DraftKings' prediction market double down is a bigger picture bet against California tribes
As DraftKings and FanDuel have unsuccessfully negotiated with the California Native American tribes, which control all gambling operations in the state, the betting operators are now exploring other options to gain access in the country's largest state (39 million people).
'Online sports betting operators have struggled to find a path into California. And if a path doesn't emerge, prediction markets will become increasingly appealing, especially if DraftKings and FanDuel feel like they're losing ground to Kalshi and Polymarket,' Chris Grove, a sports betting angel investor who is a managing partner at Acies Investments and has a stake in Underdog Fantasy, told The Post.
Prediction markets, led by CFTC-licensed operators such as Robinhood, Crypto.com, and Kalshi, are now selling futures contracts as if they were stocks on real-world events that are occurring.
This new style of betting changes everything for the traditional betting operators, who previously had to buy a sports betting license from individual states at lofty costs.
Prediction markets legally operate in 50 states, offer better prices, require just one federal license, and no taxes are raised back to the state.
If things continue on under current regulations, online sports betting operators could be in some trouble.
Kalshi, in particular, has secured some significant wins in the courts, notably winning Kalshi vs. CFTC in September 2024. This decision allowed prediction markets to offer such products legally as commodity derivatives, thereby helping them gain nationwide legality.
They've been taking wagers on all things, including elections, whether the Astronomer CEO would resign after being caught with his alleged mistress at a Coldplay concert and even the projected critic review score of 'Happy Gilmore 2.'
Smartphone displaying a Kalshi prediction market about who Trump will pardon in his first 100 days.
Bloomberg via Getty Images
It leaves DraftKings with one clear question to answer in its attempt to compete with this sleeping giant in the online sports betting world.
'It's largely a question of the legal and regulatory certainty surrounding prediction markets. A company like DraftKings is monitoring that question on a daily basis,' Grove told The Post.
'As the certainty improves, the appeal of prediction markets improves. If you ever got to a point where you had absolute regulatory and legal certainty, it's not unreasonable that prediction markets could effectively displace traditional sports betting.'
California is undoubtedly a massive market that sportsbooks would love to offer their product in, but this business is all about control and the tribes want every bit of it and then some.
As we saw in Florida, Hard Rock Bet has a monopoly on sports betting in the Sunshine State and they're doing pretty well.
Get the lowdown on the Best USA Sports Betting Sites and Apps
California could opt for a similar model or build its own operation from scratch and hope to gain the trust of its clientele that way.
We've seen this fail too. Gambet in Washington, D.C. was mostly a disaster as it attempted to run sports betting as a lottery system.
That folded rather quickly and was replaced by FanDuel, as Gambet faced criticism for bad odds and clunky interface, among other problems.
Sports betting has been highly profitable for states that charge a percentage on profits ranging between 10 and 51 percent.
A gambling tax provision was even included in the 'Big Beautiful Bill' that would change how bettors file taxes at the end of the year.
Aqua Caliente Tribal Chairman Richard Milanovich at Tribe owned Palm Springs Spa & Casino, September 1, 2000.
Getty Images
On Wednesday, three federally recognized California tribes — Blue Lake Rancheria, Mu-Wuk Indians and Chukchansi Indian — filed a lawsuit against Kalshi and Robinhood for their operations in the state as a form of sports betting.
It will be a landmark case with massive stakes both literally and figuratively.
And DraftKings, not named in the lawsuit, is certain to be wrapped up in it all.
Why Trust New York Post Betting
Erich Richter is a brazilian jiu-jitsu blue belt but he has a black belt in MMA betting. During the football season he's showcased massive profits at The Post in the player prop market the last two seasons. While constantly betting long shots, his return on investment is 30.15 percent since 2022.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's trade deals could push the average new car price well above $50,000
Markets have cheered President Trump's trade deals with Japan and the European Union. New 15% tariffs on most imported products from those countries are lower than many analysts expected, and they finally bring some predictability to Trump's chaotic on-and-off-and-on-again tariff policy. But import taxes are still going up, and past experience tells us that American consumers will ultimately bear most of the cost. Some of the most important imports from Europe and Japan are cars and car parts, and the higher taxes are sure to make all facets of owning a car costlier, just as drivers were hoping for a break from soaring prices. Trump is still working on trade deals with Canada, Mexico, and South Korea, other major sources of auto imports, and those outcomes will likely hike prices further. The average new car costs nearly $49,000, according to Kelley Blue Book. Trump's tariffs could raise costs by $3,000 or more once fully priced in, with costs rising less for cheaper models and more for luxury makes. It could take several months for those import taxes to work through supply chains, but unless there's a recession that ravages demand, car prices seem certain to hit new record highs during Trump's second presidential term. Read more: The latest news and updates on Trump's tariffs Ten years ago, the average car price was just $30,000. Several factors have pushed prices higher. Americans increasingly buy big pickups and SUVs, which cost more. Manufacturers struggle to make money on small economy cars and have been pulling them from their lineups. An explosion of digital gizmos adds to the cost, as does new automaker investments in electrification, which still isn't profitable industrywide. The COVID pandemic turbocharged auto inflation due to supply chain disruptions, parts shortages, stronger demand for non-urban transportation, and other factors. Costlier new cars increased demand for used cars, fueling inflation there, as well. More expensive parts and higher repair costs caused a surge in insurance premiums, which have doubled during the last 10 years. The charts below show the trends. Auto inflation has stabilized — but prices aren't coming down. They're basically stuck at new, higher levels. The only real break for drivers has been gasoline prices, down about 10% during the last year, to a national average of about $3.15 per have been first-line victims of Trump's tariffs. That means their customers will feel the pain too. General Motors (GM) and Jeep-parent Stellantis (STLA) both said tariffs harmed profitability in the second quarter. Ford (F) will probably echo that theme when it reports earnings on July 30. Automakers aren't just suffering from tariffs on imported parts, but also from Trump's new 50% tariff on most imported steel and aluminum, which are major components in cars. Most car prices haven't risen yet. The all-in cost of buying a car has actually dropped from peak levels of 2022, when the average cost of a new car equated to 42 weeks of work for the typical buyer, according to the Cox Automotive/Moody's Analytics affordability index, which accounts for prices, incomes, and interest rates. That's now down to about 37 weeks of work. But overall costs are still about 10% higher in real terms than they were from 2012 through 2021. And it's only a matter of time before automakers start passing higher tariff costs onto buyers. Some of the most popular cars in the US market are imports. The Subaru Impreza, Toyota (TM) Prius, and Mazda (7261.T) Miata come from Japan, as a few examples. Many Audis, BMWs ( and Mercedes ( come from Europe, along with the Volkswagen (VWAGY) Golf. Those imports will all come with the new 15% tax. Korean imports include the Hyundai ( Elantra, Kia Soul, and many other models from the two Korean manufacturers. They seem likely to face the same 15% import tax, since that is becoming the standard for Trump's trade deals. Read more: What Trump's tariffs mean for the economy and your wallet Mexico is the biggest source of automotive imports, supplying about 40% of all imported components, plus finished vehicles such as the Ford Maverick, Chevy Blazer, Mazda 3, and Nissan (NSANY) Sentra. Canada is another major source of vehicles such as the Chrysler Pacifica, Lexus RX 350, and many Honda (HMC) Civics. New Trump trade deals with Mexico and Canada seem further off, but in the meantime, he imposed a 25% tax on imported products from those countries that don't satisfy complex domestic-content requirements. All told, about 46% of the 16 million cars sold in the United States each year are imports, and almost all of the cheapest economy cars on the market are imports because carmakers generally can't afford to make them in America. Virtually all of those products will cost more because of the Trump tariffs. Earlier this year, when Trump was threatening 25% taxes on all imported cars, the Yale Budget Lab estimated such an across-the-board tariff would raise the cost of an average car by $6,400. That applied to all cars, whether imported or domestic, because price hikes in one major sector allow competitors to raise their prices too. If the across-the-board tariff is 15% instead of 25%, price hikes would obviously be less. Manufacturers might make adjustments and 'eat' some of the cost by accepting lower profits. But they can't eat all of the additional cost. Shareholders won't accept it, and with costs rising throughout the industry, all automakers will have pricing power, allowing them to charge more. Even if prices rise by less than under some other scenario, car buyers still have reason to expect lower prices from Trump, not higher ones. Trump ran for president last year, vowing to 'bring prices way down,' after three years of excessive inflation. Voters who went for Trump in 2024 said that was one of the main reasons they picked him. Yet earlier this year, Trump said he 'couldn't care less' if automakers raised prices to offset the cost of his tariffs. They're going to. Maybe it won't be by as much as analysts thought before, but that won't comfort buyers facing sticker shock anew at the dealership, service center, auto parts store, and insurance agency. Those Trump trade deals won't look so rosy once people start to pay for them. Rick Newman is a senior columnist for Yahoo Finance. Follow him on Bluesky and X: @rickjnewman. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices.
The Hill
19 minutes ago
- The Hill
Hegseth signs agreement to accept Qatar plane donation: Reports
The United States and Qatar are days away from finalizing an agreement for a Boeing jet that will be used as Air Force One, after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and his Qatari counterpart earlier this month signed an agreement outlining the terms of Qatar's 'unconditional donation,' multiple outlets have reported. The Washington Post first reported that the U.S. and Qatar are expected to finalize an agreement next week — even as the Pentagon months ago said the deal was complete — and that an outline on the terms of the deal was signed on July 7 by Hegseth and Saoud bin Abdulrahman Al-Thani, Qatar's deputy prime minister and minister of state for defense affairs. That document states that the plane is a 'bona fide gift' to the Defense Department and that the U.S. will pay nothing to Qatar for its transfer. 'This donation is made in good faith and in the spirit of cooperation and mutual support between the parties,' the document states, as reported by CNN. 'Nothing in this [memorandum of understanding] is, or shall be interpreted or construed as, an offer, promise, or acceptance of any form of bribery, undue influence, or corrupt practice.' The memorandum further emphasizes the transfer of the plane is 'not connected or otherwise related to any governmental decision and, as such, is not made, offered, promised or accepted because of any past, present or future official act or decision and is not intended to obtain or retain any improper advantage or to influence any official decision.' The Hill reached out to the Pentagon, which declined to comment. The Pentagon on May 21 announced that it officially accepted the 13-year-old luxury jet previously used by the Qatari royal family, seen by President Trump as a supplement to the aging Air Force One fleet. The controversial gift was first announced ahead of Trump's visit to the Middle East in early May, with the commander-in-chief claiming that the plane — one of the largest foreign gifts ever accepted by a U.S. president — can be used as a stand-in for the aging Air Force One fleet as delays continue in Boeing's refurbishment of the two 747 aircraft purchased during Trump's first term. But the transfer has been heavily criticized by both Democrat and Republican U.S. lawmakers, who say it raises ethical and corruption questions in addition to costing taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars to retrofit the plane into a secure and working Air Force One. Trump has repeatedly described the plane as a 'gift' and 'free of charge,' but American taxpayers will still foot the bill for the Air Force to retrofit the plane, a costly process given it must be stripped nearly to the studs to install the required security and communications equipment. Air Force Secretary Troy Meink last month optimistically estimated that the retrofit job will cost 'less than $400 million,' but aviation experts and engineers have placed the figure at as much as $1 billion or more. To fund the retrofit, the Air Force has plans to pull hundreds of millions of dollars from the Sentinel program — an over-budget and over-schedule upgrade to America's nuclear-equipped missiles — to an unspecified classified project believed to be the Air Force One upgrade. The aircraft is currently sitting in San Antonio as it awaits its retrofit.
Boston Globe
19 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
How the US-EU trade deal wards off more escalation but will raise prices and slow growth
Unresolved details: Trump and von der Leyen's announcement, made during Trump's visit to one of his golf courses in Scotland, leaves many crucial details to be filled in. The headline figure is a 15 percent tariff rate on about 70 percent of European goods brought into the United States, including cars, computer chips, and pharmaceuticals. It's lower than the 20 percent that Trump initially proposed, and lower than his threats of 50 percent and then 30 percent. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The remaining 30 percent is still open to further decisions and negotiations. Advertisement Von der Leyen said that the two sides agreed on zero tariffs on both sides for a range of 'strategic' goods: aircraft and aircraft parts, certain chemicals, semiconductor equipment, certain agricultural products, and some natural resources and critical raw materials. Specifics were lacking. She said that the two sides 'would keep working' to add more products to the list. Additionally, EU companies would purchase what Trump said was $750 billion worth of natural gas, oil, and nuclear fuel over three years to replace Russian energy supplies that Europe is seeking to exit in any case. Advertisement Meanwhile, European companies would invest an additional $600 billion in the United States under a political commitment that isn't legally binding, officials said. Not yet in writing: Brussels and Washington will shortly issue a joint statement that frames the deal but isn't yet legally binding, according to senior officials who weren't authorized to be publicly named according to European Commission policy. The joint statement will have 'some very precise commitments and others which will need to be spelled out in different ways,' a senior European Commission official said. EU officials said that the zero tariff list would include nuts, pet food, dairy products, and seafood. Steel tariff remains: Trump said that the 50 percent US tariff on imported steel would remain. Von der Leyen said that the two sides agreed to further negotiations to fight a global steel glut, reduce tariffs, and establish import quotas — that is, set amounts that can be imported, often at a lower rate or tariff-free. Trump said that pharmaceuticals, a major import from the EU to the United States, weren't included in the deal. Von der Leyen said that the pharmaceuticals issue was 'on a separate sheet of paper' from Sunday's deal. And von der Leyen said that when it came to farm products, the EU side made clear that 'there were tariffs that could not be lowered,' without specifying which products. 'Best we could do': The 15 percent rate removes Trump's threat of a 30 percent tariff. But it effectively raises the tariff on EU goods from 1.2 percent last year to 17 percent and would reduce the 27-nation's gross domestic product by 0.5 percent, said Jack Allen-Reynolds, deputy chief eurozone economist at Capital Economics. Advertisement Higher tariffs, or import taxes, on European goods mean sellers in the United States would have to either increase prices for consumers — risking loss of market share — or swallow the added cost in terms of lower profits. The higher tariffs are expected to hurt export earnings for European firms and slow the economy. Von der Leyen said that the 15 percent rate was 'the best we could do' and credited the deal with maintaining access to the US market, and providing 'stability and predictability for companies on both sides.' Mixed reaction: German Chancellor Friedrich Merz welcomed the deal which avoided 'an unnecessary escalation in trans-Atlantic trade relations' and said that 'we were able to preserve our core interests,' while adding that 'I would have very much wished for further relief in trans-Atlantic trade.' Senior French officials on Monday criticized the accord. Strategy Commissioner Clément Beaune said that the deal failed to reflect the bloc's economic strength. 'This is an unequal and unbalanced agreement,' he said. 'Europe didn't wield its strength. We are the world's leading trading power.' While the rate is lower than threatened, 'the big caveat to today's deal is that there is nothing on paper, yet,' said Carsten Brzeski, global chief of macro at ING bank. 'With this disclaimer in mind and at face value, the agreement would clearly bring an end to the uncertainty of recent months. An escalation of the US-EU trade tensions would have been a severe risk for the global economy,' Brzeski said. 'This risk seems to have been avoided.' Car prices: Asked if European carmakers could still profitably sell cars at 15 percent, von der Leyen said the rate was much lower than the current 27.5 percent. That has been the rate under Trump's 25 percent tariff on cars from all countries, plus the preexisting US car tariff of 2.5 percent. Advertisement The impact is likely to be substantial on some companies, given that automaker Volkswagen said that it suffered a $1.5 billion hit to profits in the first half of the year from the higher tariffs. Mercedes-Benz dealers in the United States have said they were holding the line on 2025 model year prices 'until further notice.' The German automaker has a partial tariff shield, because it makes 35 percent of the Mercedes-Benz vehicles sold in the United States in Tuscaloosa, Ala., but the company said that it expects prices to undergo 'significant increases' in coming years. Trade gap: Before Trump returned to office, the United States and the EU maintained generally low tariff levels in what is the largest bilateral trading relationship in the world, with around $2 trillion in annual trade. Together the United States and the EU have 44 percent of the global economy. The US rate averaged 1.47 percent for European goods, while the EU has averaged 1.35 percent for American products, according to the Bruegel think tank in Brussels. Trump has complained about the EU's $232.5 billion trade surplus in goods, which shows Americans buy more from European businesses than the other way around, and has said that the European market isn't open enough for US-made cars. However, American companies fill some of the trade gap by outselling the EU when it comes to services such as cloud computing, travel bookings, and legal and financial services. And about 30 percent of European imports are from American-owned companies, according to the European Central Bank. Advertisement
