logo
Policy U-Turn puts AAP's political skills to test ahead of '27 elections

Policy U-Turn puts AAP's political skills to test ahead of '27 elections

Time of India20 hours ago
Chandigarh: The AAP govt's move to withdraw its controversial Land Pooling Policy 2025 will be a test of the party's political dexterity ahead of the Punjab assembly elections in 2027.
While the opposition is drawing parallels between the farmers' protest against the policy the protests stage to oppose the three farm laws in 2020-2021, AAP is calling the withdrawal of the policy "pragmatic" and a "timely retreat" in response to public sentiment. This to and fro is likely to shape the political discourse around AAP ahead of the 2027 contest.
In the first example of such a narrative, finance minister Harpal Singh Cheema said during a media interaction on Tuesday that there was no comparison between the three central laws and the policy, or the protests against them.
"There is no parallel," Cheema said, adding that over 700 farmers died in the 2020-21 stir and it caused the SAD to end its political alliance with BJP.
Cheema expressed confidence that the withdrawn policy won't harm AAP's electoral prospects and the party would improve on its 2022 performance in the next elections. Asked about state govt's initial claim that the policy was "farmer friendly", Cheema said the policy was introduced in the interest of farmers and other beneficiaries, but it was withdrawn based on their feedback.
He claimed that stakeholders were properly consulted throughout the process.
When asked what prompted the govt to scrap the policy, Cheema said CM Mann personally engaged with farmers. "The chief minister realised that they were not satisfied with the policy during his interactions at events," Cheema added.
He mentioned this wasn't the first land pooling policy in the state's history, pointing out that the Akalis implemented a similar policy in a staggered way, while the Congress allowed private players to acquire land.
Daljit Singh, a lawyer and member of the All India Congress Committe, said quite contrary to AAP govt's claims that it withdrew the land pooling policy to respect the farmers' opinion, the AAP leadership sensed its eroding political space. "The AAP govt was forced to reconsider its decision after the High Court order on Saturday made strong observations against the policy. It would be impossible for the ruling party to shed the tag of being anti-farmer and it will have a bearing on its performance in the next assembly elections," said Daljit Singh, who actively opposed the policy.
Amar Singh, the Congress MP from Fatehgarh Sahib, stated that the AAP govt's land pooling policy was introduced without any demand from the ground level. "It was a plan to loot landowners, and the Congress didn't allow that to happen," he said.
An AAP leader, meanwhile, confided on condition of anonymity that the land pooling policy "not only built a negative perception in the minds of landowners, but it also strengthened the opposition's charge that the party's Delhi leadership has a role in such key decisions."
He added, "For farmers, land has always been an emotive issue and somehow they perceived the land pooling policy with suspicion."
It is learnt that in the face of fierce opposition to the policy from landowners and rival parties, some AAP members internally voiced their concerns with the party, and the move could prove to be politically damaging for the party.
BOX: WASN'T THE FIRST LAND POOLING POLICY: CHEEMA
Punjab Finance Minister Harpal Singh Cheema claimed that previous Congress and SAD-BJP govts granted "change of land use" (CLU) for more than 30,000 acres of land for residential and industrial development.
"Illegal colonies mushroomed in the state during the previous govts and people have to live without proper amenities. Land for these colonies was taken at low rates from farmers and handed over to developers.
Land pooling policy was earlier introduced in Mohali by the Akali govt," he said.
Cheema added that the land pooling policy was aimed at planned urban development but was withdrawn if farmers were not satisfied with the policy.
"The AAP govt has defended the interests of farmers and has ensured that canal water reached every field. The Bhakra Beas Management Board (BBMB) was stopped from releasing additional water to Haryana. Uninterrupted power supply has been ensured for the agriculture sector," he said.
BOX: AAP MLA DISTRIBUTES SWEETS
AAP MLA from Fatehgarh Sahib Lakhbir Singh Rai distributed sweets to celebrate the withdrawal of the land pooling policy. "We are thankful to the CM Mann and the Punjab government, who, after listening to the voice of the farmers and the people of Punjab, have withdrawn the land pooling policy. The state's development will proceed according to the wishes of its people. The state govt has scrapped it based on the feedback," he said.
MSID:: 123259693 413 |
Stay updated with the latest local news from your
city
on
Times of India
(TOI). Check upcoming
bank holidays
,
public holidays
, and current
gold rates
and
silver prices
in your area.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rahul Gandhi's lawyer fears ‘harm to Congress leader', later makes U-turn
Rahul Gandhi's lawyer fears ‘harm to Congress leader', later makes U-turn

Indian Express

time10 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Rahul Gandhi's lawyer fears ‘harm to Congress leader', later makes U-turn

THE LAWYER representing Congress leader Rahul Gandhi in the criminal defamation case filed by Satyaki Savarkar, the grandnephew of Hindutva ideologue V D Savarkar, on Wednesday submitted a pursis in the Pune court hearing the case, but later made a U-turn, saying he had filed the application without consulting Rahul. The pursis stated that there was 'substantial apprehension that Rahul Gandhi may face harm' in light of his current political stand and Satyeki's 'lineage from Nathuram Godse'. On Wednesday, lawyer Milind Pawar, who is representing Rahul, filed the pursis, which is a formal written submission placed before court. Pawar had earlier said the court had admitted the pursis after he filed it in the afternoon. 'Rahul Gandhi has condemned the present government by raising the slogan 'Vote Chor Sarkar'. He has produced documentary evidence alleging serious electoral irregularities, directly implicating the Election Commission in actions which, by their very nature, provoke hostility from those whose political power and ideological interests stand challenged. The apprehension of harm to Rahul Gandhi is neither abstract nor unfounded. In light of the documented history of violent and anti-constitutional tendencies linked to the complainant's lineage, and considering the prevailing political climate, there exists a clear, reasonable, and substantial apprehension that Rahul Gandhi may face harm, wrongful implication, or other forms of targeting by persons subscribing to the ideology of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar,' it stated. 'Prudence demands that this apprehension be placed on record at this stage. The complainant himself has asserted descent from the associates of Mahatma Gandhi's assassins. In view of the grave history associated with such lineage, the defence harbours a genuine and reasonable apprehension that history must not be permitted to repeat itself,' it stated. However, in the evening, Pawar issued a press statement, 'The pursis dated August 13 was filed by me in the court without instructions from the client. The contents of the pursis were drafted by me without consulting my client Rahul Gandhi. My client has taken strong exception to filing of this pursis and has expressed his disagreement with the contents. I shall file a formal application tomorrow for withdrawal of the said pursis before the court.' When contacted earlier after the pursis was filed, Satyaki Savarkar had said, 'The statements made by defence in the pursis are completely baseless and appalling. They have claimed apprehension of harm to Rahul Gandhi which is baseless because he has been exempted from physically attending the proceedings. The defence has been filing such frivolous applications and pursis every now and then and are trying to delay the entire case.' Meanwhile on Wednesday Satyaki Savarkar's lawyer Sangram Kolhatkar moved the court seeking action against Rahul alleging he had committed perjury. 'In the past, all relevant documents have been duly provided to the advocate representing the accused, who has acknowledged the receipt. Despite this, the accused is now falsely claiming that no such material was received. This is a clear attempt to mislead the court. We therefore urge the court, in the strongest terms, to initiate appropriate action against the accused for this deliberate misrepresentation and committing perjury,' Kolhatkar said.

DUSU polls to be held on September 18, results next day
DUSU polls to be held on September 18, results next day

The Hindu

time10 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

DUSU polls to be held on September 18, results next day

The Delhi University Students' Union (DUSU) polls will be held on September 18, DU Registrar Vikas Gupta announced in a notification on Wednesday. As per the notification, the last date for submitting nomination papers is September 10. On the same day, the list of duly nominated candidates will be published. The withdrawal of documents has been scheduled for September 11, and the final list will be issued on the same day. Polling will take place on September 18 and votes will be counted on September 19. The announcement comes amid protests by student outfits against the university's decision mandating that the candidates deposit a ₹1-lakh bond at the time of filing nomination promising not to deface public properties while campaigning. The ₹1-lakh bond is part of DU's anti-defacement measures, issued a year after the Delhi High Court came down heavily on the university for property defacement. Student groups, such as RSS-affiliated Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP), Congress-backed National Students' Union of India (NSUI) and Aam Aadmi Party's Association of Students for Alternative Politics (ASAP), have opposed the move and termed it 'undemocratic'. Earlier in the day, the ABVP submitted a memorandum to the university demanding the withdrawal of the bond. 'Imposing a ₹1-lakh bond to contest the elections is not only undemocratic but also a malicious attempt to limit the elections to only the affluent students,' it said. ABVP national media convener Harsh Attri said they held a meeting with the Registrar, and he assured them of 'looking into their demands'. Reviewing options: DU The Registrar told The Hindu that they are considering alternatives to the anti-defacement measure. 'We are in the process of looking into possible alternatives, such as a guarantee from students instead, after multiple requests from students. We had introduced the measure in pursuance of the Delhi High Court's recommendations,' he said. Terming the anti-defacement measure a 'Tughlaqi farman', Kuldeep Bidhuri, the Delhi unit president of ASAP, described it as a 'conspiracy to directly block middle-class students from contesting elections'. Meanwhile, the NSUI staged a demonstration on the campus demanding 12 days of menstrual leave per semester for women students.

Siddaramaiah on back foot after losing two ST ministers in 2 years
Siddaramaiah on back foot after losing two ST ministers in 2 years

Economic Times

time13 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Siddaramaiah on back foot after losing two ST ministers in 2 years

Synopsis The Congress government in Karnataka faces backlash after dismissing Valmiki community minister KN Rajanna for criticizing "vote theft," a move directed by AICC leadership. This decision, following B Nagendra's earlier resignation due to fund diversion allegations, has shocked Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and risks alienating the crucial Ahinda voting bloc, while the BJP attempts to capitalize on the community's discontent. Agencies Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah Bengaluru: The Congress government in Karnataka has gone into a defensive mode, refraining from reacting much to the constant barbs hurled at it by the Opposition BJP over the firing of Valmiki community (ST) minister KN Rajanna. Chief minister Siddaramaiah removed Rajanna from the ministry on directions from AICC leadership, displeased over his critical comments on "vote theft". His removal from the state cabinet comes a year after another Valmiki minister, B Nagendra, resigned after allegations of diversion of funds meant for the welfare of ST members surfaced. Rajanna's ouster has been a shocker for Siddaramaiah as the MLA from Tumakuru district has been a loyal follower, known for his blunt talk. His exit comes at a time when the CM had been trying to bring back Nagendra into the Cabinet. Siddaramaiah, who belongs to the backward class Kuruba community, has cemented his position as a tall leader of the Ahinda (acronym for minorities, backward classes and Dalit) voters. But now, the community could doubt his ability to protect its political way Rajanna was removed will exact its own political price, said an ST leader. BJP too has been trying to foment anger in the numerically strong community by supporting Rajanna's remarks and projecting him as a victim. "Congress government is always ready to betray the Valmiki community," the BJP said in a post on X.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store