Watch: Rishabh Pant sends bat flying and leaves crowd and dressing room in splits
ENG vs IND 2nd Test Day 4 Updates"Pant has lit this stadium alive. He lost his bat and then lost his shape,' said Karthik to Sky Sports. Broad asked the viewers to remain seated for the Pant show as said that nothing can be predicted while the Indian vice-captain is batting. "It's chaos. Don't go anywhere. You can't predict what Pant is going to do. Even he doesn't know!" said Broad. Pant survives two major scaresPant had come out with clear intent in the second innings as he was aiming to get quick runs and extend the lead. Pant hit a boundary and a big six off the third and fourth deliveries he faced and continued the onslaught. However, Zak Crawley dropped Pant while he was batting on 10 and it was a straight-forward chance. Right after sending his bat flying, Pant almost lost his wicket as he sent a leading edge towards Chris Woakes, whose diving attempt wasn't good enough. Pant remained unbeaten on 41 by the end of the first session as India's lead went past 350. - EndsMust Watch
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
24 minutes ago
- NDTV
Gautam Gambhir's Dressing Room-Shaking Speech Goes Viral, India Star Lauded For Inspiring Act
Indian head coach Gautam Gambhir hailed Rishabh Pant for his steely half-century despite an injured foot, saying that he has "inspired the next generation and created a legacy for himself", which is marked by resilience, bravery and putting the eam first. Pant, though unwillingly, has to bow out of the ongoing Test series against England due to a foot injury, with Tamil Nadu's Narayan Jagadeesan as his replacement. His last gift to the team before being forced to part ways due to injury was a valuable half-century, which he scored despite his injury and added some valuable runs to the first innings total of 358 runs. Speaking in a video by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), Gambhir said, "The foundation of this test team will be based on what Rishabh has done for the team. I hate talking about individuals; I have never spoken about individuals in a team sport. You have not only inspired this dressing room, but you have inspired the next generation." View this post on Instagram A post shared by Team India (@indiancricketteam) "This is what you have done, and that is a legacy which you have created for yourself and everyone in this dressing room. So very, very well done from everyone. And the country will always be proud of you," he added. Pant said that his move to bat was a gesture from his side to do whatever it takes to make his team win, and he was not thinking about any personal goals. "It has been amazing the way they have backed me. The team is under pressure, everything is there, but when the whole country stands behind you for the same cause, that is something, that emotion is difficult to explain. How proud I feel to represent my country. The only message I am going to give my team is, Let us win it, guys. Let us do it for the country," he added. All-rounder Washington Sundar also noted how swollen Pant's foot was and called him a "son of the country". "It is very difficult to even put in the feeling that he would be going through in words because he has fractured his toe, and he is in pain no matter what. I even saw his foot; it was swollen badly. So I think for him to even walk around actually takes a lot, but he did a lot more than that. I think the whole country is proud of him, and he is just the son of a country, I would say," he added. Pant finished the series as the second-highest run-getter currently, with 479 runs in four matches and seven innings at an average of 68.42, with two centuries and three fifties, and runs scored at a strike rate of over 77. His best score is 134, and he scored twin tons at Leeds, becoming the first Indian to do so in a Test. He broke several records during the series, establishing his reputation as the best wicketkeeper-batter among all Asians, especially in South Africa, England, New Zealand and Australia (SENA) nations. He also overtook his predecessor, MS Dhoni, for most Test tons by an Indian wicketkeeper, sealing his legacy as an all-time great already.
Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Nasser Hussain slams Ben Stokes' ‘silly' move: ‘He didn't have to bowl Brook… Washington & Jadeja deserved to be there at the end'
The Manchester Test between India and England, which seemed to be ending for a quiet draw took a u-turn quickly after England skipper Ben Stokes went to the Indian batters and offered his hand to call an end to the match before the last hour's play was to start. But with Ravindra Jadeja and Washington Sundar batting on 89 and 80, the Indians didn't take the offer from Stokes and chose to continue batting. Former England captain Nasser Hussain said he didn't have a problem with the call made by the Indian team, and both Jadeja and Sundar deserved to be there at the end. 'I didn't have a problem with it. England did. They had tired bowlers and tired legs and wanted to get off but the two lads had worked hard to get into the 80s and 90s and wanted hundreds,' said Hussain to Sky Sports. 'Stokes didn't have to bowl Harry Brook and it looked a bit silly but we make too much of these things. India deserved the draw and Washington and Jadeja deserved to be there at the end,' he added. Shortly after this drama, Jadeja scored his century as Stokes resorted to bowling loopy deliveries to him through Harry Brook. Jadeja slammed a six down the ground to score his 2nd Test century. Sundar, too, reached his maiden century as India finally agreed to end the hard-fought match in a draw. A visibly frustrated Stokes said after the match, 'I don't think there would have been much more satisfaction in walking off 100 not out, getting your team out of a tricky situation, than walking off at 80 or 90 not out. Scoring 10 more runs isn't going to change the fact you've saved your team from a series defeat.' India head coach Gautam Gambhir asked that if the shoe was on the other foot, would England have done the same? 'If someone is batting on 90 and the other one is batting on 85, don't they deserve a hundred? Would they have walked off? If someone from England side was batting on 90 and 85 and someone had the opportunity to get his first Test 100, wouldn't you allow him to do it? They weathered the storm. It's up to them. If they want to play that way, nothing more to say. I think both those guys deserved a 100 and fortunately they got it,' he said on Sunday at the post-match press conference.
India.com
24 minutes ago
- India.com
India vs England: Was Ben Stokes Right To Offer Early Draw? ICC Rules And Team India's Response Explained
The final day of the fourth Test between India and England at Old Trafford offered high-quality cricket — and an unexpected flashpoint. With just an hour left, England captain Ben Stokes invoked ICC Playing Condition 16.1.1, offering an early draw under the provision that allows both captains to agree that no result is possible. But when India declined — with Ravindra Jadeja on 89* and Washington Sundar on 80* — tensions flared, and the spirit of cricket was suddenly up for debate. Also Read: Explained: Why India Can't Withdraw From Asia Cup 2025 Fixture Against Pakistan – BCCI's Hands Tied So, who was right? Was Stokes justified in wanting to end early? Or did India have every right to chase personal milestones within the laws of the game? The ICC Rule Explained: What Does Law 16.1.1 Say? According to ICC Test Match Playing Conditions, Clause 16.1.1 states: "A match is drawn if no result is possible and both captains agree to terminate play." Importantly, this is not mandatory. It's a mutual decision — and a captain has every right to decline the offer. In this case, India exercised that right, with Jadeja and Sundar closing in on well-earned centuries after saving the match. India had lost only four wickets and were 75 runs ahead. The pitch was docile. The threat of collapse had passed. The team was safe — but the batters still had personal landmarks within reach. The match situation allowed it. The ICC rules allowed it. And so did the unwritten rules of Test cricket pride. Stokes Offers Draw, India Declines — Tension Follows Ben Stokes, nursing niggles and mindful of his bowling unit's workload, decided enough was enough. England had bowled 257.1 overs across five days. Archer and Woakes were visibly fatigued. Liam Dawson, the left-arm spinner, had bowled long spells exploiting the rough. Stokes offered the draw under Law 16.1.1 — and when India declined, frustration took over. Stokes turned to Jadeja and sarcastically asked: 'Jaddu, you want to get a Test hundred against Harry Brook and Joe Root?' The remark, caught on stump mic, sparked immediate criticism. Was it fair for Stokes to question India's intent when the law clearly permitted them to continue? Gavaskar, Gambhir, Manjrekar: The Verdict from Indian Legends Veteran commentator Sunil Gavaskar was quick to defend India. 'If a batter has weathered two sessions and saved the game, why shouldn't he aim for a century?' Gautam Gambhir, India's head coach, echoed the sentiment: 'They deserved that hundred. They fought hard. You don't walk off just because the opposition is tired.' Sanjay Manjrekar didn't hold back: 'Stokes behaved like a spoilt kid. Everything won't go your way just because you ask nicely.' Brook's Bowling and the Protest in Disguise After India declined the draw offer, England made a mockery of the final overs. Harry Brook, not a frontline bowler, sent down underarm lobs at 60 kmph. Jadeja responded by launching one for six to complete his century. Sundar followed soon after with his maiden Test hundred. Only then did India agree to shake hands. Was this England's passive-aggressive protest? Or was it a moment of sportsmanship gone wrong? What Does the ICC Rule Say About This? Crucially, nowhere in the ICC rules is there a stipulation that batters must accept a draw if offered. Nor is there any provision for enforcing one without mutual agreement. Law 16.1.1 exists to allow a draw — not force one. India, having secured the draw on merit, played well within the framework. In fact, continuing to bat — while seemingly milestone-driven — also served strategic goals. With just three days before the final Test at The Oval, India kept England's tired bowlers in the field longer. Tactical? Yes. Petty? Not at all.
