Kamala Harris aides held ‘mock soiree' to practice socializing: book
In 'Original Sin,' co-authors Alex Thompson and Jake Tapper note that Harris advisers made it a literal dry run — deciding not to serve wine to see if the veep could 'practice with a glass or two.'
There are no reports of awkward moments at the 'salon-style dinner' Harris attended at the home of media mogul David Bradley, whose portfolio includes ownership of National Journal and a partnership in the Atlantic magazine.
Advertisement
However, Thompson and Tapper do detail frustrations with the VP among Biden loyalists, describing the Californian as a 'regular headache' for the White House.
'She often shied away from politically tough assignments when Biden had accepted such assignments as vice president,' the authors write. 'She even turned down seemingly simple asks, such as headlining DC's Gridiron Club dinner.'
3 Kamala Harris' team was paranoid about her performance during hobnobbing events.
Bruce Glikas/WireImage
Advertisement
3 Many elements of former President Joe Biden's team were wary of Kamala Harris.
Getty Images
Six months prior to the 'mock soiree,' Harris and her team drew mockery for releasing a strange video about space exploration that featured child actors who auditioned for their roles.
Harris had been picked in May 2021 to head up the National Space Council, a Cabinet-level position that Thompson and Tapper describe as 'politically safe ground' that she still found 'difficult' to navigate — though she reportedly wasn't helped by aides who 'internally mixed up astrology and astronomy.'
'Many on the Biden team felt that Harris didn't put in the work and was also just not a very nice person,' the book reads. 'Several quietly expressed buyer's remorse: They should have picked [Michigan Gov. Gretchen] Whitmer' as Biden's running mate in 2020.
Advertisement
3 Kamala Harris is now mulling over her options for her political future.
Cameron Smith
Biden had vowed to select a woman as his No. 2, and Harris and Whitmer were the two finalists, according to the book.
Biden confidants, such as future White House chief of staff Ron Klain, had strongly backed Harris behind the scenes.
Jill Biden, however, had been vexed by Harris for raking her husband over the coals during a Democratic primary debate in June 2019 over the issue of busing.
Advertisement
After Harris joined the ticket, friction ensued between staffers in both camps — continuing once they were in office.
'Harris aides began dividing Biden advisers between the helpful and what one called 'the cabal of the unhelpful,'' according to Thompson and Tapper. 'Anthony Bernal, the First Lady's office, and [White House Deputy Chief of Staff] Jen O'Malley Dillon, along with many in the political and communications shops, were often in the latter group.'
Ironically, O'Malley Dillon would go on to chair Harris' campaign after Biden dropped out of the 2024 race in late July.
'Original Sin' is slated to hit bookshelves on May 20.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Longtime Biden aide testifies in GOP probe that former president aged on job but remained ‘fully engaged'
One of Joe Biden's former top communications advisers told the House Oversight Committee that she watched the former president age on the job but that he was always in command. Anita Dunn, the former senior adviser to the president for communications, is the latest former Biden aide to voluntarily testify before the Republican-led panel in its probe of the former president's cognitive decline and possible efforts to conceal it from the public. 'While I observed that President Biden aged physically during his time in office, which is something that happens to every president, he remained throughout my interactions with him fully engaged and clear in his directions and supervision,' Dunn said in her opening statement, obtained by CNN. To address an ongoing allegation that Biden did not make his own decisions, Dunn added: 'I did not observe White House staff making key decisions or exercising the powers of the presidency without President Biden's knowledge or consent.' In the closed-door interview, Dunn discussed the decision to not give the former president a cognitive test, two sources familiar with the testimony told CNN. One source familiar with the interview said Dunn testified that Biden's inner circle came to a consensus he should not take a cognitive test, concluding it would offer no political benefit. A source close to Dunn added that even though the group came to that conclusion, Dunn stated in the interview that they all felt he would pass one. Dunn also discussed the decision to not have Biden participate in an interview around the Super Bowl last year because of the focus at the time around the former president's handling of classified records, the sources added. The source familiar with the interview said Dunn claimed the decision was made because of information in former special counsel Robert Hur's report, which led to no charges against Biden but described him as 'well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.' The source close to Dunn pushed back on that characterization and said Dunn articulated the decision was made for Biden to not participate in a Super Bowl interview before the Hur report was released, and said the decision to not do so was because the then-president's inner circle thought the main media coverage would be about what Biden did with classified records and not about his policy decisions. Dunn had departed the administration in the wake of Biden's decision to step down from the 2024 Democratic ticket. Her testimony to the committee comes as the panel has interviewed top Biden White House aides in recent weeks as part of its intensifying investigation. A number of the former aides have sat for voluntary interviews. On Tuesday, the panel met with former deputy chief of staff for policy Bruce Reed, and former Biden counselor Steve Ricchetti and onetime senior adviser Mike Donilon sat for transcribed interviews last week. Several other Biden aides, however, have declined to cooperate with the committee's investigation and, after being subpoenaed to appear, invoked their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. White House physician Dr. Kevin O'Connor, former assistant to the president and senior adviser to the first lady Anthony Bernal and former assistant to the president and deputy chief of staff Annie Tomasini have all pleaded the Fifth. This story and headline have been updated with additional developments.
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Bernie Sanders calls Texas redistricting push 'pathetic,' urges Dems to 'fight back'
WASHINGTON − Progressive Sen. Bernie Sanders in a new interview called the Republican redistricting push in Texas 'pathetic' and urged Democrats to 'fight back.' Sanders' remarks to CNN's Dana Bash come as Texas Democrats fled the Lone Star State Aug. 3 to try to block a redistricting effort that could give House Republicans up to five more seats in the 2026 midterms. President Donald Trump has pushed for the changes. 'What Trump is trying to do, he understands that there is a good chance that Republicans will lose control over the House," Sanders said. "So what should Democrats do? Sit back and say, 'Oh, gee, Trump is doing this terrible - we can't do anything. Let them win the election,' when they shouldn't? So Democrats have got to fight back. I think it's pathetic, but I think that's what they've got to do,' Sanders said. Democratic governors Gavin Newsom of California, Kathy Hochul of New York and J.B. Pritzker of Illinois have threatened to launch their own redistricting efforts that could give Democrats a boost, sparking a tit-for-tat. Redistricting is required by federal law every 10 years following the release of new U.S. Census Bureau figures; however, Trump encouraged Texas Republicans to jumpstart the process in the middle of the decade. The president argued during an Aug. 5 appearance on CNBC that Republicans "are entitled to five more seats" in Texas because of his 2024 election victory in the state. The 38-member Texas congressional delegation is currently comprised of 25 Republicans, 12 Democrats and there is one vacant seat that leans Democratic. Abbott last week ordered Texas law enforcement to arrest Democratic lawmakers who left the state to prevent the legislature from having a quorum to block a vote on redistricting. Many of the state lawmakers went to nearby Illinois. But the longtime independent lawmaker on CNN's "State of the Union" said he believes Democrats have more work to do beyond the southern redistricting fight. Sanders, who is traveling around the country on a "fighting oligarchy tour" aimed at mobilizing voters against the Trump administration, accused Democrats of turning their back on working class Americans. For example, he claimed former Vice President Kamala Harris was 'heavily influenced by very wealthy people' in her 2024 presidential campaign, which she lost to Trump. 'How do you run for president and not develop a strong agenda which speaks to the economic crisis facing working families?' he said. 'You have more income and wealth inequality today than we've ever had.' Contributing: Joey Garrison
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
New Jersey's electric bills tripled this summer — and could cost Dems the state
When my friend Rebecca in Highland Park, NJ, opened her PSE&G gas and electric bill last month, she almost fell out of her seat: It had tripled. It's now costing her more than $1,000 a month to keep her modest home running. 'It's been creeping up for months, in spite of the fact that nothing about our house has changed,' she told me. 'In years past, it was averaging about $300 a month.' Advertisement 'I don't know how we're expected to absorb these new bills,' she posted on Facebook. Her neighbor Felix Urman wondered the same as he ticked off his household costs for me. 'Property taxes are up 6.3%,' he said — on top of what had already been the nation's highest. Advertisement 'Car insurance up 15%. Home insurance up 17%. Health insurance up 19%. 'I don't know how non-dermatologists are living in New Jersey,' he concluded. That question — how are we expected to live here? — is why the solidly blue Garden State is rapidly turning purple. Affordability and taxes, at 54% and 43% respectively, have become the defining issues in New Jersey's tightening governor's race. Advertisement The latest survey, released this week, showed Democratic Party nominee Mikie Sherrill leading Republican Jack Ciattarelli by just 6 percentage points. Those who ranked affordability as their primary issue were split over which candidate is better equipped to handle it: 36% of them named Sherrill, while 34% chose Ciattarelli. But on taxes, Ciattarelli holds a commanding lead. When asked which candidate would do a better job lowering them, 50% picked the Republican, compared to just 15% who went for the Democrat. Advertisement It's clear New Jersey residents have lost confidence in their Democratic lawmakers when it comes to tax policy. Once they realize that Democrats' bungled energy policies are to blame for their exploding utility bills as well, it could blow November's race wide open. 'They took generation off before they brought generation on,' one energy expert told me, pointing to the state's aggressive shutdown of coal-powered plants under Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy and the closure of the Oyster Creek nuclear power plant in 2018. The result? A shrinking energy supply, at a time when demand is exploding. Dan Lockwood, a spokesperson for PJM Interconnection, the regional grid operator, explained the problem plainly to the New Jersey Monitor. 'These higher prices are the result of a loss in electricity supply caused primarily by decarbonization policies that have led to an uptick in generator retirements,' Lockwood said. On top of that came 'an unprecedented spike in electricity demand,' he added, due to burgeoning AI data centers and the increasing use of 'green' technologies like electric vehicles and appliances. In short: the state is using more electricity than ever before, after legislators systematically dismantled the infrastructure that used to provide it. Advertisement Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters And the New Jersey lawmakers who championed these green policies as bold and forward-thinking left regular families to foot the bill. Adding insult to injury, they apparently thought a $30 rebate would make a difference. 'If you just opened your July electric bill and noticed a $30 'credit,' don't be fooled — it's not relief,' state Assemblyman Alex Sauickie snarked last week in Central Jersey Newswire. Advertisement 'It's a failed rebate scheme from Gov. Phil Murphy and the Democrat-controlled Legislature. It was designed to distract you.' 'That's not help,' Sauickie scoffed. 'That's an insult . . . a Band-Aid over a bullet hole.' No one prepared the grid for this transition. No one told Rebecca or Felix that their bills would quietly triple while they were busy chauffeuring kids to camp and grocery shopping for dinner. The policymakers pushed the policies, but didn't build the safety net, or the replacement energy sources, first. Advertisement Instead, families face a double squeeze. Their bills are rising, and so are the taxes funding the very lawmakers who forced costs up. Voters are rightly asking: What am I getting in return for this crushing cost of living? The answer, so far, is not much. Rebecca's story is hardly unique. Families across the state are considering relocating, cutting their budgets to the bone, or simply skipping utility payments and hoping for the best. Advertisement That's not how it should be in one of the wealthiest states in the country. This isn't about politics, it's about survival. And as New Jersey's election heats up, candidates who ignore the pain of middle-class families do so at their peril. The bills are real. The frustration is growing. And the demand for accountability is rising along with the utility costs. Voters are watching, and they're not buying the excuses anymore. Bethany Mandel writes and podcasts at The Mom Wars.
