20 iPhones replaced traditional movie cameras on Danny Boyle's '28 Days' zombie movie. Why are they better?
LONDON -More than two decades after the release of his zombie apocalyptic horror hit "28 Days Later", director
Danny Boyle
is returning to the franchise with a fresh set of eyes and a twist on a new technology.
The original film was set against the background of a "rage virus" that destroyed Britain and forced residents into quarantine. It was followed by the sequel "28 Weeks Later", directed by Juan Carlos Fresnadillo.
Even more time has passed in "28 Years Later", which is released this week and reunites Boyle with the original film's writer, Alex Garland.
Starring Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Jodie Comer, Ralph Fiennes and newcomer Alfie Williams, the movie follows a young boy's journey with his father from a closed-off community on an island to the mainland to kill his first zombie.
His mother grapples with an illness which isolates her from the rest of her community and threatens to tear the family apart.
"There'd be occasional screenings of ("28 Days Later") and ... it hadn't really dated," Boyle told Reuters at the world premiere of "28 Years Later" on Wednesday night.
"More importantly, the people's reaction to it felt like they were watching something very present day ... And that led us to start thinking, should we introduce something else into this world?"
One of the innovations was the camera setup. Boyle got in close to the action by sometimes using up to 20 iPhones at a time on special rigs.
"Smartphones, they will now shoot at 4K resolution, which is cinema resolution. So you can use them," Boyle said.
"They are incredibly light. You can go somewhere with a very light footprint and you can also build special rigs with them, which is what we did for some of the violent action in the movie."
Taylor-Johnson said the technique gave the film a "visceral and immersive" texture. "It would make me feel a bit vulnerable at times because it's very invasive."
"28 Years Later" will also be first of a new trilogy of movies, with the second - "28 Years Later: The Bone Temple" - due in January.
(Editing by Andrew Heavens)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Ralph Fiennes shares hilarious fashion advice for whoever plays Voldemort in Harry Potter TV series
Actor and film producer Ralph Fiennes shared fashion advice for whoever plays Voldemort in the Harry Potter TV series Actor and film producer Ralph Fiennes shared fashion advice for whoever plays Voldemort in the Harry Potter TV series, reported People. "Make sure you can handle the long, flowing robes, and don't trip over them," Fiennes advised during an interview, adding, "Practice your long, flowing robe walk." Fiennes also shared a fun fact about a part of his Voldemort garb he had changed throughout the film series. The actor, fresh off an Academy Awards campaign for Conclave and next starring in '28 Years Later', said he had some notes for the wardrobe department regarding his tights, as per the outlet. Fiennes played Voldemort for five Harry Potter films, making his debut in 2005's Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire. The actor went on to play the villain for the remainder of the film series, which ended in 2011 with Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows - Part 2. He also returned alongside many of his fellow cast members, including Daniel Radcliffe (Harry Potter), Rupert Grint (Ron Weasley) and Emma Watson (Hermione Granger), for a TV special in 2002 marking the 20th anniversary of the Harry Potter movies, reported People. Fiennes has said he would "of course" reprise his role as Voldemort if asked, but more recently gave his approval for Cillian Murphy taking over the part, calling him a "wonderful suggestion," as per the outlet. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pedí hoy tu kit de alarmas Verisure con 30% OFF, ¡solo por esta semana! Alarmas Verisure Ver oferta Undo Though who will play Voldemort in HBO's upcoming TV adaptation of JK Rowling's book series has yet to be announced, the actors starring as the main trio have already been confirmed. Harry, Ron and Hermione will be played by Dominic McLaughlin, Alastair Stout and Arabella Stanton, respectively, reported People.
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
20 iPhones replaced traditional movie cameras on Danny Boyle's '28 Days' zombie movie. Why are they better?
LONDON -More than two decades after the release of his zombie apocalyptic horror hit "28 Days Later", director Danny Boyle is returning to the franchise with a fresh set of eyes and a twist on a new technology. The original film was set against the background of a "rage virus" that destroyed Britain and forced residents into quarantine. It was followed by the sequel "28 Weeks Later", directed by Juan Carlos Fresnadillo. Even more time has passed in "28 Years Later", which is released this week and reunites Boyle with the original film's writer, Alex Garland. Starring Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Jodie Comer, Ralph Fiennes and newcomer Alfie Williams, the movie follows a young boy's journey with his father from a closed-off community on an island to the mainland to kill his first zombie. His mother grapples with an illness which isolates her from the rest of her community and threatens to tear the family apart. "There'd be occasional screenings of ("28 Days Later") and ... it hadn't really dated," Boyle told Reuters at the world premiere of "28 Years Later" on Wednesday night. "More importantly, the people's reaction to it felt like they were watching something very present day ... And that led us to start thinking, should we introduce something else into this world?" One of the innovations was the camera setup. Boyle got in close to the action by sometimes using up to 20 iPhones at a time on special rigs. "Smartphones, they will now shoot at 4K resolution, which is cinema resolution. So you can use them," Boyle said. "They are incredibly light. You can go somewhere with a very light footprint and you can also build special rigs with them, which is what we did for some of the violent action in the movie." Taylor-Johnson said the technique gave the film a "visceral and immersive" texture. "It would make me feel a bit vulnerable at times because it's very invasive." "28 Years Later" will also be first of a new trilogy of movies, with the second - "28 Years Later: The Bone Temple" - due in January. (Editing by Andrew Heavens)
Time of India
6 hours ago
- Time of India
Do you need to watch 28 Days Later and 28 Weeks Later before 28 Years Later? Here's what you should know
With 28 Years Later officially on the way and director Danny Boyle returning to the franchise that helped redefine modern horror, anticipation is running high. But with two decades separating this new chapter from the original film, one question has everyone intrigued: Do you really need to watch the previous movies to get into 28 Years Later? Let's unpack what we know and why watching the earlier films might give you more than just context—it might give you chills in all the right places. 28 Years Later: Is it connected to the first two? If you're the type who likes to dive into a movie fresh, you'll probably be fine. Boyle and screenwriter Alex Garland have a reputation for storytelling that's self-contained, so 28 Years Later is likely to stand on its own. That said, if you want to understand the emotional weight of the franchise, the evolution of the virus, and the deep sense of loss that defines this universe, the first two films are worth your time. 28 Days Later introduced more than just a virus Released in 2002, 28 Days Later is where it all began. This was the film that gave us the rage virus—not quite zombies, but infected humans driven by uncontrollable aggression. It also gave us Cillian Murphy's breakout performance as Jim, a man who wakes up from a coma to find London completely abandoned. 28 Days Later. Credit: IMDb But this wasn't just a post-apocalyptic survival story. It was raw, emotional, and eerily quiet, shot in a way that made everything feel uncomfortably real. You got glimpses of the virus's origin, the speed of its spread, and how fragile civilisation truly is. Even now, it holds up as a masterclass in minimalist horror. Watching this one gives you a strong foundation in what kind of nightmare world 28 Years Later is building on. What 28 Weeks Later added to the series Five years later came 28 Weeks Later, a sequel that explored the aftermath of the initial outbreak. Directed by Juan Carlos Fresnadillo, this installment zoomed out to show how military forces tried to reintroduce civilians into a quarantined zone. Predictably, the virus wasn't finished yet, and what follows is a harrowing collapse of a false sense of safety. 28 Weeks Later. Credit: IMDb While it's more action-heavy than Days, the sequel still captures the same emotional bleakness. It introduces ideas about how the virus might return, mutate, or survive in hosts that don't show symptoms. It also raises moral questions about sacrifice, trust, and institutional failure—ideas that could easily carry into 28 Years Later. What we know about 28 Years Later Very little plot information has been officially confirmed, but we do know 28 Years Later will be the first in a new trilogy. Cillian Murphy is back, this time as an executive producer, though there are strong rumours that he might appear on screen. The involvement of both Boyle and Garland is a major signal that this won't be just a nostalgia-fuelled reboot but a return to the gritty, thoughtful horror of the original. Whether the story continues any specific character arcs or not, the time jump of nearly three decades suggests we'll see either the long-term aftermath of societal collapse or the dangers of trying to rebuild. 28 Years Later is set to release in theatres on June 20, 2025 , and brings a fresh but familiar cast into the apocalyptic world. Jodie Comer stars as Isla, a mother navigating the chaos, alongside Aaron Taylor-Johnson as Jamie, her partner. Ralph Fiennes joins the cast as Dr. Ian Kelson, a mysterious figure tied to the infected, while Jack O'Connell plays a cult-like leader named Sir Jimmy Crystal. Young newcomer Alfie Williams plays Spike, a 12-year-old centre character of the story. You can totally skip the first two films! While watching the first two films will give you a deeper feel for the 28 world, you don't have to binge them to keep up with the new one. But if you do, every scream in an empty street, every split-second decision, and every flicker of hope will hit a little harder.
