logo
Revisiting Chola dynasty and Rajendra I's achievements: Insights into governance, society, architecture, and more

Revisiting Chola dynasty and Rajendra I's achievements: Insights into governance, society, architecture, and more

UPSC Issue at a Glance is an initiative by UPSC Essentials aimed at streamlining your UPSC Current Affairs preparation for the prelims and mains examinations by focusing on issues making headlines. Every Thursday, cover a new topic in a lucid way. This week, we explain to you the Chola dynasty from a broader perspective. Let's get started.
If you missed the previous UPSC Issue at a Glance | Mangroves in focus: Understanding significance, threats and conservation from the Indian Express, read it here.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi visited Gangaikonda Cholapuram in Ariyalur district, which was once the Chola capital, on July 27 to unveil a commemorative coin and inaugurate an exhibition on Rajendra Chola's northern conquest. The Union Ministry of Culture also hosted a four-day festival in the town commemorating 1,000 years of Rajendra Chola's maritime expedition to Southeast Asia and the commencement of the construction of the Gangaikonda Cholapuram temple. In this context, let's take a closer look at key aspects of the Chola dynasty and the legacy of Chola emperor Rajendra I.
(Relevance: UPSC Syllabus General Studies-I: Indian Heritage and Culture, History , Indian culture will cover the salient aspects of Art Forms, literature and Architecture from ancient to modern times.)
The Cholas are considered as one of the longest recorded dynasties in world history. The earliest references to the Cholas date as far back as the third century BCE and appear in the inscriptions of Mauryan emperor Ashoka. However, very little evidence exists about the early Cholas, apart from the early Tamil literature of the third Sangam and the references made about them in an ancient Graeco-Roman periplus written in the early centuries of the Common Era.
After a long eclipse, the Chola Empire emerged sometime in the mid-ninth century under King Vijayalaya Chola. The successors of Vijayalaya conquered neighbouring regions, and the kingdom grew in size and power. The Pandyan and the Pallava territories to the south and north were made part of this kingdom.
Notably, Rajaraja I, born to King Parantaka II in 947 CE, is considered the most powerful Chola ruler. Records from copper plate inscriptions have revealed that upon his birth, he was named Arulmozhivarman. Upon accession to the throne in 985 CE, he adopted the regnal title 'Rajaraja' or king of kings. At the time he came to power, Rajaraja I had inherited a tiny kingdom centred around the Thanjavur-Tiruchirapalli region that was still recovering from the disasters of the Rashtrakuta invasions.
Under the new king, though, imperial expansions of the Cholas took a whole new turn. The doyen of South Indian history, Nilakanta Sastri, has written in his book The Cholas (1955) that the first military achievement of Rajaraja I's reign was the campaign in the Kerala region. Under his rule, the Chola Empire expanded all along the eastern coast, up to Kalinga in the north. The Cholas soon gained the upper hand over the Pandyas, who were another great dynasty in the Tamil region at the time and one of their biggest rivals. Consequently, the Cholas emerged as the primary power in the northern and eastern parts of the Tamil country. Yet another hallmark of the rule of Rajaraja I was the predominance of maritime trade.
Over the next 10 years, Rajaraja I established himself as one of the most astute and sharp political leaders to have emerged in South India. He managed to take over all Pandya territories and then moved to Sri Lanka, where he ransacked several Buddhist Viharas and built Shiva temples in their place to establish the reign of the Cholas.
Sastri, in his book, mentions that by the end of his rule, the Chola kingdom had grown ' to be an extensive and well-knit empire efficiently organised and administered, rich in resources, possessed of a powerful standing army, well-tried and equal to the greatest enterprises.'
The personal abilities of Rajaraja I laid the foundation for the achievements of his son and successor, Rajendra Chola, also known as Rajendra the Great. Rajendra had inherited an extensive empire comprising the whole of present-day Chennai and Andhra Pradesh and parts of Mysuru and Sri Lanka. He had benefited from a well-established, powerful bureaucracy, a strong army, and a flourishing trade system.
Sastri in his book noted that 'during the thirty-three years of his reign, Rajendra turned these initial advantages to the best possible use and succeeded in raising the Chola Empire to the position of the most extensive and most respected Hindu state of the time, and one which possessed though perhaps only for a time a not inconsiderable dominion over the Malay Peninsula and the Eastern Archipelago.'
The Chola kingdom stretched across present-day Tamil Nadu, Kerala, and parts of Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka. During the Cholas' rise and fall (around the 9th to 12th centuries AD), other powerful dynasties also emerged and declined in the region, such as the Rashtrakutas of the Deccan, who at times defeated the Cholas, and the Chalukyas of the Andhra region, with whom the Cholas frequently engaged in battle.
At the peak of their rule in the ninth and tenth centuries, the entire area south of the Tungabhadra River was brought together as a single unit under the Cholas. They were perhaps the only dynasty from Southern India to have moved north, marching into Eastern India, where Rajendra Chola is known to have defeated the Pala king Mahipala of Pataliputra. They were also the first empire with grand commercial and territorial ambitions outside of the Indian subcontinent.
The Chola dynasty left many stone inscriptions and copper plate records, which have become key sources for understanding their history in recent decades. Archeometallurgist Sharada Srinivasan in conversation with Adrija Roychowdhury of The Indian Express suggested that, 'There is a profusion of inscriptions that give meticulous details about administration, social life, and material culture… The Brihadeshwara Temple alone that was consecrated in 1010 CE by Rajaraja I has nearly a hundred inscriptions.'
Regarding the local administration, the Chola copper plate mentions the following entities involved in executing land grants: Nattar, Brahmadeyakkilavar, Devadana, Palliccanda, Kanimurruttu, Vettapperu-Urkalilar, and Nagarattar.
Nattars were the representatives of nadu (locality). The brahmadeyakkilavars were the brahmana donees of brahmadeya (lands given to the brahmanas). Nagarattars comprised the trading community and belonged to the nagaram (settlement of a group of traders). Devadana, palliccanda, kavimurruttu, and Vettaperu have been identified as a tax-free village.
As a constituent of administrative structuring the nadu was important, but it incorporated and represented the urs (vellanvagai villages). Thus, in the territorial sphere, nadu comprised vellanvagai villages. Nattars were the important members (landholders) of the nadu (locality).
There are very few inscriptions related to the vellanvagai villages. It seems that the ur being the common populace represented the section that was not literate. However, the inscriptional evidence related to Ur, which is found in the temples, is attributed to literate groups.
The functions of the ur included: supervision of village lands viz. activities related to sale, purchase and gift. An important prerequisite for becoming a member of the ur was to be a holder of land.
Nadu: a locality consisting of many settlements, in early medieval south India
Nagaram: market or commercial centre in early medieval south Induia
Nagarattar: the corporate organization of the nagaram.
Nattar: leading men of the nadu in early medieval south India
Mandapika: a local entre of exchange, in between small periodic markets and larger trade entres.
Various kinds of taxes existed in the Chola dynasty. NCERT textbook mentions, 'The inscriptions of the Cholas who ruled in Tamil Nadu refer to more than 400 terms for different kinds of taxes. The most frequently mentioned tax is vetti, taken not in cash but in the form of forced labour, and kadamai, or land revenue. There were also taxes on thatching the house, the use of a ladder to climb palm trees, a cess on succession to family property, etc.'
Alongside this complex taxation system, temples played a crucial role in the Chola economy and society, acting as hubs that supported both religious and everyday life. Temples were the nuclei of settlements which grew around them. These were centres of craft production. Temples were also endowed with land by rulers as well as by others. The produce of this land went into maintaining all the specialists who worked at the temple and very often lived near it – priests, garland makers, cooks, sweepers, musicians, dancers, etc. In other words, temples were not only places of worship; they were the centres of economic, social and cultural life.
While temples anchored the Chola economy and society on land, their naval strength extended their influence far beyond the subcontinent. Their naval might, allowed them to go as far as Malaysia and the Sumatra islands of Indonesia in their conquests. While the extent of this domination is disputed, the Cholas had strong ties with merchant groups and this allowed them to undertake impressive naval expeditions, historian Anirudh Kanisetti told The Indian Express. Maintaining a strong army and naval resources made sense for the Cholas, because, 'The period from 9th to 10th century was a violent time, where kingdoms would go to war with each other frequently,' he added.
Chola's naval power can also be seen in the invasion of Anuradhapura in 993 CE by them. 'Anuradhapura, a Ceylonese political and religious capital that flourished for 1,300 years, was abandoned after an invasion in 993 CE. Hidden away in dense jungle for many years, the splendid site, with its palaces, monasteries and monuments, is now accessible once again,' the UNESCO website says. Notably, Anuradhapura is now a UNESCO World Heritage Site.
The Chola art and architecture make it one of the most prominent and culturally rich dynasties in Indian history. Archaeometallurgist Sharada Srinivasan in conversation with the Adrija Roychowdhury of The Indian Express suggests that in 'terms of the scale of accomplishments in art and architecture and the wealth of writing and epigraphic records, the Cholas would come across as one of the richest dynasties in South Indian history.'
The large volume of unique art and architectural feats left behind by Cholas well represents the wealth and prominence attained by them. A number of stone shrines associated with the Chola dynasty stand in the Kaveri basin, between the historical regions of Tondaimandalam and Madurai. Their territory is widely recognised as Cōl̥amaṇḍalam, 'the land of the Cholas'.
From the 10th century onward, the Cholas prominently started making structural temples. A standard Chola temple was configured along an east-west axis, consisting of an entry hall (mukhamaṇḍapa), a pillared hall (ardhamaṇḍapa), a vestibule (antarāl̥a), and a sanctum (garbhagṛha) sheltered by a Tamil Draviḍa–style superstructure.
Sculptures in stone and bronze, and murals adorned the exteriors and interiors of the Chola temples. However, they lacked the rhythm and flexibility of the early corpus, partly because of their large dimension. The sculptural remains in various media were not only aesthetic and religious in nature but also carried strong political connotations.
As Devdutt Pattanaik writes in The Indian Express, 'Around the 10th Century Chola period, the bronze Natarajas emerged, mobile sculptures that are made using the lost wax method. Recent research has shown that the copper for these came from Sri Lanka which is possibly why the Cholas constantly fought with Sri Lanka formerly called Thambapanni, the copper land.'
Additionally, the Chola era also saw some notable works in literature. Notable texts, including Periapuranam, Virasoliyam, and Jivaka-chintamani, were produced, alongside significant contributions in grammar and epic poetry. Poets like Kamban, Jayamkondar, and Ottakuttan flourished, and major grammatical works like Nannul were written.
Three royal temples – the Tanjore Brihadēśvara, Gangaikoṇḍacōl̥apuram, and Darasuram Airavatēśvara – built between the 11th and 12th centuries CE, are the finest examples of the Cholas' artistic brilliance. These temples were inscribed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site as the 'Great Living Chola Temples' in 1987. These state temples were laid out in a manner that they served as focal points of their capitals. These shrines not only outweigh the earlier shrines in terms of their spatial elaboration, but also in their overwhelming monumentality.
Tanjore Brihadēśvara
Rājarāja's Brihadēśvara temple at Tanjore of the 11th century CE is constructed on elevated ground encircled by a moat. It consists of a mukhamaṇḍapa (entry hall), an ardhamaṇḍapa (pillared hall), an antarāl̥a (vestibule), a two-levelled shrine with a circumambulatory path, and a fourteen-tiered tower, originally crowned by a gold-plated stupi (finial), and a copper kalaśa. The vimana (shrine plus superstructure) of the Brihadēśvara measures approximately 60 metres, twice the size of its predecessors.
The large courtyard also features a Nandi maṇḍapa, two large gopurams (gateways) of three and five storeys, topped by a barrel-vaulted roof (śālā), the now absent brick palace of Rājarāja – which was once connected to the main temple on the north – and the allied shrine of Candēśvara. In its transition from the Pallava tradition, where gopurams served as an entrance to the temple complex, the Brihadēśvara gopurams began reflecting the aesthetics of the shrine and eventually surpassed them in size.
The Brihadēśvara temple is also called Rājarājēśvaram-uṭaiyar after its patron king. It features 38 depictions of Śiva as Tripurāntaka, the four-armed, bow-wielding cosmic warrior. Of these, 37 are stone sculptures, and one is a mural. These are located on the two-storey walls, base, and gopuram of the temple.
Gangaikoṇḍacōl̥apuram
The Gangaikonda Cholapuram Shiva temple is often considered the pinnacle of Chola architecture, a triumphant declaration of the might and magnificence of an empire that at its peak stretched from near the banks of the Ganga in north India to parts of Sumatra, Malaysia, and Myanmar.
Rājarāja's heir, Rajendra Chola I, who reigned for 30 years (1014 to 1044 AD), built Gangaikonda Cholapuram as his capital after his Army marched right up to the Ganga river, defeating the Pala kingdom of Bengal, and returned victorious. In this new town, he built a grand water tank and a Śiva temple similar in form to Tanjore Brihadēśvara. The tank, Cholagangam, was meant to be a 'Ganga-jalamayam jayasthambham', or 'a liquid pillar of victory'.
Notably, where the Tanjore Brihadēśvara temple has a straight, proud tower rising up, the Gangaikonda Cholapuram temple has softer lines and curves, proclaiming more assured power and the luxury of beauty and grace.
The temple today is the site of the annual Aadi Thiruvadhirai festival. Aadi is the name of the month, and Thiruvadhirai is a nakshatra (arrangement of stars and planets) linked to Lord Shiva, also believed to be the king's birth star. Traditionally, the festival involves therukoothu or road shows enacting Rajendra I's achievements. The king's statue is offered new silk robes.
Darasuram Airavatēśvara
The Airavatesvara temple, situated in Darasuram near Kumbakonam, was built in the 12th century CE by Rajaraja Chola II. Architecture, sculptures, paintings, bronze casting – the temple reflects the rich cultural heritage of the Chola dynasty. The temple, dedicated to Lord Shiva, is named after 'Airavat', the majestic white elephant of Lord Indra.
Built in the Dravidian architectural style, the maṇḍapa of temple features several Tripurāntaka images on its walls, pillars, and base. This temple, ingeniously conceived in the form of a chariot (rathamaṇḍapa), features the Tripurāntaka imagery and myth.
The entire temple complex is filled with rich carvings and inscriptions that narrate stories from ancient Indian Puranas. Another important part of the temple is the musical steps. These 7 singing steps that lead to the altar are intricately carved and represent seven musical notes.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on July 27 unveiled a commemorative coin and inaugurated an exhibition on Rajendra Chola's northern conquest. Rajendra I, the maritime monarch of the Chola dynasty, inherited a powerful kingdom from his father Rajaraja I and expansion of the Chola empire continued under him.
To commemorate his successful northern expedition, Rajendra Chola, also known as Rajendra the Great or Gangaikonda Chola (the Chola who conquered Ganga), established Gangaikonda Cholapuram and ceremonially poured Ganges water brought back by his army into a vast man-made reservoir known as the Cholagangam tank, locally referred to as Ponneri.
After establishing his dominance within India, Rajendra Chola I then led several successful maritime campaigns, extending the boundaries of his empire and the reputation of his dynasty as one of the foremost Naval powers of India. He has campaigns from the Ganga to Suvarnadwipa (an ancient term for islands in Southeast Asia, including Java and Sumatra) that turned the Cholas into a pan-Asian maritime empire.
Arun Janardhanan of The Indian Express explains Rajendra I's naval expedition: 'In 1025 CE, he launched a naval expedition against the Srivijaya empire, targeting present-day Malaysia, Indonesia, and Thailand to assert trade dominance over the Malacca Strait. As historian Hermann Kulke has observed in Nagapattinam to Suvarnadwipa, the campaign was not a sporadic act of aggression but a deliberate assertion of maritime dominance and prestige.'
Rajendra was also one of the only Indian monarchs to conquer territory outside the Indian subcontinent. In 1025 CE, he sent a naval expedition to Indochina, the Malay Peninsula and Indonesia. His expansion to Southeast Asia was crucial in establishing trade and cultural links with the region. Hence, influence of the Cholas can be seen in language and society of large parts of Southeast Asia as well. The deification of kings in Cambodia and Thailand as incarnations of Brahmanical Gods, for instance, is a most evident imprint of the Cholas.
Prelims
1. Which Chola King returned with the water of the Ganga to sanctify and commemorate his victory at a new capital in his homeland, called Gangaikondacholapuram, after his successful campaign in the north?
(a) Rajaraja I
(b) Rajaraja II
(c) Rajendra I
(d) Rajendra II
2. Which of the following parts of a temple structure is not correctly matched?
(a) entry hall : mukhamaṇḍapa
(b) pillared hall : ardhamaṇḍapa
(c) vestibule : gopuram
(d) sanctum : garbhagṛha
3. Which of the following temples of South India is known as Dakshina Meru?
(a) Kailasanathar Temple at Kanchipuram
(b) Airavatesvara temple at Tanjavur
(c) Brihadisvara temple at Gangaikondacholapuram
(d) Brihadisvara temple at Tanjavur
Mains
Chola architecture represents a high watermark in the evolution of temple architecture. Discuss. (UPSC CSE 2013)
(Sources: PM Modi at Gangaikonda Cholapuram, How successful were the Cholas as empire builders, Ponniyin Selvan:1 puts focus on Cholas: what happened during their rule?, Why Chola architecture represents a high watermark in the evolution of temple, egyankosh.ac.in, NCERT, .tamilnadutourism.tn.gov.in, whc.unesco.org, Rajaraja I and Rajendra Chola, Art and Culture with Devdutt Pattanaik | What sculptures tell us about Indian culture)
Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter. Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – Indian Express UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.
🚨 Click Here to read the UPSC Essentials magazine for July 2025. Share your views and suggestions in the comment box or at manas.srivastava@indianexpress.com🚨
Roshni Yadav is a Deputy Copy Editor with The Indian Express. She is an alumna of the University of Delhi and Jawaharlal Nehru University, where she pursued her graduation and post-graduation in Political Science. She has over five years of work experience in ed-tech and media. At The Indian Express, she writes for the UPSC section. Her interests lie in national and international affairs, governance, economy, and social issues. You can contact her via email: roshni.yadav@indianexpress.com ... Read More
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Indian fuel exports escape Trump's tariff net, no Russian penalty yet
Indian fuel exports escape Trump's tariff net, no Russian penalty yet

The Hindu

time22 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Indian fuel exports escape Trump's tariff net, no Russian penalty yet

India's exports of petroleum products such as diesel and jet fuel to the U.S. continue to be exempted from the levy of any import duty or tariff, and President Donald Trump has, for now, not indicated the penalty he plans to impose to deter New Delhi's energy trade with Russia. On Wednesday, Mr. Trump had announced plans to impose a 25% tariff on India, along with an additional penalty, citing concerns over the country's energy and defence ties with Russia, as well as existing trade barriers. However, the executive order he signed thereafter only gives effect to the 25% tariff on Indian goods coming to the U.S. Even this has an exclusion list that includes finished pharmaceutical products (tablets, injectables and syrups), active pharmaceutical ingredients, electronics and ICT goods (semiconductors, smartphones, SSDs and computers), and petroleum products (crude oil, LNG, refined fuels, electricity and coal). The executive order also does not indicate any penalty that is to be levied for Russian trade. According to official data, India exported 4.86 million tonnes of petroleum products to the U.S. in fiscal year 2024-25 (April 2024 to March 2025) for over $4 billion. Reliance Industries Ltd is the biggest exporter of fuel to the U.S. With fuel exports continuing to be on the exemption list, it means business as usual for India and companies like Reliance, analysts said. Also, a relief would be if no penalty is imposed to punish India for its oil imports from Russia, they said, adding that for now, the U.S. administration has not indicated any penalty. "For now, there is nothing but you never know," an analyst said. From just 0.2% before the Russia-Ukraine war to now accounting for 35-40% of total crude imports, India's reliance on Russian oil has surged — drawing fresh scrutiny with Mr. Trump announcing a penalty on top of a 25% tariff, or tax, on all goods going to the U.S. India historically bought most of its oil from the Middle East, including Iraq and Saudi Arabia. However, things changed when Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022. India, the world's third-largest crude importer after China and the U.S., began snapping up Russian oil that was available at a discount after some in the West shunned it as a means to punish Moscow for its invasion of Ukraine. From a market share of just 0.2% in India's import basket before the start of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Russia overtook Iraq and Saudi Arabia to become India's No.1 supplier, with a share as high as 40% at one point of time. This month, Russia supplied 36% of all crude oil, which is converted into fuels like petrol and diesel, that India imported. Announcing the imposition of 25% tariff or tax on all Indian goods going to the U.S., Mr. Trump had said New Delhi "always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of energy, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE." "India will therefore be paying a tariff of 25%, plus a penalty for the above (Russian purchases), starting on August First," he said in a post on social media. India bought 68,000 barrels per day of crude oil from Russia in January 2022, according to global real-time data and analytics provider Kpler. That month, Indian imports from Iraq were 1.23 million bpd and 883,000 bpd from Saudi Arabia. In June 2022, Russia overtook Iraq to become India's largest oil supplier. That month, it supplied 1.12 million bpd as compared to 993,000 bpd that came from Iraq and 695,000 bpd from Saudi Arabia. Russian imports peaked to 2.15 million bpd in May 2023 and have varied since then, depending on the discount at which the oil was available. But the volumes never slipped below 1.4 million bpd, which is more than what India was buying from its top supplier Iraq before the Russia-Ukraine conflict. In July, imports from Russia averaged 1.8 million bpd, almost double of 950,000 bpd imports from Iraq. Saudi imports stood at 630,000 bpd, according to Kpler. After the Ukraine war, Western energy sanctions against Russia pushed it to cut prices for those buyers still willing to purchase its crude. The discounts on Russia's flagship Urals crude to Brent — the world's most well-known benchmark — were as high as $40 per barrel at one point but have been trimmed since to less than $ 3. G7 countries in December 2022 imposed a $60 per barrel price cap on Russian crude. Under the mechanism, European companies were permitted to transport and insure shipments of Russian oil to third countries as long as it is sold below the capped price — an effort to limit the impact of the sanctions on global oil flows but ensure Russia earns less from the trade. Last month, the European Union decided to lower the price cap to $47.6 and introduced an automatic and dynamic mechanism for its review in the future. The idea is to keep the cap at 15% lower than the average market price. In addition to stoking India's economy, cheap Russian oil gave refiners lucrative business — refining that crude and exporting the products to deficit countries. These included the European Union, which had banned direct crude oil purchases from Russia. This month, the European Union decided to ban the import of refined oil produced from Russian crude.

Letters to The Editor — August 2, 2025
Letters to The Editor — August 2, 2025

The Hindu

time22 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Letters to The Editor — August 2, 2025

Misplaced remark U.S. President Donald Trump's remark, calling India a 'dead economy', is both inaccurate and disappointing, especially when leading global institutions continue to recognise India as among the fastest-growing major economies. That the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank have all projected India's economic stability is a clear indication of economic vitality, not decline. With a young and dynamic population — in sharp contrast to aging demographics and slowing growth in many advanced economies, India's demographic strength, combined with prudent macroeconomic policies and digital advancement, positions it as a key driver of future global growth. Mr. Trump's comments appear to be politically charged rather than fact-based. Rukma Sharma, Jalandhar, Punjab What is odious is that Mr. Trump did not stop with just announcing tariffs. He has revived the U.S's old myopic game of trying to maintain a geo-political strategic balance in South Asia by supporting Pakistan, India's war-happy neighbour. One cannot but notice the fact that Mr Trump has been upping the ante against India ever since it successfully carried out post-Pahalgam retaliatory strikes against Pakistan's terror infrastructure. That India proved its military prowess with minimum collateral damage and the use of indigenous armaments has not gone down well with the Trump administration. Nalini Vijayaraghavan, Thiruvananthapuram The cartoon (Inside pages, 'On the draw' August 1), on Mr. Trump's decision, may be a correct portrayal. The U.S. President is publicity savvy and wants to take the credit when it comes to all major global events. He wants the Nobel Prize and has shamelessly expressed his desire. He is just another politician and not a statesman. Imposing shockingly high tariffs will hurt the business of the exporters to the United States of America, which will, in turn, affect the economies of many countries. Mr. Trump does not care one bit about the sufferings of others. He is whimsical, which is a bad trait for anyone in power. Here is an elected leader who is an example of how one should not be. V. Lakshmanan, Tirupur, Tamil Nadu One cannot help notice these contrasts — ISRO and NASA have successfully launched their NISAR satellite into orbit, which highlights the power of science and cooperation, but the U.S. President seems intent on giving pinpricks to India and the Indian government. One wonders how things will play out. Dhanaraj S., Bodinayakanur, Tamil Nadu The debate in Parliament The parliamentary debate on Operation Sindoor unfolded as expected, with few surprises. The ruling party remained determined to portray the operation as an unqualified success, while key questions raised by the Opposition were left unanswered. Vital issues deserving serious deliberation such as Mr. Trump's repeated claims of brokering a ceasefire, and the alarming security lapses in Pahalgam were largely ignored. From the outset, the ruling party's reluctance to engage in a substantive debate was unmistakable. Repeated references to events under the past dispensation did little more than deflect attention from the core concerns. One can only hope that future parliamentary discussions will rise above partisan posturing and offer genuine, meaningful exchanges. V. Nagarajan, Chennai Civic responsibility India-Bangladesh relations may be strained but there are areas of policy in that country which may be worth considering in India. I recently came across a video on YouTube, on an organisation called BD Clean ( It is a platform of 50,000 volunteers who work with the aim of ensuring a clean Bangladesh and bringing about a change in mentality in the disposal of garbage. The transformation in the country has been spectacular with heavily polluted areas undergoing remarkable transformations. It is an idea that is worth emulating in Indian cities and towns. V. Subramaniam, Chennai

Trump-Modi talks key to trade deal: Former Asst USTR
Trump-Modi talks key to trade deal: Former Asst USTR

Economic Times

time25 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Trump-Modi talks key to trade deal: Former Asst USTR

Synopsis A reset in India-US trade talks may be needed, potentially through a conversation between President Trump and Prime Minister Modi, according to Mark Linscott. Despite new tariffs and criticisms from Trump, Linscott sees the situation as a "hiccup," emphasizing the US desire for a short-term agreement followed by a longer-term bilateral trade deal. New Delhi: India-US talks on forging a bilateral trade deal may require a reset through a conversation at the highest level, said Mark Linscott, senior advisor, US-India Strategic Partnership Forum and a former Assistant US Trade said there is a strong desire on the US side to make progress and conclude a short-term agreement, followed by a longer-term bilateral trade deal."At this point, I think a conversation between the President (Donald Trump) and Prime Minister (Narendra Modi) can clear the air and possibly even set the terms for a deal," Linscott, who led trade negotiations under the previous Trump regime, told however, said this may require a cooling-off period once new tariffs are in place, followed by a phone call between President Trump and Prime Minister Modi."I'm a strong believer in never saying never, particularly when it involves the United States and India. We've seen over and over again how Trump can reverse course on a dime," he pointed out. "However, the next few days and weeks will be key in moving on, and I don't even rule out a trade deal along the lines of those with Japan, the EU and Korea during this period," he had on Thursday said India's tariffs are among the highest in the world and slammed its ties with Russia calling both their economies dead, hours after announcing a 25% tariff on imports from New Delhi plus a penalty for trade with Moscow. A US trade team is scheduled to visit New Delhi on August 25 to continue talks on the proposed trade deal. The two sides are engaged in talks for a bilateral trade agreement (BTA), the first tranche of which is to be concluded by October with the aim to more than double the bilateral trade in goods and services to $500 billion by 2030 from the current $191 termed the latest development only a "hiccup" in US-India trade negotiations."...it requires a steady hand on the Indian side to signal that it is committed to continuing negotiations," he said. "But Trump remains a deal maker, and I believe there is a strong desire on the US side to make progress and conclude a short-term agreement and a longer-term bilateral trade agreement, " he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store