&w=3840&q=100)
Use of children in crimes calls for re-fixing age of juvenility: Delhi HC
Justice Girish Kathpalia made the observations while dismissing an anticipatory bail plea of a man accused of using a child in illicit liquor trafficking.
The judge said far more serious than the illicit liquor trafficking was the child abuse in carrying out such crimes.
"Over a period of time, it is being observed that criminals use children to commit wide ranging crimes, involving not just liquor and drugs peddling but also arms/ammunition and even acts of extreme violence, which is leading the society to consider re-fixing the age of juvenility. In my view, far more serious than the illicit liquor trafficking is the child abuse in carrying out such crimes," the court noted.
In the case at hand, one Narender was booked on the directions of Juvenile Justice Board, when the juvenile in conflict with law was produced before it.
The board directed the FIR against the man primarily for the reason that the juvenile in conflict with law could not be the accused and the victim in the same FIR, the prosecution said.
The high court denied the relief to the accused, saying it had to be unearthed whether there was a wide network engaged in similar activities using children.
"Apart from the gravity of the offence, it is also the requirement of police to carry out custodial interrogation of the accused, which is significant. It is necessary to unearth if there was/is any other incident of similar nature involving the accused/applicant and any child. It also needs to be unearthed if there is a wide network engaged in similar activities using children. Therefore, I do not find it a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the accused/applicant," the court said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
9 hours ago
- The Hindu
₹98.25-crore Corporation contract irregularities during S.P. Velumani's tenure: Madras HC questions special court over delay in taking chargesheets on file
The Madras High Court has called for a report from a Special Court in Chennai with respect to the delay in taking on file the chargsheets filed with respect to alleged irregularities in the award of contracts by Greater Chennai and Coimbatore Municipal Corporations when S.P. Velumani of the AIADMK served as Municipal Administration Minister between 2014 and 2018. Justice N. Anand Venkatesh directed the Special Court for Prevention of Corruption Act cases to submit the report by August 22, 2025. He also directed S. Vimala, serving as the Superintendent of Police in the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC), to file an affidavit explaining the substantial delay in obtaining sanction to prosecute the public servants listed as accused in the case. The directions were issued on a second contempt of court petition filed by anti-corruption organisation Arappor Iyakkam, represented by its managing trustee Jayaram Venkatesan, against the Indian Police Service (IPS) officer. The present contempt plea had been filed for non-compliance of an order passed by the court on April 5, 2024, in the first contempt of court petition filed against her predecessor. Explaining the history of the case, the petitioner's counsel V. Suresh and D. Nagasaila said, his client had lodged a complaint with the DVAC way back in 2018 regarding illegal award of corporation contracts to those who shared close ties with the then Minister, thereby resulting in the unjust enrichment of public officials and diversion of the money earned into select companies and firms. When there was no response, Arappor Iyakkam filed a public interest litigation petition seeking a direction to register a First Information Report and constitute a special investigation team. The High Court on July 19, 2021, ordered that 'the State should spare no effort in getting to the bottom of the matter and proceed against those found to be responsible for the irregularities.' Subsequently, a FIR was registered against Mr. Velmunani and 16 others on August 9, 2021. However, another Division Bench of the High Court on November 30, 2022, quashed the FIR with respect to Mr. Velumani alone, for want of prima facie materials, but granted liberty to the DVAC to include his name too in the chargesheet if it was able to gather any fresh materials during the course of investigation. In 2023, six private firms approached the High Court to quash the FIR with respect to them too. On August 2, 2023, Justice Venkatesh refused to quash the FIR and asked the companies to wait and see whether their names figure in the final report (chargesheet). He also directed the DVAC to complete the investigation and file the final report within six weeks after obtaining sanction to prosecute the public servants. It was complaining about disobedience of this order, Arappor Iyakkam had filed its first contempt plea in 2024 against the then DVAC SP A. Myilvaganan. Justice Venkatesh closed the plea on April 5, 2024, after recording the submission of DVAC that it had filed two chargesheets before the special court on March 1, 2024. Then, he directed the special court to act upon those chargesheets within two weeks. Alleging disobedience of this order, the complainant had filed the present contempt plea against incumbent SP Ms. Vimala who told Justice Venkatesh that the chargesheets were returned by the special court on multiple occassions for rectification of defects. She said, almost all the defects pointed out by the court were rectified and the chargesheets were finally resubmitted before the court on July 12, 2025. Ms. Vimala said, the case was related to a loss of ₹98.25 crore caused to the Greater Chennai and Coimbatore Municipal Corporations. Hence, the DVAC had filed the first chargesheet against 58 accused persons along with over one lakh pages of tender related documents. The second chargesheet was filed against 40 accused persons along with over 50,000 pages of tender related documents. The special court returned the chargesheets on August 16, 2024 with an observation that several documents were not filled in OCR format, had dull impressions and were in a torn condition. The DVAC rectified the defects and resubmitted the chargesheets on November 11, 2024. However, the special court returned them again on February 14, 2025 for submission of additional supporting materials. The special court insisted on submitting the Government Orders related to the appointing authority of the public servants who had been listed as the accused, the age proof of the accused, their photographs, e-mail IDs, contact numbers, and so on. The chargesheets were finally resubmitted on July 12, 2025, along with all documents, except the GO, as sought by the special court, Ms. Vimala said. Stating she had no deliberate intention to disobey court orders, the SP urged the court purge her from the contempt proceedings. However, Justice Venkatesh directed her to explain the long delay in obtaining sanction to prosecute the public servants and also called for a report from the special court for not having taken the chargesheets on file within two weeks as ordered by the High Court on April 5, 2024.
Time of India
16 hours ago
- Time of India
'Give them a better life, don't throw them out': Former India cricket captain urges compassion for stray dogs
New Delhi: Stray dogs being fed on a roadside at KG Marg, in New Delhi. (PTI Photo) Former India cricket captain Kapil Dev has called on Delhi authorities to provide stray dogs with a better life, following a recent Supreme Court directive to move them to shelter homes. The order instructed the Delhi government and other relevant bodies to remove stray dogs from public spaces and house them in designated shelters. The decision has sparked controversy among animal rights activists, who fear challenges in its implementation. In a video message for animal welfare group Petfamilia, Kapil Dev said he believed dogs were among the most beautiful creatures and appealed to officials to treat them with compassion. 'I request the authorities to look after them, give them a better life, and not throw them out,' he said. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! The matter returned to court after another bench questioned why authorities had begun picking up animals even before the earlier order was made public. The bench also criticised the lack of proper implementation of animal control guidelines, which has contributed to the current situation. Poll What is your stance on the Supreme Court's directive to shelter stray dogs? Supportive of the directive Opposed to it Need more information Indifferent A bench comprising Justice Vikram Nath, Justice Sandeep Mehta, and Justice NV Anjaria heard the case this morning. This followed an August 11 order by a two-judge bench of Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice R Mahadevan, which led to protests by animal lovers against the removal of strays from residential areas. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 11 Foods That Help In Healing Knee Pain Naturally | Zen Life Mag Undo Representing the Delhi government, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta highlighted incidents of stray dog attacks on children, some resulting in fatalities from rabies. He argued that sterilisation alone cannot prevent rabies and stressed that while dogs should not be killed, they need to be separated from public spaces for safety reasons. Citing government data, he said there were 37 lakh dog bite cases in the last year, adding that the issue requires urgent court intervention. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
HC upholds order based on account of man with 98% burns
1 2 Kolkata: Even with 98% burn injuries, if a victim's multiple dying declarations were consistent and coherent, they alone could be the basis of conviction, the Calcutta High Court said on Thursday, upholding the life sentence of a man convicted in the murder of a Beleghata resident, who was set on fire after being doused in kerosene, in 2017. The division bench of Justice Rajarshi Bharadwaj and Justice Apurba Sinha Ray held: "Even if there are multiple dying declarations, the court should consider whether they are consistent or not. If inconsistent, the court should ask for corroboration. Otherwise, if the dying declarations, due to their coherence and unblemished nature, can inspire confidence... they can be relied upon by court without further corroboration. " In this case, convict Avijit Chatterjee alias Abhijit Chatterjee alias Ramu's fate depended on proving the dying declarations by victim Sanjoy Halder as the actual evidence. You Can Also Check: Kolkata AQI | Weather in Kolkata | Bank Holidays in Kolkata | Public Holidays in Kolkata | Gold Rates Today in Kolkata | Silver Rates Today in Kolkata Halder sold toys at Sarkar Bazar near Phoolbagan. On Jan 21, 2013, his wife Jharna and one of their two sons found him unconscious and burnt at a pond near their home. The family claimed he attempted suicide but their statements were ruled out as they did not see whether Halder self-immolated or if three persons doused him in kerosene and set him ablaze, as he claimed in his dying declarations. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Great news for Malaysians who need an early payout! iOS Credit Read More Undo Halder gave two dying declarations: one to the doctor, to whom he mentioned the oil being poured on him and another to police, whom he told the culprits' names—Madhu, Phuchka and Avijit. He also told police about an altercation that had led to the incident. "To rely upon a dying declaration, the court has to ascertain whether the victim was mentally fit and alert… It is true that in the second declaration, there is no certificate that the victim was conscious and alert to make such a statement, but as the doctor, a few minutes back, had noted the down patient's mental alertness, the non-recording of the mental condition in the second declaration cannot be treated as a serious lacuna in the prosecution case," the HC held. The court added to ascertain from a dying declaration, courts have to find out whether or not the patient was conscious and alert to make such a statement. Halder could mention his name, father's name, age and address, showing he was mentally alert. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Happy Independence Day wishes , messages , and quotes !
