Op Sindoor a 'Vijay Utsav', says PM Modi, calls for a unified celebration of Indian Armed Forces
Addressing the media ahead of the Monsoon Session of the Parliament, PM Modi hailed Operation Sindoor, and said, "This Monsoon Session is a 'Vijay Utsav'. The entire world has seen the strength of the Indian Armed Forces. The aim that the forces had established for the Operation Sindoor was 100 per cent achieved. The terrorists were neutralised right in their homes, within just 22 minutes, the operation brought them to the ground."
"I announced it at an event in Bihar, and our Indian Armed Forces demonstrated their strength during this operation. The concept of 'Made in India', which represents a new facet of India's military power, has also captured global attention. Whenever I meet people from various countries, I notice a growing interest in Made in India weapons," he said.
Expressing hope to discuss the success of Operation Sindoor in Parliament, PM Modi said, "When the House expresses its sentiments of victory of this 'Vijay Utsav' in one unified voice during this session, it will strengthen India's military power, encourage, inspire the countrymen of the country and give momentum to research, innovation and manufacturing in the defence sector, which in turn will gengerate employement opportunities for the youth."
Recalling Indian astronaut Subhanshu Shukla's recent endeavour to the International Space Station, the Prime Minister said, "This Monsoon Session is a moment of immense pride for the nation. It symbolises a true celebration of victory for the country. And when I say this session is a celebration of national pride and triumph, I must highlight one of the most remarkable moments, the Indian Tricolour being unfurled for the first time at the International Space Station."
"This is a proud moment for every Indian. This successful journey has ignited excitement and enthusiasm for science, technology, and innovation among the youth. All parliamentarians and citizens of India will come together with enthusiasm to celebrate the remarkable achievements that have reached new heights in space," he added.
The Prime Minister also called the monsoon "a symbol of renewal and rejuvenation" and said that the weather across the country is "progressing very positively".
"The reports indicate that the monsoon is favourable for agriculture, which in turn benefits the farmers' economy, the national economy and the rural economy," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
12 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Trade talks with India on hold, says Donald Trump amid tariff dispute
United States President Donald Trump on Thursday said that trade negotiations with India will not resume until a dispute about tariffs is resolved, ANI reported. When asked whether discussions would continue after his decision to double tariffs on Indian goods from 25% to 50%, Trump replied: 'No, not until we get it resolved.' #WATCH | Responding to ANI's question, 'Just to follow up India's tariff, do you expect increased trade negotiations since you have announced the 50% tariffs?', US President Donald Trump says, "No, not until we get it resolved." (Source: US Network Pool via Reuters) — ANI (@ANI) August 7, 2025 Negotiators from both countries had completed their fifth round of talks in Washington last month, with the next round scheduled for August 25 in New Delhi, PTI reported. However, Trump on Wednesday issued an executive order imposing an additional 25% tariff on goods imported from India for purchasing Russian oil. This raised the US tariff rate on Indian goods to 50%. On July 30, Washington had announced a 25% levy on goods imported from India as part of the so-called reciprocal tariffs on dozens of countries that have not finalised separate trade agreements with the US. The additional levy will take effect in 21 days. In response, New Delhi said on Wednesday that it was ' extremely unfortunate ' that the US had chosen to impose additional tariffs on India 'for actions that several other countries are also taking in their own national interest'. 'We reiterate that these actions are unfair, unjustified and unreasonable,' said the Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson. 'India will take all actions necessary to protect its national interests.'
Scroll.in
12 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Bengali migrant worker wrongfully deported to Bangladesh from Rajasthan, alleges TMC
The Trinamool Congress on Thursday alleged that a 19-year-old man from West Bengal's Malda district who had been living in Rajasthan was wrongfully deported to Bangladesh. The family of the man, Sk Amir, holds land records dating back to the pre-Independence era, claimed Samirul Islam, the chairperson of the West Bengal Migrant Workers Welfare Board. 'He is neither a Rohingya nor a Bangladeshi national,' the Trinamool Congress MP said. 'Despite being a Bengali-speaking Indian citizen, he was forcibly sent across the border.' Amir's father Jiyem Sheikh on Thursday filed a habeas corpus petition before the Calcutta High Court, The Times of India reported. A habeas corpus petition is one seeking orders for a person to be produced before court, so that the court can decide whether the person was unlawfully detained. Sheikh told the High Court that Amir was detained by the Rajasthan Police and 'pushed' into Bangladesh on the night of July 22 on the suspicion that he was an undocumented Bangladeshi immigrant. The case is likely to be heard on Friday, The Times of India reported. The family claims that Amir was held in a detention camp for nearly two months by the Rajasthan Police, despite him showing his Aadhaar and birth certificate, PTI reported. The matter came to light after a video surfaced online, showing a man, purportedly Amir, in tears. Following the video being shared widely, Sheikh said he received a call from the person who recorded it, who informed him that his son was currently in Bangladesh's Ghumra, The Times of India reported. This comes amid the Trinamool Congress raising concerns about several Bengali-speaking migrant workers being detained in parts of the country on suspicion of being Bangladeshis. Since the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, the police in several states ruled by the Bharatiya Janata Party have been detaining Bengali-speaking persons – mostly Muslims – and asking them to prove that they are Indian citizens. Several persons have been forced into Bangladesh after they allegedly could not prove their Indian citizenship. In some cases, individuals who were mistakenly sent to Bangladesh returned to the country after state authorities in India proved that they were Indians. In July, non-governmental organisation Human Rights Watch said India should stop unlawfully deporting people to Bangladesh without due process. The organisation said that the government should instead 'ensure everyone's access to procedural safeguards to protect against arbitrary detention and expulsion'.
India Today
12 minutes ago
- India Today
Trumpian Tariffs on India: Who pays? Who gains?
With US President Donald Trump's announcement of an extra 25% tariff on India on August 6 as a 'penalty' for continuing with the import of Russian crude oil, concerns are being raised about its potential impact on the Indian such a concern is natural and inevitable, a closer scrutiny of the impact of this tariff reveals something more than what meets the eye. Such scrutiny needs a better understanding of the backdrop in which the Indian economy and its long-run trade policy and dynamics have been face this: while most have been talking about the impact on India, very few have referred to the impact of this tariff on the US economy. At the very outset, it needs to be understood that among all the major economies in the developed and the developing world, India has witnessed the maximum percentage point decline in tariff rates between 2000-2022 (Figures 1 and 2).As such, given the low average tariff rates in most of the advanced economies, varying between 1 and 4%, there was not much scope for quantitative tariff reduction over the last two decades, with percentage point declines in average tariffs being below 3% (Fig. 1).Developing economies have outpaced advanced ones in tariff liberalisation this millennium (Fig. 2). India tops the chart with a dramatic drop in average tariff rates—from 23.4% in 2000 to just 4.6% in 2022. China follows closely, slashing its average tariffs from 15% in 2000 to 2.5% by 2020. Russia too liberalised briefly—cutting rates from 8.6% in 2008 to 3.1% in 2015—but post-2014 sanctions reversed the trend, pushing it toward protectionism under the weight of geopolitics and security India's tariff liberalisation has had a quietly powerful impact: lower tariffs have gone hand-in-hand with rising consumption, which consequently has spurred economic growth, as postulated widely with India's consumption-led growth thesis. As Fig. 3 shows, per capita consumption rose alongside falling average tariff rates. An econometric analysis confirms that declining tariffs have played a causal role in driving consumption, among many other in certain senses, a compelling insight emerges: tariff cuts may have quietly fuelled India's consumption-led growth. Are tariff cuts the quiet force behind emerging market success stories? If India is any guide, it may well be the missing link in the Global South's growth what is the impact of Trumpian Tariffs on India and the US?At the macro-level, the impact seems to be marginal. Some estimates from the macro-models suggest an impact on the GDP between 0.1-0.3 percentage points, if the impacts are not neutralised by counteractive measures by India. In other words, the projected growth rates may come down to 6.4% from 6.5% at inflation in India is near a six-year low at 2.1%, and foreign capital outflows have prompted dollar sales, thereby stabilising the rupee. However, it has been contended that the textiles and garments, jewellery, pharmaceuticals, petrochemicals, automotive, and machinery sectors will be among the hardest hit as they together account for a significant share of India's exports to the the US' share in Indian exports is to the tune of 18-20%, many feel that there will be a severe impact on the export numbers for India. It is a fact that India exports $8–9 billion worth of garments to the US annually; nearly a quarter of India's diamond and gold jewellery exports are accounted for by the US; and in the pharmaceuticals segment, with $6–7 billion in annual exports, India remains a vital supplier of generic drugs to the US. A 50% tariff is therefore hypothesised to make these expensive and such linear thinking will cover up a lot of nuanced facts. Contrary to such thinking, many commodities under each segment have exhibited an inelastic demand in the past (non-declining demand despite rise in price). Especially for an economy like the US that has been compared to a black hole (consuming anything that comes in its vicinity), items like gems and jewellery have been compared as Veblen goods, i.e., they are subjected to rising demand as prices increase, driven by consumers' perception of high-priced items as symbols of wealth and gems and jewellery sector's core competency is unique: they handle over 90% of the world's cut and polished diamonds by volume, which is 60–65% by value; the craftsmen's micro-cutting capabilities are considered unparalleled, and are branded accordingly. The unique design traditions of India can neither be replicated nor substituted by the UAE or Thailand.A similar situation prevails for garments and textiles. India's strength lies with natural fibres (cotton, jute, etc). While many think that trade might shift to Vietnam and Bangladesh, product differentiation needs to be taken into account. Bangladesh's declining RMG economy, at this stage, is not in a position to meet the unmet demand. Vietnam, despite being highly competitive in labour and productive efficiency as compared to India, specialises in synthetic, sportswear, casual wear and large-volume OEM pharmaceuticals, tariffs are yet to be applied to essential medicines, and US importers depend on Indian bulk drugs, and the likely secondary product lines like nutraceuticals and non-essential formulations could be hit. In any case, India is hardly an export-dependent economy to be hit substantially by the it needs to be kept in mind that the tariff hikes can prove counterproductive for the US too – possibly more than India given the former's high import-dependency. A recent article titled 'Drivers of Post-COVID Private Consumption in the US' suggests that the post-COVID growth recovery of the US has been driven by private consumption. Therefore, tariff rise, by increasing the prices of goods, can spur an inflationary pressure in the US economy, curtailing purchasing power, and diminishing the capacity of private consumption to drive growth. This may be an indication of an impending 'stagflation' (economic stagnation and inflation coexisting).advertisementWhat can India do now?As argued earlier, tariff liberalisation has been a factor leading to consumption growth in India, which has again been the prime driver of its economic growth. It is therefore important that India should shed off its protectionist status and rather actively accelerate efforts to diversify trade partners beyond the US and strengthen ties with other global players. The talks about India-Australia CEPA, FTA with the EU, and others should be taken up more vigorously. It is clear that either way, a liberalised tariff regime will be beneficial for India in the long run, though there might be short-run costs.(Dr Nilanjan Ghosh is Vice President - Development Studies and also heads the Kolkata Centre at Observer Research Foundation. An ecological economist with over two decades of experience, where he has held leadership roles at MCX and TERI SAS and served as Director of the Think20 India Secretariat during India's G20 Presidency.)- Ends(Views expressed in this opinion piece are those of the author)Tune InMust Watch
