Egypt will not accept the liquidation of the Palestinian cause: FM Abdelatty to Palestinian PM
The meeting on Monday came on the Sidelines of the High-Level International Conference on the Peaceful Resolution of the Question of Palestine and the Implementation of the Two-State Solution.
A Foreign Ministry statement said Abdelatty reaffirmed Egypt's continued and intensive mediation efforts to reach a ceasefire agreement and to ensure the flow of humanitarian aid into Gaza in light of the humanitarian catastrophe in the Strip.
It added that the two sides discussed future steps to advance the implementation of the early recovery and reconstruction plan for Gaza following the achievement of a ceasefire, including the early recovery and reconstruction conference Egypt intends to host.
They also addressed developments in the West Bank amid ongoing Israeli military incursions and repeated violations in cities and refugee camps, with Abdelatty condemning the expansion of settlements in the West Bank.
The meeting also touched on the consequences of Israeli measures to shut down schools and hospitals operated by the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) in East Jerusalem.
Egypt's top diplomat stressed Egypt's full support for UNRWA's vital and irreplaceable role.
He expressed hope that the momentum generated by the Peaceful Resolution Conference would accelerate international recognition of the State of Palestine, praising the French President's announcement of his country's intention to recognize the Palestinian state.
The top Egyptian diplomat reiterated Cairo's unwavering support for the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people, foremost among them the right to self-determination and the establishment of an independent state based on the 4 June 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital.
Separately, FM Abdelatty held a meeting with Deputy Foreign Minister of the Russian Federation Sergey Vershinin, where they exchanged views on the latest developments in the Gaza Strip.
Abdelatty reviewed Egypt's efforts to reach a ceasefire in the Strip, aiming to achieve de-escalation, facilitate the delivery of humanitarian and relief aid to Gaza, and halt the deterioration of the humanitarian situation.
Additionally, Egypt's Foreign Minister praised the level of cooperation between Egypt and Russia in several strategic projects of mutual interest, foremost among them the Dabaa Nuclear Power Plant and the Russian Industrial Zone in the Suez Canal Economic Zone.
He expressed hopes for increased Russian investments in Egypt through the Russian Industrial Zone.
The meeting also touched on tourism, with the Minister noting the steady increase in reciprocal flights between the two countries and expressing hope for the continued flow of Russian tourists to Egypt.
The two sides also touched base on the developments in Syria, where Abdelatty condemned the Israeli attacks on Syrian territory and the violation of the sovereignty, unity, and territorial integrity of Syria.
He stressed the need for Israel to withdraw from all Syrian territories it has occupied since 1967, including the Golan Heights.
Follow us on:
Short link:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily News Egypt
3 hours ago
- Daily News Egypt
Netanyahu's Final Gamble: Will the Gaza Deal Seal His Fate or Save His Legacy?
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is living through one of the most politically precarious moments of his career. At the heart of this crisis lies the looming Gaza deal — a potential turning point that could either salvage his political future or mark the end of it. While Netanyahu clearly wants the deal, he remains uncertain about what comes next. What happens on 'Day 61' if Hamas refuses to surrender? Can Israel resume its military campaign? And perhaps most critically, will international backing — particularly from the United States — still be there? Since the beginning of the Gaza war, Netanyahu has held firm to a hardline stance: no ceasefire without the complete eradication of Hamas. Yet, as the war nears its third year, none of his declared objectives have materialised — neither the release of hostages nor the dismantling of Hamas's grip on Gaza. In recent weeks, however, something has shifted — not in declared goals, but in tone and strategy. For the first time, Netanyahu has spoken publicly about ending the war as part of the proposed deal now being negotiated in Cairo and Doha. In a meeting with hostage families in Washington, he stated unequivocally: 'If the deal moves forward, negotiations for ending the war will begin immediately — not after 60 days. The goal after 60 days is to end the war.' In politics, no statement is made without intent. These words signal a notable shift — especially given US President Donald Trump's resolute stance: 'I will be very firm with Netanyahu about ending the war in Gaza.' At the same time, Israel's position is becoming increasingly untenable in the eyes of the international community, as it continues to enforce a punishing blockade on Gaza's civilian population. Thousands of aid trucks have been stranded at the Rafah border for months, denied entry by Israel without justification. Facing mounting pressure both at home and abroad, Netanyahu is manoeuvring for time. He seeks a temporary deal that would allow him to remain in power, appease Washington, and avoid alienating his far-right coalition. His ideal outcome? A partial deal that secures the release of some hostages alive, allows for a temporary halt in fighting, and buys him political breathing space. The Biden administration — and, more specifically, Trump's ambitions if he returns — appears less tolerant this time. Unlike past ceasefires, the US is signalling it will not allow a return to hostilities after 60 days. Trump, driven by his ambition to secure a Nobel Peace Prize, is determined to broker a lasting solution. Gaza, in his eyes, is merely the first step toward a grand regional bargain. To achieve that, he may be willing to pressure even America's closest ally in the region. Netanyahu thus faces a dangerous paradox. If he agrees to a deal that rules out resuming combat, he risks the collapse of his ruling coalition. If he insists on keeping that option open, he may lose Trump's support — and with it, any leverage he has on the world stage. It is a classic clash between domestic survival and international demands. The challenge is not external alone. Inside Israel, key coalition partners like Smotrich and Ben Gvir have made it clear they will not accept any deal that leaves Hamas standing in any form — military or civil. Even the prospect of sweeping regional peace agreements would mean little to them if Hamas remains intact. This is why Netanyahu prefers a limited deal: rescuing 10 hostages alive and retrieving 18 bodies in exchange for a short-term ceasefire. If Hamas refuses to surrender afterwards, Israel can return to war. But if the deal requires a full cessation of hostilities, Netanyahu will be forced to choose between recovering the hostages or saving his political career. True to form, Netanyahu will likely attempt to manoeuvre his way out — as he has done in the past. But this time, the minefield is far more treacherous. Trump is not a background player but a driving force with a prize in sight. And Gaza, for him, is not the endgame — it is the opening move on a much larger regional chessboard. Whether Netanyahu can pull off one more deal — or if this truly is his final political gamble — remains to be seen. Dr. Hatem Sadek: Professor at Helwan University
Daily News Egypt
3 hours ago
- Daily News Egypt
Trump's Reckless Nuclear Poker: Why Is Israel Exempt from 'Peace Through Strength'?
At a time when some of the world's most dangerous decisions are made through Trump's social media platform, the lines between deterrence and political theatrics are dangerously blurred. Nuclear weapons have become bargaining chips, not last resorts. This article poses a simple yet urgent question: Why does Trump threaten Russia and Iran with force while remaining silent about Israel's actions in Gaza? Can peace be achieved through selective outrage? Can justice be built on exceptions? When power trumps principle, politics loses its meaning — and the world becomes hostage to personal whims. In a dramatic announcement that shook the international stage, President Donald Trump declared on 2 August 2025 that he had ordered the repositioning of two American nuclear submarines near Russian waters. The move was a direct response to former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev's veiled threat to activate the 'Dead Hand' nuclear system. Simultaneously, Trump doubled down on threats against Iran, boasting of the June strikes that targeted its Fordow and Natanz nuclear facilities, and reaffirming his readiness to 'crush' any attempt by Tehran to revive its nuclear programme. Yet, amid these bold displays of nuclear brinkmanship, Trump continues to exempt his closest ally, Israel, from his 'peace through strength' doctrine. While he relentlessly threatens Russia and Iran, he opts for soft diplomatic language when it comes to Israel — even as the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza deepens, with over 60,000 reported deaths and critical aid convoys blocked at the Rafah border crossing. Since returning to the White House, Trump has framed 'peace through strength' as the cornerstone of his foreign policy. But the way he applies this strategy reveals deep inconsistencies. He uses it as a sword against adversaries and a shield to protect friends. His threats of annihilation towards Iran, and his warnings to Russia of being 'on the edge of disaster,' contrast starkly with his message to Netanyahu: 'I will be very tough with him,' he said in July — more of a friendly nudge than a real warning. Notably, these high-stakes messages are often delivered not through formal diplomatic channels, but via his Truth Social platform — turning matters of war and peace into viral posts. This contradiction reveals a dangerous flaw in Trump's approach to deterrence: it is driven not by principle, but by political convenience. Israel, shielded by bipartisan support in Congress and a powerful pro-Israel lobby, is treated as an exception. Washington deploys submarines for Moscow and missiles for Tehran — but when it comes to Israel, even in the face of immense civilian suffering in Gaza, it sends a diplomat and offers private negotiations. Experts are raising alarms. Hans Kristensen of the Federation of American Scientists warns that Trump's nuclear manoeuvres risk creating a 'commitment trap' that could spiral into uncontrollable escalation. Daryl Kimball from the Arms Control Association calls Trump's nuclear threats 'reckless and irresponsible' — especially when announced via smartphone. UN Secretary-General António Guterres has warned that nuclear escalation poses a global threat, while France and China continue to urge broader dialogue. The problem is not just a double standard — it is the message it sends to the world: that accountability depends on alliances, not actions. And this is not just morally troubling; it is geopolitically destabilising. In Iran's case, for instance, unconditional American support for Israel is used to justify Tehran's continued backing of Hamas and Hezbollah under the banner of 'resistance'. Trump's attempts to position himself as a peacemaker — a role he often cites when referencing his past mediation between India and Pakistan — are undermined by this selective morality. His bid to broker a regional settlement starting in Gaza sounds ambitious, but without holding Israel accountable, any peace initiative is doomed from the outset. He wants credit for extinguishing a fire without naming who lit the match. Inside the United States, growing bipartisan concern surrounds Trump's nuclear posturing. Lawmakers from both parties are now pushing to require congressional approval for any future nuclear military action, disturbed by the realisation that war may now be declared from a smartphone post. Perhaps the gravest concern is that Trump appears to operate not from strategic clarity but from a 'deal-making' mindset, as if global security were a casino table. But this time, he is not gambling with dollars or prestige — he is playing with humanity's future. The real question is not whether Trump might press the nuclear button — it is when, and why. Trump's version of 'peace through strength' seems to follow a troubling logic: threaten adversaries with bombs, warn Iran of annihilation, and gently ask Israel to 'ease up'. But in the eyes of the world, this equation is unravelling. Deterrence is not only about weapons — it is about moral consistency. Without that, 'peace through strength' becomes a dangerous illusion… and a blueprint for the next global disaster. Dr Marwa El-Shinawy: Academic and Writer
Daily News Egypt
3 hours ago
- Daily News Egypt
Egypt, Vietnam upgrade ties to comprehensive partnership
Egyptian President Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi announced on Tuesday the elevation of Egypt–Vietnam relations to the level of a comprehensive partnership during the official visit of Vietnamese President Luong Cuong to Cairo. The visit saw the signing of two memoranda of understanding in the fields of local and economic development and centred on expanding bilateral cooperation across key sectors. A formal welcoming ceremony was held at Cairo's Al-Ittihadiya Palace, followed by a closed-door meeting between the two presidents and extended talks between their delegations. Discussions explored opportunities for strengthened cooperation in agriculture, trade, investment, manufacturing, tourism, and education, according to a statement from the Egyptian Presidency. In a joint press conference, President Al-Sisi welcomed President Cuong and hailed the growing momentum in bilateral ties, expressing hope for deeper collaboration between the two governments and peoples. He stressed that both countries possess untapped potential, noting that Egypt could serve as Vietnam's gateway to the Middle East and Africa, while Vietnam could provide Egypt with access to Southeast Asian markets. Al-Sisi said talks focused on boosting trade volumes and investment flows, with particular attention to infrastructure, digital transformation, food industries, pharmaceuticals, renewable energy, electric vehicles, and textiles. The two sides also agreed to enhance cultural and educational exchanges, including scholarships for Vietnamese students at Al-Azhar University. Addressing the war in Gaza, Al-Sisi reaffirmed Egypt's unwavering commitment to de-escalation, the facilitation of humanitarian aid, and mediation efforts for the release of hostages, in cooperation with partners such as Qatar and the United States. Rejecting accusations that Egypt is obstructing aid deliveries, he stressed that the Rafah border crossing has remained open and was damaged four times during the ongoing war. He stated that more than 5,000 aid trucks are currently waiting on the Egyptian side, and that Egypt has provided over 70% of all humanitarian assistance that has entered Gaza during the past 21 months. 'The war in Gaza has gone far beyond any political objectives—it has become a war of starvation and genocide aimed at eliminating the Palestinian cause,' Al-Sisi declared. 'We are ready to facilitate aid at any time, but we will never accept the forced displacement of Palestinians from their land.' He urged the international community not to remain silent, warning that history would judge those who failed to act. Al-Sisi renewed his call for an immediate ceasefire and the launch of reconstruction efforts, stressing that a lasting settlement must be based on international legitimacy and guarantee peace and stability in the region. President Al-Sisi also praised Vietnam's longstanding support for the Palestinian people and its firm rejection of any attempts to displace them.
