Philly, Pennsylvania risk losing Digital Equity Act programs after Trump administration rules them ‘unconstitutional'
Memos from the US Department of Commerce said at least one program within the Digital Equity Act violated the constitution because it outlines specific 'racial preferences,' even though advocates say that racial minorities are only one type of underserved population that the law seeks to support. The specific initiative the department highlighted was supposed to bring increased access to devices, digital literacy and other skills needed to effectively use the internet.
'The Digital Equity Capacity Program … is unconstitutional and grants issued pursuant to it were created with, and administered using, impermissible and unconstitutional racial preferences,' read the termination letter received and confirmed by Pennsylvania's Department of Community and Economic Development.
The Digital Equity Act is one of two digital access initiatives within the Biden administration's Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA). It incorporates three grant programs, including the aforementioned Digital Equity Capacity Program and Digital Equity Competitive Grant. The latter initiative allowed entities to apply for funding directly from the National Telecommunications Information Administration (NTIA), an agency within the Commerce Department.
Recommendations for Competitive Grant recipients were announced in January, and the NTIA selected the City of Philadelphia to receive $11.9 million. These funds were going to support an internet subsidy program, laptop kiosks, esports centers and other efforts to make the internet more accessible to Philadelphians.
The city never received a formal contract for this grant, though, according to Kate Rivera, executive director of Philly-based digital equity nonprofit the Technology Learning Collaborative (TLC), which partnered with the city on its grant application.
In May, the Department of Commerce sent a notice letting grantees know they would not receive the awards.
'All Digital Equity Competitive and Digital Equity Capacity grant awards have been terminated, except for grants to Native Entities, which are pending further legal review,' read the notice received and confirmed by the city's Office of Innovation and Technology.
The other funding streams within the Digital Equity Act are the State Digital Equity Planning Grant Program and the Digital Equity Capacity Program. Each state received funds from the Planning Grant Program to create a digital equity plan, then was recommended for additional money from the Capacity Program to put the in motion. Pennsylvania received $1.6 million to create a Statewide Digital Equity plan, which was completed in January 2024.
The commonwealth was supposed to get $25 million to implement that plan, for which the state would then issue a request for proposal to subgrant much of those funds to orgs across the state.
Pennsylvania was not as far along in the process of distributing this funding as some other states were, said Drew Garner, director of policy engagement at the advocacy organization the Benton Institute for Broadband and Society.
Many states were in the process of administering their subgrant programs, but Pennsylvania hadn't even opened up applications yet. This was partially due to delays in approving the Pennsylvania Broadband Development Authority's Digital Skills and Community Capacity Program guidelines in April.
Digital Equity Act removal could affect most Pennsylvanians
In early May, shortly before these termination notices were sent out, President Donald Trump called the Digital Equity Act 'unconstitutional' and 'racist' in a post on Truth Social.
These concerns seem to come from the fact that the Digital Equity Act defines a list of eight 'covered populations,' or groups of people most impacted by the digital divide, Rivera said.
The goal of identifying those groups was to make sure the funded projects address the needs of people who need it most, Rivera said. Applicants had to show that they could reach these populations.
One of the designated populations is ethnic and racial minorities, which the president appears especially focused on, she said. The other populations include seniors (people over 60), people with disabilities, veterans and residents of rural communities. 79.4% of Pennsylvania's population falls under covered populations, according to the Census Bureau.
'Just one out of the [eight] covered populations really has a reference to race and ethnicity,' she said. 'But it's not a discriminatory requirement where people would be turned away from receiving services if they're not a racial and ethnic minority.'
Technical.ly reached out to the NTIA, asking why the Digital Equity Act was deemed unconstitutional, but did not immediately receive a response.
Federal decisions hurt digital equity beyond dollars
The end of the Digital Equity Act doesn't just impact the programs that were supposed to receive direct funding: It also affects the wider strategy of what was supposed to be a historic investment in digital inclusion, Rivera from TLC said.
The Broadband Equity Access and Deployment (BEAD) program is the other digital access initiative administered through the IIJA. Pennsylvania was supposed to receive $1.16 billion to build out broadband infrastructure that would bring internet service to unserved and underserved parts of the state. This funding is now delayed.
However, even if BEAD moves forward as planned, the program won't have as much of an impact without the Digital Equity Act, Garner from the Benton Institute said. That funding supported programs to ensure people can actually use the internet to improve their lives.
'It is only through digital adoption, having devices, having skills, that Pennsylvania will really see the economic benefit of BEAD,' Garner said.
The Digital Equity Act is a law, so the expectation is that state attorneys general will sue the Trump administration for breaking the law, he said. Pennsylvania's attorney general did not immediately respond to Technical.ly's request for comment.
In the meantime, organizations can't do much besides continuing to advocate for the program with legislators and preparing as if the money will return, Rivera said.
'Eventually, when the tide turns again, and there is funding again for digital equity work,' Rivera said, 'we will be ready, like we were ready for this funding.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Technical.ly
03-08-2025
- Technical.ly
State rep: Federal cuts leave Pennsylvania torn between basic needs and big ideas
This is a guest post by state Rep. Mary Isaacson, an elected official serving Pennsylvania's 175th District in Philadelphia. Passing the state budget each year is much more than putting numbers on a spreadsheet. It's a reflection of our shared values. State lawmakers want progress for our state and the people who live here. Therefore, we — especially those of us in the House Democratic Caucus — look to fund our state universities like Penn State, Lincoln, Pitt and Temple that help shape the next generation of leaders, and to fund our institutions that promote innovation, like Ben Franklin Technology Partners. Unfortunately, when there is so much chaos and uncertainty in our federal government, we cannot count on federal funding like we have in previous years. The federal cuts we already know about will have devastating and rippling consequences. Pennsylvania simply does not have the resources to replace federal funding cuts for science. Rep. Mary Isaacson Pennsylvania simply does not have the resources to replace federal funding cuts for science, for example. These wanton cuts to funding will not just rob Pennsylvania of the opportunity to be pioneers in technology, scientific research and innovative startups; they'll also dim our ability to think outside the box to advance our state's future as we struggle to have people's basic needs met. We are now in a position where we are tasked with the impossible: continuing to fund programs that will keep Pennsylvania competitive and innovative while meeting the basic needs of Pennsylvanians, such as healthcare, food and affordable housing. This is not ideal as the state budget is supposed to carve a path for Pennsylvania's future success. However, it is quickly becoming a reality that we must make difficult decisions. To manage the continuing burden of federal dysfunction, state House Democrats continue reaching across the political aisle and across legislative chambers to protect the people of Pennsylvania in every way we can. For example, the House recently acted in bipartisan spirit to protect Pennsylvanians from immoral health insurance companies that are more interested in their bottom line than in helping patients. Everyone deserves easy and affordable access to healthcare. The House passed a package of bills in March that are designed to enshrine key elements of the Affordable Care Act, should federal lawmakers and the Trump administration repeal or change the federal healthcare law. House Bill 535, sponsored by Pittsburgh-area Rep. Dan Frankel, would prohibit Pennsylvania insurers from capping coverage benefits. House Bill 618, sponsored by Luzerne County Rep. Jim Haddock, would prohibit Pennsylvania insurers from denying or excluding coverage based on pre-existing conditions. House Bill 755, sponsored by Bucks County Rep. Perry Warren, would require Pennsylvania insurers to cover preventative healthcare services without cost-sharing. House Bill 404, sponsored by Wilkes-Barre-area Rep. Eddie Day Pashinski, would allow children to remain on their parents' private health insurance plan up to the age of 26. We need a serious, honest conversation in Pennsylvania — not just about what we fund, but about what we're being asked to replace. When we have to replace funding cut by the federal government for food assistance for senior citizens and healthcare for the poor and elderly, we will be hard-pressed to both feed people in need and fight for university lab funding for their groundbreaking research. Unless the federal government recommits to the basic safety net of healthcare, food and housing, we're going to be forced to make trade-offs that hurt real people and Pennsylvania's chances to be a leader in innovation and scientific research. This isn't about partisanship—it's about partnership. We need Washington, DC, to hold up its end so we can continue doing our job here in Harrisburg. And we need our communities to stay informed, engaged and vocal, because the stakes are too high to be decided in silence.
Technical.ly
05-06-2025
- Technical.ly
Commerce Department nixes ‘safety' in NIST AI institute rebrand
President Trump's cabinet continues to overhaul federal programs and initiatives, with some recent AI-related moves hitting the Department of Commerce. Secretary Howard Lutnick announced that the AI Safety Institute will now be called the Center for AI Standards and Innovation (CAISI). In addition to removing 'safety' from the title of the agency, which was created under the Biden administration in 2023 to set AI standards and guidance, CAISI will pivot to focus more on national security risks and global competitiveness. 'For far too long, censorship and regulations have been used under the guise of national security. Innovators will no longer be limited by these standards,' Lutnick said in a press release. 'CAISI will evaluate and enhance U.S. innovation of these rapidly developing commercial AI systems while ensuring they remain secure to our national security standards.' The Commerce Department did not respond to request for comment, including to provide examples of 'censorship.' CAISI also houses a consortium, established in 2024, of more than 200 companies and organizations that was originally created to develop science-based safety standards for AI operation and design. The group, known as the US AI Safety Institute Consortium, includes several universities and startups from throughout the Mid-Atlantic. That group remains in operation following this announcement, but there are suspicions that it will shut down, according to a person with knowledge about the consortium. CAISI and the consortium's formation under the previous administration was spurred by an executive order by former President Joe Biden, which the Trump administration revoked during his early days in office. Priorities for this newly-renamed government body include plans to ink voluntary agreements with AI developers and companies that can pinpoint risks to national security. That strategy isn't entirely new. Under the Biden administration, the National Institute of Standards and Technology — the regulatory agency, housed under the Commerce Department, that hosts CAISI — signed memoranda of understanding to undergo AI safety research with US-based AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic. In these new evaluations, CAISI will prioritize looking at use cases in cybersecurity and chemical weapons, per the release. CAISI leadership will also collaborate with the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security and intelligence agencies to 'conduct evaluations and assessments.' This move comes as states are grappling with how to regulate AI. Nearby Virginia did not follow through with passing blanket legislation regulating the technology, and House Republicans are torn over a federal budget provision that would ban states from regulating AI for a decade.
Technical.ly
02-06-2025
- Technical.ly
Philly, Pennsylvania risk losing Digital Equity Act programs after Trump administration rules them ‘unconstitutional'
The governments of Pennsylvania and its largest city received federal termination notices related to the Digital Equity Act, cutting money to help Pennsylvanians access devices and digital skills. Memos from the US Department of Commerce said at least one program within the Digital Equity Act violated the constitution because it outlines specific 'racial preferences,' even though advocates say that racial minorities are only one type of underserved population that the law seeks to support. The specific initiative the department highlighted was supposed to bring increased access to devices, digital literacy and other skills needed to effectively use the internet. 'The Digital Equity Capacity Program … is unconstitutional and grants issued pursuant to it were created with, and administered using, impermissible and unconstitutional racial preferences,' read the termination letter received and confirmed by Pennsylvania's Department of Community and Economic Development. The Digital Equity Act is one of two digital access initiatives within the Biden administration's Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA). It incorporates three grant programs, including the aforementioned Digital Equity Capacity Program and Digital Equity Competitive Grant. The latter initiative allowed entities to apply for funding directly from the National Telecommunications Information Administration (NTIA), an agency within the Commerce Department. Recommendations for Competitive Grant recipients were announced in January, and the NTIA selected the City of Philadelphia to receive $11.9 million. These funds were going to support an internet subsidy program, laptop kiosks, esports centers and other efforts to make the internet more accessible to Philadelphians. The city never received a formal contract for this grant, though, according to Kate Rivera, executive director of Philly-based digital equity nonprofit the Technology Learning Collaborative (TLC), which partnered with the city on its grant application. In May, the Department of Commerce sent a notice letting grantees know they would not receive the awards. 'All Digital Equity Competitive and Digital Equity Capacity grant awards have been terminated, except for grants to Native Entities, which are pending further legal review,' read the notice received and confirmed by the city's Office of Innovation and Technology. The other funding streams within the Digital Equity Act are the State Digital Equity Planning Grant Program and the Digital Equity Capacity Program. Each state received funds from the Planning Grant Program to create a digital equity plan, then was recommended for additional money from the Capacity Program to put the in motion. Pennsylvania received $1.6 million to create a Statewide Digital Equity plan, which was completed in January 2024. The commonwealth was supposed to get $25 million to implement that plan, for which the state would then issue a request for proposal to subgrant much of those funds to orgs across the state. Pennsylvania was not as far along in the process of distributing this funding as some other states were, said Drew Garner, director of policy engagement at the advocacy organization the Benton Institute for Broadband and Society. Many states were in the process of administering their subgrant programs, but Pennsylvania hadn't even opened up applications yet. This was partially due to delays in approving the Pennsylvania Broadband Development Authority's Digital Skills and Community Capacity Program guidelines in April. Digital Equity Act removal could affect most Pennsylvanians In early May, shortly before these termination notices were sent out, President Donald Trump called the Digital Equity Act 'unconstitutional' and 'racist' in a post on Truth Social. These concerns seem to come from the fact that the Digital Equity Act defines a list of eight 'covered populations,' or groups of people most impacted by the digital divide, Rivera said. The goal of identifying those groups was to make sure the funded projects address the needs of people who need it most, Rivera said. Applicants had to show that they could reach these populations. One of the designated populations is ethnic and racial minorities, which the president appears especially focused on, she said. The other populations include seniors (people over 60), people with disabilities, veterans and residents of rural communities. 79.4% of Pennsylvania's population falls under covered populations, according to the Census Bureau. 'Just one out of the [eight] covered populations really has a reference to race and ethnicity,' she said. 'But it's not a discriminatory requirement where people would be turned away from receiving services if they're not a racial and ethnic minority.' reached out to the NTIA, asking why the Digital Equity Act was deemed unconstitutional, but did not immediately receive a response. Federal decisions hurt digital equity beyond dollars The end of the Digital Equity Act doesn't just impact the programs that were supposed to receive direct funding: It also affects the wider strategy of what was supposed to be a historic investment in digital inclusion, Rivera from TLC said. The Broadband Equity Access and Deployment (BEAD) program is the other digital access initiative administered through the IIJA. Pennsylvania was supposed to receive $1.16 billion to build out broadband infrastructure that would bring internet service to unserved and underserved parts of the state. This funding is now delayed. However, even if BEAD moves forward as planned, the program won't have as much of an impact without the Digital Equity Act, Garner from the Benton Institute said. That funding supported programs to ensure people can actually use the internet to improve their lives. 'It is only through digital adoption, having devices, having skills, that Pennsylvania will really see the economic benefit of BEAD,' Garner said. The Digital Equity Act is a law, so the expectation is that state attorneys general will sue the Trump administration for breaking the law, he said. Pennsylvania's attorney general did not immediately respond to request for comment. In the meantime, organizations can't do much besides continuing to advocate for the program with legislators and preparing as if the money will return, Rivera said. 'Eventually, when the tide turns again, and there is funding again for digital equity work,' Rivera said, 'we will be ready, like we were ready for this funding.'
