Bank of Canada says risk of severe global trade conflict has diminished
But for the second quarter in a row, the bank did not issue regular economic forecasts, citing the uncertainty over the direction of U.S. trade policy. Instead it issued three scenarios as to what might happen.
In the current tariff scenario, based on conditions on July 27, GDP grows by about 1% in the second half of 2025 and then picks up, hitting 1.8% in 2027. Inflation stays at around 2%.
In the de-escalation scenario, where the U.S. and others cut tariffs, growth hits about 2% in the second half of 2025 and then averages 1.7% through the end of 2027. Inflation falls in the first quarter of 2026 before rising close to 2% in 2027.
In the escalation scenario, where the U.S. and others raise tariffs, growth falls in 2025 before picking up in the first half of 2026 and rising to an average of 2%. Inflation rises to just above 2.5% in the third quarter of 2026 and then falls to around 2% in 2027.
(Reporting by David Ljunggren, editing by Promit Mukherjee)
((Reuters Ottawa bureau, +1 647 480 7921; david.ljunggren@tr.com, opens new tab))
Keywords: CANADA CENBANK/FORECASTS
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
39 minutes ago
- Reuters
Brexit's parallels with Trump tariffs tell a tale
LONDON, Aug 4 (Reuters) - In figuring out why the U.S. tariff shock hasn't sent the economy or financial world into a tailspin, Britain's exit from the European Union trade bloc provides something of a playbook - and without a particularly happy ending. Aside from vast differences in economic scale and global reach, the two episodes bear some comparison in how they upended years of deeply integrated free trade and possibly in how business, the economy at large and financial markets reacted. The 2016 Brexit referendum and Trump's tariffs this year were each widely billed as economic shocks that would send the financial world into paroxysms. They didn't, at least not at the outset. To be sure, both were followed by dramatic downward lurches in the two countries' respective currencies. But, to some extent, the steep drop in sterling after the referendum vote and the dollar's plunge on President Donald Trump's tariff plan this year helped offset some of the wider impact - at least on stock markets that are loaded with global firms with outsized foreign revenue. More broadly, however, the difficulty in isolating their immediate net impact means no "big bang" economic crisis unfolds to prove critics right - even if their enduring legacy turns out to be a slow burn of economic potential and lost output, often obscured by multiple other crosswinds. In Britain's case, the seismic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic distorted any attempt to easily assess Brexit when it actually happened. Tortuous negotiations with the EU meant the UK's departure eventually occurred on the eve of the health crisis in 2020 and the new trade rules did not come into force until a year later. But in the four years between the referendum surprise and the pandemic, the UK economy never entered a recession nor recorded a negative quarterly GDP print - confounding pro-EU supporters at the time and bolstering the Brexit lobby. Emerging from the twin hits, however, the economy has almost flatlined since. FTSE 100 stocks, helped by the weaker pound, kept pace with the S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab and world indexes for about a year after the referendum before chronic underperformance set in. Since 2018, the UK market has lagged MSCI's all-country index by some 35%. What's more, it's taken more than eight years for the pound's effective exchange rate to recover its pre-referendum levels. Few mainstream economists now doubt that Brexit has taken a serious toll on the UK economy - even if blame for that gets sprayed in multiple directions - and oceans of ink have been spilled trying to disentangle the precise impacts. One academic study, opens new tab by a number of Bank of England economists earlier this year concluded that uncertainty following the referendum resulted in little change in goods exports and imports before the exit was finalized. But after the new rules hit, UK imports fell 3% and overall exports fell 6.4%, largely because of the 13% hit in exports to the EU. While this slump seems relatively modest compared to the official forecasts of the longer-term hit, opens new tab, the pain has been borne disproportionately by small businesses. Additionally, these findings exclude the Brexit hit to services and London's finance sector, which registered a much bigger economic dent. And the cumulative damage to London and the service sector, opens new tab over the next 10 years continues to worry the City. The U.S. tariff story is of a completely different order, of course, as it will reverberate across the world economy. But there are some parallels, not least in certain aspects of the market reactions and the initial resilience. Economists estimate that the tariffs could lop anywhere from 0.5% to 1.0% off U.S. GDP over time. That's a $150-$300 billion hit, which, though painful, would not be an instant crisis for an economy that's growing at a roughly 2% annualized rate, where imported goods represent just 11% of GDP and where tech and AI trends are generating considerable tailwinds. But as former White House economic adviser Jason Furman pointed out in a New York Times essay last week, the tariff damage is likely not a one-off hit. The loss of 0.5% of GDP, he argued, is "the equivalent of every household in America taking around $1,000 and lighting it on fire - then doing it again every year. Forever." In the end, the main point of the British comparison is to show how extreme partisan arguments on the pros or cons of such giant economic policy changes don't necessarily get resolved cleanly in adaptive, hardy and hyper-complex modern economies. The upshot is there's rarely a big crash to prove a point. And that in itself is unnerving if politically-motivated policies then appear workable on the surface and resist instant pushback - only to act as a drain on the economy over a protracted period. Many observers reasonably argue that sovereign democratic politics should always trump economic conventions and even directions. But do people eventually notice when it goes wrong? The latest YouGov opinion poll, opens new tab shows 56% of Britons now think it was wrong to leave the EU - some nine years after their narrow vote to leave. The jury on Trump's tariffs is still out. The opinions expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters -- Enjoying this column? Check out Reuters Open Interest (ROI), your essential new source for global financial commentary. Follow ROI on LinkedIn. Plus, sign up for my weekday newsletter, Morning Bid U.S.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Japan's Ishiba signals talks with Trump for early cut to US auto tariff
TOKYO, Aug 4 (Reuters) - Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said on Monday he will not hesitate to hold talks with President Donald Trump to ensure an agreed cut to U.S. automobile tariffs is implemented soon. In a parliament session on Monday, Ishiba drew criticism from some opposition lawmakers for not having signed an official document with the U.S. in clinching a trade deal last month. "Creating a document could have delayed the timing of tariff cuts. That was our biggest fear," Ishiba said, defending Japan's decision to agree on a deal without creating an official document with the U.S. "He is not a typical counterpart and could overturn rules," Ishiba said on Trump's negotiating style. Ishiba said he had "absolutely no hesitation" to hold talks with Trump to have Washington execute the tariff cut soon, though he declined to comment on when such talks could take place. "Both countries will begin executing what was agreed upon, which is harder than agreeing on a deal," Ishiba said, signaling his intention to stay on as premier to see through the process. Ishiba is under pressure from within his ruling Liberal Democratic Party to step down as prime minister to take responsibility for the party's huge defeat in last month's upper-house election. Japan's trade deal struck with Trump last month lowers U.S. tariffs on imports of goods including automobiles, easing the pain for the export-reliant economy. But there is no clarity on when U.S. tariffs for automobiles and auto parts will be cut to 15% from the current 25%, clouding the outlook for Japan's fragile recovery. In the same parliament session, Japan's top trade negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, said it was hard to say how soon the U.S. could actually implement automobile tariffs, though he added it took "more than a month" in the case of Britain.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
India's JSW Steel, Japan's JFE to invest $669 million to boost cold rolled grain-oriented electrical steel output
Aug 4 (Reuters) - India's JSW Steel ( opens new tab and Japan's JFE Steel will invest 58.45 billion rupees ($669 million) to expand production capacity of cold rolled grain-oriented electrical steel across two Indian plants to 350,000 tons per annum, JSW Steel said on Monday. ($1 = 87.4070 Indian rupees)
