Exclusive-Jordan wins Trump aid carve-out for strategic projects and support
AMMAN (Reuters) - Millions of dollars in U.S. grants for Jordan's largest water desalination project abruptly dried up when President Donald Trump announced sweeping cuts to foreign aid in January.
Within two months, support was flowing again, a result of diplomacy that has arguably put the pivotal Middle Eastern state on more solid financial footing than before the U.S. president's shock move to reshape global foreign aid in January, conversations with more than 20 sources in Jordan and the United States reveal.
Jordan - which stands behind only Ukraine, Israel and Ethiopia among the largest recipients of U.S. aid globally - has won assurances from Washington that the bulk of financing worth at least $1.45 billion annually remains intact, including military and direct budgetary support, according to Reuters conversations with the sources.
Most of the sources, including Jordanian officials, diplomats, regional security officials, U.S. officials and contractors involved in U.S. aid projects asked not to be named to discuss sensitive ongoing diplomatic discussions.
Four of them said payments resumed in March to U.S. firm CDM Smith, which USAID tasked with overseeing the $6 billion Aqaba-Amman Water Desalination and Conveyance Project, seen as key to the self-sufficiency of the arid kingdom.
The United States has for decades relied on Jordan to help achieve its goals in the Middle East, including during the Iraq War and as a partner in the fight against al Qaeda in the region. Jordan hosts U.S. forces under a treaty allowing them to deploy at its bases. The CIA works closely with Amman's intelligence services.
Although several sources said much of the $430 million annual assistance for development programs remains frozen, hitting education and health projects, Molly Hickey, a Harvard-doctoral researcher studying U.S. aid and Jordan's political landscape, said these areas are seen as less strategically important.
"Trump has protected funding considered critical to Jordan's stability, namely defense, water, and direct budget support,' said Hickey, citing contacts with U.S. officials that corroborate Reuters' findings.
A U.S. State Department spokesperson confirmed Jordan's military aid was intact, calling Jordan a strong U.S. partner with a critical role for regional security.
A decision has now been taken to continue U.S. Foreign Military Financing to all recipients, after Secretary of State Marco Rubio completed his review of foreign assistance awarded by State and USAID, the spokesperson said.
The assurances to Jordan, extended during visits by King Abdullah and Prime Minister Jafaar Hassan to Washington in recent weeks, have not previously been reported, and appear to mark a reversal of Trump's earlier warning he could target Jordan's aid if the country did not agree to take in large numbers of refugees under a proposal to turn Gaza into a beach resort.
In a private White House meeting in February, Trump assured King Abdullah that U.S. aid would not be used as leverage for political concessions, two U.S. and two Jordanian officials familiar with the matter told Reuters.
The State Department spokesperson declined to comment on "ongoing negotiations." The White House said questions on the issue should be directed to State.
Senior White House aides met in recent weeks to discuss the fate of Jordan's financing, three officials with knowledge of the situation told Reuters, concluding that the kingdom's stability was critical to U.S. national security. There was agreement in the meetings that aid should be restructured and enhanced to directly support that goal, one of the officials said.
None of the sources described specific concessions by Jordan, instead pointing to its position as a stable ally whose longstanding peace deal with neighbour Israel and deep ties to Palestinians were a bulwark against wider Middle East conflict.
"We appreciate the U.S. economic and financial support and will continue to engage in discussions that will benefit the economic sectors of both countries," Jordan's Minister of State for Communications Mohammad al Momani told Reuters in response to a question about Hassan's talks and whether Jordan's lobbying to maintain critical aid was paying off.
ISLAMISTS OUTLAWED
A financial squeeze on Jordan does not serve U.S. interests, given the kingdom's vulnerability to 'radical influences,' said one senior Jordanian official, referring to Islamist group the Muslim Brotherhood as well as Iran's funding of militants in the region.
Last week, Jordan outlawed the Muslim Brotherhood, a political movement that gave rise to Hamas. Jordan accuses its members of a major sabotage plot.
The plot was announced on April 15, the same day Hassan met with U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio. One official told Reuters the threat of political Islam and the Muslim Brotherhood was discussed at the meeting. Reuters could not establish whether they discussed banning the group.
Another senior official and a regional intelligence official said economic pressure risked unrest among a population angered by the government's treaty with Israel and its pro-Western stance.
That view was bolstered by the foiled sabotage plot, the intelligence official said.
While Washington has moved to restore some World Food Program food projects to countries including Jordan, few of the USAID-led projects including those promoting political and economic reform have been brought back.
"Ensuring we have the right mix of programs to support U.S. national security and other core national interests of the United States requires an agile approach. We will continue to make changes as needed," the State Department spokesperson said.
The largest component of U.S. aid to Jordan is some $850 million in direct budget support, agreed under a seven year strategic partnership signed in 2022. Government ministers had fretted in private that this money was at risk
"Eliminating that support would significantly worsen our deficit and debt burden," former Planning Minister Wissam Rabadi said in televised remarks. "Today we face a deficit, and losing $800 million would be devastating."
However, five of the sources, including two U.S. sources, told Reuters that Washington has now assured Amman this year's support, due in December and already factored into the $18 billion national budget, would not be touched.
SHAKEN BY TRUMP
Shaken by Trump's threats, Jordan has simultaneously been locking down further assistance from other allies.
It has turned to Europe, Gulf neighbours and multilateral lenders since Trump unveiled the global aid freeze in a January 20 memo, with the State Department initially offering waivers only for military aid to Egypt and Israel.
Last week, King Abdullah visited Mohammed bin Salman, crown prince of Jordan's larger Arabian peninsula neighbour Saudi Arabia. One senior Jordanian official abreast of the discussions said Riyadh was considering a military aid package to strengthen Jordan's defense capabilities.
Ties with Saudi Arabia have been strained in recent years, and it has not previously provided military aid. The official did not give a sense of the potential scale of the package.
The Saudi government media office and Jordan's army spokesman did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Two officials and a senior Western diplomat familiar with the talks with the IMF said the government was close to finalizing a sustainability agreement with the IMF to supplement its existing $1.2 billion, four-year EFF program.
The new arrangement could unlock as much as an additional $750 million in tranches, they added. The IMF declined to comment.
Other negotiations have already yielded results: 3 billion euros over three years from the European Union, announced days after Trump's aid cuts by European Commission head Ursula von der Leyen, who cited 'geopolitical shifts;' $1.1 bln in fresh financing from the World Bank and a $690 million package from the Kuwait-based Arab Fund for Economic and Social Development, both approved in April.
Domestically, Prime Minister Hassan has been rallying corporations and business leaders to contribute to a national fund, raising over $100 million to relieve pressure on government finances.
"Jordan's economy has largely weathered the storm," said Raad Mahmoud Al Tal, the head of economics faculty at Jordan University. The government's lobbying "allowed it to retain the bulk of core aid and even get bigger donor packages beyond what was anticipated."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
17 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump tax law could cause Medicare cuts if Congress doesn't act, CBO says
WASHINGTON — The federal budget deficits caused by President Trump's tax and spending law could trigger automatic cuts to Medicare if Congress does not act, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office reported Friday. The CBO estimates that Medicare, the federal health insurance program for Americans over age 65, could potentially see as much as $491 billion in cuts from 2027 to 2034 if Congress does not act to mitigate a 2010 law that forces across-the-board cuts to many federal programs once legislation increases the federal deficit. The latest report from CBO showed how Trump's signature tax and spending law could put new pressure on federal programs that are bedrocks of the American social safety net. Trump and Republicans pledged not to cut Medicare as part of the legislation, but the estimated $3.4 trillion that the law adds to the federal deficit over the next decade means that many Medicare programs could see cuts. In the past, Congress has always acted to mitigate cuts to Medicare and other programs, but it would take some bipartisan cooperation to do so. Democrats, who requested the analysis from CBO, jumped on the potential cuts. 'Republicans knew their tax breaks for billionaires would force over half a trillion dollars in Medicare cuts — and they did it anyway,' Rep. Brendan Boyle of Pennsylvania, the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee, said in a statement. 'American families simply cannot afford Donald Trump's attacks on Medicare, Medicaid and Obamacare.' Hospitals in rural parts of the country are already grappling with cuts to Medicaid, which is available to people with low incomes, and cuts to Medicare could exacerbate their shortfalls. As Republicans muscled the bill through Congress and are now selling it to voters back home, they have been critical of how the CBO has analyzed the bill. They have also argued that the tax cuts will spur economic growth and pointed to $50 billion in funding for rural hospitals that was included in the package. Groves writes for the Associated Press.
The Hill
17 minutes ago
- The Hill
CEO of paid protest company says it works with both sides of the aisle
(NewsNation) — President Trump alleged Friday that Democrats are paying protesters to fight his Washington, D.C., crime policies. But how do paid protests actually work? NewsNation spoke with Adam Swart, the CEO of Crowds on Demand, about his company that provides services 'for impactful advocacy campaigns, demonstrations, PR stunts, crowds for hire and corporate events,' according to its website. 'All of our protesters are sincere advocates for the cause at hand. We've been in business 13 years, so we have a large roster of people we know and have networks of others we can call upon to be compensated for expressing their sincere points of view,' Swart said. Swart said compensation for protests is typically in the low hundreds of dollars, depending on the assignment. He said organizing a protest 'is like buying an ad.' He said his company receives requests for both conservative and liberal causes. 'We have been clear that we work with both liberals and conservatives on causes that align with common-sense values. Democrats are hiring our company, and so are Republicans,' he said. He did not disclose what protests his company has been asked to be a part of. Swart previously told NewsNation that he turned down $20 million to provide protesters for ' Good Trouble Lives On ' protests in July. 'I'm rejecting it not because I don't want to take the business, but because frankly, this is going to be ineffective; it's going to make us all look bad,' Swart said of the anti-Trump protests at the time.
San Francisco Chronicle
17 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Judge denies Trump administration request to end a policy protecting immigrant children in custody
McALLEN, Texas (AP) — A federal judge ruled Friday to deny the Trump administration's request to end a policy in place for nearly three decades that is meant to protect immigrant children in federal custody. U.S. District Judge Dolly Gee in Los Angeles issued her ruling a week after holding a hearing with the federal government and legal advocates representing immigrant children in custody. Gee called last week's hearing 'déjà vu' after reminding the court of the federal government's attempt to terminate the Flores Settlement Agreement in 2019 under the first Trump administration. She repeated the sentiment in Friday's order. 'There is nothing new under the sun regarding the facts or the law. The Court therefore could deny Defendants' motion on that basis alone," Gee wrote, referring to the government's appeal to a law they believed kept the court from enforcing the agreement. In the most recent attempt, the government argued they made substantial changes since the agreement was formalized in 1997, creating standards and policies governing the custody of immigrant children that conform to legislation and the agreement. Gee acknowledged that the government made some improved conditions of confinement, but wrote, 'These improvements are direct evidence that the FSA is serving its intended purpose, but to suggest that the agreement should be abandoned because some progress has been made is nonsensical.' Attorneys representing the federal government told the court the agreement gets in the way of their efforts to expand detention space for families, even though Trump's tax and spending bill provided billions to build new immigration facilities. Tiberius Davis, one of the government attorneys, said the bill gives the government authority to hold families in detention indefinitely. 'But currently under the Flores Settlement Agreement, that's essentially void,' he said last week. The Flores agreement, named for a teenage plaintiff, was the result of over a decade of litigation between attorneys representing the rights of migrant children and the U.S. government over widespread allegations of mistreatment in the 1980s. The agreement set standards for how licensed shelters must provide food, water, adult supervision, emergency medical services, toilets, sinks, temperature control and ventilation. It also limited how long U.S. Customs and Border Protection could detain child immigrants to 72 hours. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services then takes custody of the children. The Biden administration successfully pushed to partially end the agreement last year. Gee ruled that special court supervision may end when HHS takes custody, but she carved out exceptions for certain types of facilities for children with more acute needs. In arguing against the Trump administration's effort to completely end the agreement, advocates said the government was holding children beyond the time limits. In May, CBP held 46 children for over a week, including six children held for over two weeks and four children held 19 days, according to data revealed in a court filing. In March and April, CPB reported that it had 213 children in custody for more than 72 hours. That included 14 children, including toddlers, who were held for over 20 days in April. The federal government is looking to expand its immigration detention space, including by building more centers like one in Florida dubbed ' Alligator Alcatraz,' where a lawsuit alleges detainees' constitutional rights are being violated. Gee still has not ruled on the request by legal advocates for the immigrant children to expand independent monitoring of the treatment of children held in U.S. Customs and Border Protection facilities. Currently, the agreement allows for third-party inspections at facilities in the El Paso and Rio Grande Valley regions, but plaintiffs submitted evidence showing long detention times at border facilities that violate the agreement's terms.
