
Congress Party Launches Organisational Revival Campaign in Madhya Pradesh After Electoral Defeats
Published : Jun 05, 2025 11:47 IST - 8 MINS READ
On June 3, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi addressed a packed auditorium in Bhopal's Ravindra Bhawan. The audience comprised leaders and workers from the Madhya Pradesh unit of the party and the occasion was the launch of the party's ambitious plan to restructure and re-energise its organisation in the politically crucial Hindi heartland State.
Addressing the gathering, Gandhi said: 'The talent needed to defeat the BJP is present right here in this room. But your hands are tied. Your voice is not heard in the organisation.' The statement was greeted with a loud roar.
The remark was apt since the event marked the launch of the party's 'Sangathan Srijan Abhiyan' (campaign to rejuvenate the organisation), which will focus on appointing a new set of district presidents and empowering them in an effort to decentralise decision-making.
'We want to transform the party, and a beginning will be made at the level of the district president. We want to bring in people who are totally committed to the party and are energetic,' Gandhi said.
He further said: 'Race ke ghode ko aur baraat ke ghode ko alag karna padega [we will have to segregate race horses from show horses]...ek aur kism ka ghoda hota hai, langda ghoda, jise hum retire karenge [there is also a third category of horses, lame horses, who we will retire].'
The principal opposition party has declared that 2025 will be dedicated to reviving its organisation, with Madhya Pradesh among the focus States. The choice is significant, as the party is locked in a direct contest with the BJP here—a contest it is increasingly finding difficult to win.
The Congress dominated in Madhya Pradesh between 1957 and 1998, winning seven State elections. Chhattisgarh was carved out of Madhya Pradesh on November 1, 2000. Between 2000 and 2023, the Congress won only once, in 2018. The Congress government which was then formed under the chief ministership of Kamal Nath fell in 2020 when Jyotiraditya Scindia, along with MLAs loyal to him, left the Congress and joined the BJP.
Also Read | What do you do with a 'Congress'man like Tharoor?
In the 2023 Assembly election, the Congress won only 66 out of the 230 Legislative Assembly seats. In the 2024 Lok Sabha election, the party could not win even one of the 29 seats in the State, losing even Chhindwara, the Kamal Nath stronghold that had so far resisted the BJP's advance.
The Vidisha factor
In fact, Vidisha district, where the State unit of the party has launched a parallel programme to revive the grassroots organisation, offers a microcosm of the party's problems in Madhya Pradesh.
Vidisha Lok Sabha constituency in Madhya Pradesh has been a saffron stronghold since it came into being in 1967. In the 1991 parliamentary election, BJP stalwart Atal Bihari Vajpayee reclaimed the Vidisha seat with a decisive victory, ending the eight-year interlude during which Congress leader Pratap Bhanu Sharma had represented the constituency in the Lok Sabha. Vajpayee vacated Vidisha, opting to be an MP from Lucknow. The seat has since then been won by top BJP leaders such as Shivraj Singh Chouhan and Sushma Swaraj.
The story is not very different in the Assembly election, where the BJP has again dominated the proceedings. In the 2023 State election, out of the eight Legislative Assembly segments in the Vidisha Lok Sabha seat, the BJP won seven, and the Congress won only one. The Congress has won the Vidisha Assembly segment only twice since the 1960s. Although it held the Budhni Assembly constituency—part of the Vidisha Lok Sabha seat—for four consecutive terms beginning in 1980, Shivraj Singh Chouhan broke this streak in 1990, and the party has failed to reclaim the seat since.
Vidisha tells a story of how it is becoming increasingly difficult for the Congress to defeat the BJP in direct contests in the Hindi heartland. It also shows how staying out of power for long makes it very difficult to stage a comeback.
It is in Vidisha that the Congress has now launched a pilot project to revive its organisation. It also believes that the experience in the district will provide a blueprint for restructuring the State unit. If the Vidisha plan is successful, it will be replicated in the other 54 districts in the State.
The party is working to create a new level of functionaries at the grassroots—a panchayat committee in the rural areas and a ward committee in the urban centres. Vidisha has 577 gram panchayats and 139 urban wards. The Vidisha project began on May 22 and was expected to go on for around a month.
The panchayat committee and the ward committee, with 14 members each, would form a new level in the party hierarchy in addition to the existing three levels—sector, mandalam and booth. Congress veteran Kamal Nath had introduced the mandalam level when he took over as State Congress president in 2018.
'Around 100 trained observers have fanned out in Vidisha to identify workers, leaders and non-aligned individuals who are committed to the Congress's ideology and are capable of taking the party's message to the people. These observers will also study the issues that hamper the party's work on the ground,' said Manoj Kapoor, State Congress secretary and in charge of Vidisha.
The exercise is also expected to help the party identify workers who can be included in frontal organisations such as the Youth Congress and the Mahila Congress.
'Vidisha used to be a BJP stronghold, and we had succeeded in breaking the trend. However, things changed after Atalji came here and won the seat. I am hopeful that now, with the party focusing on reviving the organisation, we can make a comeback in Vidisha and elsewhere in the State,' said State Congress Vice President Pratap Bhanu Sharma, who won the Vidisha Lok Sabha seat in 1980 and 1984 before it swung back to the BJP.
Simultaneously, the AICC has launched the 'Sangathan Srijan Abhiyan' to revive the organisation and empower the functionaries at the lower rungs of the party. A total of 61 observers have been appointed by the AICC who will for the next three months camp in the districts assigned to them, and they have been given the task of understanding the strengths and weaknesses in the party's functioning at that level.
The exercise is in keeping with the Congress leadership's avowed focus on decentralising decision-making by empowering the district presidents and making the District Congress Committees the main centre of activities such as providing inputs on selection of candidates and planning outreach programmes. A special meeting of the Congress Working Committee in Belagavi, Karnataka on December 26, 2024, and the AICC Session in Ahmedabad on April 9, 2025 resolved that the year 2025 would be utilised by the party as 'a year of organisational empowerment'.
Gandhi has selected Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh as model States to carry out an organisational revamp. What is common between the two States from the Congress's point of view is that elections in both the States are a direct contest between the Congress and the BJP and the organisation in both the States has been weakened considerably over the last few decades. Devoid of power, the Congress has found it difficult in the two States to enthuse its workers while many leaders have left the party to join the BJP.
'A major task for the observers is to identify workers and leaders who are committed to the party and those who are not. There are around 28 lakh Congress workers in Madhya Pradesh. However, there are many workers who may not be very active on the ground or working for the organisation 24x7. There are also many workers who are aligned to leaders rather than the party. For example, there were workers who were loyal to Jyotiraditya Scindia and left with him,' said Sanjay Kamle, State Congress general secretary and State in charge of organisation.
The central observers, aided by a team of State-level observers selected by Madhya Pradesh Congress, will identify party functionaries working on the ground who can be appointed as district presidents.
Also Read | What the caste census could do to Bihar's election math
'The Congress organisation becomes active only on the eve of elections. We want to put in place a team that should always be active. They should be alive to the issues of the people. The people are really upset with the Modi government. There are issues of unemployment and price rise. The BJP's attempts to take credit for Operation Sindoor is not going down well with the people. The only way to tap this anger is going to the people at the district level,' said Sharma.
The appointment of Patwari, known to be close to Gandhi, was seen as marking the end of the dominance of leaders like Nath and former Chief Minister Digvijaya Singh. Rajasthan Congress leader Harish Chaudhary, also known to enjoy the confidence of Gandhi, was appointed as AICC in charge of the State. However, Patwari is said to be facing resistance from other leaders and bringing different factions together is a big challenge for him.
'Factions are there in every party, and until a certain point, the competition between them is actually good for the party. After all, everyone is working under the party flag. However, if it begins to harm the interests of the party, there is definitely a problem. Our government fell because of this. However, right now, factionalism is not such a serious issue. The main issue for us is survival,' said Kamle.
It is an uphill task for the Congress to rebuild its organisation in Madhya Pradesh and tougher still to get its house in order.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Wire
18 minutes ago
- The Wire
Justice, Speech and Selective Outrage: The Supreme Court's Contempt Dilemma
Menu हिंदी తెలుగు اردو Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion Support independent journalism. Donate Now Law Justice, Speech and Selective Outrage: The Supreme Court's Contempt Dilemma Rekha Sharma 4 minutes ago The Supreme Court's swift move to initiate contempt proceedings against journalist Ajay Shukla for a critical YouTube video contrasts sharply with the way BJP MP Nishikant Dubey was handled. Nishikant Dubey (left) and Ajay Shukla in the background. In the foreground is the Supreme Court. Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute now On May 30, a Supreme Court bench headed by the Chief Justice of India initiated suo motu criminal contempt proceedings against Ajay Shukla, a Chandigarh-based journalist, for posting a video on YouTube allegedly containing scathing and scandalous remarks against some senior judges of the Supreme Court. The bench observed that though the Constitution guarantees to every citizen the right to freedom of speech and expression, this is subject to reasonable restrictions and that such a right does not permit someone to defame a judge or bring into disrepute the institution of the judiciary. Having said so, the court directed that the offending video be taken down forthwith. It also asked the Attorney General and the Solicitor General to assist the court on the next date of hearing. Though the video is no longer available, it is widely believed that contain some allegedly objectionable remarks against Justice Surya Kant, who is next in line for the Chief Justiceship, and Justice Bela M. Trivedi, who retired mid-May. It may be stated, at the very outset, that the dignity, majesty and honour of the Supreme Court, or for that matter any court of justice must be protected at all cost by every person including by the Supreme Court itself. That said, fair criticism of a judicial decision and the conduct of a judge – provided it is done in good faith and on accurate facts – also needs to be equally protected. In this background, while no one can question the right and the prerogative of the Supreme Court to initiate criminal contempt proceedings against Shukla, the action taken has given rise to certain questions. Not very long ago, highly objectionable and vicious remarks were made by Nishikant Dubey, a Lok Sabha member of the ruling party, against the then CJI, Justice Sanjiv Khanna. Dubey held him singularly responsible for all the alleged 'civil wars' in the country. He also alleged that the Supreme Court was taking the country towards anarchy. These remarks were not only highly toxic and outrageous, they had the potential to rock the very foundation of our judicial system and erode the people's faith in the judiciary and almost bordered on 'blasphemy'. And yet, even though the fountain head of the judiciary was personally targeted, it neither caused any stir nor a ripple. There was a sphinx like silence. No judge deemed it fit to issue any suo motu criminal contempt notice against the errant MP. It was the Supreme Court Bar Association which raised its voice, and urged the Attorney General to grant consent for initiating contempt proceedings against Dubey. The AG neither on his own nor on the request of the Bar Association has till date given or declined to give his consent. This, despite the fact that he as the first law officer of the country, has a duty to uphold the dignity and majesty of the court of which he is an integral part. It ultimately fell on the lot of Justice Khanna himself to give a befitting response to the likes of Dubey. Though the bench headed by him dismissed a petition which sought contempt action against the MP, he gave a very measured and dignified response to him. Holding that the comments were highly irresponsible and reflected a penchant to attract attention by casting aspersions on the Supreme Court and its judges, he wrote that the courts are not so fragile as flowers to wither and wilt under such ludicrous statements. He further observed, 'We do not believe that the confidence and the credibility of the courts in the eyes of the public can be shaken by such statements'. Kudos to Justice Sanjiv Khanna for such a befitting response. Going by media reports, Justice Bela Trivedi has not been given a farewell by the Supreme Court Bar Association. The CJI is reported to have expressed his disapproval over the decision of the Bar Association, and so has Justice A.G. Masih, who said that tradition must be followed. It is for the first time in the history of the Supreme Court that such a tradition has been broken. The bar, it is said, is the judge of the judges. It is not for nothing that Justice Bela Trivedi has been denied the honour of a farewell by the bar. The question is why did things come to such a pass? It should set both bench and bar thinking. Undoubtedly, a long standing tradition has been broken but, then, judgeship is not a blank cheque. It comes with responsibility. The bar not only helps judges make the justice delivery system work, it also acts as a watchdog. The bar has, by its action, sent a loud and clear message. It is time for judges to remember that they too are under watch. They may, in a given case, fail to grasp some suspected hidden meaning of a column written in English by an Oxford educated professor and leave the job of deciphering it to some police officer, and that too not from a particular state. But if they fail to take action against a minister who made a highly objectionable statement in simple and understandable Hindi, it does raise eyebrows. It is in such matters that the bar has to play its role. And, if it does play its role, there should be no protest. Rekha Sharma is a former judge of the Delhi high court. This piece was first published on The India Cable – a premium newsletter from The Wire & Galileo Ideas – and has been updated and republished here. To subscribe to The India Cable, click here. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Make a contribution to Independent Journalism Related News Central Hall | Governors Increasingly Acting like Political Agents as Constitutional Morality Erodes 'Same Sex Marriage Not Legalised But Couples Can Very Well Form A Family': Madras HC Indian Astronaut Shubhanshu Shukla-led Mission to International Space Station Pushed to June 10 'Highly Irresponsible': BJP MP Nishikant Dubey Faces Supreme Court Wrath Why the Process of 44 MLAs 'Forming the Government' in Manipur Is Not Straightforward US Supreme Court Rules $1.29 Bn Lawsuit Against ISRO-Owned Antrix to Proceed Modi-Shah Face Dilemma As Their Stormtroopers Cross All Limits of Propriety The Arrest and Trial of Professor Azaan M Free Speech on Eggshells: What the Ali Khan Mahmudabad Case Signals for All of Us About Us Contact Us Support Us © Copyright. All Rights Reserved.


Deccan Herald
24 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
Stampede politics, surrender barb, and a billionaire break-up!
Hello Readers! The week that went by was a tumultuous one in political circles. A victory parade turned into tragedy with political mudslinging taking precedence thereafter, a 'surrender-' barb opened up a Pandora's box while a Bharat Mata picture in Kerala's Raj Bhavan ruffled a few feathers. The week also saw the break-up of two-most influential personalities in the world of business and trade. Here's a quick recap of the week's action in DH Political Theatre.. Stampede did not take much time for ecstasy to turn into agony as Royal Challengers Bengaluru's (RCB) maiden Indian Premier League (IPL) triumph and the resultant celebrations turned haywire last week with 11 lives lost due to a stampede near the Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bengaluru. But what followed after the stampede was sheer innuendo and political mudslinging which would put everyone into shame. While BJP, which is the principal opposition party in Karnataka, flayed the ruling Congress for giving the nod to victory celebrations at such a short notice despite being warned against the same by the police, the ruling party allowed the situation to go from bad to worse by suspending top police BJP flayed the Congress for turning the event into a virtual 'photoshoot' with most of their barbs aimed at Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and his deputy D K Shivakumar. Videos and photos showing family members of Congress leaders posing with RCB cricketers on the grand steps of the Vidhana Soudha added more fuel to the fire. Regional imbalance questions also popped up as to whether the government would have accorded a similar reception to a Ranji-Trophy-winning state team instead of arranging a grand welcome with pomp and splendor for a city-based franchise club , that too in front of the Vidhana Soudha. Though the government did do some knee-jerk action by ordering a CID probe and detaining four people, including RCB's marketing manager, the damage is beyond control. The suspension of top police officials including the city pole commissioner who netizens claim have been made a scapegoat, has drawn flak from many circles. As cricket fans became cannon fodder, questions like what was the need to organise an event at such a short notice despite police warning and measures about better crowd-control management will remain open to debate for far across the Vindhyas, a political slugfest broke out between the ruling BJP and opposition Congress after Rahul Gandhi alleged that Prime Minister Narendra Modi 'surrendered' following a call from US President Donald Trump during the India-Pakistan military conflict."A call came from Trump and Narendra ji immediately surrendered - history is a witness, this is the character of BJP-RSS, they always bow down," Rahul posted on taking potshots at the PM, the Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha also recalled the bravery of the then Prime Minister Indira Gandhi in 1971 when she held her fort despite the US sending its Seventh Fleet. The Raebareli MP also went on say that India, under Indira Gandhi's astute leadership, held on its conviction and did not yield to US pressure at that was quick to pounce upon the 'surrender barb' and flayed Rahul saying his comments were an insult to the armed forces. While alleging that Rahul's comments undermined the success of Operation Sindoor, it also said that it makes one suspect if he is a "paid agent" of China and Pakistan. The saffron party also went on to add that it was the Nehru-Gandhi family which surrendered Indian interests. Governor vs since Arif Mohammed Khan was shunted out of Kerala Raj Bhavan, the equation between the state government and the governor had been reasonably good. But it looks as though the face off between the Left Democratic Front (LDF) government and the Governor is set to resume. In a latest twist, a political row erupted after Kerala's agriculture minister P Prasad boycotted a sapling plantation function at the governor's house on World Environment Day, apparently for using a photo of Bharat Mata carrying a saffron flag. The minister's contention was that gubernatorial offices should not be used as a platform to promote religious causes, in an apparent reference to the portrait, which is mostly used in RSS 'shakhas'.Governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar refused to budge though and defending it by saying that the picture of Bharat Mata could not be removed as 'we can't not do away with the ideals for which we're living'. Though the function was moved out from the central hall of Raj Bhavan to the Durbar Hall inside the state secretariat, the damage had been done by that time as the LDF government stuck to its stand of boycotting the function unless the portrait was removed. The latest row happened close on the heels of another controversy over a programme of RSS ideologue S Gurumurthy on 'Operation Sindoor' being held at the Raj Bhavan, with both Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan and Opposition parties chiding Arlekar for what they called attempts to 'saffronise' the Raj Bhavan. It looks as though there is no end in sight to the Governor vs Govt face off in the left-ruled Kerala. Out of context!.'Misinterpreted', 'taken out of context' --- these are certain euphemisms that politicians usually use when they are in trouble after making controversial comments. It looks as though Tamil film icon Kamal Haasan, who nurtures political ambitions, is the latest to follow the trend. The 'Ulaganayagan' is in the eye of a storm following his comments that Kannada was born out of Tamil during an event to promote his film Thug Life, which he made in the presence of Kannada star Shiva Rajkumar. He faced heavy backlash from all quarters, with even Karnataka High Court pulling up the 70-year-old and asking him to apologise. But Kamal remained defiant and said that though there was no dispute or debate over the rich legacy of Kannada language, he would not apologise as demanded by Kannada outfits. But to calm down the issue, Haasan came up with a 'classic' justification, saying that his comments on Tamil and Kannada while talking about his association with thespian Dr Rajkumar's family have been 'misunderstood' and 'taken out of context.''It pains me that my statement at the Thug Life audio launch spoken out of gent affection for the legendary Dr Rajkumar's family, especially Shiva Rajkumar been misunderstood and taken out of context. My words were intended only convey that we are all one and from the same family and not to diminish Kannada any way,' Kamal said, in a belated attempt to douse the fire. After all, actors too can turn into good politicians, right?Billionaire break-up!.Across the globe, the week ended on high drama with dirty linen being washed in public by US President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk. The public feud between the two most influential figures in the United States reached a crescendo, with Trump suggesting that he may terminate US government contracts and subsidies given to Musk's companies after the latter blasted Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' as fiscally reckless and a "disgusting abomination."When Trump met privately with White House officials, there was little to suggest that the US president was close to a public spat with Musk, the billionaire businessman who helped him win a second term in office. But things took a diabolic twist as Trump called Musk volatile and the latter retaliated through a barrage of posts on his own social media platform 'X'.As the public feud between the two billionaires escalates over the tax and spending bill, the Musk-Trump break-up also sent Tesla's stock price plunging while keyboard warriors went berserk with a wave of memes and viral one-liners across the world of concludes the (political) entertainment for this week folks! We will be back next week with more. Till then, stay tuned to Stage Left,DH Newsletters Team


India Today
39 minutes ago
- India Today
JDU may edge out BJP in Bihar seat-sharing deal; good news for Chirag Paswan
The BJP and its allies are expected to map out a seat-sharing agreement for the high-stakes Bihar assembly elections along the lines of their arrangement from the 2024 Lok Sabha polls, sources familiar with the discussions National Democratic Alliance (NDA) in Bihar comprises the BJP, Nitish Kumar's Janata Dal (United), Chirag Paswan-led Lok Janshakti Party (Ram Vilas), Jitan Ram Manjhi's Hindustani Awami Morcha (HAM), and Upendra Kushwaha's Rashtriya Lok Morcha (RLM).advertisementIn the Lok Sabha elections, the BJP contested 17 seats, JD(U) 16, LJP(RV) 5, and HAM and RLM one each. While the BJP had a slight edge in the parliamentary polls, sources said the JD(U) is expected to contest one or two more seats than the BJP this time around. According to sources, out of the 243 assembly seats, the JD(U) could contest 102-103 seats, and the BJP 101-102. The remaining 40 seats will be distributed among Chirag Paswan's LJP, HAM, and its five-member representation in Parliament, the LJP is expected to get the lion's share among the smaller allies and may contest 25 to 28 assembly seats. HAM is likely to receive 6 to 7 seats, while RLM may be allotted 4 to 5 seats, sources seat distribution is being shaped by internal BJP surveys conducted earlier this year across all Bihar assembly constituencies to gauge the political sentiment. These findings will form the basis not only for seat allocation but also for the selection of candidates, with the goal of fielding the strongest contender in each constituency, insiders previously told India also said that these survey results are also expected to influence decisions on the allocation of Cabinet berths should the NDA secure a victory in the Bihar assembly polls, which are likely to be held in by its winning streak in Haryana, Maharashtra, and Delhi, the BJP is aiming to replicate its poll performance in Bihar. Party strategists are also considering announcing candidates ahead of the announcement of election dates—a strategy used effectively in several past state Watch