Gold steady as traders await U.S. payroll data for economic cues
Spot gold held its ground at $3,372.91 an ounce, as of 0354 GMT. U.S. gold futures edged down 0.1% to $3,396.60.
"Like most markets at present, gold finds itself in a holding pattern and at the whim of Trump's trade headlines — supported, yet hesitant to trade above this week's high," said Matt Simpson, a senior analyst at City Index.
"Volatility is also suppressed while we await comments from FOMC members and Friday's NFP report ... If anything, it points to a stronger jobs change figure, which could weigh on gold."
The U.S. services sector contracted in May for the first time in nearly a year, as businesses faced higher input costs amid growing fears of stagflation.
Gold gained support after the Federal Reserve reported a slowdown in U.S. economic activity, citing rising costs and prices driven by increased tariff rates since the last policy meeting.
Bullion gained additional momentum after U.S. President Donald Trump reiterated his call to Fed Chair Jerome Powell on Wednesday to cut interest rates.
The ADP National Employment Report showed that U.S. private employers added in May the fewest number of workers in more than two years, with investors awaiting Friday's nonfarm payrolls report for further clues on the labor market.
Trump's doubling of tariffs on steel and aluminum imports took effect, with his administration seeking "best offers" from trade partners to avoid further levies slated for July.
Trump described Chinese President Xi Jinping as "extremely hard to make a deal with," highlighting tensions ahead of a long-awaited call between the two leaders this week.
Gold, a safe-haven asset during times of political and economic uncertainty, tends to thrive in a low-interest-rate environment.
Elsewhere, spot silver fell 1.3% to $34.51 an ounce, platinum rose 1.1% to $1,097.13 and palladium was down 0.2% at $998.71.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia, chip stocks jump after Trump says some chipmakers exempt from 100% semiconductor tariff
Chip stocks climbed on Thursday after President Trump said he'll exempt companies from his planned semiconductor tariffs if they have committed to making their chips in the US. 'We'll be putting a tariff of approximately 100% on chips and semiconductors,' Trump said during a press conference at the Oval Office Wednesday afternoon. 'But if you're building in the United States of America, there's no charge.' 'If you've made a commitment to build or if you're in the process of building, as many are, there is no tariff.' Leading AI chipmaker Nvidia (NVDA) stock rose as much as 2.5% Thursday to a fresh intraday high of $183.88 before paring gains midday. Shares of rival Advanced Micro Devices rose more than 6%, while Broadcom (AVGO) and Micron (MU) stocks rose 1% and 2%, respectively. Most of the world's advanced chips are produced by leading contract chip manufacturer TSMC (TSM) in Taiwan, but the company has been building out its capacity in Arizona with a $165 billion investment, exempting it from Trump's tariffs. The company's US-listed shares jumped more than 4% Thursday. Tech companies have rushed to announce investments in their US manufacturing footprint in the hopes of avoiding Trump's trade war wrath. So far, Nvidia has committed to producing $500 billion of AI infrastructure in the US. Micron made a similar $200 billion commitment. Texas Instruments (TXN) has said it's spending $60 billion to bolster its manufacturing capacity in the US. Citi (C) analyst Christopher Danley said the exemptions mean the semiconductor tariff will have 'minimal impact…as US-based semiconductor companies with in-house fabs have operations in the US and fabless companies can commit to using TSMC, Samsung ( GFS (GFS) which have operations in the US.' 'Fabs' refer to factories where chips are produced, and 'fabless' companies outsource production of their chips to contract manufacturers such as TSMC, Samsung, and GFS. Companies with 'in-house fabs' include Intel (INTC), Micron, and Texas Instruments. Nvidia, AMD, Broadcom, and Qualcomm (QCOM) are 'fabless.' Morgan Stanley (MS) analyst Joseph Moore echoed Danley's sentiment, writing in a note to clients Thursday, 'To some degree this outcome would be something of a relief.' 'Yes, 100% tariffs are unpalatable but if companies are given time to restore them, the real tax is just the higher cost of building chips in the United States," he wrote. "The biggest fear was that such a tariff would be implemented immediately.' Still, Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon noted that there are questions surrounding how the tariffs would be applied, making it hard to determine its impact. He explained that most semiconductors are imported once they're already inside other products, and the US 'does not import a ton of raw chips" — $45 billion in 2024 — and it's unclear whether duties would just apply to raw semiconductors or also to products containing them. The US Department of Commerce did not immediately respond to Yahoo Finance's request for comment. Further details about the tariffs will be revealed when the agency publishes its findings from an investigation into US semiconductor imports it launched in April under Section 232 of The Trade Expansion Act, which empowers the president to restrict imports of products related to national security. "Trump's public statements often lack detail and nuance, so at this point we do not know exactly how the new rules will be implemented once they go into effect," Rasgon wrote. "We should know more once the actual 232 investigation results are published." Laura Bratton is a reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on Bluesky @ Email her at Sign in to access your portfolio
The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump's planned 100% computer chip tariff sparks confusion among businesses and trading partners
President Donald Trump's plans for 100% tariffs on computer chips that aren't made in the U.S. are stoking confusion among businesses and trading partners — boosting stocks for leading semiconductor companies while leaving smaller producers scrambling to understand the implications. The U.S. imports a relatively small number of chips because most of the foreign-made chips in a device — from an iPhone to a car — were already assembled into a product, or part of a product, before it landed in the country. 'The real question everybody in the industry is asking is whether there will be a component tariff, where the chips in a device would require some sort of separate tariff calculation,' said Martin Chorzempa, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. Trump said Wednesday that companies that 'made a commitment to build' in the U.S. would be spared the import tax, even if they are not yet producing those chips in American factories. 'We'll be putting a tariff of approximately 100% on chips and semiconductors,' Trump said in the Oval Office while meeting with Apple CEO Tim Cook. 'But if you're building in the United States of America, there's no charge.' Wall Street investors interpreted that as good news not just for U.S. companies like AMD, Intel and Nvidia, but also for the biggest Asian chipmakers like Samsung and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company that have been working to build U.S. factories. But it left greater uncertainty for smaller chipmakers in Europe and Asia that have little exposure to the AI boom but still make semiconductors inserted into essential products like cars or washing machines. These producers 'probably aren't large enough to get on the map for an exemption and quite probably wouldn't have the kind of excess capital and margins to be able to add investment at a large scale into the United States,' Chorzempa said. The announcement came more than three months after Trump temporarily exempted most electronics from his administration's most onerous tariffs. During the COVID-19 pandemic, a shortage of computer chips increased the price of autos and contributed to higher inflation. Chorzempa said chip tariffs could again raise prices by hundreds of dollars per vehicle if the semiconductors inside a car are not exempt. 'There's a chip that allows you to open and close the window,' Chorzempa said. 'There's a chip that is running the entertainment system. There is a chip that's kind of running all the electronics. There are chips, especially in EVs, that are doing power management, all that kind of stuff.' Much of the investment into building U.S. chip factories began with the bipartisan CHIPS and Science Act that President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022, providing more than $50 billion to support new computer chip plants, fund research and train workers for the industry. Trump has vocally opposed those financial incentives and taken a different approach, betting that the threat of dramatically higher chip costs would force most companies to open factories domestically, despite the risk that tariffs could squeeze corporate profits and push up prices for electronics.
Miami Herald
11 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Trump administration, TSA propose new rule expanding drone usage
The U.S. Transportation Secretary and the TSA have unveiled a new proposed rule for drones that would make it easier for companies to use drones for farming, deliveries, manufacturing and more, called Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS). Touted by Secretary Sean P. Duffy as "unleashing American drone dominance," the new BVLOS rule does away with individual waivers or exemptions for drone operators to use their drones without a visual line of sight. Traditionally, they were approved by the FAA on a case-by-case basis. "From drones delivering medicine to unmanned aircraft surveying crops, this technology will fundamentally change the way we interact with the world," said Duffy. "Our new rule will reform outdated regulations that were holding innovators back while also enhancing safety in our skies. Thanks to President Trump, America – not China – will lead the way in this exciting new technology." The new rule requires drone traffic-management services and exempts drones from operating within airspace of places like airports, space ports and other similar locations. Operations, according to the new rule, would take place at or below 400 feet, and would be allowed to occur above people. Drones would not need traditional FAA airworthiness certificates; instead of the FAA creating the standards for drone safety and security, the industry standards would become the FAA's standards for allowing drone operations. According to the release, the FAA is welcoming the public to comment on the rule for the next sixty days in the Federal Register. However, the Federal Register only shows Trump's executive order on the issue, not the proposal. Detractors will surely point to worries over personal safety, surveillance and the potential for drones to reduce the American workforce by automating some jobs. The Federal Register also shows the work of the Biden Administration in researching and working with industry partners to create the BVLOS rule, as far back as 2022 and 2023. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
