Dam plan busted? World's biggest hydropower project in the balance
From a set of roaring rapids, comes a grand vision.
There are plans to build a magnificent, multi-billion dollar mega-dam on the Congo River - one that would produce enough renewable electricity to power vast areas of Africa.
The structure would be called the Grand Inga Dam. Located in the Democratic Republic of Congo, it would have twice the power generation of China's Three Gorges and, therefore, be the world's largest hydroelectric plant.
The Grand Inga Dam enticed investors and developers but decades after it was first dreamt up, the site reserved for the structure remains untouched.
While DR Congo's government has insisted the plan is still in motion, critics point to the long delays, DR Congo's record of poor governance and the potential for serious environmental harm.
There is also concern about the project's revolving set of international partners. Just last week, Chinese state-owned firm the Three Gorges Corporation, withdrew from the project, a source close to the partnership told the BBC.
And then there is the eye-watering bill, which is reportedly as high as $80bn (£63bn) in a country that is one of the poorest in the world.
But some believe the nay-sayers are holding Grand Inga to a different standard than other major infrastructure projects. And while construction has not begun, there has been a flurry of meetings and discussions between interested parties over the past year.
The need for the Grand Inga is certainly there. Roughly 600 million people in sub-Saharan Africa lack access to electricity, according to the International Energy Agency, a global watchdog.
Attempts to solve this problem date back decades - and in the early 2000s DR Congo and its neighbours - South Africa, Angola, Namibia and Botswana - dreamt up an interconnected electricity grid.
They looked to the vast Congo River, realising that its powerful waters have an immense hydropower potential.
The international collective - known as Westcor - sought to multiply the two dams that already existed on the river - Inga 1 and Inga 2.
DR Congo's long-time leader Mobutu Sese Seko oversaw their construction in the 1970s and 1980s, but by the end of the century, both dams were dilapidated due to a lack of funding for their maintenance.
Westcor eventually disbanded but their Grand Inga dream lived on. Inga 1 and 2 now work at around 80% of their capacity and DR Congo has drawn up plans to supercharge this output, by adding six more dams along the river.
These extra dams are forecast to generate up to 40,000MW of electricity at any one time - enough to power New York city for approximately four days during the summer.
Through Inga, DR Congo will play its role as "the trigger of the African revolver... a catalyst for the industrialisation of Africa," says the country's Agency for the Development and Promotion of the Grand Inga Project.
The BBC contacted the agency for this article but it did not comment.
Despite its previous projections that Inga 3 would be completed by 2018, construction has not even begun.
The lack of visible progress suggests the project has stalled, but recent messaging from the World Bank - the world's leading development organisation - implies otherwise.
Late last year, the bank announced it was back in talks with the Congolese government, having withdrawn its funding for Inga 3 back in 2016.
The World Bank had cited "strategic differences" but eight years later - and with Félix Tshisekedi having replaced Joseph Kabila as DR Congo's president - it has done a U-turn.
'I think it's the first time that I feel more optimistic. I almost believe that we can get it done,' Demetrios Papathanasiou, the World Bank's global director of energy and extractives, told a South African panel last February.
This optimism seemed to be felt elsewhere, also. A pan-African alliance of finance institutions - including the African Development Bank - has recently been working together to help attract private investment to the project.
The Grand Inga is like a "serpent - it is up, down, visible, not visible," José Ángel González Tausz, chairman of AEE Power, a Spanish-run company and partner in the project, tells the BBC.
In November, Fabrice Lusinde, the head of DR Congo's public electricity company Snel, said that if work on Inga 3 began in 2026, two of its turbines should be up and running by 2032. Electricity produced by these turbines would then finance the plant's other turbines, he said.
On its own, Inga 3 is projected to produce 4,800MW of electricity. South Africa, a country hindered by regular power cuts, has signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) stating that they will import just over half of this amount.
South Africa's authorities have argued that Inga will deliver consistent and reliable energy, but critics in the country say cheaper electricity can be found elsewhere.
A Nigerian company, Natural Oilfield Services, has also reportedly signed up as a buyer. Like South Africa, Nigeria also suffers from severe electricity shortages.
Guinea and Angola have reportedly expressed interest in the Grand Inga Dam too.
So why - after decades of talks - have no new dams materialised?
"It is a project in the Democratic Republic of Congo," Mr Tausz says bluntly. "Even if the project is one of the best all over the world - it does not have the credibility."
For decades, DR Congo has been blighted by corruption, a lack of infrastructure and sluggish development. Conflict in the east of the country also makes international headlines - though Inga is thousands of kilometres away from the fighting.
Investors are also "afraid" because the Grand Inga would not show returns for decades, Mr Tausz says, adding "who knows what will happen in Congo in the next 30 years".
Mr Tausz - whose father worked as an engineer on Inga 1 in 1972 - also says that a lack of financial commitment by the Congolese government has contributed to the delay.
And then there is the funding issue. In September 2023, DR Congo's president told reporters that the country was "still facing difficulties in mobilising investments" for the dam.
The recent withdrawal of China's Three Gorges Corporation intensifies these difficulties. Three Gorges was a major partner, which brought money and expertise to the complex project.
According to the BBC's source, who spoke under condition of anonymity, Three Gorges pulled out as they were frustrated with the way DR Congo President Tshisekedi was handling the project.
There has been no official confirmation of the pull-out.
But are these problems unique to the Grand Inga Dam? Not really, says Professor George Aggidis, a hydropower expert at the UK's Lancaster University.
He says years of delays and numerous changes of partners are "normal" for a major infrastructure project like the Inga Dam.
He points to the UK's Mersey Tidal Project - which if successful would be the world's largest tidal barrier. The idea was first floated in 1984 and has been abandoned, then revived in the decades since.
"Does that mean we are unstable here in the UK?" Mr Aggidis asks. He describes the Inga project as "doable".
A similar sentiment is shared by Alexander Schwab, an executive at Andritz, an Austrian-based company that signed on to supply equipment for Inga 3.
Mr Schwab says Andritz signed a MoU with the Congolese authorities but has not received any word on the project since 2021.
He seems largely unfazed by the lack of communication, saying that one in three major infrastructure projects will be "stalled somewhere".
For Mr Schwab, the Grand Inga is "one of the best mega projects... in the world".
But despite its potential, there are deep concerns about the project's environmental and social impact.
A common criticism is that the dam will benefit South African consumers and DR Congo's mining companies, but not the Congolese people. Some 80% of the population lack access to electricity.
"Inga will not bring electricity for the people," says Emmanuel Musuyu, the head of Congolese civil society coalition Corap. He alleges that the majority of electricity has already been promised to South Africa and the mines.
In a recent report on Inga 3, the DR Congo authorities acknowledged that the dam is "alone not sufficient to address DRC's energy and development challenges" but said it could act as a "catalyst" for national change.
The World Bank said it was exploring how it could support the government to ensure Inga "delivers broad benefits for energy access".
Environmental and rights groups also worry that approximately 37,000 residents in the Inga area will be displaced without compensation. According to organisations like International Rivers and Observatori del Deute en la Globalització, thousands were forcibly removed from their homes and never compensated when Inga I and II were built.
They also say that the first two dams damaged the region's biodiversity and that any extra dams are likely to do the same.
"It will have a specific impact on the fish and all animals in the water... when you change the flow of water in rivers, we can see some species of fish disappear," says Mr Musuyu.
A 2018 study argued that many large-scale hydropower projects in Europe and the US have been disastrous for the environment.
DR Congo's authorities have recognised that people would be displaced by Inga III, but said residents would be resettled in areas with basic services and promised that "fair compensation" would be awarded.
They have also recognised the risks to the local environment and said an assessment aiming to reduce this impact would be completed within the next two years. However, according to the BBC's source close to the project, the authorities have not yet raised enough money to fund these studies.
If the Grand Inga is simply experiencing the ups and downs that come with big infrastructure projects, the World Bank may still have cause for optimism.
But the dam is a complex engineering project - one that requires its many stakeholders to work together in harmony.
The World Bank returning, only for the Three Gorges to leave, suggests DR Congo is struggling to maintain such unity.
And despite DR Congo's ambition, construction cannot begin unless funding is secured.
So for now, it appears as though this project which has the potential to change the lives of millions of people in Africa remains just that - a grand vision.
The spectacular failures and successes of massive dams
How Félix Tshisekedi won DR Congo's chaotic election
'Hell behind bars' - life in DR Congo's most notorious jail
BBC visits mpox clinic as WHO says DR Congo cases 'plateauing'
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.
Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
Africa Daily
Focus on Africa
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US and China agree on trade framework after two days of talks in London, Chinese negotiator says
The United States and China have agreed on a trade framework after two days of negotiations in London, China's trade negotiator Li Chenggang told reporters on Wednesday, according to Chinese state broadcaster CGTN. The two sides 'have agreed in principle on the framework for implementing the consensus reached by the two heads of state during their phone talks on June 5 and at Geneva talks last month,' he said. The US and Chinese officials will now take the proposal back to their leaders for approval, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told reporters in a separate briefing in London, Reuters reported. 'The idea is we're going to go back and speak to President Trump and make sure he approves it. They're going to go back and speak to President Xi and make sure he approves it, and if that is approved, we will then implement the framework,' he said. The latest round of talks, held Monday and Tuesday, followed a long-anticipated phone call last week between US President Donald Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping. The call appeared to ease tensions that emerged over the past month after a surprise agreement in Geneva was announced in May. After talks in the Swiss city, the two sides had agreed to drastically reduce tariffs on each other's goods for an initial 90-day period. Initially, the mood was upbeat. However, sentiment soured quickly over two main sticking points: China's control over so-called rare earth minerals and its access to semiconductor technology originating from the US. Lutnick said that China's restrictions on exports of rare earth minerals and magnets to the US will be resolved as a 'fundamental' part of the framework agreement, according to Reuters. 'Also, there were a number of measures the United States of America put on when those rare earths were not coming,' Lutnick said. 'You should expect those to come off, sort of as President Trump said, in a balanced way.' CNN has reached out to the White House for comment. This is a developing story and will be updated.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US-China talks end with plan for Trump and Xi to approve
The US and China say they have agreed in principle to a framework for de-escalating trade tensions between the world's two biggest economies. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the deal should result in restrictions on rare earth minerals and magnets being resolved. Both sides said they would now take the plan to their country's presidents - Donald Trump and Xi Jinping - for approval. The announcement came after two days of negotiations in London between top officials from Beijing and Washington. Chinese exports of rare earth minerals, which are crucial for modern technology, were high on the agenda of the meetings. Last month, Washington and Beijing agreed a temporary truce over trade tariffs but each country has since accused the other of breaching the deal. The US has said China has been slow to release exports of rare earth metals and magnets which are essential for manufacturing everything from smartphones to electric vehicles. Meanwhile, Washington has restricted China's access to US goods such as semiconductors and other related technologies linked to artificial intelligence (AI). "We have reached a framework to implement the Geneva consensus," Lutnick told reporters. "Once the presidents approve it, we will then seek to implement it," he added. The new round of negotiations followed a phone call between Donald Trump and China's leader Xi Jinping last week which the US President described as a "very good talk". "The two sides have, in principle, reached a framework for implementing the consensus reached by the two heads of state during the phone call on June 5th and the consensus reached at the Geneva meeting," China's Vice Commerce Minister Li Chenggang said. When Trump announced sweeping tariffs on imports from a number of countries earlier this year, China was the hardest hit. Beijing responded with its own higher rates on US imports, and this triggered tit-for-tat increases that peaked at 145%. In May, talks held in Switzerland led to a temporary truce that Trump called a "total reset". It brought US tariffs on Chinese products down to 30%, while Beijing slashed levies on US imports to 10% and promised to lift barriers on critical mineral exports. It gave both sides a 90-day deadline to try to reach a trade deal. But the US and China have since claimed breaches on non-tariff pledges. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said China had failed to rollback restrictions on exports of rare earth magnets. Beijing said US violations of the agreement included stopping sales of computer chip design software to Chinese companies, warning against using chips made by Chinese tech giant Huawei and cancelling visas for Chinese students. Ahead of this week's talks, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce said on Saturday that it had approved some applications for rare earth export licences, although it did not provide details of which countries were involved. Trump said on Friday that Xi had agreed to restart trade in rare earth materials. US and China meet for trade talks in London Trump confirms China trip after 'very good' call with Xi China says US has 'severely violated' tariffs truce
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Judge tosses lawsuit over Trump's firing of US African Development Foundation board members
A federal judge has tossed out a lawsuit over President Donald Trump's dismantling of a U.S. federal agency that invests in African small businesses. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in Washington, D.C., dismissed the case on Tuesday, finding that Trump was acting within his legal authority when he fired the U.S. African Development Foundation's board members in February. In March, the same judge ruled that the administration's removal of most grant money and staff from the congressionally created agency was also legal, as long as the agency was maintained at the minimum level required by law. USADF was created as an independent agency in 1980, and its board members must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. In 2023, Congress allocated $46 million to the agency to invest in small agricultural and energy infrastructure projects and other economic development initiatives in 22 African countries. On Feb. 19, Trump issued an executive order that said USADF, the U.S. Institute of Peace, the Inter-American Foundation and the Presidio Trust should be scaled back to the minimum presence required by law. At the time, USADF had five of its seven board seats filled. A few days later, an administration official told Ward Brehm that he was fired, and emails were sent to the other board members notifying them that they had also been terminated. Those emails were never received, however, because they were sent to the wrong email addresses. The four board members, believing they still held their posts because they had not been given notice, met in March and passed a resolution appointing Brehm as the president of the board. But Trump had already appointed Pete Marocco as the new chairman of what the administration believed to now be a board of one. Since then, both men have claimed to be the president of the agency, and Brehm filed the lawsuit March 6. Leon said that even though they didn't receive the emails, the four board members were effectively terminated in February, and so they didn't have the authority to appoint Brehm to lead the board. Brehm's attorney, Bradley Girard with Democracy Forward, expressed disappointment with the judge's decision. 'But in our parallel case, Rural Development Innovations v. Marocco, a grantee and two USADF employees have also challenged Marocco's unlawful appointment," Girard wrote in an email. "We are hopeful that the Court will reject the defendants' attempt to ignore the constitutional and statutory requirements for appointing board members to federal agencies.' That lawsuit is still pending before the same judge. In that case, two USADF staffers and a consulting firm based in Zambia that works closely with USADF contend that the Trump administration's efforts to deeply scale back the agency wrongly usurps Congress' powers. They also say Marocco was unlawfully appointed to the board, in part because he was never confirmed by the Senate as required. Leon's ruling in Brehm's case did not address whether the Trump administration had the power to install Marocco as board chair on a temporary basis.