
Carlsberg plans to add 2-3 breweries in India to grow market share: CEO Jacob Aarup-Andersen
Jacob Aarup-Andersen
.
The maker of the eponymous brand and
Tuborg
currently has seven breweries in India. It recently committed '350 crore for a new facility in
Mysuru
, Karnataka. Through these initiatives, Carlsberg would seek to further grow its Indian market share from the current 25 per cent .
It had an 18 per cent share just about two years ago. "We are in the process of finalising a number of supply chain projects at the moment. You would also expect to see more greenfield projects come on stream in the coming years in India," Aarup-Andersen said on a call with investors. "So, we are not sitting on our hands, and we would expect that in the coming years, you will see two to three new brewery additions in India."
At six million hectoliters per year, India accounts for about 5 per cent of Carlsberg Group's total volume. One hectolitre is equivalent to 100 litres.
India-a warm, tropical country with promising demographics and increasing affluence-is one of the world's largest beer markets.
United Breweries
, majority owned by Heineken, currently controls half of the Indian beer market.
Carlsberg entered the Indian market in 2007 through a joint venture with Nepal-based Khetan Group though it was embroiled in a commercial conflict with its partner for the past several years. Last fiscal, the Danish brewer bought out Khetan Group's stake to currently own 100 per cent of the Indian venture and said it will step up investments in India-both in terms of capital spending, and sales and marketing.
"We feel confident that we have the broad capacity we need in terms of the supply we get from-the capacity we get from our co-packer partners across the states. But we have historically had quarters where we've seen rapid demand increase in certain states where we didn't have the co-packer capabilities. And, of course, that can happen going forward," noted Aarup-Andersen.
For alcobev products, India, in particular, offers very attractive growth opportunities supported by favourable demographics, with an estimated 800 million people of legal drinking age and around 20 million people entering this cohort every year. While not everyone consumes alcohol, there are still an estimated 140 million people in the beer-drinking population. Growing urbanisation, increasing penchant for dining out, and a rising share of women beer drinkers is driving this market.
However, India remains a complicated market for companies to run operations. Alcohol sales are restricted. There are only around 90,000 outlets across India with permission to sell alcohol, and rules are set by individual states, resulting in varied market and tax structures, including import and export duties between states. The marketing of alcohol is also heavily regulated.
India is also traditionally a spirits market with high alcohol by volume (ABV) products accounting for around two-thirds of alcohol consumption. However, the market is experiencing increasing popularity of low-alcohol products-mainly beer. The beer market is largely driven by strong beers, with around 80 per cent of market volumes comprising beer with ABV between 5 per cent and 8 per cent . Carlsberg sells strong beer brands Carlsberg Elephant and
Tuborg Strong
.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump advisor criticises India over Russian oil, says tariff to hit where it hurts
WASHINGTON: White House trade advisor Peter Navarro sharply criticised India for purchasing Russian energy and defence equipment, pledging to 'hit India where it hurts' in order to change New Delhi's policy. In an opinion piece for the Financial Times, Navarro termed India's oil trade with Russia 'opportunistic' and 'corrosive' to global efforts being made to isolate the Russian economy. White House trade counselor Peter Navarro walks outside the White House after a television interview, on July 31, 2025, in Washington. (AP FILE) A former economics professor who emerged as a major trade adviser to US President Donald Trump in his first administration, Navarro is seen as a major force behind the US's retaliatory tariffs on trading partners. In his article, Navarro sought to link what he termed as India's 'high' trade tariffs and 'financial support' for Russia's war in Ukraine. 'As Russia continues to hammer Ukraine, helped by India's financial support, American (and European) taxpayers are then forced to spend tens of billions more to help Ukraine's defence. Meanwhile, India keeps slamming the door on American exports through high tariffs and trade barriers. More than 300,000 soldiers and civilians have been killed, while Nato's eastern flank grows more exposed and the west foots the bill for India's oil laundering,' wrote Navarro. In negotiations with the US for a Free Trade Agreement, India has refused to budge on protections for its agriculture, dairy and micro, small and medium enterprises (MSME) sectors from unfettered American imports. Trump on July 30 announced punitive tariffs of 25% on Indian goods shipped to America. He subsequently added another 25% levy, which is scheduled to come into effect next week, for purchasing Russian oil. India's foreign ministry has termed the tariffs as 'unreasonable' and 'extremely unfortunate'. Navarro also attacked Indian refiners for 'profiteering' by purchasing Russian discounted oil and exporting the processed petroleum products to Europe, Africa and Asia, stating that the surge in crude oil imports from Russia after 2022 was not for meeting domestic consumption. 'The Biden administration largely looked the other way at this strategic and geopolitical madness. The Trump administration is confronting it,' Navarro said of Trump's tariffs on India that have left the country's exports to the US at a significant disadvantage with those from competing nations. 'This two-pronged policy will hit India where it hurts — its access to US markets — even as it seeks to cut off the financial lifeline it has extended to Russia's war effort,' Navarro said. 'If India wants to be treated as a strategic partner of the US, it needs to start acting like one.' Navarro's criticism marks the latest recrimination of India's ties with Russia from a senior member of the Trump administration. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller have also taken issue with New Delhi's relationship with Moscow. Navarro also added to earlier criticisms of India in a new direction, by taking aim at defence technology transfers from US firms to India. In his view, building factories in India and transferring sensitive technologies does not help improve Washington's trade balance with New Delhi. Navarro also charged India with 'cozying up to both Russia and China'. Former US officials have questioned Navarro's assertions about the India-Russia relationship. 'The larger issue is that the secretary of State and other principals authorized this piece. So those who know better and are supposed to balance American interests either agree with it, don't agree with it but authorized it anyway, or just don't care,' says Evan Feigenbaum, a former diplomat who served as deputy assistant secretary of state for South Asia under George W Bush. 'This completes a strange narrative arc from Washington and has finally shifted U.S. policy from a trade war and strategic friction with China to a trade war and strategic friction with India instead. I'll say it flatly: that is just strategic malpractice,' adds Feigenbaum, who helped negotiate the India-US civilian nuclear deal during the mid-2000s.


Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
US FTC sues ticket reseller for evading Taylor Swift's Eras tour ticket limits
By Jody Godoy US FTC sues ticket reseller for evading Taylor Swift's Eras tour ticket limits -The U.S. Federal Trade Commission sued ticket reseller Key Investment Group for evading purchasing limits to buy up thousands of tickets to live events including Taylor Swift's Eras tour and resell them at a markup, according to a complaint filed in Maryland federal court on Monday. The Baltimore, Maryland-based company, which operates ticket resale sites including used thousands of Ticketmaster accounts, including fake or purchased accounts, the FTC said. Ticketmaster faced intense criticism after its botched 2022 sale of tickets to Swift's much-hyped Eras tour, when billions of requests from Swift fans, bots and ticket resellers overwhelmed its website and the company canceled a planned ticket sale to the general public. For one Swift concert in Las Vegas in March 2023, Key Investment Group and its affiliates used 49 different accounts to purchase 273 tickets and evade a 6-ticket purchase limit, netting more than $119,000 in revenue on resales, the FTC said on Monday. The company made more than $1.2 million reselling 2,280 Swift concert tickets it purchased in 2023, the agency said. FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson said in a statement that the lawsuit puts ticket sellers on notice that the agency will go after those who circumvent ticketing platforms' limits on ticket sales. The lawsuit is part of a crackdown President Donald Trump announced in March focused on curbing exploitative ticket reselling practices that raise costs for fans. A Key Investment Group spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Monday. The company sued the FTC in July to block its investigation, saying that its ticket purchases did not use automated software, or bots, and did not violate the Better Online Ticket Sales Act. The FTC has made it clear that "they intend to use the BOTS Act to shut down the entire secondary-ticket market," the company said in its lawsuit. The agency on Monday accused Key Investment Group and three of its executives of violating the BOTS Act as well as the FTC Act, which prohibits unfair and deceptive business practices. Ticketmaster and its parent company, Live Nation Entertainment, are facing a lawsuit brought by U.S. antitrust enforcers accusing the company of monopolizing markets across the live concert industry. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


The Hindu
26 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Indian broadcasters staring at crores in unpaid license fees from Nepal, Bangladesh
TV broadcasters in India are due hundreds of crores in overdue license fee payments from distributors in Nepal and Bangladesh, a problem that has been getting worse over the last year, two executives with knowledge of the payment issues told The Hindu. The problem has been particularly acute in Bangladesh, where after the ouster of former President Sheikh Hasina, TV distributors have stopped paying Indian broadcasters the fees they are due for transmitting their channels. Many Indian channels are popular in Nepal and Bangladesh, so much so that broadcasters give distributors in that country a 'clean feed,' a stripped-down live broadcast without Indian ads. In Nepal, which has had issues in the last few years of withheld payments to telecom companies like Airtel, the dues exceeded ₹100 crore in the last few weeks. Nepalese Prime Minister K.P. Sharma Oli is due to visit India in September, and Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri visited Kathmandu on Sunday for a two day official trip. Bangladeshi broadcasters also owe over ₹250 crore, one executive said. The Nepalese embassy and the High Commission of Bangladesh did not respond to queries by The Hindu. The Ministry of External Affairs did not immediately respond to a query on the dues. In Airtel's case in 2023, the telecom company cut off its link to Nepal briefly, before turning it back on in a few hours, underlining the stakes if payments didn't come through. One executive speaking to The Hindu said that the major Indian broadcasters are hesitating to do the same, as broadcasters in both countries could simply pirate an Indian retail feed, ending any hope of recovering due license fees, and posing enormous challenges in reentering the market. In Nepal, Indian channels have been facing issues with the government since April 2023, when the country's Ministry of Communication and Information Technology (MoCIT) gave every broadcaster just two days to implement an 'à la carte' pricing system, practically identical to the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India's New Tariff Order. Unlike the NTO regime, which was implemented — with much resistance — after several months of consultations, the notice given was so short that Indian broadcasters only came to know of the requirement days after the deadline. In Bangladesh, Beximcom, the country's largest conglomerate with over $1 billion in assets, has not received remittance clearance from the Bank of Bangladesh to pay Indian broadcasters, and the political situation in the country has left diplomats and politicians with little interest to deal with the commercial concerns of broadcasters, one executive said.