Serbia's police intervene to end standoff between ruling party supporters and anti-government protesters
Months of protests across Serbia following death of 16 people killed when a roof on a renovated railway station in Novi Sad collapsed, have rattled President Aleksandar Vucic and his SNS party.
Interior Minister Ivica Dacic said one policeman was injured in Novi Sad. N1 TV footage showed flares and fire crackers being thrown at protesters from the direction of the SNS offices.
Later near the parliament building in Belgrade, the police in riot gear blocked anti-government protesters approaching the area where Vucic's supporters have been camping since March.
On his Instagram account, Vucic, a former ultranationalist who converted to the cause of European Union membership in 2008, published a video showing him sitting with supporters in front of the parliament.
"I came here to be with people," he said.
Earlier he addressed his supporters in Belgrade a few blocks away and said: "Our response (to protesters) is clear - we are not going to let you destroy Serbia."
Also in Belgrade, near SNS city headquarters, protesters clashed with police who prevented them from approaching the SNS offices.
The protesters have blamed corruption for the Novi Sad railway roof collapse and have demanded early elections that they hope would remove Vucic and his party from power after 13 years.
They have accused Vucic and his allies of ties to organised crime, violence against rivals and curbing media freedoms. Vucic has denied the accusations.
On Wednesday evening, students who are leading the protests called supporters to protest in front of SNS offices in major cities in Serbia including Belgrade, Novi Sad, Kragujevac, Cacak and Nis, after several protesters were injured in clashes with SNS in the town of Vrbas on Tuesday evening.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Bishop Auckland parking scam card readers discovered
Small battery operated card readers have been discovered on car park payment machines and tariff boards in a devices discovered in Bishop Auckland, County Durham, which were being used in a parking scam, were removed from car parks earlier this week, police County Council's traffic management section manager Kieron Moralee said the scam had been reported to police and confirmed: "We never use these devices for any of our on- or off-street parking."He encouraged motorists to look out for any devices that appear suspicious, as well as any QR codes attached to parking machines as the council does not use them. The devices had been placed at the Castle Chare, Victoria Avenue and Kingsway car Auckland Town Council said: "There may be more in the area or they could potentially reappear in the future."Mr Moralee said: "We can confirm that we have identified and removed all the battery-operated card readers from affected car parks in Bishop Auckland."He said anyone who encounters or suspects a parking scam should contact the local authority's parking services team or the police."As soon as we have been made aware of an issue, we will attend and investigate as quickly as possible to ensure others don't fall victim," Mr Moralee said. Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Police used ‘Orwellian' powers to gag firefighter in free speech row
Police used 'Orwellian' powers to gag a firefighter and prevent him revealing he had been arrested after posting online messages criticising his bosses. Staffordshire Police told Robert Moss that his right to 'freedom of expression' had to be 'limited to maintain public safety and order' following his arrest on suspicion of malicious communications. But a special bail hearing at Newcastle-Under-Lyme magistrates' court overturned the 'gagging clause' amid fears officers were behaving as if they lived in a 'police state'. Now Mr Moss, who was never charged with a crime but had his home raided, said he believes 'heavy-handed' police were 'weaponised' to silence him. It is the latest example of claims that some police forces are using draconian powers to curtail freedom of speech. Mr Moss, 56, had worked for the Staffordshire fire and rescue service for 28 years before being sacked in 2021, shortly after he became the Fire Brigade Union's secretary for the county. Two years later, an employment tribunal found the service had unfairly dismissed him from his job on the grounds of capability. The father-of-one continued to offer advice to firefighters in a private Facebook group where he made a number of comments that were critical of the fire service's management. Speaking from his home in Newcastle-Under-Lyme, Mr Moss insisted the messages, seen by The Telegraph, were 'anodyne' and 'certainly not criminal'. After a 7am police raid in July in which officers seized two telephones, an iPad and computer, Mr Moss, a former Labour councillor, said he felt like a criminal. He was given bail with six conditions, which included prohibitions on posting any communication, online or otherwise, relating to the county's fire service, its chief and deputy chief fire officers, and posting messages relating to the police investigation. Tom Beardsworth, a barrister hired by the Free Speech Union (FSU), told the court Mr Moss was a man of good character who should have been dealt with by a voluntary interview rather than a police raid. Although he did not challenge four of the bail conditions, which prevented Mr Moss from contacting or communicating with Rob Barber, the Staffordshire fire chief officer, and his deputy Glynn Luznyj, Mr Beardsworth argued that two conditions limited his freedom of speech. 'A deep threat to the right of free expression' He told magistrates: 'These allow the police to arrest and detain someone and then when they are released prevent them from telling others what had happened with the threat of further arrest if they do not comply. 'We do not live in a police state and Mr Moss should have every right to speak about his arrest. 'For the police to prohibit an arrested person from speaking about their arrest is extraordinary and Orwellian, and it is not hyperbole to put it in those terms. 'This is a deep threat to the right of free expression and it engages real matters of high principle.' He quoted the College of Policing guidance on 'pre-charge bail', which said conditions should only be imposed where necessary, and referred to a police briefing note that said the conditions were 'limiting' freedom of expression to 'maintain public health and order'. DC Isobel Holliday, the arresting officer, insisted the bail conditions were 'proportionate' because Mr Moss's posts had been 'malicious and reckless', denying that requiring him not to talk about the fire service until a September bail hearing was 'unnecessary' and 'gagging'. Paul Tabinor, the chairman of the magistrates' bench, ruled that Mr Moss could post messages about the fire service and scrapped the ban on him making any posts relating to the police investigation. Mr Moss said: 'I feel strongly that under a joint police and fire commissioner the police and fire services are hand-in-glove and the fire service had weaponised the police to silence me. 'I was a critic of Staffordshire fire service and I had been gagged from saying anything about individuals there, the service itself and my arrest. That is a breach of my human rights.' Sam Armstrong, the FSU's legislative affairs director, said: 'In the more than 4,000 cases the Free Speech Union has handled, this is amongst the most egregious abuses of state power we have encountered. 'Robert's comments were not crimes, his arrest was not lawful and the police have been acting like the Stasi, not a constabulary. Staffordshire Police's chief constable must urgently end this investigation and apologise to Mr Moss before he finds himself writing an even bigger cheque than he already will have to.' A spokesman for Staffordshire Police said: 'We arrested a 56-year-old man, from Newcastle-under-Lyme, on Tuesday 8 July, on suspicion of harassment without violence, sending communication/article of an indecent/offensive nature and knowingly/recklessly obtain or disable personal data without consent of the controller. The man has been released on conditional bail as our enquiries continue.' A Staffordshire Fire and Rescue spokesman said it would be inappropriate to comment while legal proceedings are active. It's not against the law to criticise someone in authority. Not yet, anyway By Lord Young On the face of it, Staffordshire Police's efforts to gag a critic of the Staffordshire fire and rescue service are quite shocking. Robert Moss, a former firefighter and Labour councillor, was arrested last month under suspicion of having committed an offence under the Malicious Communications Act. That in itself was quite heavy-handed, given that his alleged 'crime' was to have criticised the fire service's management in a private Facebook chat. But the really sinister thing – which Mr Moss's barrister describes as 'Orwellian' – was that his bail conditions included a gagging order, stopping him from saying anything more about his former employer, either online or offline. Thankfully, with the help of the Free Speech Union (FSU), the organisation I run, he managed to get this order removed and he's now free to say what he thinks about his former employer. He is still under investigation, but I'd be amazed if he's charged with a criminal offence, given that it's not against the law in this country to criticise someone in authority. Not yet, anyway. The reason I'm not shocked by this case is because it fits a pattern of the police over-reacting to social media posts, often at the behest of people who feel they've been unfairly criticised. Earlier this year, the FSU helped Julian Foulkes, a retired special constable who had his home in Kent raided by six police officers after he got into a spat with a pro-Palestinian activist on X. After commenting on the 71 year-old's 'Brexity' books, the officers arrested him, confiscated his electronic devices, took him to the station in handcuffs, locked him in a cell for eight hours, then interviewed him under suspicion of having committed a Malicious Communications Act offence, only releasing him after he agreed to accept a caution. With the FSU's help, Mr Foulkes managed to secure a pay-out of £20,000 from Kent Police for wrongful arrest and false imprisonment, as well as an apology from the Chief Constable. We are trying to get comparable compensation from Hertfordshire Police for the arrest of Maxie Allen and Rosalind Levine, two parents whose home was raided by six officers from Hertfordshire Police following 'disparaging' comments in a WhatsApp group about the management of their child's school, as well as critical emails they'd sent to the headteacher. They were detained in front of their young daughter before being fingerprinted, searched and left in a police cell for eight hours. Like Robert Moss, they were interviewed under suspicion of having committed a Malicious Communications Act offence. According to custody data obtained by The Times, the police are currently arresting more than 30 people a day over 'offensive' posts on social media and other platforms. In total, police are detaining around 12,000 people a year under suspicion of committing just two speech offences, up from about 5,500 in 2017. At the FSU, we received a surge in requests for help following the investigation into Allison Pearson for a year-old tweet and the imprisonment of Lucy Connolly, who wrongly blamed the murder of three schoolgirls in Southport on an illegal immigrant in an intemperate social media post. Several dozen people have been prosecuted for various speech offences in connection with the Southport attacks, including one man who spent eight weeks in jail for sharing a meme suggesting a link between migrants and knife crime, a case that was singled out in the US State Department's recent report on the erosion of free speech in Britain. Of the people who are arrested for speech offences, only a fraction end up being convicted. For instance, in 2023 fewer people were convicted for breaching section 1 of the Malicious Communications Act and section 127 of the Communications Act than in 2017, when the number of arrests was much lower. This suggests the police are being over-zealous in their pursuit of thought criminals, with the data revealing that only about one in 20 of those arrested under suspicion of committing these two offences end up being sentenced. But that's scant comfort to those who find themselves under police investigation, particularly when the bail conditions interfere with their right to freedom of expression. In many cases, when the police decide to take no further action the nightmare isn't over since the episode is then logged as a 'non-crime hate incident', with the FSU estimating that more than a quarter of a million of these have been recorded since 2014. These can show up on enhanced criminal record checks, preventing people getting jobs as teachers or carers or securing a firearms licence. It's becoming increasingly clear that the police need a 'reset' when it comes to online speech offences. They should stop policing our tweets and focus on policing our streets.
BreakingNews.ie
2 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Man arrested after fatal hit and run in Antrim
A man has died and a woman was taken to hospital after being struck by a car in a hit and run collision in Co Antrim. Another man has been arrested in connection with the incident which occurred in the Ballyeaston Road area of Ballyclare on Friday night. Advertisement Detective Chief Inspector O'Loan said: 'Shortly before 10:35pm, it was reported that two pedestrians, one male and one female, were struck by a car which failed to stop at the scene. 'The male, aged in his 50s sadly died as a result of his injuries. 'The female, aged in her 40s, was taken to hospital for her injuries that are not believed to be life-threatening. 'One male has been arrested in respect of the collision and remains in police custody.' Alliance Councillor Lewis Boyle said: 'This is a deeply shocking and sad event. 'I offer my sincere condolences to the family of the deceased, and I wish the injured woman a full and speedy recovery. 'There is a sense of shock in the wider Ballyclare community upon hearing this tragic news. 'For anyone with any information or who may have witnessed the incident, please come forward and share any information you may have with the police.' Police are appealing for witnesses to get in touch with case reference number 1771 15/08/25.
