Bill regulating fees in private schools to bring greater transparency, accountability: Delhi CM
Addressing a press conference, Gupta said the Delhi School Education (Fee Determination and Transparency in Regulation) Bill, 2025, which was passed in Delhi Assembly on Friday, seeks to prevent arbitrary fee hikes and make private schools accessible to children from all sections of society, including those from underprivileged backgrounds.
'There are 1,733 private schools in Delhi, nearly 300 of which were given land at concessional rates by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA),' Gupta said.
'Under the new law, the director of education will have powers equivalent to those of a sub-divisional magistrate to take action against schools violating norms, including freezing bank accounts and attaching property,' she added.
The chief minister said the provisions will apply to all the private schools in Delhi, not just those allotted DDA land, and that fines ranging from Rs 1 lakh to Rs 10 lakh will be imposed for unauthorised fee hikes, with the penalty doubling in case of delayed payment.
Gupta said the Bill was drafted after consultations with education experts and parents, with a focus on protecting parents' interests without putting undue pressure on the schools. Criticising the previou AAP government, she alleged that despite tall claims of an education revolution, the sector was plagued by corruption and inefficiency.
'If you were truly concerned about education, why didn't you create a legal framework to control school fees in the past 27 years,' she asked the AAP and the Congress, which were in power during that period.
The chief minister also said that schools will now have to justify any proposed fee hike based on factors such as location, facilities, expenditure, and teaching quality, and that parents will have the veto power over such increases. 'This Bill is a shield for the dreams of Delhi's children. No one will be allowed to put a price on their aspirations,' she added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
7 minutes ago
- Indian Express
How BCCI has continued to resist attempts to bring it under RTI scanner
The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) will not be subject to provisions of the Right to Information (RTI) Act, according to the latest version of the National Sports Governance Bill, 2025. According to the proposed law, only sports bodies that receive financial assistance from the State constitute a 'public authority' under the RTI Act. This effectively excludes the cash-rich BCCI, which does not avail direct financial aid from the government. Over the years, the world's richest cricket board has pushed back on being labelled a public authority despite recommendations from the Supreme Court, the Law Commission of India and the Central Information Commission (CIC) to bring it under the transparency law. The new law & an exception for BCCI The National Sports Governance Bill seeks to provide for the recognition of national sports bodies, and regulate their functioning. The Bill essentially aims to align Indian sports governance with the Olympic and Paralympic Charters, and international sporting best practices. This would bring in transparency and accountability in national sports federations, and open up a number of hosting, collaboration and funding opportunities. Given that cricket will soon be included as an Olympic sport, it is necessary for the government to also bring BCCI under the proposed law. At the same time, the government is clearly open to making some exceptions. The initial version of the Bill tabled in Parliament on July 23 would have brought every recognised sports body under the RTI Act. Clause 15(2) of that draft stated that a 'recognised sports organisation shall be considered a public authority under the Right to Information Act, 2005 with respect to the exercise of its functions, duties and powers.' This broad definition would have included the BCCI, making its entire functioning, from team selection to awarding contracts, open to public scrutiny. In a later version of the Bill, which is likely to be debated in Parliament next week, this clause has been tweaked. The new provision states that a recognised sports organisation 'receiving grants or any other financial assistance' from the government shall be considered a public authority only 'with respect to utilisation of such grants or any other financial assistance'. This change makes direct government funding the sole criterion for a sports body to be considered a public authority, effectively keeping the BCCI away from RTI scrutiny. The BCCI has consistently argued that it is a private, autonomous body and not a 'public authority'. Indeed, it is not a sports federation under the Union Sports Ministry: legally, it is an autonomous charitable society registered under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975. It does not take direct financial aid from the government. This stance has been its cornerstone in resisting attempts to bring it under the RTI Act — it maintains that being financially and organisationally independent of the State places it outside the government's regulatory framework for public bodies. This position has been strongly contested by several judicial and quasi-judicial bodies. The Law Commission of India, for instance, its 275th Report in 2018, recommended that the BCCI be classified as a public authority. It argued that the board's claims of financial independence do not hold up when indirect benefits are considered. It also pointed out that the BCCI has received significant indirect financial assistance from the government over the years. Between 1997 and 2007, it noted, the board availed tax exemptions to the tune of over Rs 2,100 crores due to its legal status as a charitable institution. The Law Commission argued that this foregoing of revenue, which would have otherwise gone to the national exchequer, is a form of substantial indirect funding. The report also cited examples of state governments providing land to state cricket associations at highly subsidised rates — such as in Himachal Pradesh, where land for a stadium was reportedly leased for a nominal Re 1 per month. Beyond finances, both the Law Commission and the Supreme Court, in multiple judgements, have emphasised that the BCCI performs 'public functions' that are akin to those of a state body. It selects the national teams that represent India, uses national colours and symbols and exercises a monopoly over the sport with the 'tacit concurrence' of the government, according to a Supreme Court judgement from 2015. Previous recommendations not implemented A Justice RM Lodha-led committee, appointed by the Supreme Court in 2015 to recommend reforms to the BCCI, described the cricket body's functioning as a 'closed door and back-room affair.' It found that critical information, including its constitution and financial details, was not easily accessible, and requests for information were often ignored, underscoring the need for greater public scrutiny. The committee recommended that the 'legislature must seriously consider bringing BCCI within the purview of the RTI Act,' stating that the public has a right to know about its activities. Following this, the Supreme Court in 2016, while hearing the case on the Lodha reforms, referred the issue to the Law Commission of India, observing that since the BCCI performs public functions, there is a clear need for transparency. The Law Commission, in its 2018 report, concluded that the BCCI should be classified as a 'public authority' under the RTI Act based on both its public functions and the indirect government funding it receives. This was followed by a landmark order from the Central Information Commission (CIC) in the same year, which declared the BCCI a 'public authority' and directed it to set up mechanisms to handle RTI queries. However, the BCCI challenged this order in the Madras High Court, which put a stay on its implementation — leaving the matter in a legal limbo. Bringing the BCCI under the RTI Act would mean that any citizen of India could file a query and seek information on its functioning. This would go far beyond just financial matters and would cover the entire gamut of its operations. The public would be able to demand information on the criteria for team selection, details of contracts awarded for broadcasting and infrastructure, the appointment process for officials and coaches and the minutes of its meetings. This would enforce a level of transparency and public accountability that is currently absent, forcing the board to justify its decisions to the public at large, rather than just to its own constituent members. The Supreme Court, in 2015, has already held that even though the BCCI is not a state institution, it is amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution because it performs public functions. This means that the High Courts can intervene in the BCCI's affairs if its actions are found to be arbitrary or against the public interest.
India Today
7 minutes ago
- India Today
Delhi Chief Minister backs bill to control private school fees and boost accountability
Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta on Saturday announced that the Delhi School Education (Fee Determination and Transparency in Regulation) Bill, 2025, passed a day earlier in the Assembly, will curb arbitrary fee hikes in private schools and ensure at a press conference, Gupta said the Bill applies to all 1,733 private schools in Delhi, including nearly 300 institutions that received land at concessional rates from the Delhi Development Authority (DDA). She said the legislation is aimed at protecting parents from sudden and unexplained fee increases, while also ensuring schools remain accountable in their financial the new law, the Director of Education will have powers similar to those of a sub-divisional magistrate to act against violations. Measures include freezing bank accounts and attaching property of schools found breaching the norms. Fines for unauthorised fee hikes will range from Rs 1 lakh to Rs 10 lakh, with penalties doubling if payments are Bill requires schools to justify any proposed fee hike by presenting evidence related to location, infrastructure, operational expenditure, and teaching will have the authority to approve or reject these proposals, giving them direct influence in the decision-making process.'This Bill is a shield for the dreams of Delhi's children,' Gupta said. 'No one will be allowed to put a price on their aspirations.'Gupta stated that the draft was prepared after consulting education experts and parent groups. She said the intent was to create a balance between safeguarding parental interests and allowing schools to maintain their operations the previous AAP government and earlier administrations, Gupta alleged that neither AAP nor Congress took concrete steps to regulate school fees in the past 27 years. 'If education was really your priority, why didn't you bring a legal framework earlier?' she legislation also brings schools under stricter scrutiny regardless of their land allotment history. Authorities will have the mandate to inspect records and accounts to ensure Delhi government expects the law to address longstanding complaints from parents about steep annual hikes, especially in schools located in prime areas. The next step will involve framing rules for the Bill's implementation and setting up mechanisms for parents to file now, the government maintains that the law is designed to bring both transparency and accountability into a sector where financial decisions have often gone unchecked.- Ends
Indian Express
5 hours ago
- Indian Express
R G Kar, one year on: How Mamata government got its act together to avoid 2026 Assembly poll fallout
The rape and murder of a junior doctor at R G Kar Medical College and Hospital in Kolkata on August 9 last year shook the nation. In the aftermath of this horror, the Mamata Banerjee-led Trinamool Congress (TMC) government, ruling West Bengal since 2011, faced one of the most sustained protests that went on for close to two months. In the aftermath of the rape and murder, a section of doctors hit the streets to seek justice for the victim's family. Kolkata Police's alleged mishandling of the case and the alleged corruption nexus in medical colleges in the state also put the TMC government in a spot. What made matters worse was that the principal of R G Kar at the time, Sandip Ghosh, was facing several corruption allegations and while he was forced to step down by the protesters, he was appointed principal of Calcutta National Medical College and Hospital within hours. This and the attack on the protest venue at R G Kar by miscreants alleged to be linked to the ruling party led to a breakdown in trust between the state government and the protesters and worryingly, for the TMC, saw ordinary citizens take to the streets in solidarity marches dubbed 'Reclaim the Night'. As the protesting doctors refused to hold talks with the CM, she rushed to their protest site in an act of damage control and urged them to sit with the administration for a resolution. Their first meeting failed as the state government refused to live-stream the discussions, which the doctors sought. Eventually, the government agreed to their demands and removed Kolkata police commissioner Vinit Goyal, along with the state head of health service doctors and medical education. One year since the R G Kar incident, many people have again taken to the streets of Kolkata, starting their protests on Friday and planning to continue them till August 15. The Opposition, too, is raising its voice, looking to target the Mamata government on the issue of women's safety. The R G Kar episode put the Mamata dispensation on the back foot. The TMC has tried to fend off the attacks from the Opposition as well as the civil society by saying that it has conducted a proper investigation in the case and that the main accused, Sanjay Roy, has been sentenced to life imprisonment. Mamata also claimed that the probe was 'forcibly' taken away from Kolkata Police and given to the CBI, asserting that had it been with them, her administration would have ensured a death penalty for the accused. The government even brought in an anti-rape Bill that has a death penalty clause for such cases. Governor C V Ananda Bose has sent the Aparajita Bill back to the state government for consideration of the serious objections the Centre has raised over the proposed changes to the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita that the legislation seeks. 'All of us had demanded a death sentence, but the court has given a life term until death. The case was forcibly taken from us. Had it been with the (Kolkata) police, we would have ensured that he (Sanjay Roy) was served a death sentence,' the CM has said. Since the allegedly shoddy investigation into the rape and murder, and alleged corruption in the state medical colleges were major talking points during the protests, the Mamata administration now seems to be keen to ensure swift action in such sensitive cases. A senior government official said, 'After the R G Kar incident, Mamata Banerjee was rigid on investigation. She accepted the demands of the doctors. Naturally, after the state administration addressed their demands, the movement pacified and Mamata Banerjee and her party were able to overcome the crisis.' In contrast to the R G Kar incident, the government appeared to be trying to be more transparent in the Kolkata law college rape case. Kolkata Police immediately registered an FIR in the incident that occurred in June, cordoned off the scene of crime, sent the victim for medico-legal tests, and arrested the accused, including a TMC student leader who is the main accused, in record time. They also ensured privacy for the victim and her family. The big test now for the government will be how the prosecution in this case proceeds. With Bengal headed to the Assembly polls in less than a year, the BJP has decided to make the issue of women's safety the cornerstone of its strategy — the issue came up last week in Union Home Minister Amit Shah's meeting with the state BJP leadership — while TMC has sought to shift the focus to the issue of the alleged ill-treatment of Bengali migrants in several BJP-ruled states. 'Atrocities against Bengali-speaking people is an issue that is getting a huge response,' said a senior TMC leader. State Urban Development and Municipal Affairs Minister Firhad Hakim, who is also Kolkata Mayor, said the 'protests against atrocities on Bangla speakers are growing' and the BJP was trying to 'divert attention from this movement' by highlighting the R G Kar issue again.
