logo
Mains answer practice — GS 2: Questions on National Education Policy and 2036 Olympics (Week 113)

Mains answer practice — GS 2: Questions on National Education Policy and 2036 Olympics (Week 113)

Indian Express3 days ago
UPSC Essentials brings to you its initiative for the practice of Mains answer writing. It covers essential topics of static and dynamic parts of the UPSC Civil Services syllabus covered under various GS papers. This answer-writing practice is designed to help you as a value addition to your UPSC CSE Mains. Attempt today's answer writing on questions related to topics of GS-2 to check your progress.
🚨 Click Here to read the UPSC Essentials magazine for July 2025. Share your views and suggestions in the comment box or at manas.srivastava@indianexpress.com🚨
National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 envisaged a paradigm shift in early childhood and foundational education through the 5+3+3+4 structure. Discuss the extent to which this structural reform has been translated on the ground since its approval.
Compare India's diplomatic efforts of hosting the 2036 Olympics—anchored in Global South representation and 'Viksit Bharat 2047'—with Qatar's pitch centered on readiness, inclusion, and becoming the first Olympics in the Middle East.
Introduction
— The introduction of the answer is essential and should be restricted to 3-5 lines. Remember, a one-liner is not a standard introduction.
— It may consist of basic information by giving some definitions from the trusted source and authentic facts.
Body
— It is the central part of the answer and one should understand the demand of the question to provide rich content.
— The answer must be preferably written as a mix of points and short paragraphs rather than using long paragraphs or just points.
— Using facts from authentic government sources makes your answer more comprehensive. Analysis is important based on the demand of the question, but do not over analyse.
— Underlining keywords gives you an edge over other candidates and enhances presentation of the answer.
— Using flowcharts/tree-diagram in the answers saves much time and boosts your score. However, it should be used logically and only where it is required.
Way forward/ conclusion
— The ending of the answer should be on a positive note and it should have a forward-looking approach. However, if you feel that an important problem must be highlighted, you may add it in your conclusion. Try not to repeat any point from body or introduction.
— You may use the findings of reports or surveys conducted at national and international levels, quotes etc. in your answers.
Self Evaluation
— It is the most important part of our Mains answer writing practice. UPSC Essentials will provide some guiding points or ideas as a thought process that will help you to evaluate your answers.
QUESTION 1: National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 envisaged a paradigm shift in early childhood and foundational education through the 5+3+3+4 structure. Discuss the extent to which this structural reform has been translated on the ground since its approval.
Note: This is not a model answer. It only provides you with thought process which you may incorporate into the answers.
Introduction:
— Education is fundamental for achieving full human potential, developing an equitable and just society, and promoting national development.
— The global education development goal, expressed in Goal 4 (SDG4) of the 2030 goal for Sustainable Development, accepted by India in 2015, is to 'ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all' by 2030.
— The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 marks a watershed moment in India's drive to revitalise its higher education sector. It aims to change both the organisation and content of education. While school education reforms prioritise fundamental learning, curriculum renewal, assessment transformation, and holistic development, the higher education agenda emphasises flexible transdisciplinary learning, institutional autonomy, high-quality research, and global integration.
Body:
You may incorporate some of the following points in your answer:
Structural reforms
— The 10+2 system has been replaced with a new structure — foundational (pre-primary to class 2), preparatory (classes 3-5), middle (6-8), and secondary (9-12). In 2023, the National Curriculum Framework for School Education (NCFSE) laid out the learning outcomes and competencies for each stage.
— The NEP aims to make pre-primary learning universal by 2030. NCERT's Jaadui Pitara learning kits are already in use, and the Women and Child Development Ministry has issued a national ECCE curriculum.
— NIPUN Bharat, which was introduced in 2021, aims to ensure that every kid can read and do basic maths by the end of grade 3. According to a recent government poll, average language and maths results were 64% and 60%, respectively, which is a start but far from universal proficiency.
— The NEP recommended the Academic Bank of Credits (ABC). This, along with the National Credit Framework (NCrF), has been established. UGC guidelines announced in 2021 enabled students to earn and keep credits digitally, even across schools, allowing them to switch courses or exit and re-enter. The system allows students to obtain a certificate after one year, a diploma after two years, or a four-year multidisciplinary degree.
— The Common University Entrance Test (CUET), which was launched in 2022, is currently a primary pathway to undergraduate admissions. NEP 2020 proposed that different college entrance examinations be replaced with a single national test.
— IIT Madras, IIT Delhi, and IIM Ahmedabad have established foreign campuses in Zanzibar, Abu Dhabi, and Dubai, respectively. The University of Southampton just opened in India, after two other foreign universities in GIFT City, Gujarat.
Challenges
— NEP proposes three languages in school, at least two of them Indian. But Tamil Nadu, which follows a Tamil-English model, sees this as an attempt to impose Hindi.
— The National Curriculum Framework for Teacher Education, due in 2021, is yet to be released.
— Some states have pushed back against key NEP provisions. Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and West Bengal have refused to sign MoUs with the Centre to set up PM-SHRI schools, citing clauses that require full adoption of NEP.
Conclusion:
— NEP 2020 aspires to attain a GER of 50% by 2035. To do this, the government is focussing on establishing additional higher education institutions, assisting underprivileged students, making standalone institutions multidisciplinary, and encouraging distant and online learning.
— The PM VidyaLakshmi Scheme, which to be started in November 2024, promises to increase access to higher education by providing collateral-free loans to students enrolled at India's top 860 institutions. With a budget of ₹3,600 crore from FY 2024-25 to 2030-31, it aims to benefit approximately 22 lakh students annually and support an additional 7 lakh students, with an emphasis on inclusivity.
(Source: Five years of National Education Policy: Taking stock of the transition, http://www.education.gov.in, http://www.pib.gov.in)
Points to Ponder
Read more about NEP
Read more about schemes related to education sector
Related Previous Year Questions
Skill development programmes have succeeded in increasing human resources supply to various sectors. In the context of the statement analyse the linkages between education, skill and employment. (2023)
The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 remains inadequate in promoting incentive-based system for children's education without generating awareness about the importance of schooling. Analyse. (2022)
QUESTION 2: Compare India's diplomatic efforts of hosting the 2036 Olympics—anchored in Global South representation and 'Viksit Bharat 2047'—with Qatar's pitch centered on readiness, inclusion, and becoming the first Olympics in the Middle East.
Note: This is not a model answer. It only provides you with thought process which you may incorporate into the answers.
Introduction:
— India, which has been working on its bid for nearly two years, has competition from Turkey, Indonesia, Hungary, and Germany, all of whom want to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the 1936 Olympics.
— While Qatar maintains their interest corresponds with the 'National Vision 2030', India has stated that the 2036 Olympics are in accordance with the country's 'Viksit Bharat 2047 Vision'.
Body:
You may incorporate some of the following points in your answer:
Comparison based on:
1. Venue
— Qatar implies that they can host the Olympics now if it comes to that. Readiness, bolstered by the controversial yet successful 2022 FIFA World Cup, is their big bid plank.
— On the infrastructure front, Qatar has claimed that '95 per cent of Olympic venues are already in place and tested at the highest level'.
— In India, the pace of infrastructure building — being done from scratch — has increased rapidly in the last few months as the authorities begin work to construct the Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Enclave, which is likely to be the major hub.
— India has bid — or is in the process of bidding — multiple international tournaments over the next few years to gain hosting experience. This includes the 2030 Commonwealth Games, which is almost certain to be held in Ahmedabad, the 2027 women's volleyball world championship and the 2028 World U20 Athletics Championships, among others.
2. Regional play
— Qatar has also reaffirmed that if it were to be awarded the 2036 Games, 'it would mark the first Olympic and Paralympic Games ever held in the Middle East and North Africa'.
— India, meanwhile, has said hosting the Olympics would speak of the 'aspirations of the Global South' and, in the letter of intent to the IOC, spoke about the 'transformative economic, social and cultural impact in wider SAARC nations in South Asia'.
3. Economy and diplomacy
— Qatar is banking on its growing reputation of being a global diplomacy hub. In their pitch, the Gulf nation has said 'this bid is a natural extension of our diplomatic legacy, inviting the world to connect in an environment of peace and mutual respect.'
— India, on the other hand, has impressed upon the IOC that it is the 'only major economy yet to host the Games.' 'And while we recognise that is not the sole reason to award a Games, it is a stark reflection of our region's need for the types of sport and social benefits that only the Olympic Games can provide,' the letter of intent stated.
(Source: India, Qatar battle for hosting 2036 Olympics: Promise vs readiness, major economy vs diplomatic hub)
Points to Ponder
Read more about Olympics
Read about India-Qatar relationship
Related Previous Year Question
Critically analyse India's evolving diplomatic, economic, and strategic relations with the Central Asian Republics (CARs), highlighting their increasing significance in regional and global geopolitics. (2024)
UPSC Essentials: Mains answer practice — GS 3 (Week 112)
UPSC Essentials: Mains answer practice — GS 3 (Week 113)
UPSC Essentials: Mains answer practice — GS 2 (Week 112)
UPSC Essentials: Mains answer practice — GS 2 (Week 111)
UPSC Essentials: Mains answer practice — GS 1 (Week 112)
UPSC Essentials: Mains answer practice — GS 1 (Week 111)
Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week.
Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

School pairing will benefit students: Govt
School pairing will benefit students: Govt

Time of India

time9 hours ago

  • Time of India

School pairing will benefit students: Govt

Lucknow: The state govt on Friday said that by pairing small, under-resourced schools with nearby institutions, it aims to provide students access to smart classes, ICT labs, sports, and peer learning. Pairing, officials said, will help improve the teacher-student ratio and upgrade infrastructure under all 19 Operation Kayakalp parameters — toilets, drinking water, furniture, digital education, Bal Vatika — and promote holistic development. They added that the model, however, remains flexible, with provisions to reopen original schools if enrolment grows. The govt initiated the pairing of schools to optimise teachers, resources, and infrastructure. For instance, UP has over 6,000 single-teacher schools, affecting the quality of teaching and student learning. Based on three key criteria — low enrolment, proximity, and lack of teachers or ramshackle buildings — the pairing will not take away jobs of teachers or cook-cum-helpers deployed in the state-run schools, said a govt spokesperson. The govt further said the initiative is in sync with the NEP, which recommends better-equipped institutions to enhance learning outcomes.

An uncompromising voice for the marginalised: A tribute to V. Vasanthi Devi
An uncompromising voice for the marginalised: A tribute to V. Vasanthi Devi

The Hindu

time9 hours ago

  • The Hindu

An uncompromising voice for the marginalised: A tribute to V. Vasanthi Devi

V. Vasanthi Devi was a sincere and deeply committed educationist and activist who dedicated her life to the cause of children, dalits and most marginalised communities. Highly educated yet grounded, she never distanced herself from society and worked tirelessly for the upliftment of people. Despite her intellectual brilliance, she remained deeply connected with the common people. That conenction made all the difference. She was active with Palli Kalvi Pathukappu Iyakkam ( movement for saving school education) till her last days. She strongly opposed the National Education Policy and advocated free and equitable education for children. Vasanthi Devi had also pushed for empowerment of School management committees. She firmly belifeved that schools, particularly in rural areas, must function with greater autonomy. She ensured that teachers and parents of underprivileged children were part of such committees. Fearless in her convictions, Vasanthi Devi contested a by-election against former Chief Minister Vasanthi Devi was the most active chairperson of the Tamil Nadu State Commission for Women. She conducted numerous public hearings and exposed atrocities committed against women and also visted women's prisons in the State. She approached every petition with utmost sincerity and dedication. She never sought rewards for recognition. As the first vice chancellor for Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, she brought in several reforms. Her vision was pragmatic and rooted in empowerment. Even in her final days, our conversations were about society at large. She remained lively and always seeking to empower people. She was a close friend of veteran Marxist leader, Mythili Sivaraman and a mentor to many, including me. In keeping with her ideals, she had willed her body to be donated to the Kilpauk Medical College. I recall how she ensured that I completed the procedures for her donation two years ago. She lived by the principles she advocated. All her works, including research papers, have been given to Roja Muthiah Library. We were working to create a digital archive in her name. (Advocate Sudha Ramalingam is a close friend of Vasanthi Devi)

Acclaimed academician Vasanthi Devi passes away at 87
Acclaimed academician Vasanthi Devi passes away at 87

The Hindu

time10 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Acclaimed academician Vasanthi Devi passes away at 87

V. Vasanthi Devi, former Vice Chancellor of Manonmaniam Sundaranar University and former chairperson of the Tamil Nadu State Commission for Women, passed away in Chennai on Friday following a sudden heart attack. She was 87. Prof. Vasanthi Devi was the first woman vice chancellor of a university in Tamil Nadu, a post that she held for two consecutive terms from 1992 to 1998. After her retirement, she was a member of the State Planning Commission (SPC) before being appointed as the Chairperson of the Tamil Nadu State Commission for Women (TNSCW) in 2002. A high point in her long list of achievements was when she contested against AIADMK supremo Jayalalithaa in the R.K. Nagar constituency in 2016 on the VCK symbol as the common candidate of the DMDK-led People's Welfare Front. Interestingly, the contest pitted her against a chief minister whose government appointed her as the Vice Chancellor, nominated her to the SPC and then to the TNSCW. Born in 1938 in Dindigul, Prof. Vasanthi Devi came from an illustrious family. She was the granddaughter of Vengal Chakkarai Chettiar, a freedom fighter, trade unionist and Christian theologist who was the president of the All India Trade Union Congress between 1954 and 1957. She came to Chennai (then Madras) in 1954 to join Queen Mary's College and later did her Masters from Presidency College. She did her PhD at University of the Philippines, Manila in 1980. Even while pursuing her academic career, she actively took up several causes – women's rights, child rights and, above all, quality education for all. Prof. Vasanthi Devi is survived by her son Narendra Subramanian, Professor of Political Science, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, and daughter Ajantha Subramanian, author and anthropologist. Her body will be donated to the Kilpauk Medical College, the family said. 'She was a great intellectual but never lost touch with the grassroot,' said Sudha Ramalingam, Senior Advocate and a longtime companion. 'That connection made all the difference,' she added. She was active with Palli Kalvi Pathukappu Iyakkam (movement for saving school education) till her last days and strongly opposed the National Education Policy and advocated free and equitable education for children. Prof. Vasanthi Devi had also pushed for empowerment of School management committees. She firmly believed that schools, particularly in rural areas, must function with greater autonomy. She ensured that teachers and parents of underprivileged children were part of such committees, Ms. Ramalingam observed. CM's condolences In his condolence message, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M.K. Stalin said, 'She had been campaigning against the ill effects of the National Education Policy 2020, which Tamil Nadu has consistently opposed.' He also noted that she had voiced strong criticism of the Draft UGC Regulations, 2025. Mr. Stalin added that she had been vocal in opposing the role of religion in education. 'Her sudden demise is an irreparable loss to the education sector and to human rights-based activism.' In his condolence message, P. Shanmugam, CPI(M) State general secretary, said that Prof. Vasanthi Devi was a staunch supporter of the Left movement and always stood up for the rights of the common people.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store