KLIP collective decision of Cabinet, not mine alone: KCR
The BRS supremo deposed before the Commission, which earlier accepted his request to conduct a one-to-one inquiry without open court questioning in view of his frail health.
The former CM also disclosed the reasons for the completion of the project in just three years.
'Every decision with regard to the finalization of the project designs, location of the barrages and reservoirs, execution of the works and maintenance of the project and barrages were done only after the approval of the technical committees and engineers,' KCR told the Commission.
The Commission posed 18 questions to KCR, focusing mainly on his alleged role in the finalization of the project and barrages, damage suffered by three barrages – Medigadda, Annnaram and Sundilla, scrapping of the Tummidihetti barrage, release of water to barrage, mobilization of funds by constituting Kaleshwaram Corporation, utilization of funds etc.
Justice PC Ghose specifically sought to know the reasons for the completion of a project as big as Kaleshwaram project in a short time. It is learnt that KCR explained the urgency of the completion of the project to provide a succor to distressed farmers in the dry areas.
Further, KCR told the Commission, WAPCOS' recommendations on the location change and water availability were taken into consideration during the construction of the project.
Explaining the main objective of the Kaleshwaram project, the former CM said that the government formed a corporation and borrowed money to complete the project without any delay.
When the Commission inquired about the release of water to the barrages, KCR explained he had no role in that and mentioned that the project engineers were responsible for the maintenance of water levels in the barrages.
The Maharastra government's objection to the Tummidihetti was the main reason to construct a barrage at Medigadda, the former CM said.
The technical team recommended the construction of the three barrages and the Central Water Commission (CWC) made some suggestions which were also accepted by his government.
Official sources said that KCR submitted all documentary evidence in support of his submissions such as government orders, CWC letters and Technical Committee study on the project to the Commission during the 50-minute-long quizzing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
4 hours ago
- The Wire
ECI Response to Rahul Gandhi 'Inadvisable', Should Order 'Immediate Inquiry': Former CEC
Karan Thapar O.P. Rawat pointed out that in citing Rule 20 (3) (b) of the Registration of Electors Rules of 1960 to demand an affidavit on oath from Gandhi, the Election Commission was converting something that was discretionary and optional into a mandatory requirement. Om Prakash Rawat, who served as the 22nd Chief Election Commissioner of India in 2018, has said that the Election Commission's response to Rahul Gandhi's disturbing allegations about fraudulent voters in Mahadevapura is 'inadvisable' and 'unfortunate'. Instead, he said, the Election Commission should 'immediately inquire and investigate' into the allegations levelled by Gandhi. In a 30-minute interview to Karan Thapar for The Wire, Rawat said the Election Commission has not followed its own conventional practice and has instead opted to 'reinvent the wheel'. The established practice of the Commission – which Rawat said was followed in an earlier instance of allegations about the electoral register in Hyderabad when he was Chief Election Commissioner – is to immediately order a full-fledged inquiry and investigation and not require an affidavit on oath. Equally importantly, Rawat pointed out that in citing Rule 20 (3) (b) of the Registration of Electors Rules of 1960 to demand an affidavit on oath from Gandhi, the Election Commission was converting something that was discretionary and optional into a mandatory requirement. More importantly, Rawat argued this rule does not apply to the Rahul Gandhi case and, when pressed whether it was therefore being wrongly applied, Rawat chose to maintain silence and instead smiled. When it was pointed out to him that the audience would take his silence as an affirmative answer he continued to smile. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
The Hindu
7 hours ago
- The Hindu
French President Emmanuel Macron admits France's repressive violence in Cameroon's war for independence
French President Emmanuel Macron acknowledged that France waged a war marked by 'repressive violence' in Cameroon before and after the country's independence in 1960 in a letter made public on Tuesday (August 12, 2025.) It is France's first official acknowledgment of its repression of Cameroon's independence movement as a war. The letter sent last month to Cameroonian President Paul Biya, follows a report released in January by a French-Cameroonian commission of historians. The report revealed that France carried out mass forced displacements, detained hundreds of thousands of Cameroonians in internment camps, and backed brutal militias to suppress the country's fight for independence and sovereignty between 1945 and 1971. The commission was established by Mr. Macron during a 2022 visit to the capital Yaoundé. It examined France's role leading up to Cameroon's independence on January 1, 1960, and in the years that followed. 'At the end of their work, the historians of the Commission clearly highlighted that a war had taken place in Cameroon, during which the colonial authorities and the French Army carried out multiple forms of repressive violence in certain regions of the country — a war that continued beyond 1960 with France's support for actions carried out by the independent Cameroonian authorities,' the letter from Mr. Macron read. Mr. Macron also acknowledged France's role in the deaths of independence leaders Ruben Um Nyobè, Paul Momo, Isaac Nyobè Pandjock and Jérémie Ndéléné, who were killed between 1958 and 1960 in military operations under French command. Cameroon was a German colony until the end of World War I, when it was divided between Britain and France. The French-administered territory gained independence in 1960, and the southern British Cameroons joined in a federation the next year. The independence war began in the 1950s when the nationalist UPC launched an armed struggle for full sovereignty and reunification. Even after independence, the French-backed government continued to fight the UPC for years. The letter follows earlier moves by Mr. Macron to address France's colonial past, including his recognition of French responsibility in the 1994 Rwandan genocide and the massacre of Senegalese riflemen after World War II. However, the French President has so far ruled out an official apology for torture and other abuses committed by French troops in Algeria. The letter comes at a time when France's presence in its former colonies in Africa has become increasingly contested, particularly in the Sahel region.
Hans India
8 hours ago
- Hans India
Records of over 100 booths in Bengal missing, Chief Electoral Officer to inform ECI
Kolkata: The records of the voters' lists of around a hundred polling booths in West Bengal, post the last Special Intensive Revision carried out by the Election Commission of India (ECI) in 2002, are not available. The 2022 list is supposed to be the basis for carrying out the SIR by the Commission this year. Insiders from the office of the Chief Electoral Officer (CEO), West Bengal, said that the matter would be brought to the notice of the ECI and permission would be sought to use the draft voters' list for 2003 as the basis of the fresh SIR. The sources said that, in the case of certain booths, the records of the 2002 post-SIR were not available at all. In some cases, the lists have been damaged in such a way that it is impossible to upload them to the Commission's server. It is learnt that the majority of the polling booths, whose records are not available, are from South 24 Parganas, Howrah, North 24 Parganas, and Birbhum districts, all being traditional strongholds of Trinamool Congress. The development has surfaced at a time when the ECI and the state government are at loggerheads over the Commission's suspension of four election officials posted in two Assembly constituencies in two districts of West Bengal. The four officials were suspended for their involvement in the wrongful addition of names to the electoral rolls of these two seats. After the state government, earlier this week, intimated to the ECI that it would not currently comply with the order to suspend the four election officials, the Commission, on Tuesday, summoned the state Chief Secretary Manoj Pant to the ECI's headquarters in Delhi by 5 p.m. on Wednesday. Now all eyes are on the outcome of the meeting between Pant and ECI officials. The complications on the issue of disciplinary action against the four election officers started from the beginning, with Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee challenging the Commission's order. She said that no action would be taken against the four officers as all of them were state government employees. The main charges against these four election officers are that they not only failed to perform their duties as EROs and AEROs while disposing of the applications, but also violated the policy of data security by sharing the login credentials of the election registration database with unauthorised persons. If proven guilty, the punishment of the erring individuals will be imprisonment for a term of at least three months, but can extend to two years, and with a fine, as per legal provisions.
