logo
The Private Prison Industry Looks Forward to Soaring Profits Thanks to Trump's Budget

The Private Prison Industry Looks Forward to Soaring Profits Thanks to Trump's Budget

The Intercept10-07-2025
The private prison industry saw its influence wane under Joe Biden, but it remains dominant in the business of immigration detention. So when President Donald Trump signed the so-called 'Big, Beautiful Bill' on July 4, dedicating $45 billion to immigration detention with a goal to double or triple the population behind bars, it was a huge payoff.
The victory was in the works for years. A private prison company handed consulting and lobbying gigs to Trump's allies, its political action committee was the first to max out its donation to Trump, and industry executives had already made plans to reopen shuttered prisons — laying the groundwork for what they promised investors would be an incarceration bonanza.
In the 2024 election cycle, employees and PACs affiliated with the publicly traded industry behemoths GEO Group and CoreCivic contributed overwhelmingly to Republicans and Trump.
Republicans received 92 percent of $3.7 million in contributions affiliated with GEO Group and 96 percent of the $785,000 in contributions affiliated with CoreCivic, according to OpenSecrets, a nonpartisan, nonprofit research group that tracks official disclosures. When Trump won, the two companies gave $500,000 each to his inaugural committee.
'The private prison corporations were keenly aware of the implications of the then-Trump campaign's platform for mass deportations.'
Even though the industry kept profiting from the Biden administration — despite a supposed ban on private prisons — one advocate said it was clear to her why companies went all-in on Trump.
'The private prison corporations were keenly aware of the implications of the then-Trump campaign's platform for mass deportations,' said Eunice Hyunhye Cho, a senior staff attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union's National Prison Project. 'There is no doubt that these private prison companies were keenly aware of the potential profits to be made under such a scheme.'
Before the federal budget bill passed, private prison executives on earnings calls with investors were exultant about their upcoming business opportunities under the law — and held regular meetings with the Trump administration to pitch new plans on how to lock people up.
Now, the White House hopes to get the bill's funding out the door quickly, in order to expand the middle part of a deportation pipeline that stretches from arrests at Home Depots to flights abroad.
In a statement, the White House rejected the idea that the budget bill or any of Trump's immigration policies were shaped by industry.
'The only people who influence the President's decision-making are the American people. But leave it to the Fake News Intercept to pathetically and desperately try to attack agenda that the American people voted for – deportations of criminal illegal aliens,' Abigail Jackson, an administration spokesperson, wrote in an email.
Days after his inauguration in 2021, Biden made a splash by announcing that the federal Bureau of Prisons, or BOP, would no longer house incarcerated people in private prisons.
The supposed ban only affected a few thousand of the BOP's roughly 150,000-person population, and the private prison companies soon managed to find workarounds.
More importantly, Biden's order did not touch the much larger number of people held in immigration detention, which is reserved mostly for people accused of committing civil violations such as illegal presence in the U.S.
Three years into Biden's administration, about 90 percent of people in immigration detention were housed in private facilities. There were about 40,000 people in immigration detention by the end of his term.
Many were detained in facilities owned or operated by CoreCivic and GEO Group. Both companies also have subsidiaries profiting off other parts of the immigration system, ranging from an electronic monitoring company GEO Group bought in 2010 to a transportation company owned by CoreCivic.
Although they continued doing business with the Biden administration, private prison companies bristled at his at his attitude toward the industry.
In addition to the millions in campaign cash the private prison industry funneled to Trump and Republicans, there were jobs for major figures in Trump's orbit. Tom Homan, the former acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, had a consulting gig with GEO Group that was only made public this year. Pam Bondi, the former Florida attorney general, picked up work as a lobbyist for the company in 2019, shortly before she joined Trump's defense team at his first impeachment. Trump in his second term tapped Homan to serve as 'border czar' and Bondi as U.S. attorney general.
While many industries with government work try to cozy up to former officials, Lauren-Brooke Eisen, the senior director of the Brennan Center's Justice Program and author of a book on the industry, said private prisons cultivated unusually close relationships.
'There's sort of always a revolving door between the private sector and the government, but what we're seeing here is, we're also seeing people with super close ties,' she said.
In a statement, GEO Group did not directly address questions about the donations to the Trump campaign or its ties to high-ranking administration officials.
'We are proud of the role our company has played for 40 years to support the law enforcement mission of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement,' a company spokesperson wrote. 'Over the last four decades, our innovative support service solutions have helped the federal government implement the policies of seven different Presidential Administrations.'
CoreCivic, meanwhile, said that it welcomed 'the opportunity to support any political leaders who are open to the solutions our company provides to serious national challenges, including providing safe, humane care for people going through the civil immigration process and helping those in our criminal justice system prepare to return to our communities with the skills they need to be successful.'
The donation to the inaugural committee, CoreCivic spokesperson Ryan Gustin said, 'is consistent with our past practice of civic participation in and support for the inauguration process, including contributions to inauguration activities for both Democrats and Republicans.'
The White House rejected out of hand the idea that campaign contributions, or the work that top officials conducted for the industry while out of office, had anything to do with crafting the specifics of the budget bill.
'The One, Big, Beautiful bill provides the funding necessary to fulfill the President's promise to carry out the largest mass deportation operation in history. CoreCivic and GEO Group have received contracts under both Democrat and Republican administrations,' Jackson wrote.
After Trump's first term, Homan hung up a shingle for a consulting firm that told prospective clients it had a 'track record of opening doors,' resulting in big state and federal contracts.
As border czar, Homan has said he will not be involved in making decisions about individual contracts. Bondi has promised to consult ethics officials if any conflicts of interest come up, and a Justice Department spokesperson said she 'played no role in the provisions for additional funding for immigration detention.'
Such denials do not sway Cho, the ACLU lawyer whose work includes representing people in immigration detention.
'Whatever those responses are doesn't belie the fact that these companies clearly are purchasing influence in order to benefit politically and financially,' she said.
Citing reporting from The Intercept, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., in May called on Bondi to recuse herself from 'any and all' activities tied to immigration detention that could directly or indirectly benefit GEO Group.
The administration has brushed off such critiques as it pushes ahead with its mass deportation plans. The Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE, says the budget law will allow it to secure 80,000 new detention beds and bring its total population over 100,000.
GEO Group said in November that Trump's plans could help it fill 18,000 empty beds, translating into $400 million in additional annual revenue. CoreCivic said in February that it had pitched the federal government on plans for housing an extra 28,000 people.
The companies will face competition from states like Florida, which is relying on federal reimbursements to build tent camps at places such as the so-called 'Alligator Alcatraz' facility in the Everglades intended to house 3,000 people.
'The $45 billion represents such an unprecedented broadening for federal prison funding for immigration.'
Cho said she does not think such state facilities pose a business threat to the private prison companies, in large part because there is so much money to go around.
'Even state detention systems often depend on private prison companies for operation,' she said. 'The $45 billion represents such an unprecedented broadening for federal prison funding for immigration.'
In recent weeks, the major private prison companies have continued to make announcements about their growing capacity – for detention and profit. CoreCivic announced last month that it had spent $67 million on a detention center in Virginia that it expects to produce an extra $40 million in annual revenue.
If Homan has his way, many of the new detention centers springing up to fill the administration's demand will be under looser state regulations instead of more stringent federal standards.
'It is really scary that we are seeing a reduction of oversight, along with this idea that we should loosen the standards, with this huge increase in funding.'
Stories of suffering behind bars are already proliferating as the detention population grows. Eisen noted that one of the Trump administration's first actions at the DHS was to decimate an oversight office meant to investigate allegations of wrongdoing.
'It is really scary that we are seeing a reduction of oversight, along with this idea that we should loosen the standards, with this huge increase in funding,' she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sanders shrugs off Vance as possible MAGA successor: ‘Doesn't matter to me who heads the Republican Party'
Sanders shrugs off Vance as possible MAGA successor: ‘Doesn't matter to me who heads the Republican Party'

The Hill

time13 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Sanders shrugs off Vance as possible MAGA successor: ‘Doesn't matter to me who heads the Republican Party'

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) on Sunday shrugged off the idea of Vice President Vance being the likely Republican frontrunner for the 2028 presidential elections. 'Neither Trump, nor he nor the Republicans of today have anything of significance to say to working class people,' he said on CNN's State of the Union with Dana Bash. 'Doesn't matter to me who heads the Republican Party,' he added. President Trump said on Tuesday that Vance would be the 'most likely' successor of the Make America Great Again (MAGA) Movement in 2028. 'So it's too early to talk about it, but certainly he's doing a great job, and he would be probably favored at this point,' Trump said. Bash reminded Sanders that Vance is from a working-class family in Ohio and could appeal to many voters in red states, but Sanders shrugged off the idea that the vice president could be a threat to Democrats in 2028. 'What they are trying to do is divide us up, 'you're a Muslim, you're undocumented, you're black, you're gay, let's divide everybody up so the rich can become richer'. Our job is to bring people together. Doesn't matter to me who heads the Republican Party,' he continued. Trump also said Tuesday that he would 'probably not' try to bridge a third term and touted the idea that Secretary of State Marco Rubio could run alongside Vance as vice president in 2028. In February, Vance was already seen as a favorite successor to Trump in a Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) poll. Sixty-one percent of respondents said they would support Vance as the future of the Republican party. Other Republican politicos and media personalities have been rumored to be thinking about campaigning in 2028, including Secretary Rubio, right-wing influencer Steve Bannon and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis.

Dangerous nostalgia: Trump wants to turn back time
Dangerous nostalgia: Trump wants to turn back time

The Hill

time13 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Dangerous nostalgia: Trump wants to turn back time

In the 1978 film 'Superman,' the hero performs many impossible feats, including traveling backward in time by flying around Earth at super speed. Donald Trump, who seems to fancy himself an all-powerful Super President, appears eager to go back in time as well in an effort to return America to 'the good old days' of his youth. Trump was born in 1946, eight years after Superman made his comic book debut. Discrimination based on race, sex and other characteristics was widespread and legal. Most schools taught children a whitewashed version of America's story, glossing over racism and largely ignoring the achievements of people of color. Movies usually portrayed Black people as slaves, servants, cowards, criminals or buffoons. Consequently, 'the good old days' for Trump — born rich, white and male — were 'the bad old days' for many people of color, women, LGBT individuals and those not born to wealth and privilege. Obstacles to advancement facing these Americans — among them my Black parents — were far greater than they are today. Trump grew up at a time when white men dominated the ranks of most professions and elected offices far more than they do now. Only about 34 percent of women were in the workforce in 1950, compared with 57 percent today. Key civil rights laws were not enacted until Trump was in his late teens and 20s. They include the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the 1965 Voting Rights Act and the 1968 Fair Housing Act, which together outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin in federally funded programs, employment, public accommodations, voting and housing. America has made great progress to become a more just and equitable society since Trump was born. But now the president is sparing no effort to roll back that progress and harm millions of Americans. Trump is obsessed with ending programs promoting diversity, equity and inclusion. He has falsely denounced DEI programs as illegal discrimination against white people and men, when in truth they simply open the doors to the American dream a little wider to take advantage of the talents of all Americans. Trump's Department of Education is investigating more than 50 universities for their DEI programs and has cut billions of dollars in federal funding to higher education, prompting schools to end DEI efforts in hopes of restoring aid. Trump has halted DEI programs in the federal government and demanded a halt to DEI in the private sector. The Republican majority on the Federal Communications Commission required that Paramount (parent company of CBS) and the movie studio Skydance agree to not operate DEI programs as a condition for approving the companies' $8 billion merger. The president seems to believe that white Americans — particularly white men — are hired for jobs based on merit, while many people of color and women are less qualified and get into college and jobs primarily because of DEI. He has forced highly qualified federal officials and members of the military who are not white men out of their jobs. Trump fired the chairman of the military's Joint Chiefs of Staff, Air Force Gen. CQ Brown, a Black man, after Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth vowed to end DEI in the military and claimed Brown placed a higher priority on DEI than on the effectiveness of the armed forces. The first women to head the Coast Guard and the Navy were both forced out of their jobs, as were women who served as the senior military assistant to Hegseth and the head of the Defense Health Agency. Trump successfully pushed Kim Sajet, the director of the National Portrait Gallery, to resign after denouncing her as 'a strong supporter of DEI' and fired Carla Hayden, the first woman and first Black person to head the Library of Congress. The president and the Republican-controlled Congress have turned back the clock on American progress in many other ways. The White House launched a program designed to deport millions of unauthorized immigrants, reminiscent of Operation Wetback, which deported an estimated 1 million people to Mexico in 1954, including some who were in the U.S. legally. The administration is seeking to increase U.S. oil, natural gas and coal production, along with nuclear power generation, by reducing environmental protection regulations imposed starting in the 1970s. Trump and Congress have also cut federal support for renewable energy programs enacted under the Biden administration. Trump has called global warming a Chinese hoax designed 'to make U.S. manufacturing non-competitive.' The White House and Congress eliminated all $1.1 billion in previously approved funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which was created under a law enacted in 1967 to help fund PBS, NPR and their member stations. The Corporation soon announced that it would be shuttering. Nostalgia is a powerful emotion. It is understandable that Trump has fond memories of growing up rich in a world of white male privilege before most Americans alive today were born. But nostalgia should not drive public policy. Our country has achieved greatness because — until now — our leaders have been focused on the future, rather than fixated on recreating the days of their youth. Christopher Reeve's portrayal of Superman traveling back in time was great entertainment. But it was fantasy. We need a president who accepts reality and works to build an inclusive and equitable future for everyone in our diverse population.

Europe Casts Doubt on Trump-Putin Summit Without Ukraine
Europe Casts Doubt on Trump-Putin Summit Without Ukraine

Time​ Magazine

time14 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

Europe Casts Doubt on Trump-Putin Summit Without Ukraine

European leaders said peace talks between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska next week are unlikely to succeed without Ukraine's involvement. 'The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine,' a statement signed by the leaders of France, Italy, the U.K., Germany, Poland, and Finland read. 'We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force. The current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations,' it continued. The public show of support for Kyiv came in response to Trump's announcement at the White House on Friday that he would hold a summit with his Russian counterpart to discuss a potential end to the war in Ukraine. The talks in Alaska will be the first time the leaders of the U.S. and Russia have met since 2021. Trump provoked a backlash from allies for excluding Ukraine from the meeting, but also for saying ahead of the talks that Kyiv would have to give up territory as part of a deal to end the fighting. 'We're going to get some back, and we're going to get some switched,' Trump said. 'There'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both.' Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky quickly denounced the idea of giving up territory to Russia in a video address on Saturday, vowing that Ukraine would not 'gift their land to the occupier' and warning that any peace talks that didn't involve Kyiv would 'bring nothing.' The statement from European leaders backed Zelensky on both counts. Zelenskyy responded by thanking European allies in a post on X on Sunday: "The end of the war must be fair, and I am grateful to everyone who stands with Ukraine and our people." Some reports indicate that Russia is demanding that Ukraine give up the Donbas region and Crimea in return for ending the war. Russia has already annexed Crimea and its forces occupy most of the Donbas and further swathes of eastern Ukraine. Matthew Whitaker, U.S. Ambassador to NATO, told CNN on Sunday that "No big chunks or sections are going to be just given that haven't been fought for or earned on the battlefield," without further elaborating. Three U.S. officials told NBC News that the White House is discussing inviting Zelensky to the summit, though decisions have not been finalized. The White House did not immediately respond to TIME's request for comment. European leaders have come to Ukraine's defense, condemning Russia's war in Ukraine and vowing to continue to provide military and financial support to Kyiv as necessary. Officials have also expressed a broader interest in including European leadership in peace negotiations due to concerns about the region's own security. 'We underline our unwavering commitment to Ukraine's sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity,' the statement added. 'We are united as Europeans and determined to jointly promote our interests. And we will continue to cooperate closely with President Trump and with the United States of America, and with President Zelenskyy and the people of Ukraine, for a peace in Ukraine that protects our vital security interests.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store