Deputy shoots, kills suspect in Vancouver late Wednesday night
According to the Clark County Sheriff's Office, authorities got a call just after 10:40 p.m. from a person saying their son was going to kill them.
The caller said the son had broken in through the front door of their home, was high on meth and had been drinking.
Accused arsonist arrested after N. Portland fires, re-arrested after setting downtown fires
While responding to the scene, the caller reported that the suspect had left the home on a bicycle, and within minutes, a Vancouver police officer spotted them, and authorities said he was armed with a gun.
At 10:51 p.m., authorities said a deputy fired at the suspect near Main Street and East 19th Street in Downtown Vancouver.
Despite providing first aid, the suspect was declared dead at the scene.
Hector Castro says Washington state's new Office of Independent Investigation is looking at evidence and surveillance video to find out what led to the man's death.
But Castro also says it's not the first time the agency is looking at Clark County.
'In Region 1, there are 12 counties that include Clark County,' Castro said. 'Since we began responding to incidents as of Dec. 1 of last year, three of the five incidents we're investigating have occurred in Clark County. Two of them have involved the Clark County Sheriff's Office.'
OII said they will release the name of the deputy and the man killed at a later time before releasing their report to prosecutors in the next 120 days.
Authorities said video was captured on body-worn and in-car cameras and will be released as well.
Stay with KOIN 6 as we bring you more on the developing story.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Solve the daily Crossword
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
MANDEL: An outpouring of pain for beloved family man killed in senseless bar shooting
Craig MacDonald was a loving son, father and grandfather; a kind and generous soul who loved dancing with his daughters, fishing with his sons, and always, watching his beloved Maple Leafs. He was wearing his hockey sweater when he was killed and wore another when he was laid to rest. In a downtown courtroom Wednesday, an astounding 35 victim impact statements were submitted to Superior Court Justice Michael Brown, an outpouring of pain and heartache detailing the tremendous loss so many have suffered by MacDonald's senseless slaying at the hands of Abilaziz Mohamed. Originally charged with second-degree murder, Mohamed, 35, was convicted of manslaughter earlier this year in the October 2021 shooting of MacDonald, 43, the manager of security and maintenance at Providence Health. Both men had been at a Boston Pizza in Scarborough when a bar fight ended with Mohamed firing twice at MacDonald with his .32-calibre semi-automatic handgun. Mohamed, who was naturally under a weapons prohibition at the time, fled and was at the top of Canada's most-wanted list before his arrest in April 2022. Charged with second-degree murder, his plea to manslaughter was rejected by the Crown but at the end of the trial, the judge found prosecutors hadn't proven beyond a reasonable doubt that he intended to kill MacDonald when he opened fire. Court heard the victim, who had consumed seven to nine beers that night, recognized Mohamed from an altercation at another bar a month earlier, grabbed him from behind and began punching him and rushed at him in the parking lot 10 minutes later when he was shot. Drema MacDonald described the 1,392 days of absolute hell she has lived since that tragic night and lamented that at the judge-alone trial, her brother was reduced to being cast as drunk guy who started the 'shortest, lamest bar fight in history.' But that wasn't the Craig everyone knew, she said. He was the hero who came to the aid of a friend being threatened with a knife, the 'larger than life' guy always there to help without a moment's hesitation and the 25-year employee known at Providence as the 'ambassador of kindness.' Most of all, MacDonald was a dedicated father of five, with his youngest just eight-years-old when his dad was killed. 'My nephew's memories of Craig are being erased and it breaks my heart,' said MacDonald's sister. 'A few months ago he told me that when he thinks of his dad, all he can picture is his death — Craig in a coffin being lowered into the ground. We share story after story with him, but what he remembers is the violence.' Recommended video Amber MacDonald found out she was pregnant three days before her father was killed. 'We do not seek vengeance, we seek justice,' she told the judge. 'Justice will not bring him back but it can honour the life he lived and the love he gave.' His ex-wife, Tracy MacDonald, addressed Abilaziz directly to tell him how her children will always mourn all the milestones they will miss. 'Craig's life wasn't all you took from me, you took part of my children also, as I spoke the worst words a parent should ever have to speak: 'Your daddy was shot and killed.'' Their son Colin, 24, directed a remarkably kind and eloquent message to his father's killer that offered a glimpse into how well he was raised by his dad. 'I'm not writing this to tell you that you're a bad guy or a good guy, sometimes even good people make bad decisions,' he said. He told him that he doesn't think he'll ever forgive him — but he does want to believe in the justice system and so he asked for a favour. 'The favour I'm asking of you, Abilaziz, is please don't make my father's life meaningless. No matter what has happened in the past, every day is a new opportunity to become the person you were always meant to be. 'The walls around you may be made of concrete, but growth starts in the mind and heart, and no prison can confine that. Change is possible.' How long he should remain behind those concrete walls will be argued when his sentencing hearing continues Thursday. mmandel@
TechCrunch
6 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Two teens charged in attack on former DOGE official Edward 'Big Balls' Coristine
In Brief Two 15-year-olds have been charged with unarmed carjacking after allegedly attacking Edward 'Big Balls' Coristine, the teenage software engineer and former Neuralink intern who became a prominent figure in the Trump administration's cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). According to reports citing local authorities, Coristine — who left DOGE in June but returned to federal service at the Social Security Administration to help improve the agency's website, a spokesman recently told WIRED — was with his girlfriend around 3 a.m. Sunday in Washington's Logan Circle when a circle of roughly 10 teens approached their car and made comments about taking it. He reportedly pushed his girlfriend into the car for her safety before confronting the group, who then attacked him until police drove up to the scene. On Tuesday, Musk praised Coristine for his bravery on his social media platform, X. President Trump separately shared a graphic image of a battered Coristine on Truth Social, using the assault to call for prosecuting teens as young as 14 as adults.
Washington Post
7 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Fort Stewart army base shooting raises questions about military gun policies
A shooting that injured five soldiers at one of the country's largest military bases on Wednesday has resurfaced questions about a long-standing army policy that largely prevents service members from carrying personal weapons on military installations. Soldiers in the area who witnessed the shooting at Fort Stewart in Georgia 'immediately and without hesitation' tackled the shooter to subdue him before law enforcement arrived, Brigadier Gen. John Lubas said at a news conference Wednesday. But they didn't have firearms to shoot back because of a policy first enacted decades ago to ensure safety by limiting armed members on army bases to military police. The suspect in the shooting, logistics Sgt. Quornelius Radford, used a personal weapon, Lubas said. Questions about why soldiers didn't have weapons were buzzing online after at least one video of the incident on social media appears to show service members in uniform running to safety amid a lockdown that lasted about an hour, instead of firing back at the shooter. While some have questioned why many service members in the area during the shooting didn't use weapons to defend themselves, others have questioned whether existing regulations do enough to prevent shootings on bases. The shooting is the latest in a growing list of violent incidents at American military installations over the years — some claiming upward of a dozen lives. Experts say that there are reasons for long-standing regulations on military bases, despite their limitations. Department of Defense policy prohibits military personnel from carrying personal weapons on base without permission from a senior commander, and there is a strict protocol for how the firearm must be stored. Typically, military personnel must officially check their guns out of secure storage to go to on-base hunting areas or shooting ranges, and then check all firearms back in promptly after its sanctioned use. Military police are often the only armed personnel on base, outside of shooting ranges, hunting areas or in training, where soldiers can wield their service weapons without ammunition. The federal policy leaves little room for local commanders to use discretion about how the policy is enforced. That means the regulation applies even in Georgia, a state with some of the most lax gun regulations in the country, where Fort Stewart is located. Robert Capovilla, a founding partner for one of the largest military law firms in the country, strongly believes in the Second Amendment. But he said that the strict firearm policies on military bases exist for a reason. 'A lot of these installations are involved in top-secret operations, dealing with top-secret information, and because of that you need a heightened security,' said Capovilla, a former military prosecutor and defense attorney. 'You simply don't want folks walking around a federal installation with personal weapons.' He said he has traveled to 'nearly every single major military installation' in North America for his work. Whenever he visits an installation, he said armed military police have a visible presence almost constantly on base. He added that he doesn't believe Wednesday's shooting could have been prevented if military personnel had been armed at the time. Firearms on military bases are more regulated than most states in some ways, according to former military prosecutor and defense counsel Eric Carpenter. But he said that the limitations on gun control on military bases parallel gun policy debates in the public more broadly. 'You don't forfeit all of your rights when you enter the military,' Carpenter said. 'Outside of a military situation, the service member has just as much Second Amendment right as anyone else.' For example, it could be fairly straightforward for a service member living off-base to bring a weapon onto the military installation, Carpenter said, because a senior commander can't regulate gun ownership off base. There is also scant legal ground for leadership to confiscate a gun when a service member is exhibiting signs of a mental health crisis or post-traumatic stress disorder, potentially posing a threat to themselves or others. In recent years, those gaps have come under more scrutiny because of mass shootings, he said. 'All those rules aren't going to prevent someone from doing what the guy did today,' Carpenter said.
