When tech billionaire Mark Cuban told the story of the day 'Bill Gates stole 'His Girls' in Las Vegas
may be a billionaire now, but back in the 1980s, he was just a young tech founder trying to make his mark. During a 2022 episode of the Full Send Podcast, which is available on YouTube, Cuban shared a story from a night at COMDEX, which he claims was a major tech trade show in Las Vegas, where he found himself upstaged by none other than
Microsoft co-founder
Bill Gates. At this event, Cuban recalled chatting with a group of women when they suddenly disappeared, only to learn they had left with Gates, who had just taken
Microsoft
public and was quickly becoming a tech icon. Cuban noted jokingly that Gates took away 'his girls.'
Mark Cuban on Bill Gates Stealing His Girl!
What Mark Cuban said about meeting Bill Gates in his early days
During the podcast (Cue: 24.29), when asked about a business competition that keeps him up at night, Cuban shared the story about him and Bill Gates in Las Vegas. Cuban said, 'I'll tell you a story about in Vegas back in the day about
Bill Gates
. This is way back, it used to be like the biggest trade show in the world was called Comdex. It was a technology trade show, and it was like 125,000 people here, and I started my company when I was 26, 27, right along this. So, I just thought I was a bada**, right? So I'm hanging with these girls, and this was right when Microsoft had gone public. So, one day no one knows who Bill Gates is, the next day he's the king of tech and all this money and all this snap.'
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya
IC Markets
Mendaftar
As the hosts asked Cuban about his net worth at the time, He said: 'I was maybe worth a million dollars. So I'm buying these girls drinks and doing shots and everything, and they're like I gotta go to the bathroom. I think for real. Then they don't come back and I'm like what the fu**. Then my buddy goes yo, Do you know who Bill Gates is? (laughs).'
The hosts asked if that incident fired him up or motivated him, Cuban noted: 'It did motivate me right to go on to the next, such a good story (laughs), but it's 100% true.'
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
15 minutes ago
- India Today
AI is more persuasive than humans, can change your political views in minutes: Report
Imagine having a casual chat with an AI chatbot and walking away with a completely different opinion on a political issue you felt strongly about just ten minutes earlier. Sounds like a science fiction movie, but it's already happening. New research shows that leading AI models are becoming highly effective at persuasion and, in some cases, even more convincing than humans. They are not just sharing facts but tailoring responses to the individual, using tone, evidence, and personalisation in a way that can subtly sway to a report by Financial Express, studies conducted by the UK's AI Security Institute, in collaboration with universities including Oxford and MIT, found that AI models like OpenAI's GPT-4, GPT-4.5, GPT-4o, Meta's Llama 3, xAI's Grok 3, and Alibaba's Qwen could influence political views in conversations lasting less than ten minutes. What's more, the changes in opinion were not fleeting. A significant portion of participants retained their new views even a month researchers didn't rely on AI's default behaviour alone. They fine-tuned these models using thousands of conversations on divisive topics like healthcare funding and asylum policy. By rewarding outputs that matched the desired persuasive style and by adding personalised touches — such as referencing the user's age, political leanings, or prior opinions — the AI became even more convincing. In fact, personalisation increased its persuasiveness by about five per cent compared to generic responses. While that may not sound huge, in the context of influencing public opinion, it's substantial. Political campaigns spend millions chasing even a one per cent swing in voter sentiment. The ability to get that shift in minutes, at scale, is both impressive and alarming. I think this is where the real debate begins; it's one thing for AI to sell you a new smartphone, but quite another for it to nudge your stance on government study also highlighted that AI persuasion isn't limited to politics. Earlier research from MIT and Cornell showed these models could reduce belief in conspiracy theories, climate change denial, and vaccine scepticism by engaging in personalised, evidence-based conversations. While that sounds like a positive use case, it reinforces the fact that the same skillset could be applied in less ethical ways, such as spreading misinformation or promoting harmful AI's persuasive power also extends to commercial spaces. As Cornell's David Rand pointed out, chatbots could significantly influence brand perceptions and purchasing decisions. With tech companies like OpenAI and Google looking to integrate ads and shopping features into AI assistants, this capability could become a lucrative, yet ethically grey, revenue my view, the real challenge isn't just about how persuasive AI can be now, but how much more convincing it could become with the next generation of models. Regulation and safeguards will be crucial, but so will public awareness. If you know that the friendly chatbot you're talking to could be subtly steering your opinions, you might think twice before taking its words at face value. The technology is powerful — perhaps too powerful — and the world needs to tread carefully.- Ends
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Piloo Vidyarthi once addressed reports of 'fat alimony' after separation from husband Ashish Vidyarthi: 'Divorce can't be this easy...'
Piloo Vidyarthi addressed media speculation surrounding her separation from Ashish Vidyarthi, emphasizing her resilience and decision to retain her surname due to personal significance and practical reasons. She gracefully acknowledged Ashish's wife, Rupali Barua, highlighting Rupali's understanding nature and acceptance of Piloo's choice. Piloo focuses on moving forward with strength and clarity. Piloo Vidyarthi once opened up about life after her separation from actor Ashish Vidyarthi , addressing media speculation, her decision to retain her surname, and her views on love. The actress also spoke with grace about Ashish's current wife, offering a candid look at how she navigates personal choices and public attention. Handling media scrutiny Talking about the media attention surrounding her separation, Piloo had told Hindustan Times that she had to prove herself and stay strong. She added that she believes everything will eventually fall into place and the bigger picture will become clear. She recalled that the interview had gone viral, with many people discussing it passionately. While most comments were positive, around 20–30 frustrated individuals spread negativity, questioning the divorce and suggesting ulterior motives. She added that such reactions are part of life, but she no longer pays attention to them. Decision to retain Vidyarthi surname In another old interview with News18, she spoke about her choice to keep the 'Vidyarthi' surname and her views on love today. Her Instagram still reads 'Piloo Vidyarthi.' She explained that changing a surname in India can be complicated, with issues like updating her Aadhar card. For her, the name carries personal significance, and she sees no reason to change it. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like The Safest Cities Where People can Live in Peace Undo She added that neither she nor Ashish has any issues with it, and she doesn't feel the need to prove anything by altering her surname. The actress also spoke about Ashish's current wife, Rupali, with grace and composure. She noted that Rupali now uses her maiden name, Barua, and said that while Piloo continues to use Vidyarthi, Rupali has never had any issue with it. Piloo added that Rupali is a very simple and understanding person. "Get the latest news updates on Times of India, including reviews of the movie Coolie and War 2 ."
Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump is aiming for Pakistan-style compliance from India, but his plan is not working
" Trump wants a vessel like Pakistan. India refuses to behave like one." That blunt assessment from Ajay Srivastava, founder of the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), captures the essence of the US-India trade saga: it's less about economics than geopolitics. Independence Day 2025 Before Trump, British used tariffs to kill Indian textile Bank of Azad Hind: When Netaji gave India its own currency Swadeshi 2.0: India is no longer just a market, it's a maker While headlines focus on tariffs and trade deficits, the underlying story is about power, leverage and sovereignty. Speaking to Economic Times, Srivastava explains, "Washington expects compliance, and India is not yielding." Tariffs as geopolitical weapons Trump, who is set to meet Russian leader Vladimir Putin on Friday at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Alaska, has long framed tariffs as a tool to 'fix trade deficits,' but India's case suggests a different motive. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Top 15 Most Beautiful Women in the World Undo On August 7, the US announced it would raise tariffs on Indian goods from 25% to 50%, citing Delhi's purchase of Russian oil . India called the move 'unfair' and 'unjustified,' with the new rate set to take effect on August 27. The White House framed the tariffs as a way to cut Russia's energy revenues and pressure Vladimir Putin toward a ceasefire. With this increase, India becomes the most heavily taxed US trading partner in Asia, joining Brazil which faces similar steep tariffs amid tense bilateral relations. Live Events The economic stakes for India are high. In 2024, India exported $87 billion worth of goods to the US. According to US Census Bureau data for May 2025, imports from India stood at $9.43 billion, while US exports to India were $3.82 billion, resulting in a US goods trade deficit, or an Indian surplus, of roughly $5.6 billion. If the 50% tariffs remain in place, nearly all of India's annual exports to the US could become commercially unviable. Meanwhile, the US continues to run a $45.7 billion goods trade deficit with India, yet these tariffs disproportionately affect Indian exports compared with goods from other countries. For Srivastava, the message is clear: 'Trade deficit is just for the namesake. It's about forcing countries to fall in line with a geopolitical agenda.' India imports roughly 20% of its GDP in goods, spanning petroleum, machinery and electronics, yet Washington appears less concerned with trade imbalances than with pressuring India to compromise on sovereignty. Agriculture and dairy major flashpoints Agriculture and dairy have emerged as key sticking points in India-US trade talks, which collapsed earlier this month. On August 7, Prime Minister Narendra Modi declared, 'India will never compromise on the well-being of its farmers, dairy producers and fishermen.' New Delhi has consistently resisted US pressure to open these sectors, arguing that doing so would threaten millions of small farmers. Historically, India has kept agriculture largely off the table in trade agreements to safeguard domestic communities. According to Srivastava, US demands extend far beyond tariffs: opening government procurement, diluting patent laws that could make medicines costlier, limiting future digital taxes, and shifting military sourcing to the US. 'Even if we open agri and dairy, no trade deal will happen with this. Not a trade issue. They want you to open your government procurement, dilute patent laws, commit to never charge digital tax in future, buy military from the US, the list is endless,' he says. He adds, 'Trump imposed 50% tariffs on Brazil partly over politics and partly because Brazil asked Twitter to remove anti-Brazil content. Records show India generates even more such requests, so he could use that as an excuse too. He can conjure unlimited reasons to impose tariffs if he's unhappy. My sense is he doesn't want a partner in India, he wants a vassal. India refuses to play that role; it insists on an equal partnership. That's the basic problem.' Selective pressure and double standards The US approach to Russian oil imports is uneven. China, Russia's largest crude buyer, faces no comparable tariff threats, while India is under heavy pressure. 'Even if the US demanded zero imports from Russia, India's imports would fall anyway due to economic circumstances,' notes Srivastava. European and US bans on petroleum products derived from Russian crude are already reducing India's imports, independent of Washington's pressure. This selective approach reflects a broader pattern in US trade policy. Brazil, for example, faced a 50% tariff despite running a surplus with the US, largely over political disagreements including its stance on Venezuela and former President Bolsonaro. Venezuela itself is under secondary sanctions for buyers of its oil, though some firms, like Chevron, have received exemptions. These cases suggest that political alignment often outweighs economic considerations. Trade between Russia and the US has dropped roughly 90% since the Kremlin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, though last year the US still imported $3 billion worth of Russian goods, according to the US Bureau of Economic Analysis and Census Bureau. Meanwhile, the European Union, a partner in sanctions against Russia, imported $41.9 billion (36 billion euros) of Russian goods in 2024, Eurostat data shows. While the US pressures India to cut Russian oil imports, market forces and global regulations are already reshaping trade flows. Europe and US bans on petroleum products ensure India's imports will decline regardless of Washington's actions. Srivastava cautions, however, that the US may find new reasons for tariffs, keeping India under continuous scrutiny. Economic resilience and the cost of compliance India has built a buffer against such pressures. Exports constitute roughly 20% of GDP, compared with 90% for Vietnam, a country far more vulnerable to US-imposed shocks. 'Vietnam will suffer more. We will suffer, but we will absorb it properly. Country will bounce back. All we need to do is not to surrender,' Srivastava notes. Domestically, US consumers will also feel the impact of tariffs. About 90% of prescriptions in the US rely on generics imported from India. While the total trade value may be under $10 billion, disruption affects the majority of prescriptions, potentially raising prices significantly. Companies may eventually source alternatives over three to four months, but the immediate effect is inflationary. 'Indian exports will suffer, but we need to consider whether it's better to endure this and use it to push delayed reforms, like diversifying exports, rather than falling into a bad deal. This isn't really about trade; it's about surrendering sovereignty,' Srivastava adds. Geopolitics, not trade For Srivastava, Trump's broader strategy is political theatre. 'Basically, he wanted to hit China. He couldn't, so he has to show his domestic voters that he is a big man, that a bully can show strength by hitting someone. He couldn't hit China, so let's hit India, that's the only thing.' With China, Trump launched a trade war over the large trade deficit, but Beijing hit back by restricting supplies of critical materials, he noted. 'India hasn't used those levers, which is why Washington expected Delhi to yield immediately.' India's refusal to play a compliant role, unlike Pakistan, frustrates Trump. At the same time, India maintains strategic autonomy, engaging with Russia on defence, limiting deep Chinese investment to marketing and distribution, and managing relations with the US on equal footing. 'We are a big country, big economy, and so we have to have workable, good relations with everyone, without being in anybody's camp,' Srivastava explains. Even pre-Galwan, Chinese investment has been superficial. 'China doesn't invest in deep manufacturing. They will not supply any technology. They will invest in marketing of cars, garments, two, $5 billion here and there, but we don't want that. So we have to evaluate very carefully,' he says. 'We can have targeted strategic relationships, like with Russia for defence, but moving closer to China is complicated. There's the border dispute and a $100 billion trade deficit,' he adds. Strategic autonomy and resilience India's export-oriented economy, diversified supply chains and robust domestic market allow it to absorb short-term shocks while resisting long-term concessions. 'All we need to do is not enter into any relationship that costs us the medium or long term,' Srivastava says. The takeaway is clear: Trump's tariffs are less about trade and more about leverage. Every tweet, every tariff threat, every demand is a political signal designed to demonstrate strength to domestic voters. 'Every day he abuses us on Twitter. That shows India has entered his mind,' Srivastava notes. India's response emphasises sovereignty, resilience and strategic foresight. "Trade deal is not a trade deal. It's about bargaining for your sovereignty. And India is not bargaining."
