Leonardo DiCaprio Reveals His Biggest Career 'Regret' Is Turning Down This Mark Wahlberg Movie: 'A Masterpiece'
Leonardo DiCaprio admitted his "regret" over turning down Mark Wahlberg's role in Boogie Nights in a new interview with Paul Thomas Anderson for Esquire
"It was a profound movie of my generation," he said, calling the film "a masterpiece"
DiCaprio's Basketball Diaries costar Wahlberg went on to land the part of Eddie Adams/Dirk Diggler, and DiCaprio said he "can't imagine anyone [else]" nowLeonardo DiCaprio "can't imagine anyone but" Mark Wahlberg in Boogie Nights, but he still regrets not starring in the classic film.
Wahlberg, 54, famously played Eddie Adams/Dirk Diggler in the 1997 Paul Thomas Anderson film, but the part was originally offered to DiCaprio, 50, who turned it down as he had already signed on to star in James Cameron's epic Titanic.
But in a new interview with Anderson for Esquire's Mavericks of Hollywood issue ahead of the release of their movie One Battle After Another, DiCaprio told the director, 55, "I'll say it even though you're here: My biggest regret is not doing Boogie Nights."
"It was a profound movie of my generation," he continued. "I can't imagine anyone but Mark in it. When I finally got to see that movie, I just thought it was a masterpiece. It's ironic that you're the person asking that question, but it's true."
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human-interest stories.
Boogie Nights takes place in the 1970s and follows Wahlberg's Eddie, a teenage nightclub dishwasher, after he is discovered by filmmaker Jack Horner (Burt Reynolds) and becomes a wildly successful porn star named Dirk Diggler.
The movie also starred Julianne Moore, Heather Graham, Don Cheadle, John C. Reilly, William H. Macy and Philip Seymour Hoffman.
As for Wahlberg and DiCaprio, the two worked together both before and after Boogie Nights: in The Basketball Diaries (1995) and The Departed (2006).
Wahlberg opened up about the pair's rocky start before filming The Basketball Diaries in a 2018 interview with Extra, admitting they "both had a specific opinion about each other" initially.
'Once I finally got to the point where I was able to audition and read with [DiCaprio], then we just both kinda looked at each other, we were like, 'Wow!' We were literally out that night and we became fast friends," he added.
DiCaprio and Anderson finally get to team up with One Battle After Another, which stars the Oscar winner as Bob Ferguson, a former revolutionary figure who is being hunted by Sean Penn's police character, Steven Lockjaw.
Written and directed by Anderson, the action-thriller also stars Teyana Taylor, Wood Harris, Alana Haim, Regina Hall, Benicio del Toro and Chase Infiniti.
Related: https://people-app.onelink.me/HNIa/kz7l4cuf
In his chat with Anderson for Esquire, DiCaprio addressed how One Battle After Another "has been on" the director's "desk for a long time," adding, "It was a personal story for you in a lot of ways and certainly pertinent to the world that we're living in right now."
"But ultimately, wanting to do this movie was pretty simple: I've been wanting to work with you — Paul — for something like 20 years now," DiCaprio continued, "and I loved this idea of the washed-up revolutionary trying to erase his past and disappear and try and live some sort of normal life raising his daughter.
One Battle After Another is in theaters Sept. 26.
Read the original article on People
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Refinery29
31 minutes ago
- Refinery29
Reddit's Dirtiest Pick-Up Lines Will Make You Blush
We're all familiar with 'Hey baby, what's your sign?' and 'If I could rearrange the alphabet, I'd put U and I together.' But what about… dirty pick-up lines. You know, the sexy kind. And these pick-up lines have a very different purpose than cheesy pick-up lines, and are generally not good idea to use on strangers. Before you ask somebody, "Want to come over and watch porn all night on my new mirror?" you should be very sure they'd like to hear it. In fact, dating experts say that attempting to get a date with a pick-up line usually isn't going to work. "It's not necessarily about what you say, but whether or not you say something that feels genuine or right to you," Gabrielle Applebury, a sex and marriage counselor in Orange County, CA, previously told Refinery29. "[Using a pre-written pick-up line] is going to register on the other person that something is a little bit off.' All that said, pick-up lines are still a lot of fun to read… and you know best how your partner would respond to something like, 'Are you a stack of dirty dishes? 'Cause I want to get you wet and do you all night long.' So, here are the best dirty pick-up lines on Reddit. Funniest Dirty Pick-Up Lines "Let's pretend I'm the Titanic and you're the ocean, I'll go down on you." — Wesmore24 "I like you like I like my coffee. Constantly inside me." — madlaceann "I'm not into watching sunsets, but I'd love to see you go down." - deleted 'Are those pants from space? Because your ass is out of this world.' — jaimedieuetilmaime 'Are you a sea lion? 'Cause I can see you lyin' in my bed tonight.' — undignifiedstrut 'You remind me of a championship bass. I don't know whether to mount you or eat you.' — danman1232 Dirty Pick-Up Lines To Use On Hinge & Tinder & Other Dating Apps 'Are you my appendix? Because I don't understand how you work, but this feeling in my stomach makes me want to take you out." — robotwarlordelephant "If you were a fruit, you'd be a fine-apple.' — Pannanana 'If you were a vegetable, you'd be a cutecumber.' — missminimoo 'Hey baby, are you a tiny wooden stick and I'm an equal amount of red phosphorus? Because we're a match!' — Enzo1030 'Are you a beaver? 'Cause dam.' — domokitten 'They say you are what you eat. If that's true, I could be you by morning.' — IAmTall 'My magic watch says you're not wearing any underwear. Oh you are? It must be 15 minutes fast.' — Danielle825 "That shirt looks very becoming on you. Then again if I was on you, I'd be coming too." — ANBU_Black_0ps "Are you butt dialing me? I thought I heard your ass calling me." — jamiedieuetilmaime 'Are you my pinky toe? Because I wanna bang you on my coffee table later tonight.' — GreekGeek6467 "Is your name winter? 'Cause you'll be coming soon." — Didi_Castle 'Is that a keg in your pants? 'Cause I wanna tap that ass.' — nrtphotos 'Let's play house! You'll be the door and I'll slam you.' — Thickboned_jones 'You got a phone in your back pocket? 'Cause that ass is calling me.' — tandra17 "Hey baby did you buy those pants on sale? Because at my place they're 100 percent off." — Fluffysniper Dirty Pick-Up Lines To Say To Women 'Are you a stack of dirty dishes? 'Cause I want to get you wet and do you all night long.' — supream-potato 'Do you have pet insurance? No. That's too bad because your pussy is going to get pounded tonight.' (via anonymous) 'I was on Tinder and swiped right on a girl with the same name as me. I sent the first message, and it rea, 'I've always wanted to date myself!!'' — ajd011394 'Is your name Medusa? 'Cause I'm rock hard.' — ShortDash 'I know three ways to make six inches disappear.' — juicyjensen
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
In their heads, Leonardo DiCaprio and Paul Thomas Anderson are just a couple of cool guys in their 30s
There's a lot to recommend about the 'one famous person interviews another' format that's been making the rounds in journalistic circles of late. Yes, you get some softballs thrown into the mix, and a basic 'we're all in this together' sympathy that might preclude hard questions being asked. But it's also pretty much the only way to get certain notably guarded stars—like, say, Leonardo DiCaprio—to go on record from within their comfort zones, as DiCaprio did in a recent Esquire interview with fellow frequent reporter-phobe Paul Thomas Anderson. The pair are currently deep into collaboration mode, currently promoting their first film together, One Battle After Another, and were pretty ready to cut loose about their careers (and occasional mocking of Esquire's offered list of questions). The most interesting stuff, from a historical counterfactuals point of view, pops up early, when Anderson opens by asking DiCaprio if he has any big regrets, and immediately gets back 'not doing Boogie Nights' in response. (Anderson pursued DiCaprio for the part back in the '90s, but the actor turned him down due to time commitments on Titanic, pointing Anderson toward his former co-star Mark Wahlberg instead.) The two men spend a while basically asking why they'd never managed to work together in the intervening time, despite a long-standing mutual admiration, before Anderson pivots to something way less Hollywood history, and more genuinely interesting: Anderson: I'm going to ask you a question, and you're going to answer as quickly as you can. If you didn't know how old you are, how old are you right now? DiCaprio: Thirty-two. Which is legitimately kind of fascinating (especially after Anderson notes that his own mental age is 27, i.e., the age he was at when Boogie Nights landed in theaters). DiCaprio, meanwhile, is apparently trapped in between The Aviator—by his own account the only one of his films he still regularly watches—and The Departed. ('What you'll have to do is investigate what happened when you were thirty-two,' Anderson notes, 'And then you're going to discover and uncover why that was your answer.') And while we're well aware that DiCaprio's response opens up room for, roughly, 8 million jokes about his dating history, it's also an interesting reflection on where the just-turned-50 actor is sitting mentally right now: Deep into his long-running collaboration with Martin Scorsese, and just pushing into more of a production role on his own films. It's at least a more productive view into his worldview than the annoyed 'Sheesh' he gives when Anderson gamely fires the Esquire-provided question, 'You give so much to every role you play, once filming wraps, what do you do to come down from it?' which Anderson eventually reframes into something slightly more palatable to the two hip, young 30-somethings' mental sensibilities. One Battle After Another hits theaters on September 26. More from A.V. Club The best movies of 2005 R.I.P. Bobby Whitlock, co-founder of Derek And The Dominos Taylor Swift's Life Of A Showgirl now officially starting on October 3 Solve the daily Crossword


Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
Prince Andrew's rudeness to Kate Middleton caused ongoing feud with Prince William: book
A new explosive book on Prince Andrew is so radioactive that several royal experts already believe it will "secure the final nail in his coffin." The disgraced Duke of York is the subject of an unauthorized biography by British author Andrew Lownie that hits bookshelves on Aug. 14, "Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York." Royal experts told Fox News Digital that it's a 400-page-long reputational death blow based on hundreds of sources. One of the claims the book makes is that at one point, Andrew was "rude" to Kate Middleton, known as the jewel of the royal family. This has resulted in tensions between the duke and his nephew, Prince William, which have lasted for years. A source also claimed to Lownie that William, who is heir to the British throne, "has long worked behind the scenes to evict his uncle from Royal Lodge." "Envy has always been a strong emotion within the royal family," royal expert Ian Pelham Turner claimed to Fox News Digital. "These alleged barbed comments ultimately upset William. It's one of many 'Baby Grumpling' outbursts Andrew was famed for when flying into a rage when anyone questioned his authority." "Certainly the Royal Lodge, Andrew's home in Windsor, is a constant source of embarrassment for the rest of the family," Turner shared. While Andrew has a 75-year lease, William could look for other ways to remove the duke from the too-large palatial property once he becomes king, he argued. Lownie's book paints the late Queen's favorite son as a globe-trotting, womanizing eccentric — known for strange indulgences like "air showers" and a menagerie of stuffed animals, outbursts that left staff in tears, and a history of eyebrow-raising business dealings. Fox News Digital reached out to Buckingham Palace, Kensington Palace and a spokesperson for the duke's ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, for a comment. A Buckingham Palace spokesperson previously told Fox News Digital they don't speak for the prince as he's no longer a working royal. "Prince Andrew is becoming the Titanic of the royal family, with him hitting the scandal iceberg, which could sink the whole royal ship," said Turner. "Unruly, rude, arrogant — and that's, according to the book, some of his better qualities." "I am not easily shocked, as a journalist for 59 years," said Turner. "But this book examines the detailed sex life of 'Randy Andy,' which sounds more like a lifetime marathon than a sprint, allegedly starting at age 11. This, in any legal form across the world, is child abuse, which begs the question, how did this happen?" "This is a book that will secure the final nail in Prince Andrew's coffin," British broadcaster and photographer Helena Chard told Fox News Digital. While many of the accounts shared with Lownie are eyebrow-raising, the U.K. Times reported that the most disturbing stories from his "character assassination" are those involving late American financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The BBC reported that Lownie's book "offers meticulous detail" of the connection between the two men, which allegedly goes back to the early '90s, much earlier than what was previously claimed. "The prince was a useful idiot who gave [Epstein] respectability and access to political leaders and business opportunities," Lownie wrote. He also quoted a friend of Andrew's who said of Epstein that it "was like putting a rattlesnake in an aquarium with a mouse." "The public image of Andrew has been frightful ever since his infamous car crash interview on 'Newsnight' in 2019," royal expert Richard Fitzwilliams told Fox News Digital. "… Andrew Lownie gives us a portrait of a bizarrely dysfunctional individual. He claims that… Andrew has leveraged his status for personal gain, and he also sees him as a threat to national security." Chard pointed out that some of Lownie's promised revelations may not surprise some readers. However, the book won't do the royal, who has been attempting to keep a low profile since his exit in 2019, any favors. But it does prove that "the Andrew problem" refuses to go away, she said. "[A lot] of the book's content is rehashing information that is already in the public domain," she argued. "However, there is certainly a peppering of extra salacious material, along with alleged intimate secrets. [But] we are all aware of Prince Andrew's bombastic character and that he makes very poor judgments. "His resignation from public roles and removal of his honorary military affiliations and charitable patronages are also well documented. He is in a never-ending fall from grace and the circle of chatter around his buffoon-like behavior and alleged wrongdoing is set to continue." "There are a few things surrounding Prince Andrew's personal life that jump out at me," Chard shared. "Prince Andrew may have been afforded many privileges. However, I can't help but feel unsettled by his vulnerable, lonely, isolated feelings growing up. His air of detachment and acts of sabotage undermine others and himself… And people will push to uncover the mystery behind Prince Andrew's finances." In January 2022, the queen, who died in September of that year, stripped her second son of his military titles and patronages. At the time, the father of two attempted to have a sexual abuse lawsuit made by Virginia Giuffre dismissed. Andrew settled with Giuffre for an undisclosed sum, agreeing to make a "substantial donation" to her survivors' organization. Giuffre said Epstein trafficked her and that she had sex with Andrew three times: in London during her 2001 trip, at Epstein's New York mansion when she was 17, and in the Virgin Islands when she was 18. The prince, who vehemently denied the allegations, acknowledged in a statement filed in court that Epstein was a sex trafficker and Giuffre "an established victim of abuse." Giuffre took her life in April of this year at her farm in Western Australia, her publicist confirmed. She was 41. Royal experts told Fox News Digital that despite book sales, it has already cast a dark cloud over the House of Windsor that can't be ignored. Fitzwilliams pointed out that current U.K. polls strongly support stripping Andrew of his remaining royal titles. "Andrew is a disgrace," said Fitzwilliams. "He has lost his patronages and cannot use his HRH title. However, he is still a Counsellor of State, a Knight of the Garter, and holds the title Duke of York. The former are [a] the gift of the monarch. There are reports that his nephew will remove them when he succeeds to the throne." "The removal of his dukedom would need an Act of Parliament, and this would involve public debate, which the royal family would certainly not relish," he added. British royals expert Hilary Fordwich told Fox News Digital that while the senior royals have long followed the late queen's mantra — never complain, never explain — she wondered if Lownie's book would prompt them to publicly respond. "The royal family is to act in the interest of the British public," said Fordwich. "Unfortunately, the Prince Andrew issue has been and always shall be a blemish on an otherwise outstanding track record of service and dedication to duty." "This issue is never going away," Fordwich warned. "His conduct has been beyond ghastly for so many years. Sadly, this subject was a weakness of the late queen. Even when staff tried to raise this issue, the conversation would inevitably turn to dogs and horses." WATCH: QUEEN ELIZABETH 'REMAINED INCREDIBLY CLOSE' TO PRINCE ANDREW 'RIGHT UP UNTIL HER DEATH,' ROYAL AUTHOR CLAIMS "The royal family was aware that the book was landing at a quiet news time," Chard claimed. "They were also aware that it was going to be an ugly, damning read… The royal family will ride the wake of the allegations and keep mum." According to the Times, Andrew is now "lonelier than ever." He primarily spends his time at Royal Lodge, the estate he shares with his ex-wife, reading camera manuals and watching favorite films like "The Terminator." His "saving grace" is the love and support he receives from his ex-wife, their two daughters and grandchildren. And many of those who once spoke highly of the prince have "abandoned him." Meanwhile, Ferguson has seemingly put out a message using her personal style. As Lownie's book made headlines in late July, the Duchess of York carried out a public appearance in London wearing loafers bearing the phrases "Never Complain" and "Never Explain." "Andrew does not appear to be doing much aside from playing golf and watching videos," Fitzwilliams claimed. "It is a far cry from the period when he was seen as a hero after the Falklands War in the 1980s. The Palace must be thankful in that it no longer acts for him, as this biography is extremely damning, both for him and his ex-wife." "Where does that leave him now? Broken… in solitude and despair at Royal Lodge, watching airplanes land on a big screen," Turner claimed. "The substantial mansion, by all accounts, is falling around him. Morally, he is being propped up by Sarah Ferguson and his daughters." But if Prince Andrew was ever hoping to say "I'll be back," he could forget it, said Chard. A royal comeback won't ever be in the cards. "The damage has been done," she said. "Prince Andrew no longer has the royal role that he so desperately craves. He lost his royal standing, which gave him his platform and status. He will not get this status back." "Perhaps he [could]… write his own authorized biography," said Turner. "He has nothing to lose."