Rahul Gandhi condemns torture of two dalit youths in Odisha, demands arrest of culprits
Bhubaneswar, June 24 (UNI) Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi has strongly condemned the inhuman torture inflicted on two Dalit youths in Singipur village under Dharakot block of Ganjam district in Odisha.
Terming the incident a stark reminder that caste discrimination still persists, Rahul stated on social media, "This incident is a mirror for those who say caste is no longer an issue."
He demanded the immediate arrest and strict punishment of the culprits involved.
"The country is governed by the Constitution, not by the selective memory of individuals," Rahul Gandhi remarked.
Describing the brutality, the Congress leader said the Dalit youths were forced to kneel, eat grass, drink dirty water, and were paraded through the streets on their knees. He called the act not just inhuman but a barbaric assault on the ideals of humanity.
"Every incident that violates the dignity of Dalits is an attack on Baba Saheb Ambedkar's Constitution," he emphasized.
Rahul alleged that such incidents are becoming increasingly common in BJP-ruled states due to politics rooted in hatred and discrimination.
He further stated that atrocities against Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), and women have risen alarmingly in Odisha.
The horrifying incident, which occurred in Dharakote block of Ganjam district, went viral on social media. The video shows the two Dalit youths being publicly humiliated and tortured over mere suspicion of cattle smuggling.
The victims, residents of Haripur village, were reportedly transporting three cows to Singipur as dowry for a wedding when they were stopped by a mob.
On suspicion of illegal cow smuggling, the mob tied them with ropes, paraded them through the village on their knees, and forced them to drink dirty drain water.
UNI DP PRS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
18 minutes ago
- NDTV
Poll Panel Writes To Rahul Gandhi On 'Match-Fixing', Gets No Reply: Sources
New Delhi: Rahul Gandhi has not yet replied to an Election Commission letter inviting him to discuss allegations that the 2024 Maharashtra and Haryana Assembly elections were rigged, sources told NDTV Tuesday. The poll panel - which has repeatedly and firmly denied the Congress and Mr Gandhi's claims that voter lists were manipulated and unverified individuals allowed to vote - sent the letter June 12. It was marked as 'received' at his residence in Delhi and also sent to his e-mail address, sources said. Among his many accusations, Mr Gandhi had expressed concerns over the rigging of the 2024 Maharashtra and Haryana state elections; in the former he pointed out the BJP won 47 of 50 seats in which there was an "unprecedented increase" in voters - by eight per cent in just five months. The EC denied all such claims, labelling the allegations "factually incorrect and misleading". In fact, earlier this month the panel re-released a document issued in April to counter Rahul Gandhi's claims, and fears of a repeat in the Bihar election later this year. The Congress and Mr Gandhi had also demanded video and photographs from polling booths, arguing the poll panel's revised guidelines - reducing retention period of CCTV footage to 45 days - was meant to hide potential electoral malpractice at polling booths. On X Mr Gandhi also asked more questions of the EC and claimed it was, in fact, deleting evidence. However, the Election Commission last week said that while the request to retain visuals of voting for more than 45 days seemed reasonable, it would impact voters' privacy and security. READ | "Contrary To Voter Privacy": Poll Body Sources On Voting Footage Demands "Voter list? Will not provide machine-readable format; CCTV footage? It was hidden by changing the law; Photo-video of the election? Not in one year, we will destroy it in 45 days. The one from whom answers are needed is destroying the evidence. It is clear the match is fixed. And a fixed election is poison for democracy," the Congress MP wrote in Hindi. Sources in the Commission, however, told NDTV, "What is veiled as a very logical demand is contrary to the privacy and security concerns of the voters... a legal position laid down in the Representation of the People Act 1950/1951 and the directions of the Supreme Court". "Sharing of the footage, which would enable easy identification of the electors by any group or an individual, would leave both the elector who has voted and those who haven't vulnerable to pressure, discrimination and intimidation by anti-social elements," the panel pointed out. The sources said retaining CCTV footage is not mandatory but is done by the Election Commission for 45 days since it is in line with timeframe for fiing of legal challenges.
NDTV
19 minutes ago
- NDTV
50 Years Since Emergency: What Really Fuelled Indira Gandhi's Insecurity
On the eve of the 50th anniversary of June 25, the day in 1975 when, setting aside all norms, the Emergency was imposed, it may be worthwhile to recapitulate the events in the fortnight preceding that day as well as the events of the two years that preceded it. Gujarat's Navnirman Movement (December 1973-April 1974) was spurred by high mess bills in college hostels. This inspired the Bihar movement (from March 1974), which ultimately was led by Jayaprakash Narayan (JP) on the plank of 'Total Revolution', seeking change in polity. An all-India strike by railwaymen in April-May 1974, led by George Fernandes, the head of the National Coordination Committee of Railwaymen's Struggle (NCCRS), added to the chaos preceding June 1975. In January 1975, Railway Minister Lalit Narain Mishra was killed in a bomb blast on the platform of the Samastipur railway station in Bihar. This case is yet to be solved - a petition filed by his grandson, Vaibhav Mishra, seeking the reopening of the investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), was admitted by the Delhi High Court recently. Poverty, food shortages and unemployment fanned these tensions and shook the Indira Gandhi regime, which till 1972 had been basking in the glory of victory over Pakistan in the Bangladesh Liberation War of 1971. The roots of the political crisis that led to Emergency lay in the factional politics of Congress. In 1964, the political ambitions of Morarji Desai and Jagjivan Ram to succeed Jawaharlal Nehru were thwarted by the popularity of Lal Bahadur Shastri, whom Nehru had covertly groomed. Shastri made Gandhi a minister as he wanted to have the tag of 'Nehru legitimacy'(initially, Gandhi had been reluctant, but faced with the prospect of Shastri opting for her aunt, Vijayalaxmi Pandit, instead, she agreed). When Shastri passed away in Tashkent in January 1966, the choice fell upon Gandhi. Morarji lost out yet again. He challenged her again after the 1967 general election, which saw the Congress retain the Lok Sabha by a slender majority and lose power in the entire Indo-Gangetic plains to Opposition coalitions. Yet again, Gandhi prevailed. Morarji was a pivot of the Navnirman Movement and a prominent face of the JP agitation. He replaced Gandhi as Prime Minister in March 1977. The Congress split in 1969 began with her dropping Desai from her cabinet. The internal bickering in the Grand Old Party led to its split in 1969. A veneer of ideology was sought to be put on the split, but the intrinsic reason was a clash of personal ambitions. A section of the party wanted to throw off the Nehru yoke. The 1969 split made Gandhi lose the majority in the Lok Sabha, though she survived, thanks to the support extended by DMK and CPI leaders. To overcome this handicap, Gandhi called for elections one year before they were due, in 1971. Opposition united in what came to be known as the 'Grand Alliance' to challenge her. But the Congress, which had a slender majority in 1967, returned with over 350 seats in 1971. Irrepressible socialist leader Raj Narain, who had later defeated Gandhi in 1977, lost to her at Rae Bareli in 1971. He challenged the result in a petition before the Allahabad High Court on the grounds that Gandhi had used unfair practices to win. Raj Narain was represented by Shanti Bhushan, while Gandhi was defended by eminent jurist Nani Palkhivala. The latter had to take the witness stand in this case, which she lost on June 12, 1975. Palkhivala quit the case in protest when the Emergency was imposed as a consequence. Judge Jagmohan Lal Sinha dismissed charges of bribery but held that Gandhi had misused official machinery as her aide, Yashpal Kapoor's resignation had not been formally accepted when he began campaigning (Kapoor had resigned before leaving Delhi, but the formality of acceptance was pending). Justice Sinha gave the Congress 20 days to elect someone to discharge Gandhi's duties. Her resignation was demanded overtly by the opposition parties, but there were murmurs within the Congress as well. Initially, Gandhi toyed with the idea that Sardar Swaran Singh, who had been a minister since Nehru's days in 1952, be sworn in as Prime Minister while she stepped down and got herself cleared by the Supreme Court. Babu Jagjivan Ram, who was minister since his induction in the Interim Government of 1946, felt he should be chosen instead, though Gandhi was not confident that he would step aside when she won her case. This despite the fact that in 1969, she had relied upon Jagjivan Ram to head her faction of the Congress. The Election Commission's 1971 results record two Congress parties - the Indira faction's overwhelming 350+ results are credited to Congress (Jagjivan Ram), and 16 seats are credited to Congress (Organization). After the Emergency was imposed, on July 5, Jagjivan Ram moved the official resolution in Parliament for its approval. And after Gandhi relaxed Emergency on January 20, 1977, to hold elections, Jagjivan Ram on February 2 walked out of the Congress to form Congress for Democracy (CFD), which became an ally of the Opposition combine that ousted the Indira regime in March 1977. Apart from Jagjivan Ram, the then Congress President, Dev Kanta Barooah, who later was to be remembered for his 'India is Indira' slogan, raised Gandhi's suspicion by suggesting that till she is cleared by courts, she could swap places with him, making him the Prime Minister with she heading the party. This suggestion apparently had gained currency at a meeting of MPs held at 12 Safdarjung Road, the residence of Minister Chandrajit Yadav. Indira Gandhi's Principal Secretary, Prof PN Dhar, has recorded in his memoirs that the then Intelligence Bureau (IB) Director, Atma Jayram, had submitted a report suggesting that not more than 159 of the 350 party MPs would support Gandhi if there were to be a show of strength. The rest of the MPs' loyalties were divided - with Yashwant Rao Chavan heading the list with 17 supporters, and others having even less. In 1972, in the Shimla session of Congress, 'Young Turk' Chandrashekhar created history by getting elected to the Congress Working Committee despite Gandhi's opposition. The IB's report to Dhar stated that Young Turks had the biggest block - of 25 MPs - opposed to Gandhi's continuation. Chandra Shekhar was arrested as Emergency was imposed. When the Janata Party was launched on May 1, 1977, he became its President. He also briefly served as Prime Minister in 1990-91 after the fall of the VP Singh government. Thus, it was not merely JP's call to the army, police and government servants on June 25 from the Ramlila Ground - ' Aap roti ke tukdo par bikey nahin hain,aapne imaan nahin bech diya hai ' - which prompted the Emergency, as was cited by Home Ministry documents placed before Parliament on July 21, 1977, to justify the action. Internal threat to her leadership from within the Congress also played a part.
Hindustan Times
19 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump chastises ‘very dumb' Jerome Powell ahead of Congressional testimony, warns ‘We will be paying for…'
President Donald Trump blasted Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell for no cut in the benchmark interest rate, stressing that Europe has has 10 cuts and the 'great economy' US should at least have two to three points lower. Jerome Powell is one of over a dozen central bank executives that vote on the bank's interest rate, and he is the head of the Federal Open Market Committee. Taking to Truth Social on Tuesday, Trump wrote: 'Europe has had 10 cuts, we have had ZERO. No inflation, great economy—we should be at least two to three points lower. Would save the USA 800 Billion Dollars Per Year, plus. What a difference this would make. If things later change to the negative, increase the rate.' Trump has repeatedly called for Powell's termination and openly attacked him for failing to lower interest rates. Higher interest rates, in the view of the president, are needlessly impeding the growth of the US economy. On the other hand, the Fed is worried about the inflation forecast due to Trump's tariffs. Trump slams Powell as 'very dumb' person In his post, Trump mentioned that Powell will be in Congress today to explain why he is not slashing the rate. He went on to call Powell 'very dumb' and 'hardheaded person.' ''Too Late' Jerome Powell, of the Fed, will be in Congress today in order to explain, among other things, why he is refusing to lower the Rate,' the President wrote. 'I hope Congress really works this very dumb, hardheaded person, over. We will be paying for his incompetence for many years to come. THE BOARD SHOULD ACTIVATE. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' Last week, Trump referred to Powell as 'a real dummy' in a similar tirade on Truth Social on the announcement that interest rates would remain unchanged. 'Too Late—Powell is the WORST. A real dummy, who's costing America $Billion,' he wrote. Powell is one of over a dozen central bank executives that vote on the bank's interest rate, and he is the head of the Federal Open Market Committee. He will step down as Federal Reserve chair next year. Also Read: 'Papa Johns still reporting...'; Pentagon Pizza tracker drops new hint as Iran's bombs US airbases in Qatar Here's what Jerome Powell said After the Fed's declaration that it would not cut rates, Powell said: 'What everyone on the FOMC wants is a good solid American economy with a strong labor market and price stability. That's what we want. We think our policy is well positioned to right now deliver that and to be able to respond in a timely way as the data lead us around.' The Fed will meet again on July 29 and 30 to make a decision on whether to lower interest rates.
