Markets are shrugging off the Israel-Iran conflict. Some strategists warn of complacency
Global investors may be underpricing the impact of a conflict between Israel and Iran, market watchers warned on Monday, as stocks rallied despite escalating warfare in the Middle East.
The two regional powers continued trading fire on Monday, marking the fourth consecutive day of fighting since Israel launched airstrikes against Iran last week.
Despite the continued fighting — with hundreds reported dead — global stock markets sustained a positive momentum on Monday, seemingly shrugging off broader concerns about the conflict.
Russ Mould, investment director at AJ Bell, warned on Monday that there was a risk markets were underpricing "the risk of a major conflagration in the Middle East," particularly when it comes to the energy market.
European shares opened broadly higher on Monday, with Asia-Pacific stocks and U.S. stock futures also trading in the green. Even Middle Eastern indexes saw gains on Monday, with the Tel Aviv 35 index last seen trading 1% higher after falling 1.5% last week.
"This is partly because there are so many moving parts and geopolitical considerations, and partly because the potential outcomes are so unthinkable," Mould said. "In a worst case, oil and share prices would be the least of our worries."
In a Monday morning note, David Roche, a strategist at Quantum Strategy, warned that the conflict between Israel and Iran "will last longer than the Israeli lightning-strikes that the market is used to."
Torbjorn Soltvedtp, principal Middle East analyst at Verisk Maplecroft, agreed, saying an escalation remained of "huge concern."
"What we have now is very different, and what we're seeing is effectively a war and an open-ended one," he told CNBC's "Squawk Box Europe."
"And of course, that is something that has huge implications, not just for the region, but also for energy markets and how they interpret what is happening. You know, minute by minute and day by day."
Energy markets have moved the most on news of the attacks, as the Israel-Iran conflict stoked supply concerns.While Friday marked the biggest single-day gain for crude since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, however, global benchmark Brent crude futures — last seen at $73.75 a barrel — were still far below the prices seen in the aftermath of Moscow's incursion into Ukrainian territory.
"A lull is the most likely outcome before later escalation when Iran rejects US Trump's overtures," Roche said. "The market is likely to mistake the lull for lasting peace. I would use the lull to buy into energy assets as a safe haven."
Some market watchers are taking a somewhat less pessimistic view, however.
In a note on Monday, Deutsche Bank's Jim Reid noted that while both Iran and Israel had traded retaliatory blows, they had so far avoided "the most extreme escalatory steps."
"As geopolitical shocks are becoming more frequent it seems it's now at least a yearly occurrence that we refer to our equity strategists' work on the impact of such shocks and how long it takes for the market to recover from them," he said."The typical pattern is for the S&P 500 to pull back about -6% in 3 weeks after the shock but then rally all the way back in another 3," Reid said. "[Our strategists] believe this incident will likely be milder than this unless we get notable escalation as they highlight that equity positioning is already underweight … and a -6% selloff would need it to fall all the way to the bottom of its usual range."
Philippe Gijsels, chief strategy officer at BNP Paribas Fortis, told CNBC on Monday that he feels the market is correct in not pricing a huge escalation, such as the U.S. being drawn into the fray, or a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz.
The Strait of Hormuz, nestled between Iran and Oman, is a vital oil transit route through which millions of barrels of oil are transported every day.
"Still, the market reaction has been very modest, so there is room for disappointment if things were to escalate," Gijsels conceded on Monday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
H.C. Wainwright Maintains a Buy Rating on Agios Pharmaceuticals (AGIO), Reduces PT
Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:AGIO) is one of the 10 Best Small-Cap Growth Stocks to Buy According to Analysts. On June 9, Analyst Emily Bodnar of H.C. Wainwright maintained a Buy rating on Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:AGIO) and reduced the price target from $61 to $56. The reiteration comes after the company announced its commercial and distribution agreement with Avanzanite for its drug Pyrukynd in Europe, Switzerland, and the UK. The analyst said that the recent agreement of Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:AGIO) with Avanzanite mirrors its previously successful collaboration in the Gulf region. The agreement will enable the company to concentrate on the US market while leveraging Avanzanite's expertise in European rare disease markets. Moreover, Pyrukynd has already been approved for pyruvate kinase deficiency and is expected to receive FDA approval for thalassemia and potentially EMA approval in 2026. A technician in a lab looks off into the distance, showcasing the research taking place at Agios Pharmaceuticals. Analyst Emily Bodnar lowered the price target due to the agreement's revenue split which initially benefits Avanzanite. However, Bodnar views it as a capital-efficient way to accelerate Agios' entry and revenue growth in Europe. Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:AGIO) is a biopharmaceutical company specializing in developing innovative therapies for patients with rare diseases. Its main product, Pyrukynd (mitapivat), is the first disease-modifying treatment for adults with pyruvate kinase deficiency, a form of hemolytic anemia. While we acknowledge the potential of AGIO as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
No, prosperity doesn't cause population collapse
For years, it was treated as a demographic law: as countries grow wealthier, they have fewer children. Prosperity, it was believed, inevitably drove birth rates down. This assumption shaped countless forecasts about the future of the global population. And in many wealthy countries, such as South Korea and Italy, very low fertility rates persist. But a growing body of research is challenging the idea that rising prosperity always suppresses fertility. University of Pennsylvania economist Jesús Fernández-Villaverde recently observed that middle-income countries are now experiencing lower total fertility rates than many advanced economies ever have. His latest work shows that Thailand and Colombia each have fertility rates around 1.0 births per woman, which is even lower than rates in well-known low-fertility advanced economies such as Japan, Spain and Italy. 'My conjecture is that by 2060 or so, we might see rich economies as a group with higher [total fertility rates] than emerging economies,' Fernández-Villaverde predicts. This changing relationship between prosperity and fertility is already apparent in Europe. For many years, wealthier European countries tended to have lower birth rates than poorer ones. That pattern weakened around 2017, and by 2021 it had flipped. This change fits a broader historical pattern. Before the Industrial Revolution, wealthier families generally had more children. The idea that prosperity leads to smaller families is a modern development. Now, in many advanced economies, that trend is weakening or reversing. The way that prosperity influences fertility is changing yet again. Wealth and family size are no longer pulling in opposite directions. This shift also calls into question long-standing assumptions about women's income and fertility. For years, many economists thought that higher salaries discouraged women from having children by raising the opportunity cost of taking time off work. That no longer seems to hold in many countries. In several high-income nations, rising female earnings are now associated with higher fertility. Studies in Italy and the Netherlands show that couples where both partners earn well are more likely to have children, while low-income couples are the least likely to do so. Similar findings have emerged from Sweden as well. In Norway, too, higher-earning women now tend to have more babies. This trend is not limited to Europe. In the United States, richer families are also beginning to have more babies than poorer ones, reversing patterns observed in previous decades. A study of seven countries — including the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany and Australia — found that in every case, higher incomes for both men and women increased the chances of having a child. This growing body of evidence challenges the assumption that prosperity causes people to have fewer children. Still, birth rates are falling across much of the world, with many countries now below replacement level. While this trend raises serious concerns, such as the risk of an aging and less innovative population and widening gaps in public pension solvency, it is heartening that it is not driven by prosperity itself. Wealth does not automatically lead to fewer children, and theories blaming consumerism or rising living standards no longer hold up. Although the recent shift in the relationship between prosperity and fertility is welcome, it is not yet enough to raise fertility to the replacement rate of around 2.1 children per woman — a challenging threshold to reach. But the growing number of policymakers around the world concerned about falling fertility can consider many simple, freedom-enhancing reforms that lower barriers to raising a family, including reforms to education, housing and childcare. Still, it's important to challenge the common assumption that prosperity inevitably leads to lower birth rates: Wealth does not always mean fewer children. Chelsea Follett is managing editor of a project of the Cato Institute, and a policy analyst in Cato's Center for Global Liberty & Prosperity.
Forbes
33 minutes ago
- Forbes
4 Challenges Shaping Risk Management In Banking And How To Tackle Them
Dimitar Dimitrov is the founder and Managing Partner at Accedia, a leading European AI & Custom Software Development Company. Gone are the days when CIOs focused solely on infrastructure. As today's CIO, you're expected to drive innovation and shape the direction of the bank in a tech-driven world. A key part of this shift is rethinking how risks are identified, handled and anticipated. As a leader, you must navigate a tough mix of regulations, security threats and growing customer expectations. While some see this as pressure, it can also be a chance to make bold moves, treating challenges as a driver of growth and digital transformation. This article, which should serve as a strategic guide for CIOs, explores how risk management in banking is evolving through AI, automation and alignment between technology and business objectives, helping you respond to today's demands and prepare for those ahead. Risk is no longer confined to a compliance checklist. These four challenges highlight how the landscape is changing and what you can do about it: Regulatory tolerance in the banking sector has narrowed significantly in recent years. With governments stepping up oversight—think of Consumer Financial Protection Act (CFPA)'s Section 1033, for example, or Basel updates—is more demanding than ever. Regulators are placing greater emphasis on broad principles, fairness, transparency and ethical treatment of customers, rather than on following rules. This implies that even technically compliant systems can come under scrutiny if they enable practices perceived as misleading or biased. The most effective way to keep pace is to embed compliance into technology architecture from the start. That means using platforms where rules can be updated through configurable workflows, not hardcoded logic. Tools that support explainable AI, generate full audit trails automatically and manage user activity logs create an accountable environment. Equally important is reducing manual intervention wherever possible. Automating compliance checks, transaction validations and approval workflows minimizes the risk of human error, a growing liability in environments under heavy scrutiny. The result is faster deployment of digital services, fewer blocked releases due to regulatory review and a more flexible response to policy shifts. As digital banking expands, so does the attack surface, turning every new channel or integration point into a potential vulnerability. The stakes are high: 62% of customers lose trust after a breach, and nearly half stop using the bank altogether. To prevent that, you need to incorporate risk considerations well before a new service or feature is rolled out. The earlier you embed controls like identity verification, access management and behavioral monitoring into digital workflows, the lower the risk of exposure once those systems go live. One such example is Standard Chartered. The bank integrated AI models into their name and transaction screening workflows to detect anomalies in real time. Instead of relying on manual post-event reviews, now they identify threats as they occur. It's a strategic shift that requires aligning technology with risk, meaning choosing vendors and designing workflows that support early threat detection and automated safeguards. Technology is opening the door to smarter, faster ways to navigate risk. Banks now have greater visibility in customer behavior, and paired with scalable AI models, they can leverage those insights for threat prevention. At Accedia, we saw this firsthand in our work with a UK-based bank. To strengthen their cybersecurity strategy and KYC compliance, we integrated an AI-powered identity verification model using computer vision to authenticate documents and facial data in real time. Additionally, we developed an AI-driven fraud detection system, leveraging predictive analytics to identify anomalies in transactional behavior as they happen, resulting in 28% fewer false positives, a two-times faster response to threats and 35% decrease in manual workload for compliance teams. What stood out was how specific improvements uncovered weaknesses in the overall risk approach. To adopt AI-driven risk management for banks effectively, start by reviewing internal processes. Are decisions delayed by outdated tools? Is data siloed? Are risk signals acted on too late? Map the lifecycle of high-risk decisions and target tech initiatives that address bottlenecks while aligning with business goals. A centralized data lake, for instance, can eliminate data fragmentation and support а long-term analytics strategy. Real-time monitoring tools detect threats faster and reduce time-to-market for new services. Focus on actions that improve visibility, streamline workflows and lower reliance on manual work, instead of adopting tools without a clear strategic fit. While technological advances help organizations move faster, they also raise expectations, turning customer behavior into a major source of pressure. Today's customers want instant credit decisions, fast onboarding and personalized services across digital channels. Far from being a background concern, these expectations directly influence how banks engage, compete and grow. According to Accenture, banking institutions with the most loyal and satisfied customers achieve revenue growth nearly 1.7 times faster than their competitors. To meet new standards, banks may need to rethink their entire organization around customer experience. From a risk perspective, this creates two challenges. The first is speed. Customers anticipate instant credit decisions, approvals and onboarding, leaving little room for manual checks or lengthy reviews. The second is complexity. As services become more personalized, the processes behind them involve more data and, respectively, greater scrutiny from regulators. To manage both, understand where in the customer journey risk is introduced. Then implement measures like explainable AI, traceable logic and selective human oversight. This allows you to deliver the responsiveness customers expect while maintaining control where needed. Risk management in banking is no longer about ticking boxes. It's about making informed decisions at the right time, across every layer of the organization. That requires embedding risk thinking into digital workflows, using automation and data where it adds value and building systems that are secure from the ground up. The goal isn't just to adapt to change—but to shape it in a way that supports growth, earns customer trust and builds long-term resilience. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
