Instagram May Spin Off Reels As a Standalone App, Report Says
Instagram may be considering spinning off its Reels feature into a standalone app.
The company's head, Adam Mosseri, was reportedly overheard discussing the idea with employees as part of a broader strategy to better compete with TikTok, according to The Information.
The report said the move is part of parent company Meta's internal initiative called Project Ray aimed at taking on the wildly popular TikTok. Project Ray also focuses on improving the algorithms behind content recommendations and enhancing support for longer Reels, the report said.
The news follows Instagram's recent launch of Edits, a video editing app strikingly similar to TikTok owner ByteDance's CapCut platform. Instagram has also reportedly attempted to lure TikTok creators to its platform with cash bonuses of between $10,000 and $50,000.
TikTok's legal status in the US remains up in the air following the enactment of a law banning it if certain conditions were not met by mid-January. The Trump administration is not currently enforcing the ban and, after a brief interruption, TikTok continues to operate for US users.
Meta declined to comment for this story.
This wouldn't be Instagram's first attempt at a TikTok competitor. In 2018, the company launched Lasso, an app that let users create short-form videos with music, text and filters to appeal to younger audiences. However, it shut down two years later as the company shifted its focus to Reels.
According to Sol Messing, a research associate professor at NYU's Center for Social Media and Politics, the move could appeal to some users who may just want to watch Reels rather than visiting Instagram or Facebook to access them. Messing was previously an employee of several tech companies, including Meta and X.
"Whether it works out for Meta depends on how it affects the recommendation system underlying Reels," he told CNET. "Many have complained it's not as good as TikTok. Creating a separate app may reflect a broader effort to prioritize Reels at the company, which could be indicative of investing more in the Reels recommender system."
At the same time, he said, Meta likely wants to see a return on its significant investments in generative AI and launching a separate app could encourage more streamlined collaboration within its gen AI team.
Still, Messing said: "It's hard to see this move as unrelated to TikTok's recent legal drama."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sam Altman said none of his 'best people' at OpenAI were enticed by Meta's $100 million signing bonuses
Meta tried to recruit OpenAI's top talent with $100 million signing bonuses, says Sam Altman. Altman said that so far, "none of our best people have decided to take them up on that." Meta recently made a $15 billion investment in data-labeling firm Scale AI. Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, said Meta's attempts to poach his best staff with generous signing bonuses were not successful. Altman talked about the competition OpenAI faces from Meta on his brother's podcast "Uncapped with Jack Altman," in an episode that aired on Tuesday. "I've heard that Meta thinks of us as their biggest competitor, and I think it is rational for them to keep trying. Their current AI efforts have not worked as well as they've hoped," Altman said of Meta's $15 billion investment in data-labeling firm Scale AI. But Altman said he found it "crazy" when Meta tried to recruit OpenAI's employees by offering them $100 million signing bonuses if they jumped ship. "I'm really happy that at least so far, none of our best people have decided to take them up on that," Altman said. "People sort of look at the two paths and say, 'Alright, OpenAI's got a really good shot, a much better shot actually, delivering on superintelligence and also may eventually be the more valuable company,'" he continued. Meta has a $1.77 trillion market capitalization, and OpenAI was last valued at $300 billion in March. Altman said Meta's approach of growing its talent pool by dangling eye-watering pay packages could come at the expense of its culture. "The strategy of a ton of upfront guaranteed comp and that being the reason you tell someone to join, like really the degree to which they're focusing on that and not the work and not the mission, I don't think that's going to set up a great culture," Altman said. "There's many things I respect about Meta as a company, but I don't think they are a company that's like great at innovation," he added. The hunt for AI talent has been heating up as companies seek to dominate the field. Aravind Srinivas, the founder and CEO of AI search startup Perplexity, said in a March 2024 episode of the "Invest Like The Best" podcast that companies must offer "amazing incentives and immediate availability of compute" if they want to hire AI talent. "I tried to hire a very senior researcher from Meta, and you know what they said? 'Come back to me when you have 10,000 H100 GPUs,'" Srinivas said, referencing the AI chips made by Nvidia. Naveen Rao, the vice president of AI at Databricks, said in an interview with The Verge last year that there are fewer than 1,000 researchers who are capable of building frontier AI models. "It's like looking for LeBron James," Rao said. "There are just not very many humans who are capable of that." Representatives for OpenAI and Meta did not respond to requests for comment from Business Insider. Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Cheerios quietly discontinued three flavors — and customers are not happy
General Mills has quietly discontinued three of its Cheerios flavors, leaving customers upset. Instagram creator @the_cerealqueen shared a post earlier this month about the trio of cereals leaving stores. These flavors include Honey Nut Cheerios Medley Oat Crunch, Chocolate Peanut Butter Cheerios, and Honey Nut Cheerios 'Minis.' According to @the_cerealqueen, the Chocolate Peanut Butter Cheerios tasted like a Reese's Puffs cereal, but 'with a stronger peanut butter chocolate that dominates over the sugar element.' Meanwhile, the Honey Nut Cheerios Medley Oat Crunch combined the classic Honey Nut Cheerios with 'multigrain-based flakes that had graham cracker flour' and honey clusters of granola with almonds. The third discontinued cereal, Honey Nut Cheerios 'Minis,' was simply a mini version of the usual Cheerios. However, it's unclear when exactly the three cereals were discontinued and why. The Independent has contacted General Mills for comment. In the comments of @the_cerealqueen's post, customers have expressed how disappointed they are about the cereals being shelved, while others said they're rushing to get their hands on the last boxes. 'Choc PB Cheerios are great and I just finished a box! didn't know it would maybe be my last. will look to get one more!' one wrote, while another added: 'Chocolate pb were my entire family's favorite.' 'Awww wait these flavors look awesome, I'm sad they won't be around!!' a third wrote. A fourth customer added: "Oh I really liked the minis, this is sad.' The news about these cereals being discounted comes after General Mills welcomed some new Cheerios products. In December, the company followed the viral trend of many food brands by adding protein to their products. More specifically, the brand launched Cheerios Protein, sold in Cinnamon and Strawberry. The flavors come with eight grams of protein per serving. According to a press release, the protein cereal came after General Mills launched different products in 2024, including 'fan favorite pantry staples featuring protein, like Wheaties Protein, Annie's Super Mac, and Yoplait Protein.' 'As protein continues to be an important priority for people of all ages, we specifically created Cheerios Protein with families in mind,' Emilie Knox, vice president and business unit director, Morning Foods at General Mills, said in a statement. 'We wanted it to taste great and to preserve the iconic Cheerios shape, but with a good source of protein, all in a convenient cereal we know everyone at the breakfast table will love — turning all mornings into good mornings.' In May, a customer on Instagram also spotted that General Mills has released Cheerios Protein Bars. The chewy treat is sold in two flavors, Mixed Berry and Chocolate Peanut Butter, with each bar offering seven grams of protein.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Lawyers Just Discovered Something About Meta's AI That Could Cost Zuckerberg Untold Billions of Dollars
A legal expert found that Meta's AI is able to spit out entire portions of books verbatim — and if he's right, it could be seriously bad news for the company and its CEO Mark Zuckerberg. First, a quick primer. All the AI that's commercially buzzy at the moment, like OpenAI's ChatGPT or Meta's Llama, is trained by feeding in huge amounts of data. Then researchers do a bunch of number crunching using algorithms, basically teaching the system to recognize patterns in all that data so thoroughly that it can then create new patterns — meaning that, say, if you ask for a summary of the plot of one of the "Harry Potter" books, it'll give you (hopefully) a reasonable overview. The problem, Stanford tech law expert Mark Lemley explains in an interview with New Scientist, is that his team's research found that Meta's LLaMA is able to repeat verbatim the exact contents of copyrighted books — such as, in one example he found, lengthy passages from the multi-billion dollar "Harry Potter" series. For Meta, this is a gigantic legal liability. Why? Because if its AI is producing entire excerpts of material used to train it, it starts to look less like its AI is producing transformative works based on general patterns about language and the world it learned from its training data, and more like the AI is acting like a giant .ZIP file of copyrighted work, which users can then reproduce at will. And it looks a lot like it is. When testing out various AI models by companies including OpenAI, DeepSeek, and Microsoft, Lemley's team found that Meta's LLaMA was the only one that spat out book content exactly. Specifically, the researchers found that LLaMA seemed to have memorized material including the first book in J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter" series, F. Scott Fitzgerald's "The Great Gatsby," and George Orwell's "1984." It's not under debate that Meta, like its peers in the tech industry, used copyrighted materials to train its AI. But its specific methodology for doing so has come under fire: it emerged in copyright lawsuit against Meta by authors including the comedian Sarah Silverman that the model was trained on the "Books3" dataset, which contains almost 200,000 copyrighted publications and which Meta engineers downloaded using an illegal torrent ("Torrenting from a [Meta-owned] corporate laptop doesn't feel right," one of them fussed while doing so, in messages produced in court.) Lemley and his team estimate that if just three percent of the Books3 dataset were found to be infringing, the company behind it could owe nearly $1 billion in statutory damages, and that's not counting any additional payouts based on profits gleaned from such theft. And if the proportion of infringing content is higher, at least in theory Meta could end up nailed to the wall. Lemley is in a weird position, by the way. He previously defended Meta in that same lawsuit we mentioned above, but earlier this year, the Stanford professor announced in a LinkedIn post that he would no longer be representing the company in a protest of Meta and Zuckerberg's right-wing virtue signaling. Back then, he said he believed Meta should win its case — but based on his new research, it sounds like that opinion may have shifted. Meta declined to comment to New Scientist about Lemley's findings. More on Meta: Meta Says It's Okay to Feed Copyrighted Books Into Its AI Model Because They Have No "Economic Value"
