
JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon flashes ominous warning about economic doom
JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon has issued yet another ominous warning for the US economy.
Dimon, considered one of America's most influential Wall Street figures, has been sounding the alarm for months on the chances of a recession and a possible return of stagflation.
Now the bank leader has warned that recent upbeat economic news could be hiding a much more sinister state of affairs.
'You're going to see real numbers, and I think there's a chance real numbers will deteriorate soon,' Dimon told the the Morgan Stanley US Financial Conference in New York on Wednesday.
Dimon believes the full effects of Trump's aggressive tariff policies have yet to be felt in the larger economy.
He warned that a recent jobs report that showed hiring had slowed less than expected and an inflation report that showed inflation cooling does not mean the economy is not headed for a downturn.
'You haven't seen an effect yet other than in the sentiment,' Dimon said.
'And maybe in July, August, September, October, you'll start to see, did it have an effect? My guess is it did, hopefully not dramatic.'
Consumer sentiment and the stock market have rebounded since the initial shock of Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day' tariffs.
However, Dimon warned not to put too much stock in such measures, as neither 'consumer sentiment nor businesses' determine the key 'inflection points' of an economic downturn.
What really matters is hard economic data such as job and inflation reports, he said.
'Employment will come down a little bit. Inflation will go up a little bit.
'Hopefully, it's just a little bit,' he added.
The latest inflation report revealed that prices rose less than expected last month.
Prices rose 2.4 percent in May compared to the same time last year.
Although it is a slight increase on the month before, when prices rose 2.3 percent year-on-year, the increase of 0.1 percent suggests inflation is actually slowing as it is a smaller jump than previous months.
An economic downturn could see even more stores close across the US
Dimon added that although tariffs will disrupt the economy, they won't make the 'ship go down.'
Dimon has previously warned that the US economy could head in to a period of stagflation, where prices rise but economic growth slows leading to higher unemployment.
'There's a chance that (we'll) have stagflation (in the US),' Dimon said last month.
'We have to be prepared for something like that,' he warned.
The comments were later supported by research by JPMorgan that argued stagflation could hit the economy as early as this summer.
Under Dimon's leadership JPMorgan has grown to be the world's biggest and most powerful bank with $4 trillion.
Its prominent retail and investment arms makes it one of the most closely watched institutions on Wall Street.
Dimon himself has amassed a personal net worth of around $2.5 billion.
But he is not alone in issuing ominous forecasts about the US economy.
The World Bank cut its forecast for US growth in 2025 from its January prediction of 2.3 percent down to 1.4 percent.
Economists said 'a substantial rise in trade barriers' — referring to Trump's aggressive trade policies — were to blame for the downgrade.
The new predictions suggest the US will grow half as fast as it did last year when it hit 2.8 percent.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South Wales Guardian
13 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
G7 leaders call for de-escalation in Middle East as Trump leaves summit
Allies from the world's major economies affirmed their 'commitment to peace and stability' in a statement agreed shortly before the US president's abrupt departure from a major global summit in Canada. The White House said Mr Trump had left the G7 leaders' conference after a group dinner on Monday because of 'what's going on in the Middle East,' without elaborating. The US president said his reason for leaving the summit had 'nothing to do with a ceasefire' between Israel and Iran. In their statement, the leaders called for a 'ceasefire in Gaza' and said they 'stand ready to coordinate' to protect market stability in the face of rising oil prices amid spiralling hostilities between Israel and Iran. It said: 'We, the leaders of the G7, reiterate our commitment to peace and stability in the Middle East. 'In this context, we affirm that Israel has a right to defend itself. We reiterate our support for the security of Israel. 'We also affirm the importance of the protection of civilians. 'Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror. 'We have been consistently clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon. Diana and I were honoured to welcome the @G7 leaders to Kananaskis this morning. This Summit is an opportunity for us to create more prosperity, stability, and security for the world. — Mark Carney (@MarkJCarney) June 16, 2025 'We urge that the resolution of the Iranian crisis leads to a broader de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza. 'We will remain vigilant to the implications for international energy markets and stand ready to coordinate, including with like-minded partners, to safeguard market stability.' In a post on X on Monday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said: 'Much was accomplished, but because of what's going on in the Middle East, President Trump will be leaving tonight after dinner with Heads of State.' Mr Trump posted on Truth Social: '(Macron) has no idea why I am now on my way to Washington, but it certainly has nothing to do with a ceasefire. Much bigger than that. He added: 'Stay tuned!' Downing Street declined to comment on Mr Trump's early exit. It means the US president will miss meetings with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum that had been scheduled for Tuesday, when leaders outside the G7 will join discussions. Iran said at least 224 people had been killed in the country since strikes began on Friday, while Israeli officials said 24 people had been killed and more than 500 injured. Earlier on Monday the president said Iran should have signed a deal that he proposed to them and also urged citizens to 'immediately evacuate' Tehran, a city of up to 17 million people, without offering further details. 'Simply stated, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON,' he wrote on his Truth Social platform. 'I said it over and over again!' The Leader's Summit is a forum for open discussion, collaboration, and consensus-building on pressing global issues. Read about the #G7 priorities guiding the discussions: — G7 (@G7) June 17, 2025 During an impromptu media spray with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer after the two leaders announced a US-UK deal had been finalised on Monday, Mr Trump was asked if he supported regime change in Tehran. 'I want to see no nuclear weapons in Iran, and we're well on our way to making sure that happens,' he said. Elsewhere on the sidelines of the summit, Sir Keir held a bilateral meeting with French President Emmanuel Macron during which Downing Street said the leaders agreed 'on the need to find a route to peace through diplomacy and dialogue.' French media later reported that Mr Macron had said the US president informed G7 leaders of ongoing discussions for a ceasefire between Israel and Iran.


Reuters
21 minutes ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Donald Trump's US chip revival is half-assembled
LONDON, June 17 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Donald Trump is hoping to secure American dominance in semiconductors over China. The president wants to bring production of chips back to the U.S., while courting allies. But success will take years and much more capital, while looming tariffs and unclear export rules add cost and confusion. When it comes to stimulating a key industry, the U.S. strategy is falling short. For an example of how to approach state-backed industrial planning, look to China. The People's Republic has already become a powerhouse in making solar panels and batteries for electric vehicles. A decade ago, President Xi Jinping launched his 'Made in China 2025' plan with the intention of reducing the country's reliance on foreign semiconductors from 85% to around 30%. The urgency was clear: chips had overtaken oil as China's largest import. Nearly a decade later, China has not met its goal, but local capacity is ramping up. Of the 51 wafer fabrication plants currently under construction worldwide, 23 are in China, according to an industry expert. It's a direct result of government funding: state-led investment in chips has probably exceeded $150 billion since 2014, according to, opens new tab the Economist Intelligence Unit. Little wonder that the U.S. is worrying about its dominance of advanced chips and artificial intelligence. While Huawei CEO Ren Zhengfei says, opens new tab the Chinese tech giant's chips are still one generation behind U.S. rivals, Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab CEO Jensen Huang has said Huawei's latest processors are approaching parity with the $3.5 trillion company's cutting-edge H200 graphics processors. These are central to training advanced AI models. Chinese players like DeepSeek are also showing signs of catching up. For the Trump administration, maintaining the U.S. lead starts with safeguarding demand for American products. That means ensuring key international customers in Europe and the Middle East don't drift toward Chinese suppliers. It's one reason Trump scrapped his predecessor Joe Biden's 'diffusion rule', which set country-specific quotas for advanced chips. The rule risked restricting previously friendly nations' access to semiconductors, pushing them into Huawei's arms. On the supply side, Trump wants to bring manufacturing back onshore. As most advanced chips are still made in Taiwan, any diversification of supply chains makes sense. The $52.7 billion Biden-era CHIPS and Science Act -- which includes, opens new tab $39 billion in subsidies for domestic chip manufacturing -- is a start, but progress is slow. The bill only releases funds as projects meet staged milestones. Trump has criticised the act, while also using it to force private companies to crank up investment stateside. Taiwanese giant TSMC ( opens new tab, for instance, committed to spending over $100 billion in the U.S. as it finalised state funding of $6.6 billion. GlobalFoundries (GFS.O), opens new tab this month pledged, opens new tab $16 billion alongside a $1.5 billion subsidy. Tariffs are another of Trump's favoured tools. He has asked the Commerce Department to investigate chip supply chains under Section 232, citing national security. But applying levies to semiconductors is fraught. For a start, the U.S. imports relatively few chips, but lots of products which contain them. Semiconductors worth less than $40 billion arrived in the country in 2024, while the U.S. imported electronic goods worth $486 billion, according to the International Trade Centre. Trying to impose tariffs on components inside devices like laptops and iPhones would be tricky. There's no easy way to tell where the chip was made once it's been packaged. Even if the Trump administration can successfully tilt the playing field towards domestic manufacturing, however, resilience still comes at a price. Proposed subsidies would make the cost of building semiconductor fabrication plants in the United States as competitive as in Asia, according to an industry analyst. But running those plants in a high-wage economy is another challenge: McKinsey & Company estimates operating costs are 35% higher in the U.S. than in Taiwan. Buyers of U.S.-made chips for cars or medical machines would have to absorb that premium or pass it on to customers. It also implies that semiconductor firms will need ongoing support in the form of tax breaks or operational subsidies as they shift supply chains. However, Trump has made hostile noises about the costs of the CHIPS Act. One key incentive, a 25% investment tax credit for every dollar chipmakers spend on capital expenditures, is set to expire unless renewed. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has hinted at possibly withholding further subsidies unless paired with broader tax legislation. The administration's stance on immigration, especially from China, is another impediment. Nvidia's Huang reckons around half of global AI researchers are Chinese. Meanwhile, nearly a third of chip companies' design engineers are in mainland China – the same proportion as in the United States, according to BCG data. The administration's policy on export controls also remains in flux. Though it has rolled back the 'diffusion rule', nothing has replaced it. Crafting bespoke export agreements with every partner like the United Arab Emirates will be time-consuming. Other potential measures, such as banning shipments of chip-making equipment made by the likes of ASML ( opens new tab to China, would require cooperation from key allies in Japan and the Netherlands. It would also require U.S. equipment makers like $114 billion Lam Research (LRCX.O), opens new tab to sacrifice revenue which could be as much as 30% of the total top line. Trump's chaotic and go-it-alone instincts on tariffs risk undermining the partnerships he will need to isolate China. China's chip campaign still falls short in several areas, including scale and efficiency. But Beijing's strategic clarity, persistence, and willingness to absorb long-term costs signal its serious intent. By contrast, Trump's U.S. chip revival is at best half-assembled. Follow Karen Kwok on LinkedIn, opens new tab and X, opens new tab.


The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
World's largest banks pledged $869bn to fossil fuel firms in 2024, new report finds
The world's largest banks boosted the amount of financing given to fossil fuel companies last year, committing $869bn to those involved in coal, oil and gas despite the worsening climate crisis and the banks' own, fraying, environmental commitments, a new report has found. The report, compiled by a coalition of eight green groups, shows that while the amount loaned by big banks to fossil fuel firms had been declining in 2021, last year saw an abrupt reversal. Two-thirds of the world's largest 65 banks increased their fossil fuel financing by $162bn from 2023 to 2024. Scientists have been clear that no new fossil fuel project can proceed if disastrous climate impacts are to be avoided, with last year the hottest ever recorded amid a slew of disasters driven by global heating. However, many banks have recently watered down or ditched their own commitments to help reduce planet-heating emissions, amid a changing political dynamic that has seen the US again being led by Donald Trump, who has famously called climate science 'a giant hoax' and 'bullshit'. In February, the US treasury withdrew from a global banking network that aims to increase green finance and reduce climate risk. Four of the five largest fossil fuel financiers last year were American companies, with JPMorgan Chase lending the most at $53.5bn. Bank of America was second, followed by Citigroup. The Japanese bank Mizuho Financial was fourth, with Wells Fargo in fifth. The largest absolute increases in fossil fuel lending last year came from the top American institutions as well as Barclays, the British bank. In the decade since the world's political leaders committed, in the landmark Paris climate agreement, to restrain dangerous global heating, the biggest banks have continued to pour lending towards drilling projects, pipelines and other fossil fuel activity. In total, banks have financed fossil fuels by $7.9tn since the Paris deal. 'By injecting a staggering $869bn into fossil fuel financing in 2024 alone, the world's largest banks fund the climate chaos that fossil fuel companies wreak on people and communities worldwide,' said David Tong, global industry campaign manager at Oil Change International and a co-author of the report. 'Governments must step in and take urgent action to hold financial institutions accountable for their role in the climate crisis.' While most of the world's top financial firms have pledged to abide by the Paris deal and help tackle the climate crisis, many of them have ignored or walked back these promises in the past year while predicting catastrophic global temperature rises. Last year, six US senators said that JPMorgan Chase may have misled investors by backtracking on its climate commitments. Then, in January, shortly before the inauguration of Trump as US president, the six largest American banks – JP Morgan, Citigroup, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo and Goldman Sachs – all withdrew from the net zero banking alliance. The alliance is a United Nations-sponsored initiative to spur banks to align their lending and investment portfolios with the Paris goals. It requires banks to set targets and reduce emissions associated with their investments. 'This year, banks have shown their true colors – many have walked away from climate commitments and doubled down on financing fossil fuel expansion, even as global temperatures break records,' said Lucie Pinson, director and founder at Reclaim Finance, and another report co-author. 'A few European banks may have inched forward, but for most, the lure of dirty money has proven too strong.' The Guardian contacted all of the top lenders to fossil fuels about the report, which is called Banking on Climate Chaos. A Citi spokesperson said that it supports the 'transition to a low-carbon economy and, in 2021, made a commitment to reach net-zero greenhouse gas financed emissions by 2050. 'We work with our clients as they seek to decarbonize their businesses and support clean energy solutions as part of our $1tn sustainable finance goal. Our approach reflects the need to transition while also continuing to meet global needs for energy security, particularly in this time of increasing electricity demand.' A Barclays spokesperson said: 'Barclays provides finance to meet consumer and businesses energy needs while financing the scaling of clean energy. Last year, we mobilised nearly $100bn more Sustainable and Transition Finance than in 2023 and continue to invest £500m in climate tech start-ups by 2027. These are significant interventions to support our clients to transition.' ENDS