Revenge RTO: Workers are coming in late, leaving early and stealing snacks as they find small ways to get get back at their bosses
At an online reselling platform in Chicago, one employee always makes a pit stop by the communal fridge before heading home for the day.
The employee, who like other workers interviewed requested anonymity for fear of retribution, always picks out a few soft drinks and snacks to take home. After her workplace started instituting RTO mandates forcing her to come in a few days a week, she believes it's her right to take a few extra refreshments.
'I keep my home fridge fully stocked with all of my office drinks,' she tells Fortune. 'If the shareholders are taking my wages, at the very least, I'm going to take home three Gatorades and a couple Uncrustables.'
The Chicago-based employee is just one of the countless workers engaging in a kind of revenge RTO strategy: complying with their workplace demands, but taking advantage in other ways, like coming in late, leaving early, or stealing snacks. Reddit's AntiWork forum, for instance, has an entire thread dedicated to brainstorming 'subtle acts of resistance' when it comes to RTO. These include never answering your phone when you're not in the office, spending as much time as possible socializing, bothering your bosses when they look busy, and intentionally burning popcorn in the microwave.
Experts tell Fortune that the roots of this defiance can be traced to a wave of RTO mandates instituted with little explanation or thought for employee well-being, which is now leading them to act out in small ways. And although these little rebellions might seem petty, they're actually a sign that workers have lost faith and confidence in their employer in a way that should make managers take notice of their own actions.
'When employees feel that something is unfair, they act to make it fair,' Peter Cappelli, professor of management and director of the Center for Human Resources at UPenn's Wharton Business School, tells Fortune. 'That reflects poorly on the leadership, down to the manager.'
The COVID-19 pandemic fundamentally changed offices around the world when millions of employees transitioned to remote work on a dime.
When pandemic restrictions began to lift, many companies took a soft approach to work arrangements, allowing employees to continue working from home, or only requiring them to come in a few days a week. But those privileges have slowly eroded as CEOs and managers become more insistent that employees work from the office all or most of the time.
One thing, however, is clear: workers do not want to go back to the old days. A resounding 95% of employees want some form of remote work option, according to a 2024 FlexJobs survey. 'Because remote work is such a cherished benefit, it doesn't surprise me that companies that implement a RTO mandate may have employees who are not thrilled with the decision,' Toni Frana, career expert manager at FlexJobs, tells Fortune.
Some employers have taken a smarter approach to RTO by basing their mandate on data, and communicating effectively with workers. But others have been more heavy handed, and demanded that employees go back into the office with little to no evidence or explanation why. That has made many workers feel that an important social contract has been broken, leading them to act out, says Denise Rousseau, a professor of organizational behavior at Carnegie Mellon. The formal term for this is 'counterproductive work behavior,' defined as voluntary behavior that violates the organizational and social norms of a workplace.
'The precursors are unfair treatment, broken promises, or perceptions of an employer who does not have the workers interests at heart,' says Rousseau.'If this behavior is increasing, it's because employers have violated some implicit agreement.'
That certainly seems to be the case with one New York City government contract employee that Fortune spoke with. She says she stopped clocking in and out for her lunch hour, and now charges the agency for that time. 'I'm just going to keep doing it,' she tells Fortune. 'I have s****y health insurance, so this makes up for it.'
Another employee at a luxury goods brand in New York City that Fortune spoke with said she has seen an increase in revenge RTO behavior among her colleagues who are required to come to the office four days a week, including skipping out for a workout class or taking back food to their families. She adds that if a manager or member of leadership leaves early, other employees follow suit.
'Because we don't want to be here so often, we really are taking advantage of the moments when it is okay to leave, because nobody really sees it,' she says.
Employees who take a few extra bags of Cheez-its or lightly embellish a 'doctor's appointment' might be aggravating for bosses, but they should think twice about trying to crack down on workers taking small liberties.
'If I'm an employer, before I get all my nose all out of joint about the insubordination, I think it is important to recognize that there are all kinds of rules that get violated all the time,' says Cappelli. That's especially true when workplace norms have recently changed. 'You might think this one is really fundamental, but have you done anything to persuade people that it really is fundamental now? Because it wasn't the week before.'
These micro-transgressions, however, can also signal a deeper problem; a company may have flubbed the way they communicated their RTO demands, overlooked the needs of groups that particularly value flexible schedules, or generally made their workers feel unappreciated.
'It's a heads-up to the company that [they have] benefit[ed] from people's goodwill for many years, and that [they] don't want to throw that away,' says Rousseau.
Experts emphasize that there's still hope for employers trying to cut down on incidents of RTO revenge, and say the solution is quite simple: listen to workers. Town halls, anonymous surveys, and collecting feedback from managers are all different ways to better understand the kind of work arrangements that are compatible with employee productivity, and the kind of policies that will win back their trust.
Rousseau argues that there is no way to move forward as an organization without incorporating some type of employee feedback. And she warns that any company doing so proceeds at their own peril.
'I don't think not caring is an option,' she adds.
This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business of Fashion
an hour ago
- Business of Fashion
Explainer: How Retailers Can Fight a New Wave of Cyberattacks
Last week, Victoria's Secret went dark. On May 28, the lingerie giant shut down its website following a 'security incident,' the company said in a statement. (It did not confirm what caused the disruption). While the site was only down for two days, it likely cost Victoria's Secret millions in sales, adding another hurdle to its ongoing turnaround plan under new leader Hillary Super. The company's stock dropped as much as 8 percent the day it closed its site. It was just the latest technological dustup in a wave of cyberattacks on some of fashion's biggest brands and retailers. Bloomberg reported that in January hackers accessed some of Dior's customer data, then in April, UK-based high street retailer Marks & Spencer was forced to stop taking online orders after a security breach and in May, Harrods briefly restricted website access after hackers attempted to break into its systems. For years, the threat of security breaches — where individuals and organisations hack systems to access customer data such as contact information and credit card details — have haunted companies across industries, from Target to MGM Resorts. The frequency of these attacks is only growing: In 2024, the number of individuals and groups targeting companies' systems that cybersecurity consultancy S-RM engaged with across 600 incidents grew 96 percent year over year. These attacks can be extremely detrimental to a company's bottom line: Marks & Spencer still hasn't reopened its e-commerce operations, and doesn't expect to do so until July. The incident will likely end up costing the company as much as £300 million ($404 million) in lost profits. But the impact can be even further-reaching. Many cyber criminals require companies to pay multi-million dollar ransoms to regain access to their networks and even once the attack is over, retailers must work to avoid sustaining lasting reputational damage. The recent uptick in activity puts an extra burden on retailers to tighten existing cybersecurity processes or invest in additional tools that could chip away at profits. 'From a business perspective, it's nothing if not unfair [to the companies impacted by it],' said Simeon Siegel, managing director and senior analyst of retail and e-commerce at BMO Capital Markets. In the event of a cyber attack, companies have 'to balance short term fixes, while ensuring they don't have [long-term] implications,' he added. BoF breaks down what leaves fashion businesses vulnerable to cyberattacks and how they can protect themselves. How does this happen? Cyberattacks are typically orchestrated by groups that find and exploit a company's technological shortcomings. The culprit can often be difficult to trace, because even when law enforcement tracks them down, individuals can splinter into other smaller organisations. Criminals can also act individually by finding hacking tools on the dark web, said Christian Beckner, vice president of retail technology and cybersecurity at NRF. The tactics range in their level of sophistication. One of the common ways hackers infiltrate a company's systems is through 'phishing' — the dreaded emails where, posing as a company executive, they encourage employees to click a link that, if opened, can give them access to an organisation's entire data network. They can also use employee voice impersonation tools to target a company's customer service call centres, Beckner said. 'If one employee accidentally clicks a link in an email, it may not matter how protected and up-to-date your technology is,' Siegel said. 'Human error can supersede the most advanced technology.' Cyberattackers will target any industry with high transaction volumes, making fashion an appealing target. Plus, because most retail giants operate their e-commerce storefronts on years-old custom platforms that are likely outdated, they are particularly vulnerable, said Juan Pellerano-Rendón, chief marketing officer at e-commerce software start-up Swap. 'A lot of times these larger conglomerates have IT teams, and they're updating their website regularly, but security might not always be at the top of their list,' Pellerano-Rendón added. Retailers that operate with thin margins have historically been slower to invest in cybersecurity over tools like a website redesign that can immediately drive revenue, said Sam Rubin, senior vice president of consulting and threat intelligence for Unit 42 at cybersecurity firm Palo Alto Networks. 'You could spend several million dollars on cybersecurity and feel safer and be safer, but what's going to show up on your P&L is greater operating expenses without a necessarily highly visible tangible benefit,' Rubin said. 'Sometimes that does get neglected in favor of driving top line growth in business.' How should retailers respond? When a company is hacked, they often have no choice but to shut down services until they can find the culprit and boot them out of their network. Preventing an initial cyberattack can be a near impossible task as cyber criminals' tools become more advanced and accessible. Many retailers have increased cybersecurity measures in recent years, specifically around payment processing, Beckner said. Customers' financial information wasn't compromised in many of the recent attacks, which is the scariest violation for many customers and therefore a natural priority for companies to prevent. To lower the risk of repeat offenses, retailers have to 'assess where there might be existing vulnerabilities in your IT systems and services, and patch and upgrade those where they existed,' Beckner added, including adding multi-step authentications for company log-ins and conducting additional training for employees across the organisation. The latest run of cybersecurity hiccups could also push major retailers to make big personnel changes such as hiring heads of security (if they don't have them already), according to Pellerano-Rendón. They might also consider using more e-commerce services from software giants like Shopify that routinely update their software, making it more difficult to infiltrate, he added. Companies can institute drills where they work with third party firms to simulate an attack to better assess the strength of their existing systems and what additional processes they need to implement, said Steve Ross, director of cybersecurity, Americas at S-RM. In the aftermath of an attack, retailers also must do damage control in order to make sure their customers feel safe buying from them again. Shoppers today are aware that technology violations occur and are outside of a company's control, 'and not necessarily that Victoria's Secret or Marks & Spencer has betrayed their trust in any way,' Pellerano-Rendón said. Still, retailers need to tell customers whose personal information may have been compromised exactly which steps they've taken to protect their data down the line. 'It really comes down to making sure you're communicating … and having that plan in place to quickly bounce back,' Beckner said.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Chicago Sky Coach Sends Angel Reese, Kamilla Cardoso Message
Chicago Sky Coach Sends Angel Reese, Kamilla Cardoso Message originally appeared on Athlon Sports. The Chicago Sky improved to 2-4 in the 2025 WNBA season on Saturday after defeating the Dallas Wings. The 94 to 83 victory marked their second-straight win, and the Sky are now tied for fourth place in the Eastern Conference. Advertisement Veteran guard Ariel Atkins paced Chicago once again with 26 points, and Courtney Vandersloot added another 15. She also contributed seven assists and seven rebounds while committing zero turnovers. After scoring a career-high 23 points on Thursday, second-year forward Kamilla Cardoso only scored four points after being limited to 15 minutes due to foul trouble. Angel Reese added 14 points, nine rebounds and three steals in the win. Chicago Sky forward Angel Reese (5).Chris Jones-Imagn Images New Sky head coach Tyler Marsh has now won back-to-back games for the first time in his young coaching career as well. He spoke to the media after Saturday's win about how effective the team's trio of post players has been. Marsh shouted out Reese and Elizabeth Williams in particular for filling the void left by Cardoso, who was benched with multiple fouls. Advertisement 'I thought Angel did a great job tonight, offensively and defensively, as well as E-Will picking up the minutes for Kamilla as she was in foul trouble,' Marsh said. 'Our posts have been great. They've been great at facilitating and finding the open person, they've been great at rebounding.' Williams scored eight points and grabbed three rebounds in 15 minutes of playing time in the win. Chicago also gave up a season-low 83 points to the Wings on Saturday, who were led by NaLyssa Smith's 20 points and DiJonai Carrington's 16. The Sky will not play again until June 7, when they take on the Indiana Fever in the 2025 WNBA Commissioner's Cup. It is unknown whether or not First-Team All-WNBA guard Caitlin Clark will be available for the Fever, but the Sky also have plenty of time to get healthy and avenge their 93 to 58 loss on opening day. Advertisement Related: Fans Upset After DiJonai Carrington's Punishment During Chicago Sky Game Related: WNBA Legend Candace Parker Turns Heads After Major Personal News This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 1, 2025, where it first appeared.


Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
AstraZeneca announces results from MATTERHORN Phase III trial of IMFINZI
Positive results from the MATTERHORN Phase III trial showed perioperative treatment with AstraZeneca's (AZN) IMFINZI in combination with standard-of-care FLOT chemotherapy demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in the primary endpoint of event-free survival, EFS, versus chemotherapy alone. Patients were treated with neoadjuvant IMFINZI in combination with chemotherapy before surgery, followed by adjuvant IMFINZI in combination with chemotherapy, then IMFINZI monotherapy. The trial evaluated this regimen versus perioperative chemotherapy alone for patients with resectable, early-stage and locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction, GEJ, cancers. In a planned interim analysis, patients treated with the IMFINZI-based perioperative regimen showed a 29% reduction in the risk of disease progression, recurrence or death versus chemotherapy alone. Estimated median EFS was not yet reached for the IMFINZI arm versus 32.8 months for the comparator arm. For the secondary endpoint of overall survival, a strong trend was observed in favor of the IMFINZI-based perioperative regimen. The trial will continue to follow OS, which will be formally assessed at the final analysis. Confident Investing Starts Here: