
Why Capable Women Still Feel Disempowered In Male-Dominated Industries
In male-dominated industries, many women are recognized for their intelligence, work ethic and strategic thinking. They're the ones others trust to deliver. They earn results—and respect.
But when the moment calls for bold influence—advocating for themselves, disrupting the status quo or commanding a room—something shifts. Their voice softens. Their presence tightens. Their ideas are delivered with disclaimers.
In my experience, this doesn't happen because they're unsure of their thinking, but because they've been conditioned to lead safely instead of powerfully.
What I've Observed Across High-Stakes Industries
As a former global finance leader turned executive coach, I've worked with senior women across law, tech, healthcare and finance. Time and again, I've witnessed a quiet but persistent pattern: The most capable women are often the least visible in power dynamics.
Not because they lack skill, but because they've learned to stay credible by staying small.
Even I wasn't immune to it. I once sat in an executive meeting with a question I knew needed to be asked. But I hesitated, waiting for the "perfect moment." Then my CEO asked it. I didn't speak because I hadn't yet learned to trust that I deserved to take up space.
That moment stayed with me. It revealed something deeper: my own (and other women's) internalized belief that value must be earned and preapproved.
Three Patterns That Quiet A Woman's Power
Many women are raised to earn approval through achievement. They over-deliver, over-prepare and over-function their way into reliability. But reliable doesn't always translate to powerful. In fact, it often positions women as fixers rather than visionaries.
Leadership presence isn't built on proof. It's built on grounded clarity.
High-pressure moments—especially those involving power dynamics—often trigger the body's stress response. The signs aren't always obvious. Sometimes it looks like self-editing, deflecting or shrinking. Other times, it's a sudden flood of over-explanation or apology.
Years ago, being challenged publicly would send me into a spiral. I believed I had to have all the answers in the moment or risk losing credibility. But what I've learned is that composure comes from regulation, not perfection. Leadership doesn't mean reacting quickly; it means responding intentionally. For me, that begins with taking a deep breath and deciding to slow down.
Women are told to "speak up" and "own the room"—yet are penalized for doing so. To survive, many walk a tightrope: confident, but not too confident; straightforward, but not too direct; passionate, but not too emotional. Over time, leadership becomes a performance instead of an expression of truth.
In my work, the women who step into real influence don't become louder. They become less edited. They stop asking for permission and start leading from alignment.
Three Phrases Smart Women Say That Quiet Their Own Power
Even the most accomplished women can unknowingly diminish their authority with subtle language shaped by decades of conditioning.
Here are three phrases I hear often in coaching conversations and what they reveal:
Translation: "I don't want to take up space unless I can justify it."
One client said this after a successful board presentation. She wanted to create a new slide deck to "explain" her follow-up ideas. I asked her, "What if you didn't 'explain'? Just declare what you know to be true, and ask for confirmation instead of trying to convince?"
That's the shift: from justification to declaration. That's where power lives.
Translation: "I'm worried I'm being too much—or not enough."
This phrase often comes from an unconscious need to check one's tone or clarity in real time. But it subtly undermines authority.
A more powerful alternative? "Let me know if you'd like more detail." It keeps the door open, without shrinking the message.
Translation: "I'm trying not to be a bother."
The word "just" is a linguistic shrink ray. It minimizes the importance of what follows and is a common form of self-protection.
Here's the fix: Drop the "just." Say what you mean—directly and unapologetically.
Internal Safety Is The Missing Piece
Most leadership training focuses on communication skills, influence tactics or presence techniques. But few address the invisible drivers beneath behavior:
• The fear of being misunderstood
• The tension in the body during challenge
• The years of socialization that have taught women to lead via performance, not presence
What's missing isn't capability. It's internal safety. When that's cultivated, everything changes.
A Small Moment That Revealed A Big Shift
One of my clients, a senior executive, made a mistake during a high-stakes presentation. In the past, she would have unraveled—rushed to recover, lost her composure, spiraled internally. Instead, she paused. She took a breath. She acknowledged the error calmly and continued leading.
And her credibility didn't suffer; it actually strengthened. Because real power isn't about never faltering. It's about knowing how to come home to yourself quickly—especially under pressure.
Presence, Not Perfection
When women reclaim their internal authority, they stop seeking constant validation. They stop diluting their leadership to remain palatable. They begin to speak—not for approval—but from alignment.
And that's the shift others notice.
Because power isn't about being the loudest in the room. It's about trusting your voice enough to speak when it matters—without waiting for permission.
Forbes Coaches Council is an invitation-only community for leading business and career coaches. Do I qualify?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
11 hours ago
- Forbes
How To Unlock True Inclusion Through Open-Ended Questions And Allyship
We've all been there: in a leadership training session, a sales workshop, or a communications seminar, learning the undeniable power of open-ended questions. Most seasoned leaders intellectually grasp their importance. Yet, in practice, a significant gap often emerges between what we should be doing and what we're actually doing. This disconnect is a silent saboteur of genuine inclusion and effective allyship. Our brains are hardwired for certainty. When faced with a knowledge gap, our default is to fill it with assumptions based on what we think we already know. This innate tendency stifles curiosity and, critically, prevents us from asking the very questions that could bridge those gaps. Allies, however, consciously resist this default. They pivot to a curious mindset, intentionally peppering their interactions with open-ended questions to truly learn about their teams and foster deeper understanding. Beyond the "Oulds": The Art of Asking Open-ended questions are typically characterized by their starting words: "what" or "how." They rarely begin with helping verbs like "are," "do," "could," "should," or "would." In fact, allies often steer clear of "ould" words altogether. These can often be perceived as condescending, disguising advice within a seemingly innocuous question. The golden rule of effective questioning is simple: never ask a question you already know the answer to, or one you're not genuinely interested in hearing the response to. Doing so creates more harm than good, eroding trust and undermining your efforts at allyship. Consider a simple exercise I use in my allyship programs: pairing individuals and asking one to draw a house, while the other asks questions to learn more about it. Even after instruction on the benefits of open-ended questions, most participants unfortunately default to closed-ended queries: "Is it a ranch? Does it have multiple stories? Are there trees?" These questions rarely provide enough detail to accurately visualize the house. In contrast, a few well-placed open-ended questions – "What type of house is it? How many stories does it have? What does the landscaping look like?" – typically provide enough context for a remarkably similar rendering. The lesson is clear: open-ended questions promote clarity. Without clarity, allies risk being out of sync. You might genuinely be trying to help, but by asking assumption-based questions, you're likely missing the mark, and potentially even reinforcing biases rather than fostering inclusion. Listening to Learn: Your Allyship Compass At its core, allyship is about asking questions and, more importantly, listening. When we speak, we often hear only what we already think we know. When we truly listen, however, we open ourselves up to learning something new, to uncovering perspectives we hadn't considered. If you're unsure which allyship role resonates most with you, start with asking questions. I keep a few key questions in my back pocket as an ally. These aren't meant to be a script, but rather a compass to navigate curious conversations when you feel stuck or unsure what to say or do. The key is to stay genuinely curious, even if just for a little longer, because on the other side of that curious conversation lies learning and growth. Consider these: Dave Moerlein, author of The Safety Effect, offers invaluable questions for leaders engaging with new team members. These demonstrate a proactive commitment to understanding and supporting new hires, fostering inclusion from day one: Embracing Vulnerability for Deeper Connection Now, think about your own team. What do you truly know about them beyond their job titles and tasks? What do you wish you knew? Take a page from Dave's book. In your next one-on-one meeting, dedicate time to exploring their goals, aspirations, and even their expectations for you as a leader. You might feel a pang of fear about what they might say. But consider this: if you're afraid they might be thinking about these questions, it's highly likely they already are. Asking invites them to share, opening the door for deeper connection and trust. Model vulnerability by sharing a bit about yourself in return. This isn't always comfortable. It might feel like doing it afraid. But the results – stronger relationships, deeper understanding, and a more genuinely inclusive environment where everyone feels seen and heard – are profoundly worth it. True allyship begins with the courage to ask and the humility to listen. Asking open-ended questions is a crucial, yet often overlooked, skill for effective allyship and fostering genuine inclusion, helping to close the gap between assumptions and understanding. By actively listening and resisting the urge to fill in gaps with preconceived notions, individuals can build stronger connections and create more equitable workplaces where everyone feels truly seen and heard.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Donation unlocks opportunities for NJ Girl Scout troop for kids with disabilities
Girl Scouting has long been known to build character, confidence and leadership through a variety of experiences and activities. But for some, the Girl Scouts were a bit out of reach. A longtime troop leader, Karen Briegs wanted to change that and bring accessibility for all girls who want to participate. Six years ago, Briegs, along with co-Troop Leader Kathy Kafka, founded Troop 60561 in Hillsborough, which provides a Girl Scout experience for young women with significant disabilities. "We call this an 'adaptive' troop, and we modify the Girl Scout curriculum in ways that make it accessible to our girls who have a mixture of disabilities − physical, cognitive, intellectual," said Briegs. "I want the parents of girls who have disabilities who they believe make their daughters not eligible for Girl Scouts understand that there is a way. We want them to thrive and find opportunities to leadership in their own community." The troop offers badge work, community service projects, field trips, the Girl Scout Cookie Program and social events in an environment built around their unique needs and strengths. Last year, the girls received an award for the level of community service they performed. "Everything we do requires quite a lot of assistance, but these girls would have never done that otherwise," Briegs said. "Girl Scouts is always about trying something new. Let's do something that you might not otherwise get the experience of doing − whatever you want to try, let's go try it." The troop is comprised of members Haben Berhane, Grace Hurley, Maya Kafka, Emily Kavanaugh, Ciba Salih and Bridget McGrath, who range in age from 16 to mid-30s. Along with Kafka and Briegs, two adult volunteers, Jodi Clark and Ginny Houle, assist the troop, as do parents. Both Briegs and Kafka believed for a long time that this type of troop was "something that needed to exist." "Many of our girls' parents thought they would never be able to participate in a Girl Scout experience, or they had tried to participate in a Girl Scout experience and didn't find it very satisfying," Briegs said. "Girl Scout troops are usually very inclusive, but there comes a level of disability which is difficult to manage − difficult for the girl, difficult for other girls." Two of the girls are fairly non-verbal, two have wheelchair needs, and two have autism to a fairly significant degree. "These are girls who really would not be successful in a troop of their chronological age level," Briegs said. "One size does not fit all, and that size did not fit these girls." On average, the troop, sponsored by GiGi's Playhouse, meets two evenings a month, then participates in one or two activities, such as community service or an outing. Over the years, Troop 60561 nurtured some girls who were able to move to a neurotypical troop. "There are plenty of girls with autism or with various levels of behavioral, cognitive or physical disabilities who are in peer Girl Scout troops and who do great and thrive," Briegs said. "That's always great but this troop and this model, this concept of adaptive Girl Scouting, is about the girls who can't be successful in that setting." The troop also has been instrumental in helping other communities across the state replicate the adaptive model. "I'm really proud that the model we created, we've been able to perpetuate," Briegs said. Troop 60561 has received a $6,000 donation from Somerville Elks Lodge No. 1068 through its Special Children's Committee, chaired by Carmen Rotella, and Jack's Kids, chaired by Hank Werner. "The Somerville Elks reached out to us and asked if there was anything we needed," Briegs said. "We made a 'wish list' and instead of granting us one wish, they granted all our wishes with a major donation." Special Children's Committee Frank Higbie saved an article he read about the troop, and he reached out, which was the start of "a great relationship." "Our awareness of the troop was chance and good luck," Higbie said. "Since then, we've sponsored events like bowling and day of fishing and included the troop in our Christmas and Halloween celebrations." "We are so overwhelmed and appreciative," Briegs said. "The Somerville Elks have been so generous to our troop over the years. We were stunned by this generosity, and it makes us feel great as leaders to know that our work is appreciated and really supported." The donation will allow the troop to purchase mobility equipment for taking less mobile girls to more outdoor events, a couple of outings that had been out of reach and more inclusive programming. "The donation will help us purchase at least one wheelchair specifically suited to outdoor use so the girls who are less mobile can participate," Kafka said. The troop also plans to take a long-awaited trip to Hershey Park. "These girls love roller coasters − and we'll do a day trip to Liberty Science Center with another troop just like ours that we helped get up and running in Jersey City," Kafka said. email: cmakin@ Cheryl Makin is an award-winning feature, news and education reporter for part of the USA Today Network. Contact: Cmakin@ or @CherylMakin. To get unlimited access, please subscribe or activate your digital account today. This article originally appeared on Donation boosts NJ Girl Scout troop for kids with disabilities Solve the daily Crossword


Washington Post
2 days ago
- Washington Post
VMI appoints new leader to replace school's first Black superintendent
The Virginia Military Institute Board of Visitors appointed retired Marine Corps Lt. Gen. David Furness as its 16th superintendent on Friday, replacing retired Maj. Gen. Cedric T. Wins, the institute's first Black leader, who was ousted from his position this year over his diversity, equity and inclusion policies. 'His impeccable military record, passion for the VMI experience and proven record advancing the mission of complex organizations make him the right person to lead the Institute in this next chapter of its history,' board president Jamie Inman said of Furness in a statement. Furness, who is White and graduated from VMI in 1987, takes over an institute reeling after years of tension on campus that began with a 2020 Washington Post report about racism at the school. A statewide investigation followed, finding the institution tolerated a 'racist and sexist culture.' When Wins implemented policies to try to rectify that, conservative White alumni fought back, alleging those policies themselves were racist and eventually calling for Wins's removal. Furness served in the Marine Corps for 36 years, retiring in 2023 as a three-star general. He had been rumored as the board's pick for the job since the spring, after the board decided not to extend Wins's contract, but was chosen after the governing body formed a selection committee with alumni and students and hired an outside firm. 'The committee's search process was transparent, inclusive, and, above all, thorough, screening hundreds of candidates, interviewing six, and conducting on post visits with three finalists,' the school said in a statement. Furness said in a statement he was 'thrilled' to return to his alma mater as its new leader. 'I am indebted to the Institute for molding me into the man I am today, and it is an immense honor to give back and serve the VMI community as Superintendent,' he said. Furness, originally from Columbus, Ohio, majored in history at VMI before entering the Marine Corps. There, he served as a senior military officer in Djibouti and later helped oversee operations around the world, managing more than $2 billion in assets. He also earned two master's degrees, including one in military studies from Marine Corps University and another in national security and strategic studies from the National Defense University. After retiring, he worked at J.A. Green & Company, a bipartisan government relations firm, as executive vice president of defense programs. Furness has not served on any university or alumni boards since graduating, though he was a guest speaker at a VMI dinner in Richmond. In 2019, Furness received criticism from a junior Marine officer for being a micromanager with a rigid daily routine that mandated 5:30 a.m. reveilles, reported at the time. Furness defended his policies in that article, arguing that 'attention to detail' in a Marine's personal life makes for a better fighter. 'Marines in the division … I think they understand, there is an issue here. We may have slipped a little bit; we need to do a better job,' he told the outlet. 'The sergeants remain supportive; they believe we're doing the right thing for the right reason.'