossword
