Bharat Mata on poster for CPI meet, party pulls it out
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Sensing trouble, party district leadership immediately withdrew the poster that appeared on various social media platforms.
The poster was brought out in connection with the delegates' meet to be held from June 13 to 15. Bharat Mata was draped in a tricolour saree on the poster.
CPI district secretary V B Binu said it was not right to use the national flag along with the party symbol or use it along with party functions.
He cited this for withdrawing the poster immediately after it came to his notice.
The controversy began on June 5 when agriculture minister P Prasad of CPI opted out of the World Environment Day function at Raj Bhavan after governor Rajendra Vishwanath Arlekar insisted on displaying Bharat Mata's portrait at the event.
After CPI withdrew the poster, BJP congratulated CPI's Kottayam district leadership for circulating the poster and termed it as a response to Prasad's decision to boycott the event at Raj Bhavan.
In a statement, BJP functionary N Hari said that the poster was the beginning of a big change and that it was regrettable that the Left party withdrew it and issued an explanation.
During the freedom struggle, leaders of the movement had proudly raised 'Bharat Mata ki jai' slogans, but that is not the situation now, Hari's statement added. "They are afraid to say Bharat Mata and this fear is due to vote bank politics," he alleged.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
On Monday, Arlekar paid tributes to a Bharat Mata portrait during Goa Day celebrations at Raj Bhavan. Goa Foundation Day was celebrated at the Kerala Raj Bhavan as part of 'Ek Bharat Shreshtha Bharat' initiative, the governor's office said.
Earlier, Prasad, who refused to pay floral tributes to the portrait, said there was no official version of Bharat Mata according to the Constitution or India govt, and the portrait at the event was widely used by RSS.
Shortly thereafter, CPI announced a campaign of hoisting the national flag and planting saplings before it.
On June 7, CPI hoisted national flags and planted saplings at all its branches and also raised Bharat Mata ki jai slogans.
The very next day, Arlekar took a dig at the Left party saying, "Those who never thought of Bharat Mata are saying Bharat Mata ki jai. That is a good contribution. I appreciate that."
The same day, CPM state secretary M V Govindan came out in support of its LDF ally saying there was no concept of Bharat Mata as it was not there in the Constitution.
(With agency inputs)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
29 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Produce evidence or withdraw remarks: CEC to Rahul Gandhi on voter fraud claims
New Delhi: The Election Commission of India (ECI) on Sunday dismissed Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's allegation of 'vote chori', terming it as a 'baseless' charge that misleads the public and undermines faith in the Constitution. Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar addresses a press conference on Bihar Special Intensive Revision (SIR), at the National Media Centre in New Delhi on Sunday. (ANI) 'Produce evidence of voter fraud or withdraw your remarks. There is no third option,' Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar said at a press conference in Delhi, giving Gandhi a one-week deadline and asserting that the poll body would not be cowed by political attacks The press conference —first since the controversial Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar's electoral rolls was ordered— was also attended by Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi. 'When politics is being done by targeting the voters of India by keeping a gun on the shoulder of the Election Commission, today the Election Commission wants to make it clear to everyone that the Election Commission fearlessly stood like a rock with all the voters of all sections and all religions, including the poor, rich, elderly, women, youth, without any discrimination. (It) is (still) standing and will continue to stand,' the CEC said. The pushback came the same day Gandhi launched the Opposition's Voter Adhikar Yatra in Bihar, escalating a political confrontation over the integrity of the rolls. At the heart of the Commission's defence was a categorical rejection of Gandhi's central charge. 'Preparation of electoral rolls and casting of votes are two different processes under two separate laws. When a voter goes to vote and presses the button, he can press it only once… vote theft cannot happen,' Kumar said. He accused Gandhi of using misleading visuals to back his case. 'If someone thinks that he can use a PPT presentation to falsify data and misinterpret facts, then that act is against both the law and Constitution,' Kumar said. The SIR in Bihar—undertaken state-wide for the first time in two decades—has excluded nearly 65 lakh names from the draft roll published on August 1. Opposition leaders have flagged the removal of 22 lakh names as 'deaths' in just six months. Kumar said: 'A Special Intensive Revision was last conducted 20 years ago. Since then, only summary revisions have taken place. The deaths were those unreported to the EC in the last 20 years, not in six months.' On criticism of voters being listed under 'house number 0,' Kumar insisted this was an inclusionary move. 'There are people who stay under bridges, near lampposts, and in unauthorised colonies. The poll body tries to not leave out any voter and assigns them addresses. Nationality, proximity to the booth and age of 18 years were the criteria for inclusion, not a formal address.' The CEC also addressed the politically sensitive issue of duplicate EPICs (Elector Photo Identity Cards). The EC had recently issued a notice to RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav for allegedly holding two voter IDs, prompting charges of bias. This came months after ECI declared that the voter database had been 'cleaned' of dual EPIC ID issues back in May. Kumar sought to contextualise: 'Duplicate EPICs can happen in two ways. One, that a person in West Bengal has one EPIC number and another person in Haryana has the same number. About three lakh such cases were found and corrected earlier this year. The second type comes when the same person's name is in the voter list at more than one place with different EPICs. Before 2003, when deletions were not centrally tracked, many such names remained.' But he conceded the risks of a hurried clean-up. 'If this is done in a hurry, then any voter's name can be deleted wrongly. Someone else's name will be deleted in your place. We agree there is an issue but we will have to take time and caution to resolve this.' Kumar accused Opposition parties of wilfully spreading doubt. 'It is a matter of great concern that a few political parties have made allegations of vote chori despite their own booth-level agents having received and attested the corrected rolls in the first stage of SIR,' he said. 'This means either local voices are not reaching national leaders, or there is a deliberate attempt to confuse voters.' The CEC maintained that the Commission has received '28,370 complaints from ordinary voters, not political parties.' This contradicted RJD leader Tejashwi Yadav's claim, made in a BBC interview, that booth-level agents had lodged hundreds of objections ignored by the EC. Appealing directly to all 12 recognised parties in Bihar, Kumar set a hard deadline. 'File objections by September 1. After that, no complaints will be entertained.' On charges that the compressed timeline left little room for verification, Kumar cited precedent: 'The last intensive revision in 2003 was completed in a month. Booth-level officers visit every household and compile fresh lists from scratch. This is aimed at maximum purity in rolls.' The Commission also sought to showcase its speed in complying with last week's Supreme Court directive. The Court had ordered the EC to publish searchable, district-wise deletion lists along with reasons and to accept Aadhaar as valid proof for reinstatement—reversing the Commission's earlier position. 'We created district-level portals within 56 hours,' Kumar said, adding that voters can now check deletion status online. The press conference ranged beyond Bihar to touch on simmering disputes over privacy, citizenship and the Commission's credibility. Kumar reiterated that the EC could not release machine-readable voter rolls, citing a 2019 Supreme Court ruling that such lists would compromise electors' privacy. 'You can search the voter list available on the EC website by entering the EPIC number and download it. That is searchable, not machine-readable.' He warned Opposition leaders against exposing voters' personal data. 'They showed electors' details in public. They are breaching their privacy. Should the Election Commission share CCTV videos of any voter, including their mothers, daughters-in-law, daughters?' he asked, in a swipe at Rahul Gandhi for releasing voter documents. On the contentious question of whether the EC has the authority to verify voters' citizenship, Kumar asserted: 'Article 326 clearly says that only citizens have the right to vote, and thus the verification of citizenship is within EC's domain of powers.' This marks a departure from the Supreme Court's earlier observation that such verification lies with the Union home ministry. Kumar closed with a forceful defence of the poll body's neutrality: 'We are not scared. I want to make it very clear today that the EC will conduct its duties with fearlessness and ensure that no one is discriminated against on the basis of class and faith. The EC stood with Indian voters like a rock, stands with them like a rock and will continue to be with them like a rock. When more than seven crore voters of Bihar are standing with the Election Commission, then neither can any question mark be raised on the credibility of the Commission nor on the credibility of the voters.'
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Bias On Display': Opposition Slams CEC For Shielding BJP, Dodging Queries
Congress leaders intensified their attack on the Election Commission after Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar's press conference. Pawan Khera alleged bias, accusing the CEC of acting like a 'BJP agent' and questioning Union Minister Anurag Thakur's access to voter data. He also ridiculed the EC, claiming voters declared 'dead' were seen with Rahul Gandhi. RJD MP Manoj Jha slammed the EC, saying it was 'not above the Constitution' and must answer tough questions. Senior Congress leader Digvijay Singh questioned why only BJP had access to voter lists and launched a 'Voter Rights Yatra' in Bihar. Rajesh Thakur too called the CEC's address 'controversial and irrelevant,' accusing the Commission of lacking transparency.#electioncommission #congress #pawankhera #manojjha #digvijaysingh #rajeshthakur #anuragthakur #voterlist #loksabhaelections2025 #eci
Indian Express
29 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Dharmasthala secret burials case: Karnataka govt likely to table response in Legislative Assembly tomorrow
With the opposition BJP mounting pressure on the Karnataka government over the Special Investigation Team (SIT) probe into the Dharmasthala secret burials case, the state government is expected to table a response on the matter in the Legislative Assembly on Monday. The response has also gained significance following the remarks made by Deputy Chief Minister D K Shivakumar, who has described the case to be a 'big conspiracy' to tarnish the reputation of the temple town. By these remarks, Shivakumar lent his voice to the allegations made by BJP legislators regarding the case over the past week. On Sunday, a delegation of around 20 legislators under BJP state president B Y Vijayendra visited Dharmasthala and demanded an apology from Chief Minister Siddaramaiah for failing to curb the 'misinformation campaign' targeting the temple town. This was in reference to the social media posts by some groups about the alleged crimes that took place around Dharmasthala. The delegation met Rajya Sabha MP Dr Veerendra Heggade, who is also the Dharmadhikari of Dharmasthala. Vijayendra criticised the government for failing to act against those making false allegations against Dharmasthala. On the remarks by Shivakumar, he urged him to 'immediately disclose information about those behind the conspiracy against Dharmasthala,' if the deputy CM was truly a devotee of the Sri Manjunatheshwara Temple located in the town. Last week, the BJP had demanded that the state government table an interim report on the investigation carried out by SIT. On Thursday, during a discussion on the case at the Legislative Assembly, BJP MLA Sunil Kumar had contended that Left groups were carrying out a smear campaign against Dharmasthala and other Hindu places of worship. The exhumation carried out near the town, he said, would eventually 'shake the government'. 'The entire Cabinet should go to Dharmasthala and apologise,' he added. The probe is based on a complaint filed by a whistleblower, who has alleged that he was forced to bury several bodies between 1998 and 2014. After exhuming multiple locations since July 29, the SIT is said to have found two skeletons.
