logo
The Social Security COLA Could Shortchange You In 2026

The Social Security COLA Could Shortchange You In 2026

Forbes3 days ago
When the Bureau of Labor Statistics releases inflation numbers for July on Tuesday morning, August 12, the news is expected to be bad and will affect the Social Security COLA.
Economists say new tariffs will nudge inflation higher, and that jump will ripple straight into next year's Social Security cost-of-living adjustment. Rising inflation could mean Social Security checks in 2026 will have lower buying power for over 52 million of Americans.
How the Social Security COLA is Computed
The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) calculates official price indexes for urban consumers (CPI-U), which represents the spending habits of about 88 percent of the U.S. population, and an older one—wage earners and clerical workers (CPI-W)—which represents about 29 percent of the U.S. population. The numbers are very closely related and hardly ever diverge. The government currently adjusts Social Security benefits with the CPI-W because it was the only one available when the Social Security COLA was first introduced in 1972.
The government uses the CPI-W from the third quarter of the last year a COLA was determined to the third quarter of the current year – July–September. If there is no increase, there can be no COLA. If there is deflation, thankfully, Social Security does not reduce benefits.
Controversy About What Index Is Right For Social Security COLA
There has been a huge controversy about how the CPI is used and whether it is an appropriate index for seniors. The index used for the Social Security COLA, based on the CPI-W, may not be the typical basket of goods and services that Social Security recipients buy. It may not fully account for rising healthcare costs and shelter costs, which disproportionately affect older adults.
Because of these complaints, the BLS considered the reasonable argument from advocates that the expenditure weights—the basket of goods—for urban (CPI-U) or CPI-W were not appropriate for the 62-years-and-over population.
Another index with no official use—the CPI-E (Experimental Price Index for the Elderly)—weights medical and housing spending more heavily was calculated to see if it were really different from the official index used for the Social Security COLA.
If the experimental index had more money budgeted for its construction, it would drill down on the different spending patterns of the elderly and adjust for the cost of retail goods the elderly would typically buy. For instance, an enhanced (and more expensive) experimental index would reflect the cost of buying one tube of toothpaste at the neighborhood CVS for $2.95 rather than ten tubes at Costco for $1 each. However, the index would have to consider that seniors can get discounts that cushion price increases. Clearly, the argument for a new official index just for Social Security was not compelling enough to justify the cost.
I can see why. The expectation was that the CPI-E would be much higher than the official indices so that the Social Security index should be based on it. And, in fact, from Dec. 1982 to Dec. 2011, the CPI-E did run higher (3.1% vs. 2.9%) because medical care --which the elderly spend more on -- and shelter costs rose faster than overall inflation, and these categories carry more weight in the CPI-E.
However, from 2012 to Dec. 2024, the annual difference between CPI-E and CPI-U fluctuated between positive and negative values. Some years, like 2016, 2019, and especially 2021, saw CPI-E rise faster; other years, such as 2014, 2018, 2022, and 2023, saw the opposite. This inconsistent pattern shows seniors' cost of living is not persistently higher than that faced by the broader urban population or urban wage and clerical workers.
Social Security COLA Lag—A Defect Particularly Bad For 2026
But there are other problems with the COLA and arguably more serious than the market basket used. With an annual adjustment, Social Security check increases will always lag price changes recipients actually experience. Here is how that works. The COLA increase is based on last year's inflation, not ongoing inflation. So, if the inflation rate – basically, a person's cost of living -- increases faster than the previous year, the increase Social Security recipients get won't be enough to cover the inflation they are facing at any one point in time.
And this lag -problem is worse when the last year's inflation was lower than the current year. And since inflation in 2026 will likely be higher than 2025, Social Security recipients will lose buying power all year long and won't get relief until January 1, 2027.
Bottom line: Lagging adjustments do not keep pace with actual inflation experienced by recipients, leading to a decrease in purchasing power over time.
Fixes For Properly Adjusting Social Security COLA
The real fix to Social Security benefits is to raise the Social Security benefit across the board—say a flat $200. It would be a progressive increase because it would mean more to low-income people than high-income people. It would also be easy to pass politically and fair since everyone gets it. The U.S. has the highest senior poverty rate in the G-12—22.8%, compared to France's 5%. That's not a statistic; it's a moral failure . (Japan has the second highest senior poverty rate at 20%, Most nations' rates are below that of Spain's 13.3.)
I can't forget about a woman I read about (found by reporter Nicole Neuman of Utah's ABC News) who noted her income was low when she was working and really low now that she is retired.
'My amount is about $1,500 a month,' said Maria Garcia, 64 years old. 'When I was working, I was making $2,800 a month. I'm sure there are thousands, if not millions, of seniors in this nation like me who can't afford their medication and either get their medication and eat cat food, or skip their medication.' When asked particularly about the cat food she said, 'Some say, 'Well, it's starting to taste more like tuna.' Or, they add something to it to make it have a little more flavor,' she said. 'They already have a cat at home, so they can buy a case. They have a can for each meal. Whether or not they have something to go with it isn't important to them because they figure they're getting the nutrition they need from the cat food.'
Policy Fixes for Social Security COLA
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Minnesota Vikings just hired two male cheerleaders and MAGA is melting down
The Minnesota Vikings just hired two male cheerleaders and MAGA is melting down

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The Minnesota Vikings just hired two male cheerleaders and MAGA is melting down

If they're not crashing out over the latest celeb they think is trans or the fact that their votes actually have consequences, MAGA is spiraling over their favorite sport being infiltrated by… wait for it…male cheerleaders. The Minnesota Vikings have announced that two male cheerleaders will be joining their ranks, and when videos of the cheerleaders performing hit social media, conservatives got angry. Dancers Blaize Shiek and Louie Conn are making their debut at Saturday's game and preseason home opener, which has fans threatening to cancel their season passes and InfoWars host Owen Shroyer making derogatory comments, complete with a misspelled word. 'Imagine you buy front row season football tickets and when you sit down there's some man girating [sic] right in front of you,' he wrote on X. @gator_gum had the perfect response, pointing out the hypocrisy of loving such a homoerotic sport but being applied by male cheerleaders, writing, 'Yes, he's blocking your view of the husky man in tights putting his hands between the legs of the other man in tights. Do you know they shower together after the games too? But that dancing guy! Draw the line!' Other right-wing social media users took to X to voice their displeasure at having men join an NFL cheerleading team, with one person posting, 'The Minnesota Vikings HIRED a MALE as their LEAD CHEERLEADER for the 2025-26 NFL football season. This is just disgusting…' Another person reposted the video announcement and wrote, 'I just threw up in my mouth." But former NFL star Antonio Brown took things a step further by reposting a video of Shiek in his new Vikings cheerleader uniform with the caption that used a homophobic slur. MAGA might be up in arms about these particular male cheerleaders, but they are far from the first. In fact, according to Outsports, last season there were 'seven teams had a total of 18 men on their cheer squads,' a trend that was started in 2018 by the Los Angeles Rams. And in 2023, two out gay men became the cheer captains for the Rams' cheerleading squad. Another social media user pointed out that while the sport is dominated by women today, the first cheerleaders were men, a fact backed up USA Cheer, which makes the whole rage debate even more ridiculous. Instead of being focused on the sport they supposedly care so much about, they are worried about who is cheering on the sidelines, in the ultimate 'No homo!' This article originally appeared on Pride: The Minnesota Vikings just hired two male cheerleaders and MAGA is melting down RELATED Why Donald Trump's suits are a sign that he's separating himself from his MAGA base How to survive Thanksgiving with Trump voters without vomiting or getting arrested Why MAGA supporter Yulissa was removed from 'Love Island' & more controversial exits

Enovix Shareholder Third Reminder: Early Warrant Expiration Price Condition
Enovix Shareholder Third Reminder: Early Warrant Expiration Price Condition

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Enovix Shareholder Third Reminder: Early Warrant Expiration Price Condition

Enovix Warrants: 17 of 17 Trading Days Above $10.50 FREMONT, Calif., Aug. 13, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Enovix Corporation (Nasdaq: ENVX, ENVXW) ('Company' or 'Enovix'), a leader in advanced silicon battery technology, today announced that the price of its common stock has exceeded $10.50 for seventeen consecutive trading days since the distribution of the warrants to purchase common stock (the 'Warrants'), currently traded on Nasdaq under ENVXW. Today's closing price for Enovix common stock was $10.98 per share and the Warrants remain $2.23 in-the-money based on their $8.75 per share exercise price. As a reminder, under the Warrant Agreement, if our stock trades at or above $10.50 on any 20 out of 30 trading days, the Warrants could expire as early as 5 p.m. New York City time the next business day. The earliest expiration date for the Warrants remains August 19, 2025, subject to Enovix common stock continuing to trade above $10.50 for 20 of 30 trading days in accordance with the Warrant Agreement. Ryan Benton, Chief Financial Officer, stated, 'The strong pace of exercises to date has already delivered meaningful proceeds to support our growth initiatives, and we appreciate the many shareholders who have taken action. We encourage all remaining holders to make timely decisions regarding their Warrants. We've now completed 17 consecutive trading days above $10.50. If current levels hold, there may be as few as three more trading days before we meet the early expiration threshold. Any unexercised Warrants remaining after the expiration date will be worthless and canceled.' As of August 12, approximately 7.8 million Warrants have been exercised, generating approximately $68.5 million in gross proceeds for the Company. At 5 p.m. New York City time on the expiration date, the Warrants will no longer be exercisable and will cease trading at 4 p.m. on the expiration date. We anticipate implementing a process by which Warrant holders may cash exercise their Warrants using a Notice of Guaranteed Delivery for Exercise of Warrants. This process will be detailed further in a future notice, but it will require submission of the related notice and payment of the exercise price for the Warrants prior to the expiration of the warrants. While the Company, in its discretion, will make every effort to accommodate exercises submitted in good faith by the expiration date, we encourage all Warrant holders to ensure their Warrants are traded or exercised on a timely basis. Processing procedures and timelines may vary by broker or the institution holding your Warrants, so prompt action is recommended. Enovix expects to provide further periodic updates, including if and when the Early Expiration Price Condition is met. Further Information Relating to the Warrants For more information relating to the exercise mechanics and other terms of the Warrants, please refer to the materials filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 'SEC') available at and the information posted on the Company's website at About Enovix Corporation Enovix is a leader in advancing lithium-ion battery technology with its proprietary cell architecture designed to deliver higher energy density and improved safety. The Company's breakthrough silicon-anode batteries are engineered to power a wide range of devices from wearable electronics and mobile communications to industrial and electric vehicle applications. Enovix's technology enables longer battery life and faster charging, supporting the growing global demand for high-performance energy storage. Enovix holds a robust portfolio of issued and pending patents covering its core battery design and manufacturing process. Enovix is headquartered in Silicon Valley with facilities in India, South Korea and Malaysia. For more information visit and follow us on LinkedIn. No Offer or Solicitation This press release is for informational purposes only and shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities, nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any state or jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state or jurisdiction. The issuance of the Warrants has not been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the 'Securities Act'), as the distribution of a Warrant for no consideration does not constitute a sale of a security under Section 2(a)(3) of the Securities Act. A Form 8-A registration statement and prospectus supplement describing the terms of the Warrants were filed with the SEC and are available on the SEC's website located at Holders of Warrants should read the prospectus supplement carefully, including the Risk Factors section included and incorporated by reference therein. This press release contains a general summary of the Warrants. Please read the Warrant Agreement filed as an exhibit to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 21, 2025 as it contains important information about the terms of the Warrants. Forward‐Looking Statements This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, about us, the Warrants and our business that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements generally relate to future events or our future financial or operating performance and can be identified by words such as anticipate, believe, continue, could, estimate, expect, intend, may, might, plan, possible, potential, predict, should, would and similar expressions that convey uncertainty about future events or outcomes. Forward-looking statements in this press release include, without limitation, our expectations regarding the Early Expiration Price Condition, our ability to accommodate good faith exercises, and the anticipated trading prices of our common stock. Actual results and outcomes could differ materially from these forward-looking statements as a result of certain risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, those risks and uncertainties and other potential factors set forth in our filings with the SEC, including in the 'Risk Factors' and 'Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations' sections of our most recently filed annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and other documents that we have filed, or that we will file, with the SEC. For a full discussion of these risks, please refer to Enovix's filings with the SEC, including its most recent Form 10-K and Form 10-Q, available at and Any forward-looking statements made by us in this press release speak only as of the date on which they are made and subsequent events may cause these expectations to change. We disclaim any obligations to update or alter these forward-looking statements in the future, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. Investor Contact:Robert Laheyir@ Chief Financial Officer:Ryan in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

NY attorney general sues Zelle's parent company after Trump administration drops similar case
NY attorney general sues Zelle's parent company after Trump administration drops similar case

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

NY attorney general sues Zelle's parent company after Trump administration drops similar case

NEW YORK (AP) — New York's attorney general on Wednesday sued the parent company of the Zelle payment platform, months after the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau abandoned a similar case as the Trump administration was gutting the agency. Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, sued Early Warning Services in New York state court, alleging that the company, which is owned by a group of U.S. banks, had failed to protect users from fraud by not including critical safety features in Zelle's design. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau earlier this year dropped a similar case after President Donald Trump fired the agency's leader and his administration halted nearly all the bureau's work, closed its headquarters and moved to fire many of its workers. In a statement, James' office noted that its suit was filed after the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau abandoned its lawsuit following a 'change in the federal administration.' 'No one should be left to fend for themselves after falling victim to a scam,' James said in a statement. 'I look forward to getting justice for the New Yorkers who suffered because of Zelle's security failures.' James has been a leading antagonist of Trump, a Republican, and has sued him dozens of times. Last week, The Associated Press and other news outlets reported that the Justice Department has subpoenaed James as part of an investigation into whether she violated Trump's civil rights, according to people familiar with the matter. James' case against Early Warning Services alleged that Zelle, which allows users to send and receive near-instant money transfers, failed to include adequate verification processes. Her office said scammers were able to access peoples' accounts or trick users into sending money to bogus accounts that posed as official businesses. In one instance cited by the attorney general's office, a Zelle user got a call from someone posing as an employee of the utility company Con Edison who told the user that his electricity was going to be shut off unless he sent them money through Zelle. The user then transferred about $1,500 to a Zelle account named 'Coned Billing" and then realized he had been scammed but was told by his bank that he could not get his money back, James' office said. In a statement issued through a spokesperson, Zelle called James' lawsuit 'a political stunt to generate press, not progress.' 'The Attorney General should focus on the hard facts, stopping criminal activity and adherence to the law, not overreach and meritless claims,' the statement said. The Associated Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store