Oil surges to five-month high after US hits Iran's key nuclear sites
Brent crude futures were up $1.52 or 1.97% to $78.53 a barrel as of 0503 GMT. US West Texas Intermediate crude advanced $1.51 or 2.04% to $75.35.
Both contracts jumped by more than 3% earlier in the session to $81.40 and $78.40, respectively, touching five-month highs before giving up some gains.
The rise in prices came after US President Donald Trump said he had "obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites in strikes over the weekend, joining an Israeli assault in an escalation of conflict in the Middle East as Tehran vowed to defend itself.
Iran is OPEC's third-largest crude producer.
Market participants expect further price gains amid mounting fears that an Iranian retaliation may include a closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly a fifth of global crude supply flows.
"The current geopolitical escalation provides the fundamental catalyst for (Brent) prices to traverse higher and potentially spiral towards $100, with $120 per barrel appearing increasingly plausible," said Sugandha Sachdeva, founder of New Delhi-based research firm SS WealthStreet.
Iran's Press TV reported that the Iranian parliament had approved a measure to close the strait. Iran has in the past threatened to close the strait but has never followed through.
Iran and Israel exchanged air and missile strikes on Monday, as global tensions rose over Tehran's expected response to a US attack on its nuclear facilities.
"The risks of damage to oil infrastructure ... have multiplied," said Sparta Commodities senior analyst June Goh.
Although there are alternative pipeline routes out of the region, there will still be crude volume that cannot be fully exported out if the Strait of Hormuz becomes inaccessible. Shippers will increasingly stay out of the region, she added.
Goldman Sachs said in a Sunday report that Brent could briefly peak at $110 per barrel if oil flows through the critical waterway were halved for a month, and remain down by 10% for the following 11 months.
The bank still assumed no significant disruption to oil and natural gas supply, adding global incentives to try and prevent a sustained and very large disruption.
Brent has risen 13% since the conflict began on June 13, while WTI has gained around 10%.
Given the Strait of Hormuz is indispensable for Iran's own oil exports, which are a vital source of its national revenues, a sustained closure would inflict severe economic damage on Iran itself, making it a double-edged sword, Sachdeva added.
Meanwhile, Japan on Monday called for de-escalation of the conflict in Iran, while a South Korean vice industry minister voiced concern over the potential impact of the strikes on the country's trade.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
30 minutes ago
- RTÉ News
Mexico transfers 26 more cartel members to US
Mexico has sent more than two dozen suspected cartel members to the US, amid rising pressure from President Donald Trump on Mexico to dismantle the country's powerful drug organisations. Authorities shipped 26 prisoners wanted in the US for ties to drug-trafficking groups, Mexico's attorney general's office and security ministry said in a joint statement. Mexico said the US Department of Justice had requested their extradition and that it would not seek the death penalty for the accused cartel members. The transfer is the second of its kind this year. In February, Mexican authorities sent 29 alleged cartel leaders to the US, sparking a debate about the political and legal grounds for such a move. That Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum permitting yet another large-scale extradition of Mexican nationals underscores the balancing act she faces to appease Mr Trump while also avoiding unilateral US military action in Mexico. In a statement, the US Embassy said among those extradited were key figures in the Jalisco New Generation Cartel and the Sinaloa Cartel, which are Mexico's two dominant-organised crime groups. "This transfer is yet another example of what is possible when two governments unite against violence and impunity," US Ambassador to Mexico Ronald Johnson said in a statement. "These fugitives will now face justice in American courts, and the citizens of both our nations will be safer." Mr Trump has tied tariffs on Mexico to the deadly fentanyl trade, claiming the country hasn't tackled drug cartels aggressively enough. Last week, he directed the Pentagon to prepare operations against Mexican drug gangs that have been designated global terrorist organisations. Ms Sheinbaum has said the US and Mexico are nearing a security agreement to expand cooperation in the fight against cartels. However, she has flatly rejected suggestions by the Trump administration that it could carry out unilateral military operations in Mexico.
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
Ukraine fears fresh offensive to coincide with US-Russia summit
Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy has warned that Russian troops seem to be preparing for a new offensive rather than ceasefire and said his country must be involved in talks on its future, in advance of Friday's US-Russia summit in Alaska . Mr Zelenskiy is expected to join online talks hosted by Germany on Wednesday with several European leaders, top European Union and Nato officials and US president Donald Trump , as Kyiv's military tries to shore up leaky defences in the eastern Donetsk region. 'We all support President Trump's determination, and together we must ... not allow Russia to deceive the world once again,' said Mr Zelenskiy on Tuesday. 'We see that the Russian army is not preparing to end the war. On the contrary, they are making movements that indicate preparations for new offensive operations.' Ukrainian and western analysts who monitor the battlefield say Russian troops have advanced about 10km in recent days near the eastern mining town of Dobropillia, as they try to surround the nearby small cities of Pokrovsk and Kostyantynivka. READ MORE If they were to fall, it would exert further pressure on Kyiv's two main remaining strongholds in Donetsk region – the cities of Slovyansk and Kramatorsk. 'The situation is quite chaotic, as the enemy, having found gaps in the defence, is infiltrating deeper, trying to quickly consolidate and accumulate forces for further advancement,' said Ukrainian analyst DeepState , which maps the ever-changing battlefield. The Ukrainian military acknowledged but downplayed the development, claiming that only small groups of Russian troops were sneaking through the front line and were being destroyed before establishing a foothold in the rear and bringing up reinforcements. The first Azov corps of Ukraine's national guard said it had deployed to the area in recent days: 'The situation remains complex ... Units of the corps have planned and taken measures to block enemy forces in a designated area.' A Russian strike on a bus station in Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine, at the weekend. Photograph: EPA A respected military analyst and former Ukrainian soldier who uses the name Tatarigami_UA on social media noted that Russia had also launched big offensives before peace talks in 2014 and 2015, when fighting was confined to eastern Ukraine. Moscow has claimed this week to have made a significant breakthrough near Dobropillia. 'The current situation is serious, but far from the collapse some suggest,' he said. 'A collapse ... means a loss of command and control, a breakdown in battlefield awareness, and an inability to regroup, withdraw in an organised fashion, or co-ordinate with units. To the best of my knowledge, none of these conditions are currently present.' News from the battlefield deepened Ukrainian anxiety in advance of talks between Mr Trump and Russian president Vladimir Putin . Kyiv and European capitals fear they want to clinch a quick, sweeping agreement to end the war and present it to Ukraine and the world as a done deal. 'As for the negotiations ... they are important at the level of leaders, but it is impossible to talk about Ukraine without Ukraine and no one will accept it,' said Mr Zelenskiy. 'Therefore, the conversation between Putin and Trump may be important for their bilateral track. But they cannot agree anything about Ukraine without us. I really believe and hope that the US president understands and recognises this.' On Monday evening, all EU leaders except Hungarian prime minister Viktor Orban agreed on a statement that 'the path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine ... The European Union underlines the inherent right of Ukraine to choose its own destiny and will continue supporting Ukraine on its path towards EU membership.'
Irish Examiner
7 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Finally, a large-scale anti-war protest in Israel
An estimated 100,000 Israelis took to the streets of Tel Aviv last Saturday night to protest against the Israeli Government's announcement to intensify and prolong the war on Gaza. This was the largest and most raucous anti-government demonstration in months. The anger was palpable; it was probably the first demonstration that I can recall that had a decidedly anti-war sentiment. For many months, smaller demonstrations have been held every Saturday evening across the country. Whilst these protests have always had an anti-government message, their focus remained squarely on the fate of remaining hostages held in Gaza. Explicit anti-war messages at the mainstream weekly demos have remained muted – up until now. Saturday night's demonstration felt different. This was arguably the first large-scale anti-war demonstration in Israel since the conflict began almost two years ago. The government's announcement to expand the war came after a 10-hour cabinet meeting last Thursday, indicating, unusually for this government, some real cabinet dissent. Netanyahu, in a press conference on Sunday evening, doubled down on that commitment. Israeli activists take part in a protest last month in Tel Aviv against the war in the Gaza Strip. Many demonstrators believe that Netanyahu's motivation to expand military operations is fuelled by nothing more than a cynical desire for political self-preservation. File photo: AP/Ohad Zwigenberg In language reminiscent of the infamous quote of the Vietnam War, 'It became necessary to destroy the town to save it', Netanyahu on Sunday spoke in English, without any hint of irony, 'We do not want to occupy Gaza but free Gaza'. This is after 22 months of relentless Israeli assault that has already killed over 60,000 Palestinians, including 18,000 children. Netanyahu's announcement to intensify the war on Gaza, including a plan to occupy and 'evacuate' Gaza city, has shocked but not surprised Israelis. Details of the military plan remain unclear. Initial local media reports over the weekend suggested that the plan included a full evacuation of Gaza City, to be completed by October 7, the second anniversary of the Hamas massacre. Recent polls suggest that more than 70% of Israelis want the war to end now. Presumably, an even higher percentage are opposed to any intensification of fighting that puts at risk not just the lives of the remaining hostages but also the lives of thousands of young Israeli soldiers who are now tasked with the unenviable job of ethnic cleansing. The IDF's (Israeli Defense Forces) Eyal Zamir has let it be known publicly that he is opposed to Netanyahu's ground plan for logistical reasons, arguing, like almost everybody else here, that the expansion of the war as outlined by the government puts the lives of soldiers and hostages at risk. Zamir's very public opposition has provoked accusations of treason from Netanyahu's son Yair, who has not been shy of weighing in with politically provocative outbursts since the war began. The political mood in the country has grown increasingly tense in the past 72 hours, with calls from both the family of the hostages and opposition leaders for a national strike later this week. Many political pundits in Israel, however, are genuinely scratching their heads as to the motivation behind Netanyahu's decision. Most are asking, why now? And why such a brazen and provocative call for an intensification of war, that has generated fierce condemnation from leaders across the globe, flies in the face of the majority of Israeli public opinion and is resolutely opposed by the Israeli military itself. If we take Netanyahu at his word, the war plans are simply a 'proposal for defeating Hamas'. If we do not take him at his word - and many Israeli political pundits say we shouldn't - the announcement is a ploy for Netanyahu to prolong the war, to ensure his short-term political survival. Israeli activists take part in a protest last month in Tel Aviv against the war in the Gaza Strip. The political mood in the country has grown increasingly tense in the past 72 hours. File photo: AP/Ohad Zwigenberg Any proposal to end the war that doesn't include a commitment to full Israeli occupation, ethnic cleansing, or expulsion, the argument goes, will not satisfy his far-right messianic coalition partners. The so-called never-ending war is designed to stave off the collapse of the government. Some have argued that the announcement is nothing more than a negotiation tactic to force Hamas to make concessions in the negotiations to end the war. There is a fourth and altogether darker interpretation. This is the opinion that none of this is being forced upon Netanyahu by political expediency, but instead driven by a deliberate, pre-planned strategic goal to eventually expel two million Palestinians from Gaza. This was the opinion of Aluf Benn, editor of Haaretz newspaper, the Israeli paper of record, just last week. The few demonstrators I spoke to on Saturday night were unanimous that Netanyahu's motivation to expand military operations was fuelled by nothing more than a cynical desire for political self-preservation. 'He [Netanyahu] cares nothing about the hostages, everything he does is for himself,' said Yoav. 'We need to get rid of this 'crime minister 'before more hostages die,' Yael added. Netanyahu has been indicted for corruption. His trial has been dragging on for years. Posters with his face behind bars with the caption 'Crime Minister' have been visible at all demonstrations for two years now. Lior was visibly angry. 'What are we fighting for? What are our soldiers dying for? Nothing, absolutely all a lie.' Israeli activists take part in a protest last month in Tel Aviv against the war in the Gaza Strip. Recent polls suggest that more than 70% of Israelis want the war to end now. File photo: AP/Ohad Zwigenberg 'We are killing children every day – it has to stop,' said Taly, one of the few people I spoke to who first raised the plight of Palestinian civilians. Her voice remains a minority. A little reported poll from the Israel Democracy Institute this weekend revealed that 78% of Jewish Israelis think that 'given the circumstances of the fighting in Gaza, Israel is making efforts to avoid causing suffering to the Palestinian population there'. A perhaps shockingly naive or wilfully ignorant viewpoint, indicative that many of the demonstrators on Saturday continue to either turn a blind eye to the reality what their state has done in the past 22 months of war. Many observers, I am sure both inside and outside Israel, would agree however, whatever the motivation of the demonstrators, any protest by ordinary Israelis that brings 100,000 of its citizens onto the streets to call for an immediate end to the war on Gaza should be welcomed by all.
