Why the next EU budget could be doomed to failure
The plan for the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), which will run from 2028 to 2034, comes amid growing fears about the bloc's prosperity and security, with the US-China rivalry, Russia's military threat, and climate change all threatening to exacerbate major economic challenges, including low productivity, weak demand, and high energy prices.
Brussels has said it will attempt to address these issues by, among other things, 'simplifying' the next MFF to make it easier for firms to apply for EU funds and making the budget more 'efficient' to free up more money for new strategic priorities, like defence.
While analysts broadly support these measures, many argue that a radical increase in the MFF's size is also necessary to address Europe's investment needs and soften the impact of today's geopolitical volatility and enormous economic uncertainty.
However, they also warn that the Commission, aware that the budget's size is the most politically explosive of multiple highly combustible MFF-related issues, is unlikely to propose a radical increase from the current total of €1.2 trillion, or just over 1% of the bloc's annual gross national income (GNI). The US, by comparison, spends around 23% of its GNI at the federal level.
'The Commission doesn't want to come up with a proposal that will be immediately dismissed,' said Zsolt Darvas, a senior fellow at Bruegel, a Brussels-based think-tank. 'So they might propose a slight increase, but certainly not what is needed.'
In a recent analysis, Darvas and his colleagues estimated that, to plug the €800 billion investment gap identified by former European Central Bank President Mario Draghi, the EU's next budget should be nearly doubled to 2% of annual GNI.
Such an increase is, however, overwhelmingly unlikely. Germany, the EU's biggest economy, has already ruled out higher contributions, while other large economies like France, Italy, and Spain are fiscally constrained by their own high national deficits.
Moreover, attempts to bolster the budget through new 'own resources', or special EU revenue streams, are unlikely to raise significant amounts of money and are also likely to be opposed by EU countries wary of ceding additional power to Brussels.
Where all EU countries stand on the next long-term EU budget
'The new budget should be 0.9% of GNI higher than the current budget,' Darvas said. 'This is desirable, but I'm afraid we won't see it.'
Roughly 0.1 percentage point of this increase, Darvas noted, is necessary to pay back the €650 billion NextGenerationEU pandemic recovery programme – a one-off scheme to turbocharge the bloc's post-COVID-19 economy, financed through common EU debt.
Repayments of the fund's principal and interest are set to begin in 2028 and are expected to account for 20% of the next MFF's annual budget expenditure, or €25-30 billion.
The repayment means that an effective EU budget decrease is a scenario 'we are quite acutely facing', said Philipp Lausberg, a senior analyst at the European Policy Centre (EPC), another Brussels-based think-tank.
'Europe needs the financial capacity to be able to compete with the strategic investment power of the US and China,' said Lausberg. 'And for this, you need a bigger budget, but I'm afraid this won't happen.' Spending better – together Analysts, however, suggested that even without a significant increase in the MFF's size, the budget's myriad programmes can still be restructured and streamlined to effectively boost strategic investments in green, digital, and other technologies.
'It makes sense to spend a lot more together,' said Lucas Guttenberg, director of the Europe's Future programme at Bertelsmann Stiftung, a foundation based in Germany. 'But I don't think we now do that very well. I think we could do a lot better with the 1% we have.'
Currently, the MFF is split into three roughly equal portions, in which €387 billion is devoted to agriculture (the so-called Common Agricultural Policy or CAP), €392 billion to regional development (Cohesion Policy), and the remaining third to everything else.
Former US President Joe Biden's adage about budgets – 'Don't tell me what you value; show me your budget, and I'll tell you what you value' – suggests that the EU's current priorities are seriously awry, Guttenberg said.
'If you look at the budget at the moment, one-third is for farmers, one-third is for regions, and one-third is for the rest,' Guttenberg added. 'I don't think that's an accurate reflection of the EU's priorities.'
On Wednesday, the Commission is expected to propose an alternative 'three pillar' scheme in which CAP and Cohesion funds are merged into country-specific 'national and regional partnerships," according to a draft regulation obtained by Euractiv. Under the proposal, payouts would be linked to national reforms and adherence to the rule of law.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euractiv
3 hours ago
- Euractiv
EU's privacy supervisor clears Commission's use of Microsoft
European institutions' privacy supervisor closed its enforcement action on the Commission's use of Microsoft on Monday, following updates to the Commission's privacy practices. The development – which clears the Commission's use of Microsoft's digital products – follows exchanges between the EU's executive and the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS). In March 2024, the EDPS found that the EU's executive had breached data protection rules for EU institutions over its use of Microsoft products such as Office 365. The EDPS' 2024 decision determined that the Commission's contract with Microsoft for cloud collaborative tools insufficiently protected personal data from transfers outside the European Economic Area (EEA). It also provided recommendations for bolstering protections. The Commission has since updated its contract with Microsoft in line with the EDPS' recommendations. Under the new approach, Microsoft must now specify the purpose for which data may be transferred outside the EEA, along with stipulating any recipients. The updated contract also requires it to list countries to which data may be sent, limiting it to places where the EU recognises an equivalent level of privacy protections or where public interest makes a transfer necessary. New provisions in the contract further mandate that Microsoft discloses to the Commission when it is asked by another country to comply with data access requests, unless the request is from the EU or a country with equivalent data protections. In a statement about closing the enforcement, EDPS Wojciech Wiewiórowski also called on other EU institutions, bodies, offices and agencies that use or are considering adopting Microsoft 365 services to carry out "similar assessments and to implement technical and organisational measures comparable to those adopted by the Commission". Microsoft welcomed the EDPS' move, a spokesperson told Euractiv . Digital sovereignty and adequacy In parallel with the EDPS' green light to continue buying Microsoft, the Commission remains worried about its heavy dependence on the non-European company for digital platforms and products that are needed to ensure the EU's administration can function day-to-day. The bloc's executive has also continued to recognise the US as having equivalent privacy protections as the EU's, under the high level adequacy deal agreed two years ago. However, since then, US President Donald Trump's decision to switch Democrats for Republicans in key positions within US privacy oversight bodies has raised concerns over their independence – and, therefore, over the validity of the EU-US adequacy decision. (nl)
Euractiv
3 hours ago
- Euractiv
EU-US deal avoided ‘potentially devastating' consequences, Italian Prime Minister Meloni says
She added, however, that she still had to 'study the details' of the deal AFP Jul 28, 2025 12:30 1 min. read News Service Produced externally by an organization we trust to adhere to journalistic standards. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni welcomed an EU-US trade deal on Monday, saying it had avoided "potentially devastating" consequences. Meloni – an ally of US President Donald Trump on many issues – had earlier this month warned against a "trade war within the West". Speaking at a summit in Ethiopia, Meloni said a "trade escalation between Europe and the United States would have had unpredictable and potentially devastating consequences". She added, however, that she still had to "study the details" of the deal. She spoke hours after Trump and the EU's Ursula von der Leyen struck the deal – that will see EU exports taxed at 15 percent – in Scotland. Meloni stressed she views the fact that a deal was struck at all "positively." The right-wing Italian leader said Rome will look into whether exemptions could be possible, "particularly on some agricultural products". (vib)
Euractiv
3 hours ago
- Euractiv
Chinese e-commerce giant Temu accused of breaching EU's digital rules
On Monday the Commission announced that it has found the Chinese e-commerce giant Temu is breaching the bloc's Digital Services Act (DSA) after it failed to assess risky and illegal products on its online marketplace. Temu, which is one of a handful of online platforms offering heavily discounted goods that typically ship directly from China, has been under investigation by the Commission since October, when it opened a DSA probe on the marketplace covering multiple concerns, including over the sale of illegal products. Announcing its preliminary finding today, the Commission said it believes Temu has failed to properly assess risks posed by products for sale on its marketplace. The finding follows a risk assessment report which Temu submitted to the Commission last October as it was required to do under the DSA. However the report lacked specificity. It "primarily looked at general issues for online marketplaces and not specific issues with respect to its own marketplaces," a Commission official told reporters during a background briefing earlier today. EU consumers are also very likely to find unsafe products on Temu – including toys and small electronics – according to a Commission "mystery shopping exercise" which was conducted as part of its DSA oversight. Unsafe products is one part of the Commission's ongoing investigation against Temu. But the Commission has other concerns that it's still examining, including probes on addictive design, recommender systems and transparency obligations. Following the Commission's initial findings, Temu has been given a few weeks to provide a response, per an EU official. The EU's executive did not give a precise deadline for when it expects Temu's feedback on its findings. Under the DSA, companies can be fined up to 6% of their annual total worldwide turnover. While there is no EU fine for Temu today, ultimately, if the Commission confirms a breach it could issue the marketplace with a financial penalty. Separately, Temu has been under a consumer protection probe since last November. That ongoing investigation, which falls under EU consumer laws, is co-led by the Commission and national consumer protection authorities, including Belgium and Ireland. (nl)
