Oil falls nearly 4% as Iran retaliates
Oil prices slipped more than $3, or 4%, on Monday after Iran attacked the US military base in Qatar in retaliation for US attacks on its nuclear facilities, and took no action to disrupt oil and gas tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz.
Brent crude futures were down $2.91, or 3.8%, at $74.09 a barrel by 1713GMT. US West Texas Intermediate crude (WTI) eased $2.8, or 3.8%, to $71.06.
US President Donald Trump said he had "obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites in strikes over the weekend. Israel also carried out fresh strikes against Iran on Monday.
At least two supertankers made U-turns near the Strait of Hormuz following US military strikes on Iran, ship tracking data shows. About a fifth of global oil supply flows through the strait. However, the risk of a complete shutdown is low, analysts have said. A telegraphed attack on a well defended US base could be a first step in reducing tensions provided there are no US casualties, Energy Aspects said in a post.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Indian equity benchmarks lower on Mideast tensions
MUMBAI: India's equity benchmarks inched lower on Monday, tracking Asian peers, as investors assessed the likelihood of Iran's response to the United States' bombing of its nuclear sites. The indexes pared some losses as Brent crude oil futures retreated below $77 per barrel, after hitting a five-month high earlier. The Nifty 50 closed 0.56% lower at 24,971.9 and the BSE Sensex fell 0.62% to 81,896.79, after trading as much as 1.1% lower earlier in the session. The US index futures too recovered, while the MSCI Asia ex Japan was down 0.8%, trimming some losses. Higher crude oil prices are a negative for India, which depends heavily on imports for its energy requirements, as they could stoke inflation and widen the fiscal deficit.
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Lurching towards another war
EDITORIAL: Belying international law and his own pledges to stay away from foreign conflicts, President Donald Trump's reckless decision to strike Iran's key nuclear sites could plunge the world into yet another endless war in the Middle East. Once again, Israeli interests have dictated US policy and trumped the interests of peace in the region. President Trump was quick to declare victory following the June 22 strikes, claiming they had 'totally obliterated' Iran's nuclear ambitions while Benjamin Netanyahu was at his obsequious best terming the decision as 'courageous'. Notwithstanding the claims of absolute destruction of Iran's nuclear material by the Trump Administration, the view of independent experts analysing commercial satellite imagery has been more muted, with many voicing the opinion that while there has been damage inflicted on Tehran's nuclear enterprise, it is far from completely destroyed. It is important to note that President Trump's decision to eschew diplomacy in favour of confrontation, claiming that was the only way to deter Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, which he insisted Tehran was on the verge of obtaining, directly contradicted assessments from the US intelligence community. Back in March, the US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard had categorically declared that Iran was 'not building a nuclear weapon and … Khomeini has not authorised the nuclear weapons programme that he suspended in 2003'. Israel's relentless bombing campaign against Iran, launched earlier in the month, also continues unabated, and now the American military intervention initiated at Tel Aviv's behest risks completely undermining the pillars of international stability. It strengthens a perverse logic, which follows that non-nuclear nations that agree to dialogue — as Iran did with its nuclear talks with the US — remain vulnerable to military action while nuclear-armed countries remain untouchable. Far from deterring Tehran, this turn of events may only harden its determination to pursue nuclear capabilities, regardless of the setbacks it has faced due to the American strikes. The US, for its part, has clearly learnt no lessons from history, with President Trump now floating highly dangerous ideas around regime change in Iran. The devastating missteps committed by the world's sole superpower over the last 20 years in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya have now been followed yet again by an act of war based on a lie. For decades, Netanyahu has been goading successive American administrations into striking Iran by grossly exaggerating its nuclear capabilities, belying assessment made by UN weapons inspectors and Western intelligence agencies. And Trump has now conveniently played into his hands. How Iran responds to this naked act of aggression will likely have far-reaching consequences even though the immediate options before it remain limited. A direct attack on US assets in the region will surely result in a major American reprisal that Tehran and the wider region can ill-afford. Shutting down the Strait of Hormuz, the vital maritime corridor handling 20 percent of global oil shipments, could alienate Iran's regional allies and China, its largest oil importer, while also giving Western powers reason to intervene further in the region in a bid to prevent major market disruptions. For now, Tehran has confined its response to striking Israeli targets, but the threat of wider retaliation persists unless swift de-escalation efforts begin. However far-fetched this might seem right now, the surest path to defusing tensions lies in the US and Israel halting their campaign of aggression, starting with a ceasefire in Gaza as well as a cessation of hostilities with Iran. Third-party mediation by the likes of Qatar or China could provide opportunities for diplomatic off-ramps. Without such steps, the region, and the world, risks spiralling into uncontrolled conflict. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Europe stocks fall on fears of Iranian retaliation after US strikes
FRANKFURT: European stocks stumbled on Monday, as investors nervously eyed the threat of Iranian retaliation following joint US-Israeli strikes on Iran's nuclear sites over the weekend. The pan-European STOXX 600 index closed 0.3% lower, after touching its lowest level in over a month earlier in the session. Other major bourses also closed in the red, with Germany down 0.3%, France down 0.7%, Britain's FTSE down 0.2%, while Spain's was flat. A Reuters report said that Iran could soon strike back at American forces in the Middle East, even as US officials scramble for a diplomatic solution to avert conflict. Tensions soared after US warplanes joined Israel in bombing Iran's nuclear facilities over the weekend, prompting Iran to brand President Donald Trump a 'gambler' for escalating the standoff. With aerial assaults between Israel and Iran showing no sign of slowing, jittery markets braced for the possibility that Iran might retaliate by shutting the Strait of Hormuz—the world's most crucial oil passageway. Investors rushed into safe-haven assets, driving up gold prices and eurozone bonds. Meanwhile, the utilities sector , often seen as a bond proxy, outperformed the STOXX 600 sectors. Meanwhile, sources said that Germany will raise defence spending to 3.5% of economic output by 2029 funded through a nearly 400 billion euro borrowing programme. Still, Europe's aerospace and defence stocks lost 0.7%. The US attacks on Iranian nuclear facilities could very well succeed in eliminating a nuclear capable Iran,' said David Bahnsen, chief investment officer, The Bahnsen. 'There is still plenty of risk for short-term volatility driven by the uncertainty of the possibility of Iranian retaliation or a protracted conflict in the region.' Meanwhile, the July 8 US tariff-pause deadline approaches with little progress on trade deals with Washington, with only a US-UK formal deal reached. On the data front, fresh data showed euro zone's economy flat lined for a second month in June, barely expanding, as the bloc's dominant services industry showed only a small sign of improvement and manufacturing displayed none at all.
