Motive emerges for murder of Perth brothers in Mexico
Miguel Ángel Gaxiola Rodríguez says there is still no evidence linking the brutal murders to organised crime, the ABC reported.
This is despite the horrific killings occurring in an area notorious for cartel activity and violence. Instead, Mr Gaxiola Rodríguez believes the most likely reason for the murders was tyre theft.
Jake and Callum Robinson had been camping in a remote part of northern Mexico with their American friend Carter Rhoad when they were each shot in the head in April 2024.
Their bodies were then callously dumped in a 15-metre-deep well in Baja California. A fourth, unrelated body was also found in the same location.
Mr Gaxiola Rodriguez told the ABC: 'It appears the perpetrators identified an opportunity for robbery when they encountered the foreigners in a highly isolated location.
'These individuals exploited the circumstances to perpetrate the robbery, resulting in the fatal shooting of the three foreigners.'
Four people are now facing charges over the killings: Jesús Gerardo, known as 'El Kekas'; his then-girlfriend Ari Gisell; Ángel Jesús; and Irineo Francisco.
Mexican laws prevent the publication of the group's surnames. Jake Robinson and Callum Robinson. Missing in Mexico. Credit: Unknown / Instagram
Since their arrests, a court was told Gerardo — who was the first to be taken into custody — had allegedly confessed to his then-partner, showing her the allegedly stolen tyres and then allegedly telling her: 'I f...ed up three gringos'.
All the defendants are due to appear in court next week, where they will face charges of aggravated homicide — which carries a maximum penalty of 60 years, violent robbery, and grand theft auto, with the three men also facing an addition count of forced disappearance.
'We have compelling evidence, including witness statements, and we have found the vehicle,' Mr Gaxiola Rodríguez said. 'The objective is to ensure that the accused are brought to trial and convicted of the homicide and robbery.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Perth Now
44 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Latham portrait stays on the hook in Labor party room
A picture of former Labor leader Mark Latham will keep hanging in the party's caucus room as he faces domestic violence allegations. Mr Latham is accused by his former partner Nathalie Matthews of a "sustained pattern" of abuse. Her allegations include he pressured her to take part in "degrading" sex acts. Mr Latham strongly denies the untested claims made in a civil court apprehended violence order application by Ms Matthews, saying he has "broken no laws". Calls have grown since the allegations were raised for his official portrait in Labor's federal party room to be removed. But a Labor caucus meeting on Monday was told a "unanimous consensus position" had been reached where the photo would remain, but with a caption providing context. The words will read: "In 2017 Mark Latham was expelled from the Australian Labor Party and banned for life. His actions do not accord with Labor values and fail to meet the standards we expect and demand." Mr Latham sits as an independent in the NSW upper house and faces calls to resign over sexually explicit messages allegedly sent to his former partner while sitting in the chamber of parliament. The decision to add context to Mr Latham's portrait was the right one, Finance Minister Katy Gallagher said. "It's finding the balance, you can't erase history, we can't pretend he wasn't our leader, he was and so there he sits in the leaders' timeline," she told reporters in Canberra."But it's a recognition ... his behaviour and attitudes don't reflect the modern Australian Labor Party." Senator Gallagher said the wording allowed people to feel something had been done. "It will exist there forever on our leaders wall," she said. "It's a pretty strong statement." Mr Latham lost his bid for the nation's top job at the 2004 federal election to former Liberal prime minister John Howard. The campaign was marked by his aggressive handshake with Mr Howard outside the ABC's radio studios on election-eve. The infamous episode was largely blamed for his election defeat and delivered the Howard government a fourth term. The Federal Court in 2024 ordered Mr Latham pay independent NSW politician Alex Greenwich $140,000 in damages over a homophobic social media post. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) Lifeline 13 11 14 Men's Referral Service 1300 766 491
Perth Now
3 hours ago
- Perth Now
Stolen Shoalwater puppy reunited with owner
A young puppy has been reunited with her family, almost three weeks after she was stolen in broad daylight from a Rockingham home. Poppy, an American staffy, was stolen outside her home on Gloucester Street in Shoalwater after a person walked up the driveway about 12.40pm on June 30. Poppy was reunited with her owners last Friday. Credit: WA Police Police on Monday confirmed the pooch was returned to her owner last Friday, and thanked the WA community for their help. 'As a result of community assistance and through social media, Poppy was quickly returned to the owners' residency on Friday 18 July,' a police spokesperson said. 'Poppy's owner, and WA Police would like to thank everyone for their help in this matter.'
West Australian
4 hours ago
- West Australian
Walter Sofronoff fights against corruption findings during inquiry into Bruce Lehrmann's prosecution
Lawyers have rejected suggestions a corrupt motive could've driven a former judge to prematurely send out copies of a report into the prosecution of Bruce Lehrmann to journalists, arguing 'at worst' it was an 'erroneous attempt' to ensure accuracy in public discourse. Former Queensland judge Walter Sofronoff KC led the 2023 board of inquiry into Mr Lehrmann's prosecution over the alleged rape of Brittany Higgins. A subsequent investigation into Mr Sofronoff's conduct during that inquiry, in particular his decision to send a copy of the board's report to two journalists – ABC's Elizabeth Byrne and The Australian's Janet Albrechtsen – prior to its official release by the ACT government, was launched by the ACT Integrity Commission. The commission in March found Mr Sofronoff had engaged in 'serious corrupt conduct'; however, he is seeking to have the commission's Operation Juno report overturned by the Federal Court. Barrister Adam Pomerenke SC argued there was 'overwhelming evidence' Mr Sofronoff genuinely believed he was acting in the good of the public to ensure accurate media reporting by sending out the report to the journalists – an essential part of his role investigating a matter of public interest. Therefore, his conduct couldn't amount to having a corrupt, dishonest, or malicious motive, regardless of whether reasonable people disagreed with Mr Sofronoff's views. 'In my respectful submission those views of Mr Soffronoff are not rationally capable of amounting to a corrupt dishonest or malicious motive,' Mr Pomerenke told the court. 'A person can be wrong without being negligent, much less corrupt, dishonest or malicious.' He said even if Mr Sofronoff was 'wrong', he genuinely and honestly held his view. 'At worst, it could be characterised as an erroneous attempt to ensure accuracy and transparency in public discourse, and an attempt at accuracy and transparency in public discourse cannot rationally, in my respectful submission, be described as corrupt,' Mr Pomerenke said. 'Even if one vehemently disagrees with what Mr Soffronoff did, that statute does not authorise a misuse of language by describing it as corrupt.' This fell under Mr Sofronoff's sixth ground of appeal, which claims the commission's finding that his conduct was a 'breach of public trust' is affected by jurisdictional error. Further, Mr Pomerenke argued an error by the commission in finding Mr Sofronoff had engaged in contempt was a 'serious offence against the administration of justice' and cannot be 'disentangled' from the conclusion of serious corrupt conduct. He also claimed the Juno report couldn't be 'saved by reconstruction'. 'Our submission is given this entanglement, the conclusion of serious corrupt conduct is affected by jurisdictional error because its material …(there's a) realistic possibility that the conclusion could have been different if the respondent had not wrongly found that Mr Sofronoff could have committed a serious offence of contempt,' Mr Pomerenke said. 'And as I say if this is the right … serious corrupt conduct cannot stand.' Turning to the other grounds of appeal, he claimed if any of the first 11 grounds were established, they couldn't be 'disentangled' from the 12th ground relating to the finding of corrupt conduct itself, as each error was 'bound up in the rolled up conclusion of serious corrupt conduct'. 'Your Honour can't have regard to one error in isolation,' Mr Pomerenke said. 'Each additional error we establish beyond the concession in ground two fortifies that conclusion that … there was jurisdictional error, entitling Mr Sofronoff to relief.' He also argued there was a 'basic misuse of language' and a 'distortion' of the concept of corruption by the commission in interpreting 'integrity' as meaning soundness or efficacy as distinct from probity of government or public administration. 'In our respectful submission that's not correct: it seriously dilutes and distorts the very notion of corruption, which has probity at its heart,' Mr Pomeranke said. 'On the respondent's approach, it can include findings in its reports which stigmatise conduct as corrupt even though it is disconnected from probity in government or public administration.' Documents filed by the retired judge's legal team claim that Mr Sofronoff was given the ability to do 'whatever (he) considers necessary or convenient for the fair and prompt conduct of the inquiry' as head of the inquiry, and he considered it necessary or convenient to engage with journalists 'for the fair and prompt conduct of the inquiry'. The documents also claim Mr Sofronoff's actions were 'incapable of amounting to corrupt conduct' and the findings were 'seriously illogical, irrational and/or unreasonable'. The Federal Court has found that Mr Lehrmann raped Ms Higgins on the civil standard of the balance of probabilities. A criminal trial was aborted due to juror misconduct and a charge against him was dropped. Mr Lehrmann has always denied the allegation and is appealing the Federal Court's finding.
