Super PACs flood Boston mayor's race with cash: Who's spending what
Just in time for the weather to warm up, super PACs backing Boston Mayor Michelle Wu and main challenger Josh Kraft are turning up the heat in the race for City Hall.
All told, independent expenditure groups on either side of the already tense mayoral campaign recently have poured nearly $1 million into the contest, state records show.
The pro-Wu super PAC Bold Boston reported raising $743,000 between Jan. 1 and June 12, according to a report filed with the state's Office of Campaign and Political Finance. The group reported spending $256,114.
The money underwrote a campaign commercial highlighting supporters of President Donald who donated to a pro-Kraft super PAC.
Two big donors to that super PAC included the political arms of the Environmental League of Massachusetts and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, who respectively donated $175,000 and $50,000, records showed.
The pro-Kraft Your City, Your Future, meanwhile, reported raising $230,100 between May 30 and June 18, state filings show. That comes on top of the $2.4 million the super PAC raised in the opening months of the race.
Read More: Boston Mayor Wu slams Kraft over claims White Stadium cost secretly spiked
On Friday, Wu's reelection campaign went on the attack, singling out John Paulson, a supporter of President Donald Trump, who made a $100,000 contribution to the pro-Kraft super PAC earlier this month.
Paulson is the president of the New York City-based hedge fund firm Paulson & Co.
A report by Forbes put the investor's net worth at $3.8 billion. He made his money by 'betting against subprime mortgages at the peak of the 2007 credit bubble,' according to Forbes.
Last year, Paulson notably threatened to pull his money from the market if former Vice President Kamala Harris prevailed over Trump, according to Vanity Fair.
'Every single day, Donald Trump and his administration attack Boston and everything that makes our city the greatest in the world. It's not enough that Trump and his minions attack our community; now they are trying to buy the city too,' Wu's campaign said in a statement.
Under state law, campaigns and independent expenditure groups are forbidden from coordinating with each other.
Kraft has previously dismissed accusations that he's trying to buy the race.
'The power of incumbency is a real thing,' Kraft said in a Friday statement to The Boston Herald. 'While Mayor Wu appears to be running her campaign out of City Hall, I have a fully staffed campaign team, including a campaign headquarters in Nubian Square.'
Read More: Out-of-town money floods Boston mayor's race
Through Friday, Wu's campaign was sitting on $2.3 million in cash on hand, state filings showed.
Kraft, who injected $2 million of his own money into his campaign, was just behind at $1.95 million, state filings showed.
Boston Mayor Wu slams Kraft over claims White Stadium cost secretly spiked
Kraft and Wu clash over cost of White Stadium project
Boston NAACP calls for pause on White Stadium renovation
Read the original article on MassLive.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
17 minutes ago
- New York Times
Live Updates: Iran's State Television Announces Cease-Fire With Israel
F.B.I. and Department of Homeland Security officials held a call with state and local law enforcement officials on Sunday to warn of potential consequences of U.S. action in Iran. Federal officials are increasingly concerned about the possibility of Iran or its supporters retaliating on American soil after the bombing of nuclear sites in Iran by U.S. forces. In an internal email on Sunday, top officials at the F.B.I. cautioned that Iran and its proxies have 'historically targeted U.S. interests in response to geopolitical events, and they are likely to increase their efforts in the near term.' They urged field offices to monitor their collection platforms and stay in close contact with the Defense Department, including the National Guard, 'who may be targeted for retaliation' while 'specific attention should be paid to' U.S. military facilities connected to the strikes in Iran. In New York City, Mayor Eric Adams said that more police officers would be on duty around religious, cultural and diplomatic sites 'out of an abundance of caution,' given the situation in the Middle East. Iran, which the United States has designated as a state sponsor of terrorism, has long backed a network of militias across the Middle East in an attempt to extend its influence across the region and undermine Israel. Those militias include Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis, who control parts of Yemen. Separately, the Department of Homeland Security issued a security bulletin stating that the 'ongoing Iran conflict' had elevated security concerns in the country and adding that cyberattacks by pro-Iranian hackers were likely. 'The likelihood of violent extremists in the homeland independently mobilizing to violence in response to the conflict would likely increase if Iranian leadership issued a religious ruling calling for retaliatory violence against targets in the homeland,' the bulletin said. It noted that 'cyberactors affiliated with the Iranian government may conduct attacks against U.S. networks.' Such advisories are typical after American forces take significant military action overseas, reflecting a worry by national security officials that people living in the United States may be angry or compelled to lash out. The relationship between Iran and the United States is particularly fraught in recent years, particularly given that U.S. officials have accused Iran of trying to assassinate American officials, as well as Iranian dissidents in the country. In a conference call on Sunday, D.H.S. and F.B.I. officials cautioned state and local law enforcement officials of the possibility of threats to U.S. communities. During the call, the nonprofit organization Secure Community Network, which provides safety consulting and training for Jewish facilities across North America, said that the level of threats was very high. 'Iran would not strike in the U.S. unless a red line was crossed,' said Michael Masters, the group's chief executive, according to a summary of the call. 'That red line was assessed to be direct military engagement, especially targeting Iran's nuclear facilities. That red line has now been crossed.' The bulletin by the Department of Homeland Security said that the Iran-Israel war 'could also motivate violent extremists and hate crime perpetrators seeking to attack targets perceived to be Jewish, pro-Israel, or linked to the US government or military in the homeland.' Former F.B.I. officials said the bureau was well versed in these situations and would ask informants to find out if there were any new threats while scrutinizing existing cases, including possible surveillance of those being investigated. In its email on Sunday, the F.B.I. said to prioritize tips potentially associated with Iran or its proxies. Carlos Fernandez, a former senior F.B.I. agent in charge of New York's counterterrorism division, said the agents had to take seriously the possibility of sleeper cells in the United States, especially since Iran has been accused of plotting to kill President Trump before the election and a human-rights activist in Brooklyn. Indeed, the bureau has also uncovered members of Hezbollah, who trained in Lebanon but then moved to the United States, where they were eventually arrested in Michigan and New York and charged with terrorism. 'It's very real,' he said. 'It's a legitimate concern.'
Politico
24 minutes ago
- Politico
Media Matters sues FTC over ‘retaliatory' investigation
A liberal media watchdog group has filed suit against the Federal Trade Commission, saying it was placed under investigation in retaliation for its reporting about extremist content on the social media site X. Media Matters said in the suit filed Monday in federal court in Washington that White House appointees in the FTC were seeking to punish the organization on behalf of Elon Musk, the billionaire owner of X who until recently had a prominent role in the Trump administration. The FTC notified Media Matters last month that it was investigating the organization over whether its reporting on X amounted to illegal collusion with advertisers. 'The Court should put an end to the latest effort by the Trump Administration and Elon Musk's government allies to punish, intimidate, and harass Media Matters for publishing reporting they do not like,' it said. In November 2023, Media Matters reported that ads were appearing next to pro-Nazi posts on X. Musk, the lawsuit said, 'promised a 'thermonuclear' lawsuit against Media Matters—and his supporters in government were quick to pile on.' Two subsequent investigations from attorneys general in Missouri and Texas, which Media Matters asserts were both also retaliatory, were later dismissed by federal judges on First Amendment grounds. Neither the White House nor the FTC responded immediately to requests for comment from POLITICO. Media Matters said the federal investigation is part of a broader politicization of the agency under the administration. 'The Trump Administration has opened investigations into former officials who were critical of the President,' the lawsuit said. 'And it has targeted swaths of civil society deemed to be disloyal: universities, cultural institutions, public radio, and other media outlets.' Trump in March fired the FTC's two Democratic members, Alvaro Bedoya and Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, overturning decades of precedent. The agency now has three commissioners, all Republicans. Several key leaders at the agency have previously spoken out against both Media Matters and advertiser boycotts like the one that affected X, the lawsuit said. Those named in the complaint include FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson and commissioners Mark Meador and Melissa Ann Holyoak. The organization also wrote that the administration's investigation has cast a chill on its reporting, preventing staff from covering Musk's relationship with Trump and connections between right-wing media and the FTC. 'This is a significant free speech issue, and Media Matters will not back down from this fight,' Angelo Carusone, chair and president of the nonprofit, said in a statement. 'If the Trump administration is allowed to use this unlawful investigation to punish legitimate reporting on behalf of a political ally, then there is nothing to stop it from targeting anyone who stands up and exercises their rights.'
Politico
39 minutes ago
- Politico
Trump's megabill gets a late makeover in the Senate
President Donald Trump already had Republicans scrambling to get their 'big, beautiful bill' to his desk by next week. Now he's got Congress grappling with something even bigger: the aftermath of his airstrikes on Iran. The issue could come to a head with a vote as soon as this week. Sen. Tim Kaine's (D-Va.) resolution requiring congressional approval for military action in Iran ripens Friday but is expected to be on the floor sooner with the megabill set to eat up the back half of the week. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is pushing to move up the vote. He's urging his party to support the measure, but Democrats expect to lose the vote of Sen. John Fetterman (Pa.). On the GOP side, keep an eye on Sens. Rand Paul (Ky.) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), who said Sunday on X 'Congress alone' has the power to authorize war. Lawmakers in both chambers are set to receive briefings Tuesday on the situation in Iran; they were on the books before the strikes. In the House, Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna's (D-Calif.) war powers resolution, which would block U.S. involvement in Iran, will not ripen until next week. But House GOP leadership is considering getting ahead of that: Speaker Mike Johnson could move this week to kill the effort with language getting rid of the privileged nature of the resolution, according to a person granted anonymity to relay the private discussions. Trump and GOP leaders are moving to unify the rank-and-file behind Trump's decision to strike, even as Trump openly muses about pursuing regime change in Iran. Take note of Trump's renewed attacks on Massie — a person familiar with the conversations who was granted anonymity to discuss them tells POLITICO it's part of an effort to keep members in line. Adding to the chaos for Republicans is Trump's Sunday evening musing about pursuing 'regime change' in Iran if its current leaders can't 'MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN.' 'This is not America First folks,' Massie said in response to Trump's Truth Social post. House Democrats are less unified. Most are questioning the constitutionality of the strike, but the party is split on where to go from there. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.) has brought up impeachment. Others, like Rep. Steny Hoyer (Md.), were more supportive of the strike. That could be a problem for Democrats trying to strengthen their opposition. The top Democrats on Foreign Affairs, Intelligence and Armed Services are drafting their own resolution in response to the strikes, according to a person granted anonymity to discuss the plan. There are likely a handful of pro-Israel Democrats who will vote against any war powers resolution. Even if the bill makes it to a House floor vote there likely won't be enough Republicans. What else we're watching: — Megabill's big week: Republicans will hold a closed-door meeting Monday night after votes for leadership to update members on the GOP megabill and its outstanding issues. Full bill text could land Monday, though it may also slip. While the 'big, beautiful bill' could hit the floor as soon as Wednesday, Thursday is looking more likely. — First Dem oversight vote: House Democrats' steering committee will vote this evening on who should be the party's leader on the Oversight Committee, followed by a full caucus vote Tuesday. California Rep. Robert Garcia, 47, is seen as the favorite in a field split along generational lines. He's running against Reps. Jasmine Crockett of Texas, 44; Kweisi Mfume of Maryland, 76; and Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts, 70. — Slashes to GAO funding: House Republican appropriators are proposing to cut funding for the Government Accountability Office by nearly half. It's the latest in a series of flash points between the GOP and the watchdog agency, which has been involved in clashes this year over DOGE, regulatory rollbacks and Trump's incursions into the power of the purse. Meredith Lee Hill, Jordain Carney, Nicholas Wu and Katherine Tully-McManus contributed to this report.
