
Brits to be blocked from adult content TONIGHT with booze-style ID or face-scan checks replacing ‘ridiculous' tickbox
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
MILLIONS of Brits will be blocked from adult content online at midnight tonight unless they pass booze-style age checks.
The new rules mean you'll need to prove you're over 18 – including by showing ID or scanning your face with a phone.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
3
New online rules aim to stop youngsters being exposed to dodgy online content
Credit: Getty
It affects any websites showing porn, or content linked to self-harm, suicide, or eating disorders. This includes social media apps too.
The new Ofcom rules enforce the Online Safety Act, and kick in on Friday, July 25.
'It's really the rubber hitting the road,' Oliver Griffiths, group director for online safety at Ofcom, told The Sun.
'The situation at the moment is often ridiculous because people just have to self-declare what their birthday is. That's no check at all.'
Major websites like PornHub, X (formerly Twitter), and Reddit have already vowed to follow the rules. Reddit will remain open, but will require an age check if you attempt to view adult content on the site.
Shockingly, around 8% of children aged eight to 14 have accessed online porn in a given month, Ofcom says.
Boys are more likely to visit than girls (at 19% vs 11%).
Now Ofcom can crack down on this behaviour, by blocking youngsters from accidentally stumbling on all kinds of adult content – not just porn.
'One is pornography. The other one is making sure that we've got highly effective age assurance in place for things that aren't illegal but are highly harmful for children,' Griffiths said, speaking to The Sun.
'So that could be suicide content, self-harm, or eating disorders.
Don't risk ignoring four free iPhone tricks built to save your life
'And we will be starting an enforcement programme next week if there are websites dedicated to that who haven't got proper age gates in place for midnight tonight.'
CHECK YOURSELF
There are three main ways that Brits will be asked to prove their age.
The first one is called an 'age estimation'.
This can work by scanning your face with an approved third-party service like Yoti or Persona.
3
Yoti is one of the tools that can be used to estimate a user's age
Credit: Free for editorial use
Or it could be estimating your age with an email check that examines if it's been linked to a household utility bill.
The second option is linking back to info that's held on you.
For instance, it could be checking with your bank or mobile phone company – both of which would already know if you're an adult or not.
A simple computer handshake works out if you're a child or not, and then you can be cleared for access if you get the go-ahead.
The third method is sharing an official document – a bit like showing your ID at the till in a supermarket.
You might be asked to show your passport or driver's license online.
SAFE SPACE?
This might all sound like a privacy nightmare, especially if you're watching X-rated content online.
But the adult websites don't actually get the personal info about you.
3
Ofcom has warned that too many children are being exposed to adult content online
Credit: Getty
And the age-checking services aren't learning what kind of content you're trying to view either.
The age-check is compliant with data protection, and simply gives the adult website a 'yes' or 'no' for your account.
You'll remain anonymous and won't have your online habits linked to your identity when you do oe of these checks.
Griffiths noted: 'The key bit of information that's needed is purely: is this user a child or not?'
Companies are able to choose the method they want – but they can't opt out.
If they breach the new rules, they face massive fines.
'These can lead, in the end, to fines of up to 10% of qualifying global revenue for these companies,' Griffiths said.
'So there's real teeth that sit behind this."
THE SHOCKING STATS
Latest figures show the scale of adult content consumption online...
Ofcom stats: Around 8% children aged 8-14 in the UK visited an online porn site or app in a month.
15% of 13–14-year-olds accessed online porn in a month.
Boys aged 13-14 are the most likely to visit a porn service, significantly more than girls the same age (19% vs 11%).
Our research tells us that around three in ten (29%) or 13.8m UK adults use porn online.
Pornhub is the most used site in the UK – Ofcom research says 18% (8.4m) visited it in one month.
Children's Commissioner stats:
Of the 64% who said that they had ever seen online pornography: The average age at which children first see pornography is 13 . By age nine, 10% had seen pornography, 27% had seen it by age 11 and half of children who had seen pornography had seen it by age 13.
. By age nine, 10% had seen pornography, 27% had seen it by age 11 and half of children who had seen pornography had seen it by age 13. We also find that young people are frequently exposed to violent pornography, depicting coercive, degrading or pain-inducing sex acts; 79% had encountered violent pornography before the age of 18 .
. Pornography is not confined to dedicated adult sites. We found that Twitter was the online platform where young people were most likely to have seen pornography.
The maximum fine is £18 million – but a company can be charged an even higher sum of 10% of global revenue. This is aimed at targeting giant web companies who may be in breach of the rules.
DODGY DEALINGS
Of course, some youngsters will go out of their way to dodge the checks.
It's possible to skirt the ban using a VPN, or Virtual Private Network.
These easily-downloaded apps scramble your internet data to boost your privacy from online spies.
But they also let you trick websites and apps into thinking you're logging on from another country.
Ofcom insiders admit there's no way to stop this – but that doesn't make the new rules redundant.
'Our research shows that these are not people that are out to find porn – it's being served up to them in their feeds,' Griffiths explained.
'And we think that these measures are going to have a really big impact in terms of dealing with that particular problem.
Using parental controls and having conversations, feels a really important part of the solution.
Oliver Griffiths
'There will be teenagers – dedicated teenagers – who want to find their way to porn, in the same way as people find ways to buy alcohol under 18. They will use VPNs.
'And actually, I think there's a really important reflection here. It's not just us, in terms of making life safer online.
'Parents having a view in terms of whether their kids have got a VPN, and using parental controls and having conversations, feels a really important part of the solution.'
Another fear around the new rules is that by blocking unverified Brits from mainstream sites, they'll seek out adult content in more extreme corners of the web.
But Ofcom says the porn industry is aware of this, and is working to get everyone on board.
'This was certainly a concern that when we were working with the adult sector,' Griffiths told us.
'The big sites were saying, well if we age-assure here, then won't that just divert traffic to darker corners.
'And I think it was that sort of sense that everybody needed to move together.
'That's allowed us to get to the position where we've got 6,000 websites hosting porn that are going to have age-assurance in place as of midnight.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
EastEnders' Joel Marshall finally punished for sick acts after shock 'illegal' discovery
EastEnders' Ross Marshall made a disturbing discovery on Joel's laptop in tonight's episode of the BBC soap - has he finally had enough of his son's sick behaviour? Joel Marshall was caught by his father Ross in tonight's episode of EastEnders, as he made a shock discovery on his son's laptop. Since joining the show earlier this year, fans have been aware of Joel's misogynistic mindset and have witnessed some of his sick acts, including assaulting a stranger on a tube and recording himself being intimate with Avani. It was later revealed that Ross paid off a girls' mother in Australia, after he had up skirted a girl in his class. Ross later found the video of Avani, but Joel managed to talk himself out of things once again. In tonight's episode however, it appeared Joel's father had finally had enough of his sick acts - as he made a shock discovery. It comes after an EastEnders legend was rushed to hospital after a deadly attack by a familiar face. Ross and Joel sat down in the living room sharing beers as Joel showed his father a video of influencer Drake Zagan, who he seems to idolise. As Joel walked out the room, Ross was left disgusted when he heard Drake saying feminism was a lie, and that a women's only job is to find a boyfriend. He was then left raging when he found a number of "100% illegal" up skirting and changing room videos on his teenage son's laptop, as he threw his laptop in the sink with the water running. "I do not want this filth in my house!", Ross exclaimed. "You are a revolting, arrogant disgusting little pervert!" Fans were left overjoyed that Ross had finally clocked on to how much of a "creep" his son was. Taking to Reddit, one fan penned: "Hallelujah Ross has finally wised up to his creepy son," as another penned: "Why has it taken that long for Ross to realise what a creep his son is? At least he's finally doing something about it." Another fan wrote: "wheyyyy ross finally grew a fkn backbone." The explosive scenes come just after Joel's mum was mentioned for the first time. Last night, we learnt Joel's mum was called Cleo, and cheated on Ross while in Australia. It came after fans believed his mum was Zoe Slater, in line with her return. Despite this, fans are still convinced that Zoe is Joel's mum, with many believing Cleo is a "cover up name." There's more drama for Joel next week, as spoilers reveal he's left reeling when he finds out Avani has had a termination without him even knowing she was pregnant with his baby. How will the storyline progress - and will we ever meet Joel's mum?


Scottish Sun
3 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Moment boozy Jet2 passengers are hauled off flight for VAPING after plane was forced to turn back one hour into flight
THIS is the moment two yobs sparked an emergency at 30,000ft after vaping in their seats. Families were devastated as the boozed-up thugs rowed with cabin crew and ignored demands from the cockpit to stop smoking. Advertisement 3 Two yobs sparked an emergency at 30,000ft after vaping in their seat Credit: The Sun 3 One of the nicked hooligans was later alleged to be found carrying cocaine and MDMA Credit: The Sun There was anger and disbelief at no-frills carrier Jet2 that the two men were 'drunk as skunks' at take-off and allowed on-board. Passengers told The Sun they were knocking back alcohol after the scheduled 5.55am departure was delayed. One of the nicked hooligans was later alleged to be found carrying cocaine and MDMA. An emergency was declared one hour into Jet2's Flight 1577 to Heraklion in Crete on Tuesday morning. Advertisement The pilots declared an emergency and returned to Stansted airport where police waited to seize the two men. Footage obtained by The Sun shows the moment officers entered the twin-jet Airbus A321 at 9.36am to wild cheers from the rest of the exasperated passengers. Boos can be heard ringing out the cabin and one fed-up woman shouts at the hooligans, one of whom is weaning a back-to-front black baseball cap: 'Get off!' A male passenger bellows, 'Loser!', then adds of the duo: 'F****** b***ends!' Advertisement Another flyer screams: 'Do not get on a flight if you cannot control your drink!' She adds: 'We love you police - thank you!' Acknowledging the no-frills airline's catchphrase, 'Nothing beats a Jet2 holiday' following the ad campaign starring pop star Jess Glynne, she then quipped: '...And if you want to take a Jet2 holiday!' A source told The Sun: 'Passengers were livid. Everyone was looking forward to the start of the holiday. "The worst scenario is having to turn around and return to the UK after an hour into the flight. Advertisement 'But there was also anger that the two men were allowed on board, clearly drunk. 'It's ridiculous that they could be so boozed-up so early. The flight was meant to go before 6am but was delayed for over an hour. "That clearly gave these thugs more time to knock back the hard stuff. 'There were lots of kids on the plane and the airline should not allow these lunatics to spoil hard earned holidays.' Advertisement 'EVERYONE WAS DISTRAUGHT' A passenger added: 'On the flight the duo were so obnoxious. They began vaping, then kicked off when told to stop smoking. 'They couldn't understand or care just how dangerous it was for everyone on the plane. 'The pilots were told what was going on and a cockpit announcement warned that if the pair didn't stop vaping the flight would have to return to the UK. 'The drunk pair ignored the threat and continued being rude to the crew, so we had to return to Stansted. Everyone was distraught and families were a little frightened. It is very unnerving. Advertisement 'When the police boarded the plane on landing there were cheers for the officers, and abuse for the yobs. I hope they get the book thrown at them. They should be locked up and banned from flying in future.' The gutted holidaymakers were forced to wait until a later service could take them on the four-hour journey to Greece yesterday evening. Jet2 gave passengers a £10 voucher to be redeemed in WHSmith at Stansted. A passenger blasted: 'The guys were so obviously drunk before boarding. They should not have been on the plane. The whole thing could have been avoided if Jet2 had done their job. Advertisement 'Everyone was furious. Some passengers were only going to Crete for a few days and it took a big chunk out of their holiday. It was such a frustrating experience.' Jet2 is the UK's third biggest scheduled airline offering package and charter flights and based at Leeds Bradford airport. The carrier is the largest tour operator in the UK ahead of Tui. THUG ARRESTED An Essex Police spokesman told The Sun: 'We were called at around 8.40am on Tuesday 5 August to reports of a disruptive passenger on board a flight bound for Greece. 'Officers were alerted to the flight's imminent return to Stansted Airport and detained two passengers for searches. Advertisement 'One was arrested and taken into custody after a quantity of suspected Class A drugs was found. 'A man, aged in his 20s, from High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, remains in custody for questioning.' The second passenger was detained by cops for a stop and search after leaving the aircraft but not arrested. LIFETIME BAN Last night Jet2 broke their silence to reveal they'd issued a passenger with a life ban. Advertisement The branded the behaviour "disgraceful" and "aggressive". An airline spokesperson said: "We can confirm that a customer has been issued with a lifetime ban following a catalogue of disgraceful and aggressive behaviour, which led to flight LS1577 from London Stansted to Crete Heraklion having to return to Stansted so that police could offload them. "We would like to thank the police and our crew for their handling of this difficult situation. "As a family friendly airline, we take a zero-tolerance approach to disruptive passenger behaviour and we will fully support the authorities with any subsequent investigation, including prosecutions and pursuing civil proceedings if necessary." Advertisement


The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Labour accused of using Jimmy Savile's name to ‘bait' Nigel Farage
Labour's use of Jimmy Savile's 'toxic' name appeared to be an attempt to 'deliberately bait' Nigel Farage and would distress survivors of child sexual abuse, a lawyer for victims of the late TV presenter has said. Alan Collins, the head of the abuse team at Hugh James solicitors, said it was 'concerning' to see Jess Phillips, the safeguarding minister, and others use Savile's name to try to 'score points over political opponents'. Labour has accused Farage and Reform UK of being 'on the side of predators like Savile' by opposing the Online Safety Act. Peter Kyle, the technology secretary, was the first minister to make the comparison when he told Sky News last week: 'I see that Nigel Farage is already saying that he's going to overturn these laws. So you know, we have people out there who are extreme pornographers, peddling hate, peddling violence. Nigel Farage is on their side. 'Make no mistake about it, if people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online. And Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side.' Kyle defended the remark, which was criticised as 'one of the most disgusting things a politician had ever said' by Reform's chair, Zia Yusuf. Phillips, who has spent years supporting abuse survivors, later said she would like to speak to Farage about 'one of those modern-day Saviles', referring to Alexander McCartney, who abused at least 70 children online, and 'just needed a computer', she said. Heidi Alexander, the transport secretary, also refused to distance the party from the Savile comparison, telling Sky News that Farage was 'in effect saying that he is on their side because he's saying he's wanting to repeal the Online Safety Act'. However, Collins said the comparison would have 'triggered' distress and trauma among any survivors of child sexual abuse, not just those who came into contact with the late Jim'll Fix It host. 'Lots of victims who were abused in whatever circumstances, often when they are seen by a psychiatrist or a therapist, they will mention the name Savile, even though they weren't his victim, they get triggered by it,' he said. 'So when it comes up on TV or radio it's a common refrain that they get triggered by it.' Collins said Labour's use of the name 'demonstrates the lack of understanding' of its effect on survivors. He added: 'One doesn't want to think along these lines but one could think it was an attempt to deliberate bait [Farage], so to speak. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion 'His name is so toxic I struggle to understand why the government would throw his name out there. It's really concerning. There is nothing constructive in it,' he added. Collins said he was not seeking an apology from Labour but would urge Phillips and Kyle to stop reprising Savile's name: 'They should stop using it and concentrate on the day job which is safeguarding vulnerable people and kids.' Hundreds of people targeted by Savile came forward after his death in 2011, forcing a reckoning for the BBC and other institutions that had lauded one of Britain's most famous light entertainment figures despite repeat concerns about his conduct. Richard Scorer, another solicitor who represented Savile's victims, said it was 'completely wrong for any politician of any party to seek to score points using the suffering of Savile victims'.