logo
What is NATO's new 5% defence spending target?

What is NATO's new 5% defence spending target?

Hindustan Times23-06-2025
By Lili Bayer and Andrew Gray What is NATO's new 5% defence spending target?
BRUSSELS, - NATO leaders are expected to endorse a big new defence spending target at an alliance summit in The Hague on Wednesday, as demanded by U.S. President Donald Trump.
Here are some key questions and answers about the new target.
WHAT ARE NATO LEADERS EXPECTED TO PROVE?
They are expected to agree that NATO members should spend 5% of their economic output - or Gross Domestic Product - on core defence and broader defence and security-related investments.
That's a hefty increase on the current goal of 2%, which was approved at an alliance summit in Wales in 2014. But the new target will be measured differently.
NATO members will be expected to spend 3.5% of their GDP on core defence such as troops and weapons – the items currently covered by the old 2% target.
They will also be expected to spend a further 1.5% of GDP on broader defence and security-related investments – such as adapting roads, bridges and ports for use by military vehicles, and on cyber-security and protecting energy pipelines.
HOW BIG A LE WILL THIS BE FOR NATO COUNTRIES?
Very big for a lot of them.
Twenty-two of NATO's 32 member countries spent 2% of GDP or more on defence last year.
As a whole, alliance members spent 2.61% of NATO GDP on defence last year, according to a NATO estimate. But that number masks big differences in spending among members.
Poland, for example, spent more than 4% of its GDP on defence, making it the biggest spender. At the other end of the spectrum, Spain spent less than 1.3%.
WHEN ARE NATO COUNTRIES EXPECTED TO HIT THE TARGET?
They will be expected to meet the target by 2035. The targets could also be adjusted when they are reviewed in 2029.
HOW MUCH MORE CASH ARE WE ACTUALLY TALKING ABOUT?
It's hard to say exactly how much extra cash NATO members would have to spend, not least because it will depend on the size of their economies for years to come.
Also, NATO does not currently measure spending on the new broader category of defence and security-related investments – so there is no baseline measurement to go by.
But NATO countries spent over $1.3 trillion on core defence in 2024, up from about a trillion a decade earlier in constant 2021 prices. If NATO states had all spent 3.5% of GDP on defence last year, that would have amounted to some $1.75 trillion.
So, hitting the new targets could eventually mean spending hundreds of billions of dollars more per year, compared with current spending.
WHY ARE NATO COUNTRIES INCREASING SPENDING NOW?
Russia's continued war in Ukraine, concerns about a possible future threat from Russia, and U.S. pressure have led many European capitals to boost investment in defence and plan to increase it even further over the coming years.
'Russia could be ready to use military force against NATO within five years,' NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte said earlier this month.
Europe is also preparing for the possibility that the U.S. under President Donald Trump will decide to withdraw some of its troops and capabilities from Europe.
'America can't be everywhere all the time, nor should we be,' U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said earlier this month.
WHAT WILL THE NEW MONEY BE SPENT ON?
NATO this month agreed on new capability targets for its members – the types of troops, military units, weapons and equipment that NATO says they should possess to defend themselves and the alliance.
Those targets are classified but Rutte said after they were approved that the alliance needed to invest more in areas including "air defence, fighter jets, tanks, drones, personnel, logistics and so much more".
IS EVERYONE ON BOARD?
Not quite. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez says his country can meet its military capability targets by spending just 2.1% of GDP.
His government approved the draft summit statement with the new spending target but made clear it does not intend to spend that much. NATO officials say Sanchez does not have an opt-out - Spain's spending will be tracked and if it's not investing enough to meet the military targets, it will need to improve.
Some countries that have signed up to the targets may also not meet them, diplomats and analysts expect. But publicly, they have insisted they are committed.
WHERE WILL THE MONEY COME FROM?
Every NATO country will decide on its own where to find the cash to invest more in defence and how to allocate it.
The European Union has moved to try to make it easier for capitals to spend on defence.
The EU is allowing members to raise defence spending by 1.5% of GDP each year for four years without any disciplinary steps that would normally kick in once a national deficit is above 3% of GDP.
EU ministers last month also approved the creation of a 150-billion-euro arms fund using joint EU borrowing to give loans to European countries for joint defence projects.
Some European countries are pushing for EU joint borrowing to fund grants – rather than loans – for defence spending. But they have met resistance from fiscally conservative countries including Germany and The Netherlands.
HOW DOES THE NATO TARGET COMPARE TO OTHER COUNTRIES' DEFENCE SPENDING?
NATO allies dedicate a much smaller share of their economic output to defence than Russia but, taken together, they spend significantly more cash than Moscow.
Russia's military spending rose by 38% in 2024, reaching an estimated $149 billion and 7.1% of GDP, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
China, the world's second-largest military spender, dedicated an estimated 1.7% of GDP to military expenditure last year, according to SIPRI.
HOW DOES DEFENCE SPENDING COMPARE TO GOVERNMENT SPENDING IN OTHER AREAS?
In NATO countries, defence tends to make up a small portion of national budgets.
Military spending accounted for 3.2% of government spending in Italy, 3.6% in France and 8.5% in Poland in 2023, according to SIPRI data. In Russia that year, military expenditure made up nearly 19% of government spending.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What Is Germany's Freelance Visa And Why It Matters To Indian Travellers
What Is Germany's Freelance Visa And Why It Matters To Indian Travellers

NDTV

timean hour ago

  • NDTV

What Is Germany's Freelance Visa And Why It Matters To Indian Travellers

For many Indian travellers, the idea of living in Europe has always felt like a distant, if beautiful, hypothesis. A place for brief holidays, Schengen stamps, and postcard winters-never a space to pause, work, and actually live. But in recent years, Germany has been quietly opening a different kind of door: a visa that does not ask for an office desk or a corporate job offer. Instead, it asks what you do, how well you do it, and whether you are ready to build a life on your own terms. It is not instant, and it is not for everyone. But if you have the paperwork and the patience, it could mean something much more lasting than a two-week Euro trip. What Is Germany's Freelance Visa? Germany's Freelance Visa is a residence permit that allows non-EU citizens to work independently in certain professional categories while living legally in the country. Unlike a tourist visa, which restricts work, or a work visa that depends on a full-time employer, this option gives qualified individuals the freedom to run their own professional practice. It is structured around liberal professions-meaning it is ideal for creatives, educators, scientists, and consultants whose work is not bound to a traditional office. The visa is typically granted for one year, with the possibility of extension. If you meet the conditions-ongoing freelance work, proof of income, tax registration-it can be extended for up to three years. After five years of continued stay and fulfilment of requirements, applicants may become eligible for permanent residency. Why It Matters To Indian Travellers For Indian citizens, navigating European visas often comes with a long list of constraints-employer sponsorship, tight visa durations, and little flexibility. Germany's freelance visa breaks that mould. It allows Indian travellers to: Base themselves in Europe for at least one year Work independently, legally invoicing clients in Germany and other EU countries Travel within the Schengen area (up to 90 days in any 180-day period) Renew the visa or eventually apply for permanent residency This visa is not meant for backpackers or short-term tourists-it is for those looking to spend an intentional year or more abroad, combining career with travel, language learning, and cultural immersion. Who Is Eligible? Eligibility is based on whether your profession falls under what Germany defines as a "liberal profession." These are jobs that require expertise, creativity or intellectual work, but not a business license. Some of the eligible professions include: Journalists and photojournalists Writers, editors, interpreters, and translators Architects, engineers, and surveyors Visual artists, musicians, and designers Teachers, educators, and researchers Lawyers, patent agents, tax consultants, and accountants Medical and therapeutic professionals like physiotherapists, dentists, and veterinarians Pilots and aviation specialists If you are in IT or business services, you may need to apply for a different visa, such as the self-employment visa (Gewerbetreibende). What Documents Do You Need? Be prepared-Germany is detail-oriented. The documentation required for the freelance visa application is extensive, and applicants need to show that they are financially self-sufficient and professionally qualified. Here is a checklist of the key documents required: A valid passport (issued within the past 10 years and with at least two empty pages) Proof of income: approximately 1,280 euros per month (Rs 1.27 lakh) as a minimum Proof of professional qualification (such as a university degree) Proof of freelance work or client contracts-letters of intent or ongoing projects Detailed freelance business plan or project outline A comprehensive CV Health insurance valid in Germany Proof of address/accommodation in Germany Two passport-size photographs (taken within the last six months) Pension plan documentation for applicants over 45 Visa fee payment receipt (75 euros or about Rs 7,500) Tip: Double-check which documents need to be submitted in German or translated versions. Many consulates require official translations. How To Apply From India Applying for this visa involves a combination of paperwork in India and follow-ups in Germany. Here is a step-by-step guide tailored for Indian travellers: Fill out the National D visa application form and print a copy for submission. Book an appointment with the German Embassy or Consulate in India. Prepare your documents, including income proof, business plan, and health insurance. Attend the in-person appointment, where your biometric data will be collected. Wait for the visa to be processed-this can take between 6 and 10 weeks. Once in Germany, register your address (Anmeldung) within two weeks. Visit the local Auslanderbehorde (Foreigners' Office) to apply for your freelance residence permit. Remember, the National D Visa is your entry pass. The residence permit is what allows you to live and work long-term. Can You Afford To Live In Germany On A Freelance Visa? While the visa fee itself is nominal, living costs are not. Germany is not the cheapest destination in Europe, but it offers value in terms of quality of life, infrastructure, and access. Here is a monthly estimate to help plan your finances: Shared housing (WG or flatshare): 300 to 600 euros Groceries: 150 to 200 euros Transport pass: 49 to 90 euros Internet/phone/utilities: 100 euros Miscellaneous personal expenses: 100 to 200 euros Total estimated monthly budget: 800 to 1,200 euros In addition to this, you must show proof of funds for one year-around 11,208 euros, which is close to Rs 10 lakh. What Life In Germany Could Look Like For A Year This visa is not just about work. It opens up a different kind of European life-one that involves living like a local. No two months will feel the same: Winter: Christmas markets, hot chocolate, snow-covered old towns Spring: Bike rides through parks, blooming cherry trees, weekend trips to neighbouring cities Summer: Beer gardens, lakeside picnics, outdoor cinema screenings Autumn: Foliage trails, wine festivals, and local Oktoberfest celebrations You could also take up: Volunteering at local cafes or co-working spaces Enrolling in a neighbourhood language school Shopping at weekly farmers' markets Living without a car-most cities are built for walking and cycling Adjusting to Sunday quiet-most shops are shut, so it is your day to slow down What Happens After One Year? If you have maintained your freelance work and financial self-sufficiency, your visa can be extended. Some freelancers also use the opportunity to: However, if your income is not consistent or the freelance work dries up, you may need to return to your home country.

Turkish, Italian, Libyan leaders discuss joint strategy to curb migration and support Libyan unity
Turkish, Italian, Libyan leaders discuss joint strategy to curb migration and support Libyan unity

First Post

time2 hours ago

  • First Post

Turkish, Italian, Libyan leaders discuss joint strategy to curb migration and support Libyan unity

Oil-rich Libya plunged into chaos after a NATO-backed uprising toppled and killed longtime dictator Moammar Gadhafi in 2011. In the disarray that followed, the country split into rival administrations in the east and west, each backed by rogue militias and foreign governments read more Turkey's President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, center, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, left, and Libyan Prime Minister Abdul-Hamid Dbeibah, pose for photos before their meeting in Istanbul, Turkey. AP On Friday, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan hosted a conference in Istanbul with Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and Libyan Prime Minister Abdul-Hamid Dbeibah to discuss migration, collaboration, and Libya's political stability. According to a statement published by Meloni's office after the closed-door meeting, the three leaders addressed boosting collaboration in the Mediterranean region, beginning with migration management. Meloni applauded the 'excellent results achieved' through partnership with Turkey on migration control, stating that the lessons learnt should be applied to strengthen the Libyan Government of National Unity's migration efforts, according to a statement released by her office. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to a statement released by Erdogan's office, 'long-term and sustainable' solutions were required to eliminate the root cause of migration. Libya is a major transit hub for migrants escaping war and poverty in Africa and the Middle East. Drownings along the country's shore have been prevalent. In December, at least 61 migrants, including women and children, drowned off Zuwara on Libya's western coast. The Italian prime minister also underlined Italy's commitment 'to Libya's stability, unity, and independence,' as well as its support for a political process led by Libya and assisted by the United Nations that would lead to elections. According to the Turkish presidential statement, the three leaders will meet again to assess their conclusions after lower-level technical meetings. Oil-rich Libya plunged into chaos after a NATO-backed uprising toppled and killed longtime dictator Moammar Gadhafi in 2011. In the disarray that followed, the country split into rival administrations in the east and west, each backed by rogue militias and foreign governments. Turkey has been allied with the Tripoli-based government in the west, but has recently taken steps to improve ties with the eastern-based government as well. In 2019, Turkey reached an agreement with the Tripoli-based government which delineated maritime boundaries between Libya and Turkey, angering Greece and Cyprus which say the agreement infringes on their rights. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

World War III fears grow as Trump sends nuclear submarines toward Russia — fires back at Putin crony's bold threat
World War III fears grow as Trump sends nuclear submarines toward Russia — fires back at Putin crony's bold threat

Economic Times

time2 hours ago

  • Economic Times

World War III fears grow as Trump sends nuclear submarines toward Russia — fires back at Putin crony's bold threat

President Donald Trump has taken a bold step by ordering the deployment of two U.S. nuclear submarines near Russia, following aggressive nuclear threats from Russian official Dmitry Medvedev. This unexpected move, announced on August 1, 2025, has sent shockwaves through global capitals and triggered urgent responses from NATO allies. As the war in Ukraine drags on and nuclear rhetoric escalates, Trump's action signals a high-stakes moment in international diplomacy. Donald Trump orders U.S. nuclear submarines near Russia after Medvedev's warning sparks global tension- In a dramatic turn of global events, President Donald Trump has ordered two U.S. nuclear submarines to be strategically deployed near Russian waters. This powerful move comes after Russia's Dmitry Medvedev, former president and current deputy chairman of the Security Council, made what Trump called 'foolish and inflammatory' threats, evoking Cold War-era nuclear rhetoric. The decision is not just a military maneuver—it is a strong geopolitical message amid rising global tensions and ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Tensions between the U.S. and Russia are reaching a boiling point after President Donald Trump ordered two nuclear submarines to reposition closer to Russian waters. This dramatic military maneuver was a direct response to former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev's alarming nuclear rhetoric, where he warned of retaliatory measures over Trump's Ukraine ceasefire deadline. Trump framed the move as a "precaution," yet it marks one of the boldest nuclear postures by a U.S. president since the Cold War. His administration is sending a clear signal: America won't tolerate escalatory threats from Moscow. But Trump's move isn't just about deterring Russia militarily—it's part of a broader pressure campaign that includes punishing economic measures. Alongside the submarine deployment, Trump is ramping up tariffs and trade restrictions, directly tying them to global alliances and behavior, especially countries with growing ties to Russia. This includes India, a key member of the BRICS alliance, which has continued importing discounted Russian oil and weapons. With NATO on edge and global markets rattled, Trump's military and economic posture is designed to reassert American dominance on multiple fronts. Trump, reacting via his Truth Social account, stressed that the U.S. cannot afford to ignore such escalatory language. Calling Medvedev's rhetoric 'provocative,' Trump revealed that two nuclear-powered submarines have been moved to undisclosed locations near Russia 'as a precautionary measure.' His words echoed a deepening concern that the world is again walking a tightrope between diplomacy and destruction. The deployment of U.S. nuclear submarines near Russia serves a dual purpose—military deterrence and strategic signaling. While Trump emphasized that the move is defensive and meant to 'avoid unintended consequences,' analysts say this marks one of the most visible escalations between the U.S. and Russia in recent years. The submarines involved are part of the U.S. Navy's Ohio-class ballistic missile fleet, capable of carrying dozens of nuclear warheads. Their undetectable stealth and immense power make them one of the most formidable assets in America's strategic arsenal. This development is especially critical as it comes at a time when U.S.–Russia relations are already strained over the prolonged war in Ukraine, cyber threats, and economic sanctions. Trump's decisive move may shift the global chessboard and intensify calls for diplomatic engagement before the situation spirals further. At the center of this high-stakes exchange is Dmitry Medvedev, who has increasingly taken on a more hawkish and aggressive tone in recent months. In his latest statement, Medvedev dismissed Trump's suggested Ukraine ceasefire plans and instead referenced Russia's massive nuclear arsenal. He also mentioned the 'Dead Hand' system—a Cold War legacy technology rumored to automatically launch Russia's nuclear weapons if national leadership is wiped out. This chilling detail sent shockwaves through Western governments and likely played a major role in Trump's rapid military response. Medvedev's public comments appear designed to demonstrate Russia's refusal to be bullied or coerced into surrendering geopolitical ground, especially in the ongoing conflict with Ukraine. Yes, and the message is loud and clear. President Trump has slapped a 25% tariff on Indian imports, followed by a penalty tied to India's continued trade with Russia. His administration is increasingly frustrated with BRICS nations—including India, Brazil, and China—who've maintained or deepened economic ties with Moscow despite the ongoing war in Ukraine. India's position is particularly sensitive: while it maintains strategic autonomy, its oil purchases from Russia and growing defense partnerships have drawn Trump's ire. U.S. officials even suggested India is being "made an example" to deter other nations from ignoring Washington's red lines. Trump's trade strategy is deeply intertwined with his foreign policy objectives. He's not only seeking better deals for the U.S. but also using tariffs as leverage to isolate Russia and disrupt emerging multipolar alliances like BRICS. Some U.S. lawmakers have gone as far as proposing 500% secondary tariffs on countries that continue to fund what they call "Putin's war machine." The timing is no coincidence—Trump's submarine deployment near Russia and economic pressure on India are part of the same high-stakes chess game. By linking military deterrence with aggressive trade tactics, Trump is reshaping the global order on his terms. The announcement came as a shock to many international leaders, with NATO allies quickly convening emergency briefings to assess potential fallout. Several European nations have voiced concern about the dangerous path being carved by nuclear saber-rattling on both sides. Financial markets also reacted with caution. Global stocks dipped, oil prices surged, and defense stocks rallied as investors priced in the risk of growing military conflict. Analysts warned that such volatile moves could create long-term instability unless world leaders return to diplomatic channels. The United Nations issued a statement urging both the U.S. and Russia to exercise restraint and avoid inflammatory actions that could further escalate nuclear tensions. The Ukraine–Russia war, now in its third year, remains a core source of global instability. President Trump has repeatedly insisted that Russia must agree to a ceasefire and begin peace talks, warning of strict deadlines and harsher consequences. However, Moscow has resisted U.S. pressure, and the Kremlin continues to frame the conflict as a defensive effort against NATO expansion. Trump's latest move underscores just how intertwined the nuclear issue has become with the broader Ukraine war. Experts fear that any misstep—verbal or strategic—could ignite a new, more dangerous chapter in this long-running conflict. Nuclear policy experts across the globe have raised alarms, cautioning that any military escalation involving nuclear assets, especially submarines, could be misinterpreted as a preparation for attack. 'This is a very delicate moment,' said Dr. Elena Petrov, a nuclear strategy analyst at the Atlantic Institute. 'By publicizing the submarine deployment, Trump is both deterring aggression and potentially increasing the likelihood of misunderstanding or miscalculation by the Russians.' She added that in a world where communication can be instantaneous but filtered through political rhetoric, leaders must be especially cautious. 'What's said online or in speeches can spark real-world consequences—especially when nuclear weapons are involved.' In the face of mounting criticism, President Trump defended his decision. He emphasized that the U.S. had no plans to initiate conflict but could not sit idle while a senior Russian official made what he termed 'reckless threats.' Trump insisted the move was not just about protecting American interests but also about showing strength in the face of intimidation. 'Words matter,' he wrote. 'When someone threatens nuclear retaliation, we must take it seriously.' This response plays into Trump's broader strategy of projecting American strength on the world stage, particularly in matters involving national security, energy dominance, and great power competition. The current climate raises difficult questions about the future of international diplomacy. With both Washington and Moscow hardening their stances, and with war still raging in Eastern Europe, the room for peaceful resolution appears to be narrowing. Analysts warn that mutual threats and weapons deployments only serve to erode what little trust remains between the superpowers. The absence of formal arms control talks, especially after the collapse of key nuclear treaties in recent years, makes these moments even more dangerous. Whether this incident becomes a turning point for reengagement—or the beginning of a new era of nuclear brinkmanship—remains to be seen. Trump's bold decision to deploy nuclear submarines close to Russian territory has transformed a war of words into a potential flashpoint. His warning to Medvedev—combined with the reality of submarine positioning—sends a clear message that the U.S. is ready to defend its interests and allies, even at great risk. At the same time, the move has rattled the international community, highlighting the urgent need for renewed diplomacy, strategic calm, and nuclear de-escalation. For now, all eyes are on what happens next—because in a world with nuclear weapons, miscommunication can become catastrophe in a matter of minutes. Q1: Why did Donald Trump deploy nuclear submarines near Russia? To respond to Medvedev's nuclear threats and rising tensions over Ukraine. Q2: What did Dmitry Medvedev say that triggered Trump's decision? He warned of Russia's Cold War-era nuclear retaliation system, the 'Dead Hand.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store