logo
Part Of Broader Campaign By Illegitimate Govt: Awami League On Charges Against Its leaders

Part Of Broader Campaign By Illegitimate Govt: Awami League On Charges Against Its leaders

India.com03-08-2025
The Bangladesh Awami League on Sunday denounced the charges brought against its leadership, calling them a "politically motivated" move orchestrated by the Muhammad Yunus-led "illegitimate" interim government. Awami League leader Mohammad A. Arafat stated that neither former Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina nor him have received any formal notice of the trial proceedings against the party members, which he said, highlights the "absurdity" of the "unelected" government.
"This is part of a broader campaign by an unelected usurper heading an illegitimate government, intent on erasing democratic legitimacy, silencing opposition, and clinging to power. Such a regime has no legal or moral authority to prosecute a government elected by the people's mandate. An illegitimate regime cannot amend legislation passed by Parliament. Only Parliament has that authority," Arafat said in a statement.
The party's statement comes after a Bangladeshi court on July 31 brought charges against Sheikh Hasina, her son Sajeeb Wazed Joy, daughter Saima Wazed Putul, and several others in connection with six cases over alleged corruption under the Purbachal New Town project. The court also issued arrest warrants against them and fixed August 13 to record the testimonies of prosecution witnesses. The party leader called the events that happened in July last year "tragic and chaotic" and said that the law enforcement responded to escalating mob violence with the tools available.
"By then, the elected government had effectively collapsed. To suggest Sheikh Hasina was directing real-time tactical decisions is absurd," he added. He said that no democratically elected leader should be "prosecuted for upholding constitutional duties in the face of violent insurrection." Arafat called the charges of abetment, incitement and complicity "baseless" and said that these were based on testimony from "compromised figures and unauthenticated audio clips."
The party leader mentioned that the Hasina government had initiated an independent inquiry to understand the root of the "criminal acts," but the investigation was "later dismantled by the current regime." He also claimed that this is not the only investigation that the Yunus regime has cast aside. "During the 1971 War of Independence, collaborators committed atrocities: mass killings, rape, arson, looting.
The International Crimes (Tribunals) Act of 1973 was passed by Parliament to prosecute these crimes. Yet the interim government has halted these trials and is instead using powers outside its jurisdiction to bring fabricated and politically motivated cases against its political rivals," he said. Arafat said that the Tribunal's rejection of defence submissions and its fast-tracked indictments "expose this process as a political show trial."
He also described the amendments to the ICT Act, which he claims are politically motivated, as an "abuse of power, designed to target a specific political party and undermine democratic rights." "Even issuing contempt rulings over unverifiable audio clips shows how the judicial process is being weaponised against the Prime Minister." The Awami League leader claimed that it was Sheikh Hasina who had initiated the prosecution of war criminals; however, those who once backed these criminals are now leading the tribunals.
"This blatant conflict of interest makes a fair trial impossible. This is an assault on Bangladesh's democratic institutions. The interim regime has banned our party, silenced millions, and trampled due process to cement its grip on power. Its agenda is clear: eliminate dissent and erase the Awami League from politics," he added. Arafat urged the international community to recognise the Tribunal as "a tool to criminalise political opposition and rewrite lawful governance as criminality."
The party leader also said that he welcomes an impartial, international investigation into all acts of violence before, during, and after July 2024, including "ongoing political killings ignored by this regime." "Justice must never be selective. History will judge those who destroy democracy in the name of law," he added.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Centre to bring three bills for removal of PM, CMs, ministers held on serious criminal charges
Centre to bring three bills for removal of PM, CMs, ministers held on serious criminal charges

New Indian Express

time8 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Centre to bring three bills for removal of PM, CMs, ministers held on serious criminal charges

The Union government is planning to introduce three bills in Parliament on Wednesday for the removal of a prime minister, a Union minister, a chief minister or a minister of a state or Union Territory when arrested or detained on serious criminal charges. These bills are the Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill 2025; the Constitution (One Hundred And Thirtieth Amendment) Bill 2025; and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill 2025. Union Home Minister Amit Shah will also move a motion in the Lok Sabha to refer these three bills to a joint committee of Parliament. According to the statement of objects and reasons of the Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill 2025, there is no provision under the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963 (20 of 1963) for the removal of the chief minister or a minister arrested and detained in custody on account of serious criminal charges. Hence, there is a need to amend section 45 of the Government of Union Territories Act, 1963, to provide a legal framework for the removal of a chief minister or a minister in such cases. The Bill seeks to achieve the above objectives. The objectives of the Constitution (One Hundred And Thirtieth Amendment) Bill, 2025, say there is no provision under the Constitution for the removal of a minister who is arrested and detained in custody on account of serious criminal charges. Hence, there is a need to amend Articles 75, 164 and 239AA of the Constitution, for providing a legal framework for the removal of the prime minister or a minister in the Union Council of Ministers and the chief minister or a minister in the Council of Ministers of States and the National Capital Territory of Delhi in such cases. The Bill seeks to achieve the above objectives. The objectives of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2025, say there is no provision under the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 (34 of 2019) for the removal of the chief minister or a minister arrested and detained in custody on account of serious criminal charges. Hence, there is a need to amend section 54 of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, to provide a legal framework for the removal of the Chief Minister or a Minister in such cases. The Bill seeks to achieve the above objectives.

Monsoon session: Govt to table bills for removal of PM, CMs, ministers if arrested on serious charges
Monsoon session: Govt to table bills for removal of PM, CMs, ministers if arrested on serious charges

Time of India

time32 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Monsoon session: Govt to table bills for removal of PM, CMs, ministers if arrested on serious charges

Union home minister Amit Shah (File photo) NEW DELHI: The government will on Wednesday introduce three bills in Parliament to provide a legal framework for the removal of prime minister, a Union minister, chief minister, or a minister in a state/Union territory if they are arrested or detained on serious criminal charges. According to PTI, the proposed legislations are: Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill, 2025; Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill, 2025; and Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2025. Union home minister Amit Shah will also move a motion in the Lok Sabha to refer these bills to a joint committee of Parliament. Government of Union Territories (Amendment) Bill, 2025 The Government of Union Territories Act, 1963, currently has no provision for the removal of a chief minister or minister if arrested or detained for serious criminal charges. The proposed bill would amend Section 45 of the Act to address this gap. Constitution (One Hundred and Thirtieth Amendment) Bill, 2025 The Constitution lacks provisions for the removal of prime minister, Union ministers, chief ministers, or state/Delhi government ministers if arrested and detained on such charges. The bill seeks to amend Articles 75, 164, and 239AA to create this framework. Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2025 The Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, does not provide for the removal of the UT's chief minister or minister detained on serious criminal charges. The proposed bill would therefore amend Section 54 of the Act seeks to address this.

Centre to bring J&K Bill in Lok Sabha seeking removal of CM, ministers if jailed for 30 days
Centre to bring J&K Bill in Lok Sabha seeking removal of CM, ministers if jailed for 30 days

New Indian Express

time38 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Centre to bring J&K Bill in Lok Sabha seeking removal of CM, ministers if jailed for 30 days

NEW DELHI: The Union government will introduce the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Bill, 2025 in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday, seeking to insert a provision for the removal of the chief minister or a minister who is arrested and detained on serious criminal charges. The bill will only be introduced and is scheduled to be referred to a joint committee of Parliament for detailed scrutiny. The amendment to the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019 was deemed necessary as there is currently no legal framework for the removal of the chief minister or a minister in such cases, a source said. Quoting the draft bill, the sources said: 'In view of the above, there is a need to amend section 54 of the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019, for providing legal framework for removal of the Chief Minister or a Minister in such cases.' According to them, the bill's objective is to ensure accountability of ministers in office. It said that a Minister facing allegations of serious criminal offences, who is arrested and detained in custody, 'may thwart or hinder the canons of constitutional morality and principles of good governance and eventually diminish the constitutional trust reposed by people in him.' As per its provisions, the sources said, a minister who is arrested and detained for 30 consecutive days on allegations of committing an offence punishable with imprisonment of five years or more 'shall be removed from his office' by the Lieutenant Governor on the advice of the Chief Minister, to be tendered by the 31st day after being taken into custody. 'Provided that if the advice of the Chief Minister, for the removal of such a Minister is not tendered to the Lieutenant Governor by the thirty-first day, he shall cease to be a Minister, with effect from the day falling thereafter.' The bill also states that nothing in this subsection shall prevent such Chief Minister or Minister from being subsequently appointed to office by the Lieutenant Governor on release from custody, 'as per sub-section (1).'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store