logo
Proposed bill in New York would limit political activity for tax-exempt nonprofits

Proposed bill in New York would limit political activity for tax-exempt nonprofits

The Hill2 days ago
ALBANY, N.Y. (NEXSTAR) — A new bill floated by Democrats in the New York State Legislature targets tax-exempt nonprofits like churches and charities that participate in political campaigns.
The proposal, introduced by Sen. James Skoufis and Assembly member Tony Simone, would create a new state process to enforce a federal rule currently being challenged.
The Nonpartisan Pulpit Act, S8745, would codify into state law a 1954 provision called the Johnson Amendment. This rule is supposed to prevent 501(c)(3) organizations — a tax category including charities, foundations, and religious institutions — from endorsing or opposing political candidates, or else lose tax-exempt status.
The bill's text defines 'political campaign activity' as any participation or intervention in a political campaign for or against a candidate for office, including actions, communications, or spending. It would block organizations from making or asking for contributions to candidates or parties and from publishing statements advocating for the election or defeat of a candidate.
In a statement on the bill, Simone said, 'Community organizations succeed when they remain safe havens from partisanship.'
The legislation allows for lobbying for or against new laws so long as that lobbying doesn't impede a campaign. It also permits nonpartisan voter education, like publishing voter guides or hosting forums, provided those events are neutral. The text also includes specific safe harbors that let organizations host candidates for public office at an event if all other legally qualified candidates for the same office are invited and offered equal opportunity to speak.
Simone's office added that the new bill creates a separate certification process at the state level, making requirements for tax-exempt organizations a matter of state law. That means the rules would remain in New York even if the federal Johnson Amendment is compromised or overturned.
'Most New Yorkers want politics to stay where it is—in political debates, newspaper op-eds, and the comment section on Facebook,' Skoufis, who previously ran to chair the Democratic National Committee before dropping his bid, said in an email. 'Not in museums, soup kitchens, and certainly not in churches.'
He added that tax exemptions are for the good of all members of the public, not just for people who vote a certain way.
Historically, the federal government and courts have upheld the constitutionality of the Johnson Amendment. In ' Branch Ministries Inc. v. Rossotti,' the Interal Revenue Service (IRS) revoked a church's tax-exempt status after it ran newspaper ads criticizing a presidential candidate. The court ruled that the government has a 'compelling interest in maintaining the integrity of the tax system and in not subsidizing partisan political activity,' and that the ban on political activity was the 'least restrictive means' of achieving those goals.
But the current debate about the Johnson Amendment — whose opponents argue that it violates First Amendment protections for free speech and religion — reignited on July 7. That's when the IRS agreed in a court filing not to enforce the provision against two churches that had sued. The agency justified the position, saying that when a house of worship speaks to its congregation about electoral politics during religious services, it doesn't 'participate' or 'intervene' in a political campaign.
In a 2017 speech at the National Prayer Breakfast, President Trump cited Thomas Jefferson when he said, 'I will get rid of and totally destroy the Johnson Amendment and allow our representatives of faith to speak freely and without fear of retribution.'
He signed an executive order that year that loosened enforcement, instructing the Treasury Department not to take 'adverse action' against religious organizations for speaking about political issues from a religious perspective.
In 2019, then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo (D), who is currently running for New York City mayor, signed S4347 / A623 to enshrine the Johnson Amendment statewide. That bill amended one part of the state tax law to prohibit nonprofits from participating in political campaigns generally, asserting that the prohibition should be interpreted the same way the federal government interprets the amendment.
The new bill goes further, adding a new section to the tax law and amending the real property law so a nonprofit could lose real estate tax exemptions over political campaign activity. It includes more detailed definitions and specific violations and lets the state's Department of Taxation and Finance 'establish rules and regulations to administer and enforce' its provisions.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hochul throws shade on Mamdani's NYC-owned grocery store plan
Hochul throws shade on Mamdani's NYC-owned grocery store plan

New York Post

time43 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Hochul throws shade on Mamdani's NYC-owned grocery store plan

Gov. Kathy Hochul threw cold water Saturday on socialist NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's proposal to bring government-owned-and-operated grocery stores to the Big Apple. 'I favor free enterprise,' Hochul told business leaders at a Hamptons breakfast hosted by supermarket mogul John Catsimatidis, when asked about Mamdani's pie-in-the-sky plan. The response drew huge applause from attendees, including Catsimatidis. 3 Socialist NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani's proposal to bring government-owned-and-operated grocery stores to the Big Apple was slammed Saturday by Gov. Kathy Hochul. James Keivom The Gristedes supermarket owner later told The Post Mamdani's plan would fail miserably, pointing to failures at a Kansas City, Mo.-owned grocery store that closed Monday after years of being a huge money pit for taxpayers and being plagued by rampant shoplifting and empty shelves. Kansas City reportedly invested $18 million the past decade trying to keep the store afloat. 3 'I favor free enterprise,' Hochul (left) told business leaders at a Hamptons breakfast hosted by supermarket mogul John Catsimatidis (right). Obtained by NY Post 'New York City is a capitalist city – look what happened in Kansas City?' he said of the now-shuttered Sun Fresh Market. 'These types of grocery stores just don't work.' Hochul, a moderate Democrat, has yet to made an endorsement in the mayoral race. Mamdani, the Democratic nominee and frontrunner heading in November's mayoral election, has proposed opening five municipal grocery stores — one in each borough — and potentially expanding to a larger network of stores. 3 Mamdani has proposed opening five municipal grocery stores — one in each borough — and potentially expanding to a larger network of stores. James Keivom He's estimated the first five would cost $60 million combined to build. Critics have said they fear Mamdani's plan to create 'Soviet' markets would leave customers stuck with just one brand or generic brands of items like bread and milk. They also said that fixed prices at city-run markets could force competing private businesses like Gristedes to shutter, leaving New Yorkers with less selection. Mamdani's campaign declined to comment.

Bill Maher Slams High-Profile Democrats For Being Too 'Afraid' To Appear On His Show
Bill Maher Slams High-Profile Democrats For Being Too 'Afraid' To Appear On His Show

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Bill Maher Slams High-Profile Democrats For Being Too 'Afraid' To Appear On His Show

Bill Maher on Friday's 'Real Time' commended past Republican guests for coming on his show — and slammed numerous high-profile Democrats he said were too 'afraid' to do the same. Maher made an exception for Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.), who appeared as recently as March. Maher named several Democrats in his monologue, including former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Vice President Kamala Harris and former Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama. He first poked fun at Newsom, however, for his 'perfect hair.' Related: 'Hey, at least Gavin comes here,' said Maher. 'People ask me all the time, 'Why haven't you ever had Hillary or Bill Clinton on? Why didn't you have Kamala on during the last campaign?' You think we don't ask? We ask these people every week. They say no.' Maher noted that it took eight years 'and a petition' to get Obama on his show in 2016. 'And these are people, all people, I voted for,' the 'Real Time' host continued. 'Think about that: they're afraid to come on the show of a guy who voted for them. The Republicans? They show up, and when they do, they take their beating like a man.' Related: Maher went on to play a montage of him sparring with past Republican guests, including former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, Trump's former U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and former Trump aide Steve Bannon. He then reiterated that he 'would love' to have more notable Democrats on the show, specifically naming Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and New York City's Democratic mayoral nominee, Zohran Mamdani. 'But I can't subpoena the guests,' joked Maher. 'And I can't fix that what the Democrats are scared of, more than anything else… is being primaried from the far-left, even though most Democrats are not far-left. They're mild-mannered and moderate, at least in my bathhouse.' Warren has notably appeared on the show six times between 2009 and 2017. Other notable members of the Democratic Party who have sat down with Maher include House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and Obama's former chief of staff Rahm Emanuel. Maher appeared to suggest on Friday that Democrats might win more elections if they came on his show. He cited former CIA analyst Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.), who urged her party in April to shed their 'weak and woke' reputation and 'fucking retake the flag.' Related: 'She's right,' said Maher. 'People vote on instinct. They can smell fear a swing state away.' Related... Gavin Newsom Says California Will Redraw Its 'BEAUTIFUL MAPS' In Hilarious All-Caps Post Mocking Trump Trump Reacts To Hillary Clinton's Surprising Nobel Peace Prize Endorsement Trump Goes After 'Nutjob' Senator Elizabeth Warren: 'She's Got To Take A Drug Test'

PARKER: Companies on the move to escape California blues
PARKER: Companies on the move to escape California blues

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

PARKER: Companies on the move to escape California blues

California Gov. Gavin Newsom is upset with Texas. There's a reason he should be upset. California companies are pulling up in droves and moving to the Lone Star State and elsewhere. But that isn't what's bothering him. Newsom cares about politics and power, not markets and business. He's upset that the Texas state legislature is moving to redistricting, which could add up to five Republican seats in 2026. So, Newsom wants to redistrict, which could add another five Democratic seats in California. California's congressional districts are already gerrymandered to death to favour Democrats — 17% of the State's 52 congressional seats are held by Republicans in a state in which Donald Trump garnered 38% of the popular vote in 2024. In ballot initiatives in 2008 and 2010, Californians amended the state constitution to establish an independent redistricting commission, with five representatives from each party and four unaffiliated, to take rote politics out of the process. But removing rote politics for Gavin Newsom is like asking the L.A. Dodgers to show up for a game without bats, balls and gloves. Newsom wants to circumvent the commission by putting new district maps for 2026 before voters in a special ballot initiative this November. It is too bad that Newsom's obsession is with accumulating power rather than improving his state. Just listen to Orange County resident and much-followed economist and blogger Scott Grannis. From Grannis' latest post, which he calls California Leavin': 'Between 2020 and 2025, approximately 500 companies have moved their headquarters out of California or shifted significant operations elsewhere, with a notable spike in relocations since 2019. From 2018 to 2021 alone, the Hoover Institution reported 352 companies relocating their headquarters out of the state.' Grannis continues: 'Government has become increasingly lazy and dysfunctional; the roads are a mess, traffic is the bane of everyday existence, taxes and regulations are oppressive, and modest cottages start at $1 million.' U-Haul annually reports its U-Haul Growth Index. This ranks the 50 states according to 'each state's net gain (or loss) of customers utilizing one-way U-Haul equipment in a calendar year.' Which state was first in one-way departures out of the state for the last five years? Yes, you're right. California Leavin'. And what state was number two in the nation in arrivals into the state in 2024? Yes, Texas, the Lone Star State. Texas has ranked first or second every year since 2016. According to of the top five cities in the U.S. with new corporate headquarters openings from 2018 to 2024, three are in Texas — Dallas, Austin and Houston. The other two are in Nashville and Phoenix. All five are in red states in 2024. In the top five cities for corporate headquarters closures from 2018 to 2024, three of the five are in California. San Diego, Greater Los Angeles and the San Francisco Bay Area. The other two are Chicago and New York City. All five are in blue states in 2024. Harvard's Joint Center for Housing Studies documents which states had the largest migration gains from 2014 to 2024 and which states had the largest losses. Of the top 10 that gained over this period, seven of the 10 were red states in 2024. Of the top 10 losers over this period, seven of the 10 were blue states in 2024. Needless to say, Texas is in the top 10 gainers. It is a state that is booming because it provides a tax and regulatory environment conducive to those who want to work and grow. It makes all the sense in the world, with the huge influx of businesses and people, that the Texas population landscape has changed dramatically since the last census. There is a rationale for the redistricting initiative in Texas. But in California, Newsom just wants to institutionalize failure. Let's hope, in the interest of Californians, that he doesn't manage to get this misguided initiative on the ballot. And if he does, that it fails.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store