Gig workers coalition welcomes RON95 price reduction, toll freeze
Gem chief activist Jose Rizal said the announcement by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim would slightly ease the daily cost burden faced by e-hailing and p-hailing drivers, many of whom operate on tight margins.
"Alhamdulillah, Gem welcomes the Prime Minister's announcement on the RON95 price reduction and toll rate retention. It is a positive move that brings some relief to the e-hailing and p-hailing community in dealing with daily cost pressures," he told the New Straits Times.
Earlier, Anwar announced that toll rates for 10 highways would remain unchanged this year. The price of RON95 petrol will also be reduced to RM1.99 per litre when fuel subsidies are rationalised.
However, Jose said the impact of the government's move remained relative and subjective, given that wage rates were still dictated by platform companies and regulated by the Land Public Transport Agency (Apad) under the Transport Ministry.
"To date, Apad continues to be seen as rigid and unresponsive to our many demands," he said.
He said what the community truly needed was a structural change in wage protection, and urged the government to fast-track the tabling of the Gig Workers' Bill 2025.
"Gem places high hopes on the Human Resources Ministry and the commitment of Minister Steven Sim Chee Keong to table the Gig Workers Bill in the upcoming Parliament sitting. We believe this can be a real game changer for the future of the gig economy and its workers," he said.
Jose added that gig workers continued to face income instability due to a lack of formal wage protection, and called for stronger regulatory intervention to ensure fairer treatment by digital platforms.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Barnama
43 minutes ago
- Barnama
Ringgit Ends Lower Vs Greenback Following BNM's GDP Forecast Revision
WORLD By Durratul Ain Ahmad Fuad KUALA LUMPUR, July 28 (Bernama) -- The ringgit ended easier against the US dollar today, as traders' sentiment was affected by Bank Negara Malaysia's (BNM) gross domestic product (GDP) revision for the year. At 6 pm, the local note slid to 4.2275/2345 versus the greenback from last Friday's close of 4.2195/2245. The central bank has revised Malaysia's 2025 GDP growth to 4.0-4.8 per cent from 4.5-5.5 per cent previously, and similarly, the inflation rate for 2025 is projected to range between 1.5 per cent and 2.3 per cent from the previous forecast of 2.0-3.5 per cent. Bank Muamalat Malaysia Bhd chief economist Dr Mohd Afzanizam Abdul Rashid said the BNM is being pragmatic by adjusting the growth forecast lower, taking into account external risks. At the same time, a lower inflation forecast suggests that the impact from the anticipated RON95 subsidies rationalisation is likely to be manageable. 'As such, we foresee this will be positive for the ringgit in the mid- to long-term as fiscal consolidation will continue to take place, resulting in more fiscal space which can be redirected into targeted assistance as well as higher development expenditure (DE). 'This Thursday, the government will announce the 13th Malaysia Plan, and we foresee a higher allocation for DE in the next five years to drive the Malaysian economy into high-income status,' he said to Bernama. Meanwhile, he noted that the US Dollar Index (DXY) has strengthened, buoyed by optimism over the upcoming US-China trade talks.
New Straits Times
4 hours ago
- New Straits Times
InDrive, Maxim risk losing licences over non-compliance
ALOR STAR: E-hailing companies Maxim and InDrive may have their licences cancelled if they fail to ensure their drivers comply with key requirements, particularly those involving the E-Hailing Vehicle Permit (EVP). Transport Minister Anthony Loke said the ministry took a serious view of offences committed by both companies for allowing drivers to operate without the mandatory EVP, a key condition under the operator's licence. He said it was the operators' first offence and that they have submitted appeals seeking time to rectify the matter. "They have been given a monitoring period under the law. "Any licensed operator can appeal to the ministry, and we will consider their appeal. "There are improvements and corrective steps the companies must take, and we can see they have begun doing so. "Normally, for a first offence, we allow room for improvements and correction. "But if they continue to violate the terms, only then will we suspend or revoke their licences," he told reporters after launching the Stage Bus Service Transformation Programme (SBTP) for Kota Setar ( Kota Setar) here today. Loke said the Land Public Transport Agency (APAD) had earlier recommended revoking the companies' licences for violating EVP requirements. However, he said certain considerations were taken into account, including the fact that many drivers use both applications, and the high number of users in some states. "This is their first offence operating without an EVP, which is serious, and I do not take it lightly. "That's why APAD proposed the cancellation. "But they have appealed, and we've taken into consideration that there are drivers on both apps, and that they provide alternatives for the public, especially in states where their services are widely used. "If we were to shut them down immediately without giving them a chance to improve, users might face difficulties and start lodging other complaints," he said. As such, both companies have been placed under a three-month monitoring period. If they are found to commit further violations during this time, action will be taken to revoke their licences. "For any licensed company, we allow them to rectify first offences. But if the violations persist, I issue a stern warning that their licences will be revoked. "That's why we're giving them three months to comply. "If they breach the conditions again during this time, we will revoke the licences," he said. In a statement last Wednesday, APAD said Maxim and InDrive had been allowed to continue operating but were placed under a three-month monitoring period to ensure compliance with service requirements. An audit found that both companies had failed to meet several operator conditions, particularly in relation to the EVP, prompting the issuance of a notice of cancellation.
Free Malaysia Today
6 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Populist spending not the same as helping the people
From Muhammed Abdul Khalid The government recently announced a rakyat assistance package, the headline measures of which included a reduction in RON95 petrol price, one-off cash aid of RM100 for all adults, and a freeze on toll rate hikes. While these moves sound rakyat-friendly, in reality, they are wasteful, regressive, and fail to address the root causes of hardship for Malaysians. Let's break it down. Petrol subsidies: rewarding the rich, ignoring the poor The government is currently spending RM20 billion to RM23 billion annually to subsidise RON95 petrol. In the coming months, fuel prices are expected to be reduced even further by six sen. But who benefits the most? Certainly not Mak Cik Kiah riding a kapcai or driving her old Kancil to the pasar. Instead, it is those filling up their luxury SUVs, such as Alphards, twice a week who are reaping massive benefits from a system that disproportionately favours high fuel consumption. Data shows that one-fifth of B40 households do not own any vehicles, compared to the 100% car ownership among T20 households. These poorer households receive no benefit from petrol subsidies, yet help fund them through taxes, particularly through indirect taxes such as the recently expanded sales and service tax. A mere six-sen drop in fuel prices could result in an additional RM2 billion to RM3 billion in subsidies, much of which would again flow into the fuel tanks of the well-off. On average, the T20 will receive nearly three times more fuel subsidies than the B40. This is clearly a policy that favours the wealthy, an absurd outcome in any system that claims to be just. RM100 for all, even the rich Another move is the RM100 one-off cash handout to all adults under the Sumbangan Asas Rahmah (SARA) programme, at a cost of RM2 billion to the government. There is no question that RM100 means a lot to those in need. This should not be dismissed or belittled. Perhaps policymakers intended for everyone, regardless of income, to benefit from government generosity. But is it really sensible for corporate leaders, ministers, and millionaires to receive the same RM100 as daily wage earners, pensioners, or rubber tappers? Is that fairness? Especially when the country is already RM1.6 trillion in debt, why are we giving money we do not have to people who clearly do not need it? Wouldn't that be a textbook example of waste? Moreover, economic growth is forecast to remain slow this year. Debt-to-GDP is unlikely to meet the 60% target under the new Public Finance and Fiscal Responsibility Act. The RM5 billion earmarked for these blanket handouts could be better directed to where it actually makes a difference, instead of being thrown at everyone equally. For instance, the existing SARA programme currently channels RM100 monthly to 5.4 million low-income households and individuals. If the new RM2 billion allocation were entirely redirected to them, each recipient could receive nearly RM400 in additional aid – four times more than what is being offered now. Wouldn't that be more meaningful, targeted, and Madani? The additional RM2 billion to RM3 billion in fuel subsidies would also go much further if spent on the poor. As of mid-July, about 300,000 families were officially registered as poor. If the government were truly prudent, it could distribute at least RM1,600 per family from these funds on a monthly basis between now and year-end, rather than through a meaningless one-off amount. This would be a better way to spend RM5 billion to RM6 billion of taxpayers' money, and a better way to stimulate the economy over the long term. If the government truly wants to help the rakyat, it should gradually phase out blanket fuel subsidies in a systematic way and avoid populist cash giveaways to those who do not need them. The savings could be redirected to free breakfast programmes at primary schools, more investment in public transport, or the construction of new hospitals. If nothing else, increase salaries for the police, soldiers, nurses, and teachers, or raise pensions for retirees. That would be far better than giving unnecessary handouts to the rich. In other words, much more can be done with RM5 billion to RM6 billion than doling out cash to those who do not need it. Don't squander the nation's taxes or its long-term economic future through reckless spending. With global headwinds mounting, we need smart spending, not blanket handouts that favour the wealthy while leaving the poor behind. Continuing with these regressive policies will not only strain our fiscal position but also deepen inequality. If these trends continue, it will not be reform but social injustice. Muhammed Abdul Khalid is a research fellow at the Institute of Malaysian and International Studies at UKM and a fellow at the World Inequality Lab at the Paris School of Economics. The views expressed are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.
