
India has the fastest growing number of billionaires. This isn't a good thing: Veerappa Moily
McKinsey Global Institute has quoted in its report—'India needs to increase the relatively low participation of its citizens in labour markets and sustain fast productivity growth as the country has just 33 years until it is as 'old' as advanced economies. 'India still has some time to benefit from its demographic dividend for economic growth but is aging faster than many realize.'
Despite very fast progress, India is still a low-income country. If India is to achieve the status of being the fourth-largest economy by the end of 2025 and to be a real powerhouse in the world, our policies must be transformative.
Citing IMF data, NITI Aayog CEO BVR Subrahmanyam has expressed confidence that India could become the third-largest economy in two and a half to three years. The 2024-25 Economic Survey stated, India will need to improve its global competitiveness through grassroots-level structural reforms and deregulation to reinforce its medium-term growth potential. The survey pitched for less state control and easier rules, stating that lowering the cost of business through deregulation will make a significant contribution to accelerating economic growth and employment amid unprecedented global challenges.
It also said that India is projected to reach the same support ratio (number of working-age individuals per senior 65 or older) in the 2050s as seen in advanced economies, but its GDP per capita is just 18 per cent of the World Bank's high-income threshold. Also, in per capita terms, we are still near the bottom of the global scenario tables—136 in nominal GDP and 119 in PPP terms.
India still has the lowest GDP per capita among G20 nations. Human Development Indicators are still poor, with challenges in education, healthcare, and poverty reduction. Referring to the reports that India is set to pass Japan as the fourth largest economy, Alicia Garcia-Herrero, chief economist for the Asia-Pacific region at Hong Kong investment bank Natixis, said. 'Inequality is also an issue, certainly compared to Japan.'
As of 2023, nearly 45 per cent of India's workforce was still employed in agriculture, while Japan's was at around 3 per cent, with a considerable rise in employment in industrial and service sectors. The share of salaried workers with formal employment contracts was just 23.9 per cent in India, while that of Japan is around 91 per cent. Apart from these criteria, the life expectancy in India is 72, while that of Japan is 84. India's Human Development Index is just 0.685 out of a highest possible of 1. Japan's HDI has crossed the 0.9 mark.
India needs to increase the relatively low participation of its citizens in labour markets and sustain fast productivity growth. Additionally, India is ranked 142 out of approximately 190 countries in terms of press freedom, with a nominal per capita GDP of around $2700.
India's GDP growth of 6.5 per cent in FY 2025 is the lowest since the Covid-19 pandemic of 2020-21. The risk is that a GDP growth of 6.5 per cent will not be able to generate enough jobs to fully absorb the labour force growth. The most worrying factor is that industries are not adding capacity that will generate more jobs. Creating more jobs in the organised sector is also seen as the biggest challenge to the government. Considering the magnitude of joblessness, there is an urgent need to incentivise state governments to improve the business environment and investments, which in turn will augment the labour force and sustain growth.
A growing gap
Surprisingly, India is also home to the largest and fastest growing number of billionaires—India has around 200 billionaires today—third globally in billionaire count. The Economic Survey has also warned of the disproportionate rise in corporate profits concentrated largely among a few large corporations.
No wonder the gap between the rich and the poor, economic inequality and wealth distribution are widening day by day. The imbalance between profit growth and declining wages will have major macroeconomic consequences. If household earnings do not increase, consumer demand will weaken, undermining the very growth of GDP. This depicts the dark side of India's growth story that we are celebrating!
Again, the share of manufacturing in India's GDP in 2023-24 is the same as it was in 2013-14. Where does the PM's favourite 'Make in India' sloganeering stand today? More so, as per the RBI's KLEMS database, the contribution of manufacturing to job creation is lower at 10.6 per cent compared to 11.6 per cent in 2013-14.
As per the data from the PRICE ICE 360 survey, the richest 20 per cent of households, which account for Rs 155 trillion in income, save Rs 57 trillion and consume just 63.6 per cent. The bottom 20 per cent earn Rs 22 trillion but spend Rs 23 trillion, resulting in negative savings and the highest debt-to-income ratio of 15.4 per cent. The middle 60 per cent, earning Rs 159 trillion and saving Rs 28 trillion, are the backbone of consumption but remain economically vulnerable, highlighting a macro-micro disconnect.
To bridge the gap, we need to shift focus from redistribution to empowerment of the bottom 20 per cent—creating job opportunities and skilling youth, affordable insurance, pension schemes, and tax-friendly saving instruments. The bottom 20 per cent must live without the fear of debt traps or income loss.
We also need to look at rationalising GST. The GST council should work out a roadmap for levying petroleum products, electricity and real estate and bring it into the GST regime. Both slabs and rates have to be rationalised. Liberate financial markets to ensure adequate and reasonable business borrowing rates.
RBI should also create a roadmap to phase out the Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR), which compels commercial banks to buy government bonds.
Tariffs on intermediate goods and inputs are too high to push manufacturing in India
Roadblocks to growth
The harsh reality faced by millions in the country, with rising inequality, stagnating wages, and weak job creation, should prompt serious introspection by the government. The benefits of the so-called economic growth have been concentrated among a minuscule segment of the population, while the wage earners and informal sector workers continue to struggle. India's ascension to the fourth position in global GDP ranking is masked by foundational cracks in the economy.
According to the International Monetary Fund's 'World Economic Outlook' released in April 2025, India's GDP is projected at $3.91 trillion for FY 25, while Japan is estimated at $4.03 trillion for FY 25. These figures put India in the fifth spot for now. Niti Aayog CEO saying India has overtaken Japan to become the world's fourth-largest economy is premature.
And if India has to overtake Germany to become the third-largest economy in the world, we need to have faster, sustainable, and inclusive growth at all levels. India needs to fast-track the infusion of new technologies and infuse greater investment in research and development both in the government and private sector along with upgradation of human capital with training, skilling and employability.
The current trend is dangerous unless growth translates into better livelihood for people and reduces inequalities.
M Veerappa Moily is former Chief Minister of Karnataka & former Union Minister. Views are personal.
(Edited by Theres Sudeep)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Two parallel compensations at work for domestic, international services in case of airline accidents in the country
Although many airlines have been using the same aircraft for the operations of domestic and international services, two 'parallel systems of compensation' — one for the domestic and the other for the international — are at work in the country. For instance, in the event of an accident, compensation to the victims varies depending on whether the flight was international or domestic. For death or serious injury, international passengers may receive up to 1,13,100 Special Drawing Rights (SDR) (around ₹1.25 crore), while the compensation for the same in the domestic sector is limited to just ₹20 lakh. The SDR is the global currency for airline compensation under the Montreal Convention, valued daily by the IMF based on five major currencies and published as the official exchange rate. Similarly, baggage claims are capped at 1,131 SDR in international flights, but only ₹20,000 in domestic. For cargo loss or damage, the limit is 19 SDR per kg internationally, compared to just ₹350 per kg on domestic flights. Equal compensation Speaking to The Hindu, Biji Eapen, president, Airline Users Rights and Grievances Redressal Forum (AURGRF) which submitted a representation to the Union Minister of Civil Aviation seeking to fix the anomalies in the compensation rules, said equal compensation is the right of all passengers, regardless of route or carrier type. Further, the adoption of the International Civil Aviation Organisation's (ICAO) revised compensation limits under the Montreal Convention 1999 (MC99), effective 28 December 2024, will address some of the major gaps in the area, he said. Though the Air Passengers Rights Charter, 2019, was a positive move, the revised Montreal Convention Compensation Limits were not adopted by the country. The 1999 Montreal Convention (MC99), framed by the ICAO and International Air Transport Association (IATA), establishes a uniform global liability standard that applies equally to domestic and international airline operations worldwide. Under MC99 As per the ICAO's revised compensation limits under the MC99, death or serious injury will attract a compensation of 151,880 SDR ($2,02,500) followed by 6,303 SDR ($8,400) for passenger delay, 1,519 SDR ($2,000) for baggage loss/damage/delay, and 26 SDR/kg ($35/kg) for cargo loss/damage. In the aftermath of the Ahmedabad plane crash, the Air India and the Tata Group announced ₹1 crore in compensation per victim, along with an interim ₹25 lakh payment. If the revised compensation limit is adopted, the compensation would be around ₹1.72 crore, said Mr. Eapen. Considering that Indian carriers frequently operate the same aircraft across both the domestic and the international routes and participate in code-sharing with foreign airlines, a unified regulatory framework is essential. Hence, the Union government should be ready to ratify the ICAO's updated MC99 limits without delay, along with amending the 2019 Air Passengers Rights Rules to reflect international standards, said the representation submitted to the Centre.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
4 hours ago
- First Post
China leaves ‘all-weather' friends high and dry: Pakistan, Iran, Sri Lanka
The so-called friends of China — from Pakistan to Sri Lanka and Iran — wonder what foes could be like, if the friend urges allies to take big risks but fails to support them when crises hit read more Beijing often urges its partners into high-stakes deals but routinely fails to come through when crises strike. AP China's claim to be an 'all-weather' friend has for long been dubious. Once hailed as steadfast allies, Pakistan and China now see their partnership fray. Islamabad's deepening financial crisis prompted a plea for Chinese support; yet, Beijing delivered little beyond words. Further west, China likewise offered only rhetoric, not action, on Iran's behalf. These developments echo earlier strains in Beijing's alliances. Sri Lanka famously lost control of its Hambantota port after defaulting on Chinese loans, a move that can be likened to the Shylockian demand for a 'pound of flesh' in The Merchant of Venice by William Shakespeare. African governments have likewise warned that China's opaque, stringent loan conditions leave borrowers crippled. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Beijing often urges its partners into high-stakes deals but routinely fails to come through when crises strike. Pakistan: China's 'all-weather' friend on shaky ground Beijing's cosy partnership with Pakistan is straining under economic pressure. Islamabad owes China billions under the $62 billion China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), and when Pakistan's reserves ran low, it urgently sought relief. But China's response was strikingly cautious: analysts say Beijing had grown 'impatient' with Pakistan's woes and 'reluctant to provide unconditional bailouts'. In 2018, Prime Minister Imran Khan flew to Beijing expecting aid, but the official communique made no mention of emergency support. Instead, China insisted that Pakistan fully honour existing CPEC terms — signalling that any relief would depend on Islamabad's compliance. With Beijing withholding immediate assistance, Pakistan had little choice but to turn to the IMF for a bailout. Officials eventually secured a separate $6 billion rescue package from Saudi Arabia and an IMF programme, underscoring that China's role was not to rescue Islamabad but to protect its strategic interests. This episode suggests that China will demand returns on its investments rather than simply writing them off. The latest development is worse. In a dramatic reversal of loyalties, Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff, Gen Asim Munir, has reportedly offered the United States access to military bases on Pakistani soil to launch strikes against Iran, China's strategic partner and a fellow Muslim nation. If true, this move not only signals a chilling betrayal of the Islamic principle of ummah (solidarity among Muslim nations) but also raises serious questions about Pakistan's reliability as a Chinese ally. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD For years, China has nudged Pakistan into geopolitical standoffs, from India to Afghanistan, without offering full-throated support in return. Now, Pakistan appears to be returning the favour — pursuing backroom deals with Washington, Beijing's chief rival, even at the expense of regional Islamic unity. In essence, Pakistan may be responding to China's duplicity with a diplomatic double-cross of its own. Iran: China's rhetoric, No rescue China's strategic partnership with Iran has likewise revealed limits. Despite formal ties, China's actions in moments of crisis have been modest. When conflict flared in 2023, Beijing publicly protested attacks on Iranian territory and urged de-escalation but provided no concrete assistance. China continued its oil purchases and offered only 'ritual calls for 'dialogue,'' as analyst Craig Singleton put it, with 'no drones or missile parts, no emergency credit line' for Tehran. In effect, Iran's leaders were left largely on their own. A power promising friendship to all sides risks being an 'unreliable partner' when true support is needed. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD As Iran finds itself under sustained bombardment from Israeli and American airpower in the latest round of hostilities, China's silence has been deafening. Despite signing a much-publicised 25-year strategic cooperation pact with Tehran in 2021, Beijing has offered little more than vague diplomatic statements calling for 'restraint' and 'dialogue'. While Iran bears the brunt of Western military might, China — its supposed economic and strategic partner — has done nothing tangible to shield it. No emergency aid, no political deterrence, and certainly no military support. This passivity has not gone unnoticed in Tehran, where officials are beginning to question whether China's promises of partnership are worth anything in moments of existential crisis. Once again, Beijing's playbook appears consistent: exploit the partnership when it serves Chinese interests, then retreat into cautious neutrality when the ally is under fire. Sri Lanka & Africa: China's debt-trap diplomacy China's approach to debt has alarmed leaders from Asia to Africa. In Sri Lanka, Colombo borrowed heavily to build the Hambantota deep-water port. When the port failed to generate enough revenue, Sri Lanka in 2017 gave China a controlling stake and a 99-year lease on the facility. Sri Lanka effectively handed over a sovereign asset to settle its debts. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In Africa, governments have voiced analogous concerns. Many Chinese loans carry high interest rates, short maturities and stringent conditions that squeeze borrowers. For example, Uganda agreed to cede the first 20 years of toll and airport revenues to China under a single infrastructure loan. Unlike Western creditors, China generally does not cancel principal; instead, it extends repayment schedules, leaving nations mired in long obligations. This dreaded 'debt-trap diplomacy' is akin to a modern usury scheme, as Chinese financing often ensnares partner states in burdensome debt. In case after case — from Sri Lanka's debt crisis to Africa's warning cries, from Pakistan's economic freefall to Iran's military isolation — China has repeatedly proven to be an unreliable partner. It urges nations into high-risk ventures and alliances but recoils when those same partners face pressure or peril. As Iran takes a relentless beating from Israeli and American forces, Beijing remains conspicuously absent, offering neither deterrence nor defence. And now, the betrayal appears mutual. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD What emerges particularly from Islamabad's offer of military bases to the US must trouble Beijing: If China's 'all-weather friendships' are built on shallow commitments, its allies are increasingly beginning to respond in kind — with double-crosses, disillusionment and quiet departures from the orbit of the Middle Kingdom. The author is a senior journalist and writer. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views


Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Former CJIs to present views before ONOE panel
Former chief justices of India D Y Chandrachud and J S Kehar would appear before the parliamentary panel scrutinising the bills proposing simultaneous polls, a source said on Thursday. The next meeting of the Joint Committee on the Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-Ninth (Amendment) Bill, 2024 and the Union Territories Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2024 has been scheduled for July 11 when the panel members will hold interaction with the two retired chief justices, the source added. Besides, senior advocate and former Rajya Sabha member E M Sudarsana Natchiappan , who is also a former chairperson of the standing committee on Personnel, Public Grievances, Law and Justice, and former Union law minister and former Karnataka chief minister M Veerappa Moily would also appear before the panel for an interaction. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Direct Shopping From Adidas Franchise Store, Up To 50% Off Original Adidas Get Offer Undo The 39-member committee is in the process of scrutinising two bills on simultaneous elections, including one for amending the Constitution. The tenure of the committee headed by BJP MP P P Chaudhary has extended till the first day of the last week of Parliament's monsoon session. Live Events The bill was sent to the panel in December last year after being introduced in Lok Sabha . The government has asserted that simultaneous elections would boost development, as frequent elections hampered development work, and reduce public expenditure. Opposition parties have slammed the idea as "unconstitutional" and against federalism.