Change measurement of school funding amid falling pupil numbers – ex-minister
Conservative MP Damian Hinds said the decline in the number of children in primary and secondary schools meant funding being measured on a per-pupil basis was no longer a good reflection of whether funding is increasing or decreasing.
Mr Hinds said: 'Things are changing very significantly now in schools because of demographic change, and we have reached a point where I do not believe it is legitimate to use the measure of real terms per pupil as the yardstick for whether effective school resourcing is increasing or decreasing, and that is because the number of pupils is going to fall.
'We know already from the Times Educational Supplement that surplus secondary places have increased by some 50% in just two years.
'Now Labour MPs may well argue this, and I hope they do, and they will say 'obviously when you've got a smaller number of children there's going to be less funding', and there is of course some logic to that argument.
'But in a sense, it doesn't really matter what arguments Labour MPs make in this chamber, because back in their constituencies talking to head teachers they will hear something different.
'When pupil numbers are rising, if you hold real-terms per-pupil funding constant, that is a net increase in resourcing to the school.
'When they're falling, even if you increase real terms per pupil by a few percent that feels very much like a cut.'
He used the analogy of a school class falling by two pupils from 29 to 27, it being equivalent to about £10,000 less in funding.
'The vast majority of your costs don't change,' Mr Hinds said.
'You're still paying the teacher the same, and so on.'
The problem comes amid falling birth rates in recent years, which have hit primary schools.
The issue has been acutely faced in parts of the capital, where high living costs have exacerbated the issue.
Meanwhile secondary school pupils born during the late 2000s and early 2010s baby boom will move out of the system in the coming years.
Mr Hinds said schools in urban areas had already closed, with others on the horizon.
He said some could convert into nursery schools, or special schools.
Some larger schools have reduced the number of entries into each year.
Primary schools in parts of London have shut in recent years due to falling pupil numbers.
Camden, which includes Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's Holborn and St Pancras constituency, has seen the shutting of schools while a secondary school has reduced the number of pupils it expects to take in each year.
Earlier this month data from the Government showed pupil rolls in England had fallen for the first time in more than a decade.
Primary pupil numbers have been falling for several years; however, they have been balanced out by secondary school pupils born in the baby boom in the late 2000s and early 2010s.
Other figures from the Department for Education (DfE) reported there were 611,000 unfilled primary places for 2023-2024, a 5.8% increase on the year before.
Mr Hinds told the House of Commons that the problem could be felt just as sharply outside of towns and cities, saying: 'In a rural primary school neither of those things is an option.
'You have major, major indivisibilities.
'And right now, 92% of DfE funding for schools is driven by pupil numbers, and I just don't think that is going to work over the years ahead.
'So I ask ministers, what are you going to do to reform funding, so it is fair and effective at a time of falling overall pupil numbers.'
Responding to the estimates day debate, education minister Catherine McKinnell said: 'This Government has – as Labour governments always do – prioritised education with the department's budget for day-to-day cash spending, increasing by almost £6 billion compared to last financial year, and within that, we have increased the overall core schools budget by £3.7 billion in 2025/26 compared to last year.
'This real-terms per-pupil increase in funding helps to underpin our ambition of achieving high and rising standards for all children in all of our schools.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
5 minutes ago
- The Independent
How many asylum seekers are in UK hotels and why are they being housed there?
The subject of asylum seekers being housed in hotels has come into sharp focus after a High Court ruling. On Tuesday, Epping Forest District Council was granted a temporary injunction blocking asylum seekers from being housed at the Bell Hotel in the Essex town. Here, the PA news agency takes a look at the latest overall data. – How many asylum seekers are in hotels across the UK? The most recent Home Office data showed there were 32,345 asylum seekers being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March. This was down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079. New figures – published among the usual quarterly immigration data release – are expected on Thursday, showing numbers in hotels at the end of June. Figures for hotels published by the Home Office date back to December 2022 and showed numbers hit a peak at the end of September 2023 when there were 56,042 asylum seekers in hotels. – How many hotels are in use for asylum seekers? It is thought there were more than 400 asylum hotels open in summer 2023. Labour said this has since been reduced to fewer than 210. – Why are asylum seekers being housed in hotels? Asylum seekers and their families can be housed in temporary accommodation, known as contingency accommodation, if they are awaiting assessment of their claim or have had a claim approved and there is not enough longer-term accommodation available. The Home Office provides accommodation to asylum seekers who have no other way of supporting themselves on a 'no choice' basis, so they cannot choose where they live. When there is not enough housing, the Home Office can move people to accommodation such as hotels and large sites, like former military bases. In May, the National Audit Office said those temporarily living in hotels accounted for 35% of all people in asylum accommodation. – Is this likely to be a permanent arrangement? Labour has pledged to end the 'costly use of hotels to house asylum seekers in this Parliament' – which would be 2029, if not earlier. Campaigners and charities have long argued that hotels are not suitable environments to house asylum seekers. The Refugee Council said they 'cost the taxpayer billions, trap people in limbo and are flashpoints in communities' and urged the Government to 'partner with local councils to provide safe, cost-effective accommodation within communities'. – What is the Government saying since the legal ruling? Ministers are 'looking at a range of different contingency options' following Tuesday's ruling, according to security minister Dan Jarvis In the immediate aftermath of the judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle repeated criticism of the previous Conservative government, saying Labour had 'inherited a broken asylum system'. She said the Government would 'continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns' around asylum hotels. – What options does the Home Office have now? Last month, amid protests outside the Bell Hotel and more migrants crossing the Channel, an extra 400 spaces were being prepared to house male asylum seekers at RAF Wethersfield in Essex. The former military site, which has a usual capacity of 800 beds, is expected to house more adult men on a short-term basis. The Labour Government scrapped the large site of the Bibby Stockholm barge in Portland, Dorset, earlier this year, while Napier Barracks in Folkestone, Kent, is also due to end housing asylum seekers and be returned to the Ministry of Defence in September. – Why were there protests outside the Bell Hotel? The hotel in Epping has been at the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks after an asylum seeker who was staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl – something he has denied and he is due to stand trial later in August. After the High Court's ruling, Reform UK leader Nigel Farage wrote in the Telegraph calling for Epping protests to inspire further action wherever there are concerns about the 'threat posed by young undocumented males' living in hotels. But on Tuesday more than 100 women's organisations wrote to ministers warning that vital conversations about violence against women and girls are being 'hijacked by an anti-migrant agenda' that fuels divisions and harms survivors. The joint statement, including from Rape Crisis England & Wales and Refuge, said: 'We have been alarmed in recent weeks by an increase in unfounded claims made by people in power, and repeated in the media, that hold particular groups as primarily responsible for sexual violence. 'This not only undermines genuine concerns about women's safety, but also reinforces the damaging myth that the greatest risk of gender-based violence comes from strangers.'
Daily Mail
6 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
UK's military chief in Pentagon talks after Donald Trump pledges a NATO-style security guarantee for Ukraine - but British peacekeeping troops 'won't be sent to the frontline'
The UK's top military chief is set to hold meetings in Washington DC today following Donald Trump 's promise of security guarantees for Ukraine. Sir Tony Radakin, the chief of the defence staff, is expected to attend talks at the Pentagon to thrash out how Ukraine would be defended from future attack in the event of a peace deal with Russia. It follows crunch talks at the White House on Monday between the US President and European leaders, including Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky. After the emergency summit in the Oval Office - held in the wake of Mr Trump's talks with Russia's Vladimir Putin in Alaska last week - Sir Keir said there had been a 'common understanding' about a NATO-style security guarantee for Ukraine. The PM added this was an 'Article 5-like guarantee', which could mirror the 'collective defence' clause of the NATO treaty that states that an attack against one NATO ally is considered an attack against all NATO allies. Sir Keir has pledged to put British troops on the ground in Ukraine as part of efforts by the so-called 'coalition of the willing' of Ukrainian allies to help ensure a potential peace agreement with Russia holds. But, during the Pentagon talks on Wednesday between military chiefs from the coalition of the willing and their American counterparts, Sir Tony is expected to state that UK peacekeeping troops would not be on the frontline with Russia. US President Donald Trump told Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky on Monday that America would help guarantee Ukraine's security in a deal with Russia A British official told The Guardian: 'Wednesday is a really important moment. 'Nothing happens in Washington without the President giving the green light, so Trump giving his support to security guarantees on Monday kickstarted a lot of activity.' Another said Sir Tony would echo pledges made by Defence Secretary John Healey, who recently said Britain was willing to deploy troops to Ukraine 'to secure the safe skies, safe seas and to build the strength of the Ukrainian forces'. They added that ministers envisaged this as meaning logistical and training support rather than sending battalions of frontline troops who could end up in combat. Security minister Dan Jarvis this morning said the flurry of diplomatic talks in recent days had 'brought the prospect of peace much closer' in Ukraine. Speaking on Times Radio, he said: 'We've always strongly supported Ukraine's integration, both in terms of their potential desire to be members of the European Union and membership of NATO. 'We don't think that any limitation should be placed on Ukraine's armed forces or on its co-operation with third countries, and Russia certainly shouldn't be able to have a veto against Ukraine's pathway to the European Union or NATO.' Mr Jarvis added: 'I think it is important to make the point that very significant progress has been made. 'I think the Alaska summit and the talks in Washington over the previous days have brought the prospect of peace much closer than they had been previously.' But, despite the growing hopes that the three year-long conflict in Ukraine could soon be brought to an end, former Russian prime minister Mikhail Kasyanov warned that Mr Putin is 'absolutely not' ready for peace. He told Times Radio that the Russian leader was 'absolutely not' serious about striking a peace deal, despite Mr Trump's suggestion trilateral meeting - potentially in Budapest - between himself, Mr Putin and Mr Zelensky. 'He doesn't want to have the high-level meeting. He doesn't want to meet to sit down with Zelensky,' Mr Kasyanov, a leading Putin critic, said. 'It will be some of a humiliating event for him. That's why he will be avoiding it. You're correct that the ball is on Putin's court, but he will continue dragging out time, continue his offensive operation, believing that he will win the war of attrition. 'He simply managed to avoid imposing just tough sanctions as a result of Alaska meeting.'
The Sun
6 minutes ago
- The Sun
All the new tax raids Rachel Reeves is planning on YOUR cash to fill £50bn blackhole – how to protect yourself
RACHEL Reeves is under pressure to fill a £50billion blackhole with an all-new tax raid in the Autumn Budget. Experts have suggested a raft of tax changes could be announced in the speech - but how could they affect you? And what can YOU do now to protect your finances. We explain. 2 The Chancellor is under increasing pressure after slow economic growth, U-turns on spending and a weak jobs market have all pushed the government finances further into the red, the National Institute for Economic and Social Research has warned. Among the ideas on the table are changes to stamp duty, capital gains tax and council tax. Labour has already pledged not to raise income tax, national insurance or VAT in its manifesto, which means it is considering other options. Of course, the full details of the Budget will remain under wraps until the day it is unveiled. But here we explain what could be on the cards and what it might mean for you. Inheritance tax Reeves is said to be eyeing up inheritance tax changes as part of plans to fix the nation's finances. Some of the options on the table are stopping parents from making unlimited tax-free gifts to kids by capping the value of gifts that someone can pass on to loved ones. Currently, you can give away unlimited amounts of money and assets to friends or family members without paying inheritance tax, as long as you do so seven years before you die. If you give money away and then die within seven years then the amount of tax you pay is charged at a tapered rate. Capping the amount relatives can give to their loved ones could raise millions of pounds for the Treasury. 2 The tax raised a record £8.2billion last year alone. Experts have warned that if the measure was brought in it could cause 'a fundamental change to the way families pass on wealth". Rachael Griffin, tax and financial planning expert at Quilter warned the change 'could capture not just large transfers designed to reduce tax bills but also modest, routine support between family members." Stamp duty It has also been suggested this week that the Chancellor is considering plans to replace the current stamp duty thresholds with a new property tax. Earlier this week The Guardian published a story about how the Chancellor Rachel Reeves is considering a new levy on houses over £500,000. It said the Treasury has been considering suggestions from a report by thinktank Onward. In it, Onward recommended that if a property is worth more than £500,000 it would incur an annual tax of 0.54%. Meanwhile, any home worth more than £1million would pay 0.81% on the proportion of its value over the threshold. This would replace the current stamp duty thresholds, which are tiered depending on the value of your home. Currently there is no stamp duty to pay on a home worth less than £125,000. On homes worth between £125,001 and £250,000 stamp duty is charged at a rate of 2%. But this rises to 5% for homes worth between £250,001 and £925,000. The Government has not yet confirmed how the proposals would work but did not rule them out. It is understood that only homeowners who buy a property after the tax is brought in could be affected by the change, so the tax would not be applied to properties retrospectively. This means homeowners who already paid stamp duty when they bought their home would not be charged again. The extra stamp duty for homeowners with more than one property would remain in place and this group would not have to pay the new tax. Experts have described the change as 'designed to radically overhaul stamp duty'. David Hollingworth, of L&C Mortgages, said: 'Many have called for a rethink of stamp duty which can act as a barrier to buying, moving and downsizing. 'Buyers won't shed any tears for stamp duty but may have to rethink the likely annual cost of owning their own home. 'If that sees a big increase it will have a knock on impact for affordability.' Meanwhile, property expert Kirstie Allsopp said the Chancellor's plans to reform stamp duty would have a 'destabilising' effect and added it's 'not the place to fly kites.' Speaking on Times Radio she warned: "It's not Rachel's to go after because it's their homes. "It's the roof over their head. And this Government seems to want to punish people for making the sacrifices they've made to buy their own homes." Council tax Officials are also said to be considering whether to replace council tax with a local property tax. This would mean a total overhaul of the current council tax system, which came into effect in 1993. Currently council tax is an annual fee that is paid to the local council to fund services such as road upkeep and state schools. People pay more or less depending on where they live and the size of their home. There have been fears that council tax will be reformed after several councils declared themselves bankrupt and others warned they have just months left before they run out of funds. But a total reform of the council tax system could take years, so it is unlikely to happen in this parliament. Capital gains tax Homeowners with expensive properties could be hit with capital gains tax when they decide to move house, recent reports suggest. Rachel Reeves is said to be considering ending private residence relief, which stops people from having to pay capital gains tax when they sell their main home. The change would mean that properties worth over a certain amount would be subject to the tax. Higher rate taxpayers would pay 24% of the value of any gains they make, while basic rate taxpayers would have to pay 18%, The Times has reported. If the levy was brought in with a threshold of £1.5million then it would affect around 120,000. These wealthy homeowners would be hit with a bill of £200,000 if they tried to move house. It is not clear from when this change could be introduced or if it would be phased in. Pensions Another option that could come under the microscope is tax relief on pensions. The Chancellor has previously shied away from this option but is said to be reconsidering it as an easy option to raise cash. Currently you get tax relief on any money you pay into your pension. This is done through rebates from the Government and the exact amount you get depends on your income tax rate. For example, basic rate taxpayers get 20% tax relief on any money they pay into their retirement pot. However, for higher rate taxpayers the relief rises to 40%, or 45% for additional rate taxpayers. As a result, the system is currently tilted in favour of more wealthy people as they pay more tax. But reports have suggested that the Chancellor could introduce a flat rate of tax relief. This would cut the amount of cash higher and additional taxpayers get back from the Government. However, it could also hit hardworking teachers, nurses and public sector workers who are on modest incomes. This move could raise billions of pounds for the Chancellor each year. Official figures show the total cost of providing pension tax relief was £52.5billion in 2023/24, up from £50.1billion the year before, official figures reveal. Most of this money went to higher and additional rate taxpayers. Former pensions minister Baroness Ros Altmann thinks the measure is likely to appear in the Budget. She said: "With a desperate need for more money to be invested in this country, it is inevitable that the Chancellor will be looking at whether this money could be better used in Britain directly, and I do think she will find ways to reduce its generosity." But overhauling the pension system would be a major reform, so it cannot be brought in overnight. This means the Government is unlikely to be able to use it to raise the cash it needs in the short term. What should YOU do now None of the potential changes being tabled have been confirmed yet. The Government has not yet ruled them out but any measures it introduces will not happen until after the autumn Budget at the earliest - and a date has not been set yet. Don't make any rash decisions based on the current Budget speculation. If and when the changes are announced you can decide to act to stop your finances from being hit. For example, if the changes to stamp duty are brought in from a certain date then you cold move house before this deadline to avoid being hit. Or if the Government decides to charge Capital Gains tax on high value properties then you could downsize to a smaller house before the change is implemented. Most of the suggestions on the table will only affect the very wealthy, so you may not even be hit by the tax changes. There are some things you can do if you're worried. Get financial advice If you are worried about your finances then you should speak to a financial adviser. They will be able to offer you advice about your situation and explain if any of the measures will affect you. You can find one using - but remember, you will pay a fee. Make a will First, you should ensure your money gets to the right place by making a will, according to Ms Young. 'If you die without a will, your estate will fall under the rules of intestacy, which could mean a higher IHT bill. 'This is especially key for couples who aren't married, as unmarried partners will not automatically inherit from one another, even if they have lived together for many years.' Check how to make one in our guide. Give your finances a makeover It's good practice to sit down and take stock of your finances every six months and work out a plan. Work out all your bills and outgoings and what income you have and factor in any changes, such as bills going up or new income streams. Think about what you need to do to make the most of your money. For example, do you need to prioritise paying off debts or saving for a house deposit. Our guide to paying less tax legally could help you avoid giving away more cash to the tax man than necessary. Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@
