Bärbel Bas offers new hope for ailing SPD – DW – 06/29/2025
Bärbel Bas comes from a humble background. Her father was a bus driver, her mother a homemaker.
Bas was born in 1968 in Duisburg, an industrial city in the Ruhr region characterized by coal mining and iron and steel production. As a working-class child with five siblings, secondary school and an academic education were not a likely path.
She attended secondary school, which qualified young people for basic vocational training, and then became an office assistant. But when that wasn't enough for her, she did a second apprenticeship, got involved as a works council member and continued her education while working to complete a two-year evening course at a business academy.
Bas began her political career at the same time. In 1988, she joined Germany's center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD), became a city councilor and made her way into the country's parliament, the Bundestag.
In 2009, she won her first direct parliamentary mandate in Duisburg and became the parliamentary secretary and deputy leader of the SPD parliamentary group. From 2021 to 2025, she was president of the Bundestag, the second-highest state office in Germany. And now, she heads the SPD alongside Lars Klingbeil.
At the SPD party conference in Berlin on Friday, Bas pointed out that she wasn't born into her political and professional career. "But I had the chance to progress step by step," she said. "I have continued to educate myself and worked my way up."
Bas wants to ensure that this kind of professional advancement through is possible for many more people in Germany. "That's also why I joined the SPD back then," she said.
Bas belongs to the SPD's left wing. As co-leader of the party, her role will be to act as counterweight to Lars Klingbeil, who belongs to the party's conservative wing.
Now in his third term, the 47-year-old has co-chaired the party since 2021. That makes him partly responsible for SPD's disastrous election defeat in February, when it received just 16.4% of the vote — the worst result since the end of the 19th century.
With Klingbeil, Bas will now have the task of rebuilding the SPD and leading it forward. It will be a daunting task for a deeply wounded party, and it showed at the party conference. Klingbeil was only reelected by just under 65% of the party's delegates — a poor result laden with frustrations.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Immediately after the election defeat, Klingbeil positioned himself for the new governing coalition with the leading conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU) and its Bavarian sister party, the Christian Social Union (CSU), expanding his power to become both finance minister and vice chancellor.
Saskia Esken, his SPD co-chair at the time, was sidelined until she eventually gave up.
"I found much of what came from within my own ranks, but also from outside as comments, to be unfair," she said in an interview with the , in which she also admitted to making mistakes. "But the way I was maligned was disproportionate and undignified."
Speaking on Friday, Bas agreed with Esken's assessment. "You, dear Saskia, have had to experience that it can sometimes be damn lonely in politics — even in a party with over 350,000 members," she said at the party conference. "You have had to experience that solidarity is not always a given — not even in social democracy."
As such, Bas said she'd considered whether she should take on the party chairmanship. But her decision was clear: "It's not acceptable for us women to avoid responsibility. It's about visibility, respect — and yes, it's also about power!"
Bas now has power not only in the SPD, but as Germany's new labor minister. In that role, she has taken on the mammoth tasks of reforming unemployment benefits and patching up the crumbling pension system, the latter of which is plagued by demographic changes that make it unlikely there will be enough to support the aging population.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The conservatives are pushing to cut social benefits, something which Bas has rejected outright. She sharply criticized talk of allegedly lazy Germans and attempts to turn the term "welfare state" into a dirty word. This is "shamelessly punching down" she said, adding that a society based on solidarity with dignified work for all should be at the heart of politics.
Delegates celebrated her stance on Friday, electing her as the party's new co-chair with 95% of the vote. Bas knows that she has the historically difficult task of saving the SPD from further disintegration.
"But I always say: if it were easy, others could do it too," she said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
2 hours ago
- DW
For Ukraine, the Alaska summit was a complete disappointment – DW – 08/16/2025
A red carpet for Vladimir Putin and no results for Ukraine. The Alaska summit, which many had pinned high hopes on, turned out to be a complete disappointment from the perspective of many Ukrainians. During Saturday night, many Ukrainians stayed up and anxiously waited for news from the Alaska summit between US President Donald Trump and Russia's head of state Vladimir Putin. For some, there was hope the talks could lead to some sort of end of Russia's war against Ukraine. Many Ukrainians though feared the price for this might be territorial concessions Kyiv would be pressured into making. But it soon became clear that the summit in Alaska had brought no fundamental changes. "There were no concrete results for Ukraine," Oleksandr Kraiev of the Ukrainian Prism think tank told DW. "Thank God nothing was signed and no radical decisions were made," the North America expert said. "The summit was an extremely successful information operation for Russia. The war criminal Putin came to the US and shook hands with the leader of the free world." According to Kraiev, apart from "Trump's deference toward Putin, there were no final answers to the most important questions." He believes that Putin dealt with Trump "with surgical precision" and told him everything Trump wanted to hear. This way, Putin got everything he wanted out of the summit. According to Ivan Us from Ukraine's Center for Foreign Policy of the National Institute for Strategic Studies, the Russian president never wanted the summit to lead to an end to the war. Instead, Putin's goal was to legitimize himself and end his international isolation. "For Putin, having a joint photo with Trump was the goal of this summit. To show in Russia that the isolation is over, that there won't be new sanctions, and that everything is fine, so that there'd be positive impulses for the markets. And for Trump, it was a moment where he wanted to demonstrate strength. He was walking next to Putin while a US bomber flew above them, the same bomber that recently attacked Iran. This was a signal to everyone not to forget who the most important country in the world is," Us told DW. As if to confirm this, Dmitry Medvedev, chairman of Russia's Security Council, said after the Alaska summit that a "full-fledged mechanism for meetings" between Russia and the US at the highest level had been restored. "Important: The meeting proved that negotiations without preconditions and simultaneously with the continuation of the Special Military Operation are possible. Both sides directly put the responsibility for future negotiation results on Kyiv and Europe," Medvedev wrote on social networks. The term Special Military Operation is how Russia refers to its war against Ukraine. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Ivan Us thinks that the summit did not get Ukraine closer to peace. Instead, it intensified the chaos, as the US and Russia are making contradictory statements about continuing possible trilateral dialogue involving Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. For example, Moscow says that Trump and Putin did not discuss a trilateral summit with Zelensky, while Washington says the opposite. Zelenskyy himself spoke of receiving an invitation to a trilateral meeting. "We support President Trump's proposal for a trilateral meeting between Ukraine, the US, and Russia. Ukraine emphasizes: Important issues can be discussed at the level of heads of state, and a trilateral format is suitable for this," he wrote on social media after a phone call with Donald Trump. Zelenskyy shared that he would meet with Donald Trump in Washington on August 18. "Ukraine confirms once again that it is ready to work toward peace as productively as possible. President Trump informed me about his meeting with the Russian president and about the key points of the discussion. It is important that US power influences the development of the situation," the Ukrainian president said. There are fears in Ukraine that Zelenskyy's trip to Washington could result in new pressure from the US on Ukraine. "Any 'no' from the Ukrainian side could be portrayed as [a] lack of willingness to end the war. Trump essentially admitted that it's about an 'exchange of territories for security guarantees,' and he confirmed that agreement was reached on certain points and spoke of a 'chance for success,'" Iryna Herashchenko, Ukrainian MP and co-chair of the opposition party "European Solidarity," wrote on social media. She believes that such formulations allow Moscow to present this as legitimization of its demands. "Putin repeated during the brief briefing once again that the actual causes of the conflict must be eliminated. This means that Moscow will not change its goals - because the existence of an independent Ukraine is seen as the actual cause," warns Herashchenko. Ukrainian political scientist Vadym Denisenko, however, believes that Russia's idea of "doing business with the US in exchange for Ukrainian territory" didn't work. Putin managed to gain time, though. "At Alaska, they agreed to negotiate," Denisenko wrote on social media. Nevertheless, he argues that Putin "lost what was most important: his maneuverability. He drastically restricted his scope for action and is actually rapidly falling into China's arms." Denisenko believes that if no results regarding the end of the war are achieved within two months, the issue will become part of Chinese-American negotiations. "In other words: A new window for negotiations will open earliest at the end of the year, realistically only in spring 2026," he predicted. Judging by discussions among ordinary Ukrainians, what angers them most is the red carpet that was rolled out for Putin at the US military base in Anchorage. Countless angry comments on social media leave little doubt over how this was perceived in Ukraine. "History always remembers not only those who kill, but also those who bestow murderers with honors. This is a special kind of shame and complicity in crime, which is too often confused with diplomacy. Today, this gallery was expanded with a new picture, with a bloody carpet and a parade of honor guard for the architect of Bucha, Mariupol, Izium, thousands of torture chambers, mass shootings, and deportations," said Mustafa Nayyem, former parliament member and ex-head of the State Agency for Reconstruction and Infrastructure.
DW
3 hours ago
- DW
Air Canada: Gov't forces striking cabin crew back to work – DW – 08/16/2025
More than 100,000 passengers were left stranded after Air Canada's flight attendants went on strike. Canada's government says it is stepping in to avoid lasting economic damage. The Canadian government on Saturday moved to end a strike by Air Canada flight attendants. The strike had forced Canada's largest airline to cancel all of its 700 daily flights and grounded over 100,000 passengers at the peak of the summer travel season. The government has ordered an immediate end to the strike and for the Canada Industrial Relations Board to impose binding arbitration on Air Canada and the striking cabin crew. The airline had requested the move, while the flight attendants, who walked off the job early Saturday demanding better pay and conditions, had been opposed to it. "The talks broke down. It is clear that the parties are not any closer to resolving some of the key issues that remain and they will need help with the arbitrator," Canadian Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu told a press conference. She added that Air Canada had said it would take up to five days for its operations to resume fully. "Canadians are increasingly finding themselves in very difficult situations and the strike is rapidly impacting the Canadian economy," Hajdu said, according to a statement. She explained that the government had to act to "preserve stability and supply chains in this unique and uncertain economic context." Hajdu added that her arbitration order was "critical to maintaining and securing industrial peace, protecting Canadians and promoting conditions to resolve the dispute." Flying in Canada, the world's second largest country, is often the only viable option for long-distance journeys. In a social media post, just before 01:00 ET (05:00 GMT), the union represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) confirmed the 72-hour freeze. More than 10,000 Air Canada flight attendants were participating in the strike over a pay dispute with the airline. Currently, the flight attendants are paid only when they are flying. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video However, the union wants flight attendants to be compensated for the time they spend on the ground between flights and as they help passengers board. The airline and the union had been in talks for months, but the negotiations collapsed when the union turned down the airline's request to enter into government-directed arbitration. Air Canada, which is based in Montreal, said the strike, which would also have impacted the airline's budget arm Air Canada Rouge, was due to affect around 130,000 passengers per day.
DW
9 hours ago
- DW
Brazil announces $5.5 bn package to counter Trump's tariffs – DW – 08/14/2025
Brazilian President Lula da Silva said the move is supposed to "create new things" out of the crisis caused by Donald Trump's tariffs. But Lula also said his country is still ready to negotiate. Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva announced a plan on Wednesday to support exporters who have been hit by high tariffs of up to 50% imposed by US President Donald Trump on several products from the country. The plan provides credit of 20 billion reais ($5.5 billion; €4.7 billion) to support the embattled exporters. Other measures in the plan include postponing tax charges for businesses affected by the tariffs, while also incentivizing Brazilians to buy locally produced goods that would have otherwise been exported to the US. "We cannot be scared, nervous and anxious when there is a crisis," Lula said. "A crisis is for us to create new things." Lula also said Trump has no good reasons for hitting Brazil with high tariffs. While the Trump administration announced sweeping tariffs on many countries around the world, Brazil was ultimately singled out with some of the highest levies of up to 50%. Trump said the additional tariffs were a reaction to the legal situation of his ally, the far-right populist former president, Jair Bolsonaro. Bolsonaro is currently under house arrest over allegations that he plotted a coup after losing the 2022 presidential election. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Lula did not hold back on the grounds for the tariffs, saying every time the US decides to "fight with someone," they paint their rivals as the devil. "Now they want to talk about human rights in Brazil… We have to look at what happens in the country that is accusing Brazil," Lula added, hinting at Trump's domestic policies. The US president had cited "human rights abuses" by the left-wing government in support of his ally Bolsonaro. Lula responded to the claims, saying Brazil's judiciary is independent, with the country's Finance Minister Fernando Haddad saying Brazil is being "sanctioned for being more democratic than its aggressor." The Brazilian leader has so far refrained from imposing higher tariffs on American imports, saying he is not interested in "worsening our relations with the US." "We like to negotiate," Lula said. "We don't want conflict. I don't want conflict with Uruguay, Venezuela, or even the US. The only thing we need to demand is that our sovereignty is untouchable, and that no one should have any say in what we should do."
