I started one of the largest Tesla clubs in the US. Here's why I believe in Elon Musk and his vision.
I was first exposed to Tesla back in 2018.
Traffic in the Bay Area is horrendous. At the time, I was driving about two hours a day in my Toyota Scion from San Jose to San Mateo, and it was just painful. You're working at a stressful job, but you're already wound up by the time you get in the car because you have to deal with idiotic drivers.
My goal was to get an electric vehicle because it would give me access to the carpool lane and the EV tax credit.
That's when my wife told me about Tesla.
I started to look into the company, and my friend allowed me to drive his Model 3. After experiencing Autopilot, I just knew: This is the future.
A Tesla would drive for me 90% of my commute so that I could relax and enjoy the journey. And to see how the app was integrated into the car and how the vehicle communicated with my phone and vice versa, I saw how Tesla was a software-first company.
In 2018, there was no car even close to the integration of the software that Tesla had. And then to have the side mirrors collapse as you walk away from the car — it just kind of felt James Bond-ish. It was a no-brainer. It was like it would be dumb for me not to make the move.
My first Tesla was a metallic silver Model 3, long range.
Tesla Owners of Silicon Valley is born
After I bought the car, I got on Twitter in July of 2018 to connect with other owners.
One of the most powerful things about Twitter, now X, is that stuff breaks there, and it's kind of like the world's discourse. I started to see all these insane articles about Tesla, and I thought, "I drive the car. That's not true."
You see all this insane amount of hate, so you're like, "Okay, how do you not jump on board and really just help tell the story of what this company is?"
In October 2018, I started the Silicon Valley chapter of the Tesla Owners program — a community of Tesla owners that's officially partnered with the company.
One requirement for Tesla to officially recognize your club is to get 25 VINs. So, I literally went to my neighbors and friends to start the club.
The mission is obviously aligned with Tesla's, just building awareness of sustainability. But also community building.
Today, we have about 6,000 members. We have also partnered with some of the other clubs in Northern California, for an overall umbrella of 10,000 in the region.
We're the largest Tesla club in North America, but we also have the largest digital presence of any Tesla group. Our social media channels have two and a half million followers. We've also conducted three interviews with Elon Musk for a total of six and a half hours—not that anyone's counting.
In a lot of ways, we've become the global voice of the Tesla community.
A lot of our members are environmentally-friendly people, tech enthusiasts, and early adopters who want to drive the best tech. Some of our original members were Model S and X owners, who paved the way for Model 3 owners. And then we have a plethora of members who are on the younger side who came in with the more affordable Model 3.
A lot of our members are also Democrats. You will have some people who are not as involved and are not fans of the things Elon Musk is doing in politics. It's been insane to see the left attack their own base. To say that our group is a MAGA group would be ridiculous.
Around 2019, I also started to invest in Tesla for all the reasons I first bought the car, and for the safety aspect that I discovered later. The fact that my car is recording 24/7 saved me from a hit and run a year after I bought my car.
I can't believe I was just involved in a hit and run. Person must have been drunk and I doubt I can get the license plate. I am so thankful I was in a @tesla @elonmusk that barely moved when this drunk driver hit me. So glad my son and I are safe. pic.twitter.com/an7Gb88Saw
— Tesla Owners Silicon Valley (@teslaownersSV) July 5, 2019
To believe in Tesla is to believe in Elon
For me, to believe in Tesla is to also be excited about what Elon Musk is doing for the company and what he brings to the table. If I'm an investor in Tesla and I'm not a fan of Elon Musk, I'm probably going to get out. Why would you put your money into the guy who's driving the ship?
So, for me, where Tesla's headed and what Elon's doing are pretty tied together. When you get someone like Elon, there's a whole ecosystem that comes with it — a network of people who will come and work for his company and an opportunity to work with the brightest person, entrepreneur, and engineer of our lifetime.
It's super exciting to think about where the company is today and where it's going — the humanoid robots, the robotaxis.
Elon also made these great products by receiving feedback from the Tesla community. We're not an echo chamber. Why would we be sitting here shilling the biggest, richest man in the world? He's not paying us.
Has he been way too optimistic about when Full Self-Driving is going to be here? 100%. But I was the first public beta tester for FSD, so I knew it was going to be a growing process.
Elon's a visionary. The dude sees 10 years into the future, and he thinks things could be done in a week. He's probably oversimplifying problems. But I've been in the same room with him for four hours in Austin and have done two virtual interviews with him. I've literally seen this guy do math and solve problems in his brain in real time.
But I also don't need to prove anything about Elon to anybody. Just look at the results. He created a trillion-dollar company.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
30 minutes ago
- CNBC
Why Cybertruck sales have struggled
Before Tesla rolled out the Cybertruck, it made big promises - specs that outdid leading pickups and demand that was "off the charts." Both the specs have fallen short, and just a fraction of reservation holders have bought the trucks. There have also been some other disappointments - a range extender never materialized, and recalls. Despite that, some owners love their trucks, and would probably buy one again. Here's why.
Newsweek
30 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Judges Hand Elon Musk Double Legal Blow
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Elon Musk and Tesla suffered a pair of legal setbacks on Monday after federal judges in California and Maryland certified separate class action lawsuits against the carmaker and its CEO personally. The rulings open the door for broader litigation over Tesla's marketing of its self-driving technology, and Musk's alleged role in efforts to defund the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Musk has not publicly responded to either ruling. Newsweek contacted Tesla and USAID for comment via email outside of normal office hours on Tuesday. Why It Matters A class-action lawsuit allows one or more people sue on behalf of a larger group with similar claims. Instead of each person filing separately, the court treats them as a single "class," making litigation more efficient and giving individuals—who might not sue on their own—the ability to pursue claims collectively. If plaintiffs win or reach a settlement, the outcome typically applies to everyone in the class unless they opt out. Certification of the Tesla class action magnifies the company's legal and financial risk by grouping customers into a single lawsuit. Certification of the USAID class action raises Musk's potential liability and exposes him to wider discovery into his personal actions. Together, the new rulings highlight Musk's growing exposure in the courtroom. The rulings do not decide liability but mark a pivotal stage, significantly raising the stakes. Elon Musk looks on during a news conference with U.S. President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30, 2025. Elon Musk looks on during a news conference with U.S. President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30, 2025. Allison ROBBERT/AFP via Getty Images What to Know Tesla Ruling In California, U.S. District Judge Rita F. Lin certified two classes in litigation over Tesla's claims that its vehicles were equipped for full self-driving capability. The case centers on statements by Tesla and Musk that all vehicles produced since late 2016 had the hardware necessary for "Level 5 Autonomy." At an October 2016 press conference, Musk said: "Basic news is that all cars exiting the factory have hardware necessary for Level 5 Autonomy so that's in terms of Cameras, Compute Power, it's in every car we make ... literally meaning hardware capable of full self-driving for driver less capability," court papers said. Plaintiffs argue those claims misled consumers into purchasing costly packages such as Enhanced Autopilot (EAP) and Full Self-Driving (FSD). One named plaintiff, Thomas LoSavio, said he spent $8,000 on the packages because he believed full autonomy would soon be available. Tesla has disputed allegations it missold features, pointing to disclosures that FSD was subject to "validation and regulatory approval." But the court ruled those statements did not negate the broader message that vehicles already had the hardware for autonomy. Tesla's lawyers opposed class certification, arguing plaintiffs cannot represent all buyers exposed to self-driving claims since October 2016, noting some owners value the features and may not want them deactivated. Judge Lin concluded that Tesla's representations were widespread enough to affect California purchasers and could form the basis for class-wide claims under consumer protection and fraud statutes. "Plaintiff has shown by a preponderance of the evidence that class members were exposed to the Hardware Statement from October 2016 to August 2024," she wrote. Two subclasses were certified: one covering California residents who purchased FSD packages between October 2016 and May 2017, and another for those who opted out of Tesla's arbitration agreement between 2017 and mid-2024. An injunctive relief class was also certified, which could bar Tesla from making similar statements unless vehicles can actually drive themselves. USAID Ruling Meanwhile, in Maryland, U.S. District Judge Theodore D. Chuang certified a class action against Musk personally. In J. Doe 4 v. Musk, plaintiffs allege that Musk was involved in efforts to dismantle or defund USAID programs, undermining the agency's operations. The lawsuit, filed by USAID employees and the State Democracy Defenders Fund, represented by Norm Eisen and other attorneys, alleges that only someone nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate as an "Officer of the United States" could dismantle the agency. Plaintiffs allege Musk, an informal adviser to President Donald Trump, was involved in efforts aligned with the second Trump administration's attempt to dismantle USAID. The judge's 2-page certification order allows plaintiffs to press collective claims rather than pursue them individually. While the court did not detail the alleged conduct in Monday's filing, the decision means Musk could face broader liability if the claims are proven. Musk's lawyers argued class certification was unnecessary, saying overlapping lawsuits already cover the claims and would add "significant additional complexity and burdens" on the court. What People Are Saying Plaintiff Thomas LoSavio, who paid about $8,000 for the Full Self‑Driving feature in 2017, said in his testimony he was, "still waiting for the technology six years later, with Tesla remaining unable 'even remotely' to produce a fully self‑driving car." Judge Theodore D. Chuang's March 18, 2025 decision on USAID read: "Where Congress has prescribed the existence of USAID in statute pursuant to its legislative powers under Article I, the President's Article II power ... does not provide authority for the unilateral, drastic actions taken to dismantle the agency." Plaintiffs' counsel in the USAID case Norm Eisen, executive chair of the State Democracy Defenders Fund, told the Washington Post on March 18: "They are performing surgery with a chainsaw instead of a scalpel, harming not just the people USAID serves but the majority of Americans who count on the stability of our government. This case is a milestone in pushing back on Musk and DOGE's illegality." Deputy press secretary for the White House Anna Kelly responded in a March 19 statement: "If these Judges want to force their partisan ideologies across the government, they should run for office themselves. The Trump Administration will appeal this miscarriage of justice and fight back against all activist judges intruding on the separation of powers." What Happens Next The Tesla case will now move toward trial, with plaintiffs seeking damages in the form of refunds for FSD purchases and subscriptions. A September 24 conference will set the schedule as discovery begins, with Tesla expected to seek dismissal. In the USAID case, class members will be notified as discovery and motions proceed, potentially expanding Musk's liability.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Bitcoin Price Crash Fears Gather As Crypto Braces For A Fed Shock
08/19 update below. This post was originally published on August 18 Bitcoin—alongside other major cryptocurrencies ethereum and XRP—have fallen sharply, raising fears of a crypto market crash after it bubbled up to an all-time high of $4.2 trillion this month (just as Tesla billionaire Elon Musk breaks his silence on crypto). Sign up now for CryptoCodex—A free newsletter for the crypto-curious The bitcoin price has plunged from an all-time high of $124,000 per bitcoin just last week, dropping around 10% to $114,000, while ethereum and Ripple's XRP have seen similar declines despite U.S. president Donald Trump dropping a surprise $12.2 trillion crypto bombshell. Bitcoin and crypto's decline, coming just as JPMorgan makes a game-changing Federal Reserve flip, follows Wall Street giants issuing a warning that the recently passed Genius Act stablecoin bill could trigger a $6.6 trillion flood of account withdrawals. Sign up now for the free CryptoCodex—A daily five-minute newsletter for traders, investors and the crypto-curious that will get you up to date and keep you ahead of the bitcoin and crypto market bull run U.S. banking groups that count Wall Street giants such as JPMorgan and Bank of America as members have urged Congress to close a loophole in the recently passed Genius Act stablecoin bill that allows issuers of the dollar-pegged cryptocurrencies to offer yields via affiliates, warning it could trigger huge account deposit flight that would undermine the banking system. 08/19 update: The bitcoin price and crypto market has swung wildly as fears swirl a widespread crypto market crash could be gathering pace. The bitcoin price dropped towards $113,000 before bouncing back to around $115,000, dragging down the wider crypto market that's seen $250 billion in value wiped out since last week. 'Cryptocurrencies traded sharply lower,' David Morrison, senior market analyst at Trade Nation, said in emailed comments. 'Bitcoin continued to pull back away from Thursday's all-time high just below $124,500. Ethereum came under heavier selling pressure, dropping over 5%. These losses highlight the continued volatility within the crypto sector. The bigger question is whether this is simply a round of profit-taking following the sharp rally over the first two weeks of August, or if it is the beginning of a deeper and more protracted sell-off.' The closely-watched crypto fear and greed index has swung from a reading of 68 last week to just 56, its lowest reading since the bitcoin price dropped to under $112,000 at the beginning of August and putting it on the verge of 'fear' territory. This week, the three-day Jackson Hole economic policy symposium begins in Wyoming, with Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell's Friday speech topping the agenda as traders brace for what's widely expected to be a Fed interest rate cut in September. 'Markets are shoring up their focus on upcoming commentary from the Fed chair at the Jackson Hole Symposium," Joel Kruger, market strategist at LMAX Group, said in emailed comments. 'Fed reserve timelines and geopolitical developments are shaping flows across equities, FX, and crypto.' Last week, Treasury secretary Scott Bessent said the Federal Reserve could cut interest rates by 50 basis points in September, mirroring a surprise 2024 interest rate cut that powered a bitcoin price boom into the November election. 'If Powell signals a slower path to easing at Jackson Hole, markets could reprice aggressively, tightening financial conditions and putting pressure on crypto prices in the near term,' Carolane de Palmas, market analyst at Activtrades, said in emailed comments. 'While bitcoin is often framed as 'digital gold,' its short-term performance is still highly sensitive to liquidity cycles. Traders need to recognize that Fed policy directly shapes dollar liquidity, and by extension, influences the flows into and out of bitcoin. If the Fed looks more cautious on rate cuts, we could see reduced momentum in the crypto space through the fall. But there's a second layer here—beyond just liquidity. The symbolism of Jackson Hole matters. This is where Powell sets the tone for policy direction, and any hint that rate cuts are still firmly on the table could restore confidence in the crypto rally. On the flip side, if the Fed appears hesitant because of tariff-driven inflation concerns, bitcoin could remain trapped in consolidation until a clearer macro catalyst emerges. In the next quarter, bitcoin's path will be closely tied to Fed expectations.' In April, a Treasury Department report estimated that stablecoins could trigger up to $6.6 trillion in deposit outflows, depending on whether they can offer interest or yield, with the stablecoin market expected to grow to $2 trillion by 2028, up from $280 billion today. "Congress must protect the flow of credit to American businesses and families and the stability of the most important financial market by closing the stablecoin payment of interest loophole," the report, posted to the Bank Policy Institute website, and addressed to lawmakers, read. 'Banks power the economy by turning deposits into loans. Incentivizing a shift from bank deposits and money market funds to stablecoins would end up increasing lending costs and reducing loans to businesses and consumer households.' The plea to lawmakers was also signed by the American Bankers Association, Consumer Bankers Association, Independent Community Bankers of America and the Financial Services Forum. Stablecoin adoption wars are heating up following the passage of the Genius Act that laid down rules of the road for the crypto-based dollars. Tether's USDT remains the dominant stablecoin but is facing a tidal wave of competition from all angles, including Wall Street giants themselves, technology companies such as Facebook's Meta, as well as financial technology companies like PayPal and Stripe. Earlier this year, David Sacks, a technology investor and U.S. president Donald Trump's crypto czar, said on the All In Podcast he hosts with three other investors that he hopes that eventually the rules will swing in favor of stablecoin issuers, allowing them to directly offer interest to stablecoin holders. Trump's sons Eric and Don Jr have publicly said their World Liberty Financial crypto project is a direct challenge to Wall Street following their claims of being 'de-banked' in the aftermath of Trump's 2020 election loss. 'Honestly, I would love to see some of the big banks go extinct, because, honestly, they deserve it," Eric Trump said in May. Sign up now for CryptoCodex—A free newsletter for the crypto-curious The bitcoin price and crypto market's latest downturn, coming as just as traders celebrated a fresh all-time high, have raised fears the market could see further declines in coming weeks. 'The crypto market continued its decline on Monday after a pause over the weekend,' Alex Kuptsikevich, FxPro's chief market analyst, said in emailed comments. 'The total capitalisation fell back to $3.88 trillion, reaching its lowest level in more than two weeks. As expected, altcoins are falling the hardest, with ethereum and XRP losing about 5% in the last 24 hours, twice as much as bitcoin. Bitcoin fell to $115,000, the lowest level in the last 11 days. It is now testing the 50-day moving average, which has been the bullish trend line since April. A consolidation below it will sharply increase the chances of a deeper correction, and a failure below $112,000—the area of recent lows—will confirm the correction, opening the potential for a decline to $105,000-107,000.'
